Obama
Climate Change/Global Warming NOT Man-caused
Marbie’s Blog has written extensively about the global warming, then climate change, myth, taking the position that it is not caused by the activities of humans, nor industry. Earth’s climate fluctuates, affected by the activities of the sun, such as the eleven-year solar cycles, and Earth’s own systems. See explanation of solar cycles here: http://solar-heliospheric.engin.umich.edu/hjenning/TourSolarCycle.html
In the seventies, some people argued that Earth was COOLING and we had to do something about it before it was too late. Dreaded deadly dire straits! ICE AGE! Pres. Obama’s current science advisor, Dr. John Holdren, even suggested shooting soot (particle pollution, according to the Lung Association) into the atmosphere. Gads! I’m thankful they didn’t convince enough people to actually do such a terrible thing. But don’t breathe a clean sigh of relief just yet. Holdren still believes in climate change and wants to do the same thing, but this time, to combat WARMING! God save us all.
(Does Pres. Obama know that his global warming advisor has flipped from believing the Earth was cooling? Does he know that Holdren suggested shooting soot into the atmostphere?)
Here’s an article that can’t be improved upon. Information I wish everyone knew:
“North Pole Sees Unprecedented July Cold – Arctic Sees Shortest Summer On Record”
Help inform others. This administration intends to burden the U.S. with expensive regulations that rob us all of freedom and hampers business, harming the economy.
Read Full Post | Make a Comment ( 1 so far )Motor Voter Law 1993, Clinton, Cloward, Piven, Alinsky, Obama, Economic COLLAPSE
Remember the “Motor Voter Law” passed by Democrats and signed into law by Bill Clinton? Bet you didn’t know this:
“This voter registration movement was spearheaded by the husband and wife team of Frances Fox Piven and Richard Cloward in the early 1980s in response to the Reagan administration. Both of them college professors and liberal activists.” Both of them involved in Alinksy radicalism. Still at it today. Obama embraced Alinsky, Cloward and Piven beliefs.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Voter_Registration_Act_of_1993
What’s the implication of involvement of Cloward and Piven? This:
“First proposed in 1966 and named after Columbia University sociologists Richard Andrew Cloward and Frances Fox Piven, the Cloward-Piven Strategy seeks to hasten the fall of capitalism by overloading the government bureaucracy with a flood of impossible demands, thus pushing society into crisis and economic collapse. Obama attended Columbia U and is carrying this out right in front of us, brazenly destroying our economy. ”
Have you noticed that there is crisis after crisis after crisis, since Obama was first elected in 2008? Each one is said to be devastating if Congress doesn’t pass some big money bill to solve it. The results are trillions in debt, ailing economy, job losses, businesses closing. Capitalism is under attack. If it fails, what will replace it? Socialism, Marxism, Dictatorship, something less than our Constitutional republic?
“In their 1966 article, Cloward and Piven charged that the ruling classes used welfare to weaken the poor; that by providing a social safety net, the rich doused the fires of rebellion. Poor people can advance only when “the rest of society is afraid of them,” Cloward told The New York Times on September 27, 1970. Rather than placating the poor with government hand-outs, wrote Cloward and Piven, activists should work to sabotage and destroy the welfare system; the collapse of the welfare state would ignite a political and financial crisis that would rock the nation; poor people would rise in revolt; only then would “the rest of society” accept their demands.
The key to sparking this rebellion would be to expose the inadequacy of the welfare state. Cloward-Piven’s early promoters cited radical organizer Saul Alinsky as their inspiration. “Make the enemy live up to their (sic) own book of rules,” Alinsky wrote in his 1989 book Rules for Radicals. When pressed to honor every word of every law and statute, every Judeo-Christian moral tenet, and every implicit promise of the liberal social contract, human agencies inevitably fall short. The system’s failure to “live up” to its rule book can then be used to discredit it altogether, and to replace the capitalist “rule book” with a socialist one.”
“Cloward and Piven calculated that persuading even a fraction of potential welfare recipients to demand their entitlements would bankrupt the system. The result, they predicted, would be “a profound financial and political crisis” that would unleash ‘powerful forces for major economic reform at the national level’.”
“Their article called for “cadres of aggressive organizers” to use “demonstrations to create a climate of militancy.” Intimidated by threats of black violence, politicians would appeal to the federal government for help.
