birth certificate

OBAMA’S IMMIGRATION PING PONG POLICY

Posted on October 5, 2011. Filed under: amnesty, Big Brother, birth certificate, Capitalism, Democrats, Dictator, Freedom, Illegal Aliens, immigration, Liberty, Obama, politics, sovereignty | Tags: , , , , , , , |

Has anyone ever verified the validity of Obama’s insinuation that nursing mothers were torn from their infants, that children came home from school to find their parents missing, that communities are terrorized by ICE immigration raids or that people are detained without access to legal representation?

What happened to those infants and children? Who took care of them after their parents were “torn” away and “missing”?  Don’t infants go wherever their mothers go?  Since when are ICE agents so cold and heartless that they tear mothers from their nursing infants and what (?) cast the babies aside while they drag the mothers away? Isn’t the reason we have an estimated twelve million illegal immigrants here because the government won’t deport them?

We have heard countless stories on the evening news about repeat offenders being released from jail rather than deported and we’ve all asked why.

But that was 2008 when Senator Obama was campaigning against GOP Senator John McCain for president.  Fast forward to 2011, the third year of President Obama’s administration.

“The government is deporting record numbers of illegal immigrants” – Janet Napolitano, Homeland Security, Obama Administration, 2011  http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/wireStory/napolitano-promote-dhs-work-immigration-14670017

So how sincere was candidate Obama when he worked to illicit emotional sympathy from his La Raza crowd in 2008 to secure their votes?

Better yet, how sincere is Pres. Obama today in his attempts to overcome criticism that he’s soft on illegal immigration and to match the GOP’s “secure the border” party platform, which polls high with the voters?

Obama Amnesty Begins:  Halts Deportations of 300,000 Illegal Aliens; Offers Work Permits  http://standwitharizona.com/blog/2011/08/18/obama-amnesty-begins-halts-deportations-for-300000-illegal-aliens-offers-work-permits/

Americans can be fooled once, but they aren’t as stupid as some amateur politicans believe. They want the borders secured, illegal aliens deported and law-breakers prosecuted.  Obama does none of that and the voters have taken note.

THE CHANGES WE WANT ARE COMING – OF THE PEOPLE, BY THE PEOPLE, FOR THE PEOPLE! 

ELECTION 2012

Advertisements
Read Full Post | Make a Comment ( None so far )

WILL OBAMA GET AWAY WITH IT? Birth Certificate Fraud

Posted on May 23, 2011. Filed under: birth certificate, Christianity, Communism, Constitution, Democrats, Dictator, Freedom, Freedom of Speech, global governance, Indonesia, Kenya, Liberty, Marxism, McCain, News Media, Obama, planet, politics, Socialism, sovereignty, U.S. Government, United Nations, Who Is Obama? | Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |

 

Oppose Obama at your own peril!

Did you think the Obama birth certificate controversary was over and settled when the White House posted a document on their web site and all of the media, including Fox News, declared Obama a U.S. citizen eligible to hold the office of President?  If you did, then you would be wrong.  Dr. Jerome Corsi’s new book came out a few days after the White House’s pre-emptive move to squelch interest and severely limit the sales of Where’s the Birth Certificate?  The case That Barack Obama is Not Eligible to Be President. 

The reaction of Fox News is puzzling since they are the only broadcaster to present both sides of any other issue, but in the case of Obama’s birth certificate, they are loathe to entertain the idea that something is amiss.  If Obama is ineligible, Fox News would be just as guilty as Obama, for perpetuating the cover-up rather than investigating seriously with intent to discover the truth.  It would seem that Fox News has chosen to pass up their opportunity to report the NEWS OF THE CENTURYout of fear of being wrong and looking foolish (you know, being one of those ridiculous “birthers”) or more likely, FEAR OF OBAMA’S WRATH!

Obama’s campaign team boasts of its close association with Google and Facebook, and hired Lawrence Lessig, technology guru,   to advise them on campaigning on the internet in 2007/8.  Is it really out of the realm of possibility that this group could forge a birth certificate for Obama?  Of course not.  Is it totally unthinkable that this group would do such a thing to get and keep Obama in the most powerful office on the planet, the power to get extreme left policies in place, the ticket to wealth, fame and power for progressives?  The answer is obvious.

For a more revealing look at Lawrence Lessig, visit https://marbiesblog.wordpress.com/2008/04/28/another-bad-character-in-obamas-circle-april-27-2008/.  Obama says he’s a Christian, but hired this anti-Christianity guy, who went so far as to denegrate Jesus in public in a vicious way and laughed about it. 

Do these people really have the scruples that would prevent them from executing a lucrative fraud?  There’s no evidence of such scruples.  Did anyone have difficulty believing that Nixon and his team commited fraud and cover-up?  No.  What’s so different about Obama that it’s inconceivable that he and his  bunch would commit fraud for the sake of power, wealth and fame?  Many people have committed great frauds for wealth, but add great power and it’s even more tempting and more likely, especially when there is enough evidence to suspect.

Obama also has the support of gazillionaire, George Soros and a very wealthy Arab, Dr. Khalid Al-Mansour, who is noted for his intervention in  Obama’s acceptance to Harvard.    All the money needed to create a sham biography and cover up the true bio is easily at Obama’s disposal. 

