Motor Voter Law 1993, Clinton, Cloward, Piven, Alinsky, Obama, Economic COLLAPSE

Posted on February 22, 2013. Filed under: ACORN, Capitalism, Clinton, Communism, Constitution, Democrats, Dictator, Freedom, Health Care, Hillary, Illegal Aliens, immigration, Liberty, Marxism, Obama, politics, Rush Limbaugh, Socialism, sovereignty, Taxes, U.S. Government, Uncategorized | Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |

Obama Black PanthersObama teachingCloward Piven Clinton

Remember the “Motor Voter Law” passed by Democrats and signed into law by Bill Clinton?  Bet you didn’t know this:

“This voter registration movement was spearheaded by the husband and wife team of Frances Fox Piven and Richard Cloward in the early 1980s in response to the Reagan administration. Both of them college professors and liberal activists.” Both of them involved in Alinksy radicalism. Still at it today. Obama embraced Alinsky, Cloward and Piven beliefs.

What’s the implication of involvement of Cloward and Piven? This:
“First proposed in 1966 and named after Columbia University sociologists Richard Andrew Cloward and Frances Fox Piven, the Cloward-Piven Strategy seeks to hasten the fall of capitalism by overloading the government bureaucracy with a flood of impossible demands, thus pushing society into crisis and economic collapse. Obama attended Columbia U and is carrying this out right in front of us, brazenly destroying our economy. ”

Have you noticed that there is crisis after crisis after crisis, since Obama was first elected in 2008? Each one is said to be devastating if Congress doesn’t pass some big money bill to solve it.  The results are trillions in debt, ailing economy, job losses, businesses closing. Capitalism is under attack.  If it fails, what will replace it? Socialism, Marxism, Dictatorship, something less than our Constitutional republic?

“In their 1966 article, Cloward and Piven charged that the ruling classes used welfare to weaken the poor; that by providing a social safety net, the rich doused the fires of rebellion. Poor people can advance only when “the rest of society is afraid of them,” Cloward told The New York Times on September 27, 1970. Rather than placating the poor with government hand-outs, wrote Cloward and Piven, activists should work to sabotage and destroy the welfare system; the collapse of the welfare state would ignite a political and financial crisis that would rock the nation; poor people would rise in revolt; only then would “the rest of society” accept their demands.

The key to sparking this rebellion would be to expose the inadequacy of the welfare state. Cloward-Piven’s early promoters cited radical organizer Saul Alinsky as their inspiration. “Make the enemy live up to their (sic) own book of rules,” Alinsky wrote in his 1989 book Rules for Radicals. When pressed to honor every word of every law and statute, every Judeo-Christian moral tenet, and every implicit promise of the liberal social contract, human agencies inevitably fall short. The system’s failure to “live up” to its rule book can then be used to discredit it altogether, and to replace the capitalist “rule book” with a socialist one.”

“Cloward and Piven calculated that persuading even a fraction of potential welfare recipients to demand their entitlements would bankrupt the system. The result, they predicted, would be “a profound financial and political crisis” that would unleash ‘powerful forces for major economic reform at the national level’.”

“Their article called for “cadres of aggressive organizers” to use “demonstrations to create a climate of militancy.” Intimidated by threats of black violence, politicians would appeal to the federal government for help.

“This was an example of what are commonly called Trojan Horse movements — mass movements whose outward purpose seems to be providing material help to the downtrodden, but whose real objective is to draft poor people into service as revolutionary foot soldiers; to mobilize poor people en masse to overwhelm government agencies with a flood of demands beyond the capacity of those agencies to meet. The flood of demands was calculated to break the budget, jam the bureaucratic gears into gridlock, and bring the system crashing down.   Fear, turmoil, violence and economic collapse would accompany such a breakdown — providing perfect conditions for fostering radical change.

“Cloward and Piven recruited a militant black organizer named George Wiley to lead their new movement.”  Beginning to sound like what we’re watching today?

“Both Cloward and Piven attended the White House signing of the 1996 Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act as guests of President Clinton.

“Both the Living Wage and Voting Rights movements depend heavily on financial support from George Soros‘s Open Society Institute and his Shadow Party.”

(Unlikely to improve on the writings in these two cited articles, I chose to post excerpts from them, adding only a little commentary here and there. I sincerely hope you go to these articles and read them in their entirety. It’s important that our elected officials and influential people like Rush Limbaugh, Mark Levin, Sean Hannity, and many others, be sent this information.  Send it to your state governors and elected officials, too, because they fight on the front lines to stop this onslaught.  They need to know and expose it before it’s too late.)


Read Full Post | Make a Comment ( 12 so far )


Posted on August 22, 2009. Filed under: American Revolution, Cap and Trade, Democrats, Health Care, News Media, Obama, Political, U.S. Government | Tags: , , , |

tax man

So it’s Friday afternoon and everyone’s anxious to get on with their weekend plans, especially the Obamas who are taking off for a vacation in “the tony Martha’s Vineyard”, as some reporters put it.  They’ve rented a $20 million dollar farm from a wealthy Republican, which begs the question, “why did Michelle tell college students at their commencement ceremony to forego a corporate career and chose a life of service, essentially steering them away from making hefty salaries.  It seems like a case of “do as I say, not as I do”, which is a typical Obama pattern.

What you might have missed in all the vacation talk, or your own scurry home for the weekend, is the little bit of news released by the White House amidst the Friday afternoon “no one is paying any attention right now” time slot.  Obama’s administration has raised its 10-year deficit projection to approximately $9 trillion.  They tried to stick with the former projection of $7.1 trillion (oh what’s a trillion or two?), but finally had to agree with the Office of Management and Budget Office on the higher figure. 

This doesn’t include the universal health care bill that the Congressional Budget Office pegs at a cost of $1.6 trillion or the cap and trade bill that will wind up costing $2 trillion over eight years instead of Obama’s  initial projection of $646 billion.   As usual, the government underestimated the costs.  Don’t be surprised if they raise the projection for the cost of the health care bill, too.

So why do you think Obama’s people released the new $2 trillion higher figure on Friday afternoon as the President is capturing the news media’s attention with his vacation plans?  Why do they always tend to release bad information on Friday afternoon during the “no one’s paying any attention right now” time slot?

With the Communist Chinese buying our debt instruments, at least for now, we could find ourselves in a peck of trouble someday.  Where will the government get the  money to pay these astronomical debt amounts if and when the Chinese call it in?  They’ve got two places to grab a buck or a trillion bucks:  print it or take it from our paychecks by hiking taxes to astronomically high rates.  If they print it, the dollars in our bank accounts will be diluted to minimal value.  A dollar that once bought a  loaf of bread, now only buys one-fourth of a loaf.  So it could take four diluted dollars to buy the same loaf.  (Of course, I’m not trying to be accurate, just over-simplifying.)  Either way, or a combination of the two, would be devastating to families, young people trying to get started in life and retirees on a fixed income.

It certainly seems that Obama is hell-bent on taking Americans to that unholy place of “flat-broke” at home and in Washington, D.C.  Do you think the White House, the Congress and the Senate will give up their jets, cushy hotels, world travel, expensive restaurants and other perks to save money?  Rather doubt it, don’t you?  They never have!

We’re going to have to stand up and fight these bills and expenditures without growing weary.  We can’t let up.  Our future is at stake.  Our chidren and grandchildren’s futures are at stake.  America is a republic, and it should never be a banana republic.

Read Full Post | Make a Comment ( None so far )

Liked it here?
Why not try sites on the blogroll...