“This was an example of what are commonly called Trojan Horse movements — mass movements whose outward purpose seems to be providing material help to the downtrodden, but whose real objective is to draft poor people into service as revolutionary foot soldiers; to mobilize poor people en masse to overwhelm government agencies with a flood of demands beyond the capacity of those agencies to meet. The flood of demands was calculated to break the budget, jam the bureaucratic gears into gridlock, and bring the system crashing down. Fear, turmoil, violence and economic collapse would accompany such a breakdown — providing perfect conditions for fostering radical change.
“Cloward and Piven recruited a militant black organizer named George Wiley to lead their new movement.” Beginning to sound like what we’re watching today?
“Both Cloward and Piven attended the White House signing of the 1996 Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act as guests of President Clinton.
http://www.discoverthenetworks.org/Articles/theclowardpivenstrategypoe.html
“Both the Living Wage and Voting Rights movements depend heavily on financial support from George Soros‘s Open Society Institute and his Shadow Party.”
(Unlikely to improve on the writings in these two cited articles, I chose to post excerpts from them, adding only a little commentary here and there. I sincerely hope you go to these articles and read them in their entirety. It’s important that our elected officials and influential people like Rush Limbaugh, Mark Levin, Sean Hannity, and many others, be sent this information. Send it to your state governors and elected officials, too, because they fight on the front lines to stop this onslaught. They need to know and expose it before it’s too late.)
IT’S NOT A CONSPIRACY. IT’S A FACT!
Read Full Post | Make a Comment ( 12 so far )The Left Fixated on Trivia – New WaterGate
Social media and otherwise serious news organizations were all abuzz about Sen. Marco Rubio’s drink of water during his speech which followed up Obama’s State of the Union Address Tuesday night. The frivolous attention to trivia did not mask their attempt to avoid the substance of Rubio’s well-received common sense contrast to Obama’s call for more spending and bigger government which hasn’t worked in four years, nor anytime it’s ever been tried in history. The bias of the Left prompts their mocking of a Republican expressing conservative views, yet having no desire to do the same to “their guy”. Obama’s list of highly visible faux pas’ are noteworthy, but the Left will never note them.
Read Full Post | Make a Comment ( None so far )A SHOCKER! – Installment 2 Global Warming/Climate Change UPDATE! James Lovelock Changes His Mind
Begin by reading the original post of May 15, 2008 about James Lovelock and his influence on the global warming movement, and his devotion to the pagan religion, Gaia. There’s a lot to learn there and it’s never mentioned by the main stream media. Too many people know nothing of this. If they did, they’d be much more skeptical of the green/global warming/climate change movement.
https://marbiesblog.wordpress.com/2009/10/29/a-shocker-installlment-2/
After you have the important background knowledge, read today’s surprising news coming from the ninety-two year-old James Lovelock whose latest comments are shocking AND will be completely ignored by the people in the movement whose beliefs are the direct result of this man’s influence.
Lovelock believes in the Gaia religion, as you will see in both articles. The Gaia religion “no longer sees man as the measure of all things or the center of the universe. He has been measured and found to be an undistinguished bit of matter, different in no essential way from bacteria, stones and trees. Gaians also believe that over-population is a root cause of an imbalance in the Earth’s ecology. Therefore, they believe in man-made global warming/climate change. (Could this be a reason behind the fight for abortion “rights”?
Lovelock, having formulated the Gaia Hypothesis, is the father of the climate change movement. He’s predicted complete doom on the Earth unless governments force people to adopt severe and costly changes to every thing people do on earth. It’s called “sustainable development”, and has been marketed to the people as “going green.”
But what is he saying today?
“Adapt and survive.” He supports nuclear power, hates wind power, remarking that they are useless and ugly, AND is now encouraging the U.K. to embrace fracking because natural gas is cheap and doesn’t produce as much CO2 as burning coal.
“We rushed into renewable energy without any thought. The schemes are largely hopelessly inefficient and unpleasant. Fracking buys us some time, and we can learn to adapt.”
“Let’s be pragmatic and sensible and get Britain to switch everything to methane. We should be going mad on it.”
What has brought about this major reversal? He’s been hit hard with some hefty home energy bills and he doesn’t like it. He’s realizing that these costs are unsustainable, I suspect. It has changed his economic, political and scientific views on global warming, as he used to call it.
He told MSNBC that “he had been extrapolating too far in reaching such a conclusion and had made a mistake in claiming to know with such certainty what will happen to the climate.”
He says “being allowed to change your mind and follow the evidence is one of the liberating marvels of being an independent scientist.”
Many of us never bought into what has been proven faulty and fake science, but we’ve all paid a high cost for Lovelock’s Gaiantic mistake.
At the International Climate Change Conference in Rio next week, Lovelock’s devotee’s will seek solutions to the devastating climate change disaster that he now says doesn’t exist. They won’t be phased by Lovelock’s latest revelations.
“Whenever the UN puts its finger in, it seems to become a mess.”
“The climate situation is more complex than we at present are capable of handling, or possibly even in the future.”
“It’s so much cheaper to air-condition the cities and let Gaia take care of the world. It’s a much better route to go than so-called ‘sustainable development’, which is meaningless drivel.”
Where’s the proof that he’s really changed his mind and won’t jump back on the “sustainable development” wagon? He’s moving from his home of thirty years amidst acres of trees that he planted himself to a small beach cottage. Unafraid of the horrors of rising seas caused by climate change.
“At worst, I think it will be two feet a century.”
Unfortunately for us, the costs associated with climate change legislation will rise much more rapidly.
As for his political views on the subject now days:
“I’m neither strongly left nor right, but I detest the Liberal Democrats.” “The coalition has behaved disgracefully on environmental and energy policies. It would have been much better if they had been properly right wing.”
Perhaps he was warning us when he said:
“It’s just the way the humans are that if there’s a cause of some sort, a religion starts forming around it. It just so happens that the green religion is now taking over from the Christian religion. I don’t think people have noticed that, but it’s got all the sort of terms that religions use. The greens use guilt. You can’t win people round by saying they are guilty for putting CO2 in the air.”
Mr. Lovelock, some have noticed it.
https://marbiesblog.wordpress.com/2009/11/16/a-shocker-installment-6/ The Gaia Ark of Hope, The Earth Charter inside the Ark (to mimic The Ten Commandments), Temenos Books (to be sacred like our Bible), Cosmos is our God
https://marbiesblog.wordpress.com/2009/10/30/a-shocker-installment-3/
If you read Lovelock’s past writings and statements, you might think he sounds a little spacey. He was an important person at NASA. Just mull over that for a minute. We never pay attention to the kind of people who lead our world. BUT WE SHOULD.
The Kyoto Treaty? Kill it. Get out of all treaties, legislation and programs born out of the global warming/climate change hoax. Get back to basics, back to normal and relieve the people of the world from burdensome expenses and regulations that adversely affect their lives.
PASS IT ON. THE TRUTH SHALL SET US FREE (from tyrannical governments, world governments, and slavery to regulations based on falsehoods and pagan religion.)
Read Full Post | Make a Comment ( None so far )Obama Said Wives Are Off-Limits! In 2008
Candidate Obama said in 2008 that wives and families are off-limits in a campaign. Here it is:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wwtO1k5GoAo&feature=results_main&playnext=1&list=PL105C071CB80D26CD
He said he would speak out against anyone doing that. (crickets, crickets, crickets)
His surrogates have attacked candidate Mitt Romney’s wife. (crickets, crickets, crickets)
Where is Pres. Obama defending her and demanding that his own people stop the attacks on wives? Where was he when they attacked Cindy McCain, Sarah Palin, the Palin children, Michelle Bachmann and the husbands of Palin and Bachmann?
Is Obama responsible for what his team says? By his own mouth, he has said he would speak out to stop it. But he hasn’t.
CNN’s Anderson Cooper held a conversation with Obama supporter, Hilary Rosen in which she criticized Ann Romney for choosing to stay at home and raise her children, rather than have a career. Is Rosen connected to Obama’s campaign?
Hilary Rosen and Anita Dunn are partners in a PR firm, SKDKnickerbocker, used by the DNC for their campaigns, which includes that of Debbie Wasserman-Schultz, the DNC chairwoman. This firm was involved in the Sandra Fluke appearance before a mock Congressional hearing and the ensuing controversy, which Obama’s team used to begin their War On Women. Anita Dunn was Obama’s White House Communications Director from April through November, 2009. She left under some controversy over her statement to high school seniors that the murderous and brutal dictator, Mao Zedong, was one of her FAVORITE political philosophers. Did Obama know she was a Maoist before he hired her? It’s very likely that Obama knows Anita Dunn as well as anyone, considering their long association.
In 2oo6, Senator Obama hired Dunn as his STRATEGIST and communications director for his political action committee which he aptly named, The Hopefund. She also helped with staffing and worked for his “Obama for America” effort. Dunn became one of only four top advisors to Obama during his 2008 campaign, gaining the title “Senior Advisor” and was one of the MAJOR DECISION MAKERS.
What were some of her decisions regarding the strategy of Obama’s campaign? Listen to her explain it. “We control the news media.”
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NlGNhAnwp_Y
She helped devise the Wars on Fox News, Glenn Beck, Republicans, and wives of candidates. There can be no doubt. She was the senior advisor who made the major decisions. She was his communications director and strategist. It’s her plan.
There can be no mistake that Hilary Rosen’s attack on Ann Romney is no accident, but part of Dunn’s campaign strategy for Obama’s re-election effort.
Yes, Ms. Dunn. Anyone can now find the YouTube video to expose you, Rosen, Obama and team. Citizen journalists are vetting Obama and will be contrasting the videos of his former statements and promises with his current ones.
*************
SKDKnickerbocker’s web site boasting of role in Obama’s election: http://www.skdknick.com/work/far-reaching-role-in-election/
Dunn’s bio is well documented online. One source is: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anita_Dunn.
*************
Does Dunn tell the truth and nothing but the truth?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1AEt180Wnls
Is CNN in Obama’s pocket?
Dunn consistently used CNN to get the smear out. They seemed most willing to oblige. Rosen committed her attack on CNN.
Read Full Post | Make a Comment ( None so far )
Free Cell Phones From Mexico Compliments of the Government
The story is going around that the Obama administration is giving free cells phones to welfare recipients. That doesn’t sit well with some taxpayers who want the government to cut spending, pay off the debt and balance the budget. Is it true? Why would the government give away free cell phones? Who pays for this?
YES, it’s true! Read this short article for the details of the FCC program.
http://www.truthorfiction.com/rumors/f/free-cell-phones.htm
In 1984, the FCC enacted a government program, Lifeline, to assist low-income families and update services in areas affected by disasters.
Lifeline is a government-supported program for low income-eligible households that insures available and affordable telephone service.
September 29, 2009, the first year of Obama’s administration, prepaid wireless cell phone provider TracFone Wireless, Inc. announced the launch of SafeLink in Illinois, Obama’s home state. Note that SafeLink Wireless in Illinois is the FIRST and ONLY completely free offering of Lifeline.
Obama’s new administration took care of his state. Recipients in other states’ didn’t receive the program for free. In fact, the program is only available in nineteen states plus the District of Columbia.
Where does the funding come from for this government program? The funding is collected from surcharges added to telephone and cell phone bills. This means that other people pay surcharges on their phone bills to fund those receiving free service in Illinois. Do the payers know they’re paying for phone service to recipients of free service in Illinois and subsidizing the others?
The interesting thing about the FCC’s decision to implement this program is their unnoticed creation of a new right! According to a Reuter’s article, the FCC decided to “enhance its Lifeline program and keep the right to communicate in pace with technology.”
Lifeline program and “keep the right to communicate in pace with technology.” A quick check of the Constitutional Bill of Rights finds no such right enumerated. We are guaranteed the right to free speech, press, religion. While our right to communicate cannot be abridged by the government, it is not a right that requires the federal government to provide and fund. The government is only responsible for maintaining a free society whereby individuals can freely communicate. How they communicate and use services available for purchase is entirely the responsibility of individuals.
Besides the free cell phone, recipients also get sixty free wireless phone service minutes per month. According to the SafeLink web site, they’re also offered additional free minutes for referring a friend!
The choice of TracFone Wireless, Inc. is an interesting one. It is a subsidiary of América Móvil S.A.B. de C.V. based in Mexico City, Mexico. The government doesn’t even choose an American company. TracFone says it expects the program to go nationwide soon.
Is it any wonder that America is deep in debt and has a high jobless rate? The Obama administration seems intent on keeping U.S. that way.
Want to apply for your free cell phone with sixty free wireless minutes of service?
https://www.safelinkwireless.com/Safelink/home
Don’t forget to refer a friend. Or two or three. It’s all free!
Fine print: Your friends, neighbors, relatives, co-workers are all picking up your tab and the money is going to Mexico.
Have a nice day and thank you for shopping with the U.S. FCC – Obama administration.
Read Full Post | Make a Comment ( None so far )Social Issues Must Be Part of the Campaign
It's a living human being.
It’s astonishing that Republicans can be so duped by their opponents in the Democrat Party and lame stream media. The Dems make abortion and gay marriage the premiere issues of their campaigns, all the while telling the electorate that the GOP will lose if they so much as mention the same. It is usually assumed that the Democrat positions are correct and the only viable stances while the GOP positions are shameful. Yet, Republican voters still secretly harbor pro-life and anti-gay marriage values. What is shameful about protecting living human babies from harm, suffering and death?!
While ashamed to admit their pro-life, anti-gay marriage beliefs in public, they make these the litmus test for selecting candidates! Once they’ve anointed someone, they immediately muzzle their champion for fear of losing the election. This suggests that Democrats have already won the debate and Republians are wimps.
But that’s not the case. Democrats have used the media to brow beat, excoriate, attack without merit, lie, exagerate and vilify anyone who dares to hold a different set of values from them. They’ve successfully used mob tactics to intimidate into compliance. Al Capone would be proud.
In the light of truth, there is no way that people can be against protecting the life of human beings. The U.N. claims it’s existence for that very purpose – “no more wars.” Doctors, nurses and hospitals exist to save life. The Health Movement’s platform is to protect and preserve human life. Pre-natal care is pushed to preserve and protect the life of the unborn baby. The government has a watchdog agency charged with insuring that products used with, for and around human babies are completely safe.
Now why is the pro-life position unpopular in America and something to keep quiet about in a campaign? Which party should be ashamed of their values or lack thereof? The GOP candidates should make the Democrats ashamed of their murderous cold-blooded life-snuffing position in every campaign. GOP candidates should stand tall and firm, heads held high and confidently proclaim Democrats as heartless. They should point out that pregnant women who prefer to murder their own innocent babies are self-centered and irresponsible.
Let the Democrats yell and scream. They will look like spoiled brats throwing temper tantrums. GOP will look like the mature adults with common sense.
To say that social issues do not belong in politics ignores the fact that politics is all about governing society and the government absolutely does interfere in and exert control over social issues, therefore, must be part of any political campaign. It’s time Republicans realize what the Democrats have perpetrated on their party and get over it. They must stop cowering and fight for the beliefs of their party. Show how and why the GOP is the opposite of the Democrat Party. Isn’t that the purpose of campaigns? It’s all common sense.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wlSyfUQDWVw&feature=related
What’s the best way to go about killing this little baby?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gfgq7WiHbh4
There is NO way. Could you kill this baby? Could you support killing this baby? Can you support candidates who are determined to continue the legality of killing babies? And what about botched abortions? Could you support killing the baby after it’s born, if the doctor was unsuccessful in his first attempt at murder? Not only did Sen. Obama of Illinois support such barbaric behavior, he was the only one who voted to protect it, when the rest of his party voted to end it. He voted three times to protect this murder of living infants. Live birth abortions = Murdering babies after they’re born and alive.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BYRpIf2F9NA
Can you support this or a candidate who did? I CAN’T!
Read Full Post | Make a Comment ( None so far )OBAMA’S IMMIGRATION PING PONG POLICY
Has anyone ever verified the validity of Obama’s insinuation that nursing mothers were torn from their infants, that children came home from school to find their parents missing, that communities are terrorized by ICE immigration raids or that people are detained without access to legal representation?
What happened to those infants and children? Who took care of them after their parents were “torn” away and “missing”? Don’t infants go wherever their mothers go? Since when are ICE agents so cold and heartless that they tear mothers from their nursing infants and what (?) cast the babies aside while they drag the mothers away? Isn’t the reason we have an estimated twelve million illegal immigrants here because the government won’t deport them?
We have heard countless stories on the evening news about repeat offenders being released from jail rather than deported and we’ve all asked why.
But that was 2008 when Senator Obama was campaigning against GOP Senator John McCain for president. Fast forward to 2011, the third year of President Obama’s administration.
“The government is deporting record numbers of illegal immigrants” – Janet Napolitano, Homeland Security, Obama Administration, 2011 http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/wireStory/napolitano-promote-dhs-work-immigration-14670017
So how sincere was candidate Obama when he worked to illicit emotional sympathy from his La Raza crowd in 2008 to secure their votes?
Better yet, how sincere is Pres. Obama today in his attempts to overcome criticism that he’s soft on illegal immigration and to match the GOP’s “secure the border” party platform, which polls high with the voters?
Obama Amnesty Begins: Halts Deportations of 300,000 Illegal Aliens; Offers Work Permits http://standwitharizona.com/blog/2011/08/18/obama-amnesty-begins-halts-deportations-for-300000-illegal-aliens-offers-work-permits/
Americans can be fooled once, but they aren’t as stupid as some amateur politicans believe. They want the borders secured, illegal aliens deported and law-breakers prosecuted. Obama does none of that and the voters have taken note.
THE CHANGES WE WANT ARE COMING – OF THE PEOPLE, BY THE PEOPLE, FOR THE PEOPLE!
ELECTION 2012
Read Full Post | Make a Comment ( None so far )The Truth About Gov. Rick Perry
Decision making in the 2012 election MUST BE MADE ON FACTS NOT RUMORS. Don’t be led around like sheep. Don’t fall prey to the rumor mill. Be educated. Know the facts. Find reputable trustworthy sources, which eliminates MSNBC, Salon.com, Huffington Post, The Daily Kos, SEIU publications and Jane Doe’s little blog. Marbie’s Blog always looks for sources that are credible and recognized as trustworthy with a good track record on accuracy and most importantly provides their sources for the information they publish.
As the front-runner in the GOP primary for the 2012 presidential election, Gov. Rick Perry of Texas is taking a real beating. The other candidates who are far below him in the polls have to knock him off to move up because, apparently, their message has been unable to propel them to the top. Mitt Romney has to attack him, as well, because he took first place, which Romney used to occupy, as soon as he announced his candidacy. It seems that Romney sees Perry as “the one to beat”.
The smears and lies and half-truths are being hurled like javelins squarely at Perry with little regard for truth. How will the voters know what is true and what is false? Here’s a great website by a citizen who has spent long hours researching Rick Perry through multiple credible sources which are listed in the same paragraph with the information so that we can all check out the validity of his presentation.
http://peskytruth.wordpress.com/2011/07/19/rick-perrys-negatives/
Bookmark this website and use it to help your family and friends know the truth. Learn these facts for use in conversations when the smears come up. Some really good people have been misled and will appreciate finding out the truth. You can help.
What good is a president elected on false premises or one that might have made a good president, but was eliminated because of lies? America is at a dangerous crossroads.
WE CANNOT AFFORD TO MAKE ANOTHER MISTAKE!
Read Full Post | Make a Comment ( None so far )Global Warming Fallacies – Polar Bears Not Victims – Shocker Series
Global warming did not kill the polar bears. That’s the finding of the Interior Department’s investigators looking into the work of biologist Charles Monnett.
Read the details of that investigation and its implications at: http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=45447.
Charles Monnett’s current position is that he never stated that global warming was melting the ice caps and killing polar bears.
“We never mentioned global warming in the paper,” Gleason told the investigators, according to the transcript.
“But it’s inferred,” responded investigator Eric May. “That’s why the world took it up as a global warming tangent.”
Gleason told investigators that reaction to his and Monnett’s paper was overblown and spun out of context.
But did he ever speak up and correct the record when Al Gore, inventor of the internet, used his study to promulgate a hoax on the world? Not so you would notice! Did he take to the microphones and dispute the falsehood in the Inconvenient Truth when it won an Oscar for best propaganda film (or was that “documentary film?)? It never made the headlines if he did. Did he get with his colleagues in the scientific community and discuss what to do about non-scientist Al Gore distorting what he did say in his paper when Gore won the Noble Prize for fictional science (or was that the Peace Price?)? Few, if any, heard about that meeting if it did take place.
So while defending himself, there is little or no evidence that he did anything to dispel the myth that propelled Gore’s scheme which would have limited our freedom, taxed our earnings, and interfered with our successful lifestyles, based on a lie. Integrity is crucial to scientific study results. Truth should be the desired result, rather than a politial agenda.
Read Full Post | Make a Comment ( None so far )« Previous Entries
Marbie's Blog 