Why all the skeptism and doubt is beyond explanation.  The Congress, the news media, conservatives, Obama’s political opponents, all prefer to go along with the cover-up for two reasons:  supporters to keep him in power, opponents not wishing to look like tin foil hat wearing “birthers”  GOD FORBID SUCH A FATE!.  Opponents fail to recognize who coined the moniker “birthers”.  It was Obama’s supporters in a defensive move.  Why play by their rules instead of truth?  In fact, the democrats and Obama’s team brought up the issue of Sen. John McCain’s eligibility to serve as president based on his place of birth and demanded to see his birth certificate, which McCain happily and QUICKLY produced. None in the media called Democrats or Obama’s team “birthers.”  NONE!

Dr. Jerome Corsi’s book will still be in the public during the 2012 campaign season and World Net Daily will still be investigating and reporting.  Those who are smart enough, will still be proving that the White House document was produced by placing layer of information upon layer of information, to build the bio that fits Obama’s public statements.  A document typed on a 1961 typewriter, then scanned in 2011, cannot be broken into a dozen or more separate layers.  It was produced in one step – typing the info on paper.  Scanning does not produce multiple layers as shown in the many YouTube videos online.  Get the free version of Adobe Illustrator, download the WH document, and see for yourself.

What’s to be gained by covering up Obama’s felony, treason and fraud? 

A DICTATORSHIP!

 

“In a television interview last October, President Obama accidentally let slip a key element of his political philosophy: “We’re gonna punish our enemies, and we’re gonna reward our friends who stand with us on issues that are important to us.”

Obama later apologized — not for the underlying sentiment, mind you, but for his word choice. “I probably should have used the word ‘opponents’ instead of enemies,” the president declared.”  http://www.aei.org/article/103643

Read Full Post | Make a Comment ( None so far )

Obama’s Long Form Birth Certificate is Another Fraud

Posted on April 29, 2011. Filed under: ALERT!, birth certificate, Constitution, Democrats, Dictator, Freedom, Kenya, Liberty, Marxism, Obama, Orly Taitz, politics, SEIU, Socialism, U.S. Government, Who Is Obama? | Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |

Who’s in the White House?

Barack Hussein Obama, II?  Barry Obama?  Barry Soetoro? Soebarkah, as found underneath his name, Barack Hussein Obama, on Stanley Ann Dunham’s passport renewal application of 1965?  Was he adopted by step-dad Lolo Soetoro in Indonesia?  How many citizenships does he have? One, American?  Two, American and British (Kenya)?  Three – American, British (Kenyan) and Indonesian?

Can we look at his birth certificate and be assured of who it is that’s writing executive orders and signing bills into law?  Not as conclusively as the situation calls for.   First, he sealed all of his records.  Why do that?  Is there something incriminating?  Then he published a certificate of live birth, which accomplishes one thing and one thing only.  It certifies that Stanley Ann Dunham had a son and her address at the time was in Hawaii.  It states that Barack Hussein Obama was his father.  The difficulty with this is that it is a document that anyone could apply for whether or not the child was born in Hawaii and the parents supply the information.  Once the certificate is issued, it triggers the notice in the papers.    The two papers were owned by the same company, hence the identical wording.  (This information has been widely reported online by many researchers.)

During the firestorm over a lack of long form birth certificate, there were reports that Obama couldn’t secure it because the State destroyed them after putting them all on microfiche.  Then,  Democrat Gov. Neil Abercrombie announced that he was going to find that long form and show it to the skeptics and end this controversy.  After weeks of trying, he announced that he could not do it.  We heard that it didn’t exist, but there was a hand-written notation in the books.  A former employee had been saying that it didn’t exist.  Now the public is confused.  More and more high-profile people become suspicious and the  derogatory “birther” label is no longer intimidating.  It hits the main stream media, including Fox News and it’s discussed seriously without tin foil hats.

Finally, Donald Trump, with the funds and the means to send investigators, determines to solve the mystery.  He has the clout to affect Obama’s poll numbers just as the president begins his re-election campaign.   Just days before Jerome Corsi’s book, Where’s the Birth Certificate:  The Case That Barack Obama is Not Eligible to Be President, is due to hit the shelves and be shipped out to thousands of Amazon.com customers,  the country is surprised to learn that a document purported to be Obama’s long form birth certificate is on the whitehouse.gov website in .PDF format.  The president holds a presser in which he is condescending and sarcastic, stating that he has more important things to do – not the skyrocketing $trillions debt, the inflation train barreling down the tracks or the jobless economy making America a  third-world nation.  No, he immediately jets off to do the Oprah show and attend a couple of fund-raisers.  Very important.   Obama would have us believe that we can’t walk and chew gum at the same time – that we can only concentrate on the birth issue and nothing else.  That the five minutes it took him to phone someone and say “put the document online”, kept him from attending to national issues of import.

The country yawned.  The “birthers”, more accurately,  “Constitutionalists”, smelled a rat and the Obama supporters gloated.  Fox News, who had surprised viewers by finally asking the right questions, were relieved to get this monkey off their backs and called it solved – over – file closed once and for all.  BIG MISTAKE!  They will forever be remembered as spineless sycophants.

Not five hours later, the internet was filled with YouTube videos explaining in detail with Adobe Illustrator how the .PDF document had been built on a computer by layering, a technique that takes elements and builds them, one upon another, to get a desired result – a realistic-looking long form birth certificate that says all the right things to make Obama eligible to be President of the United States.  The ease with which techies discovered the layering and broke the document down, section by section, layer by layer, shocked even the techies.  Was this a joke, they wondered.  Could a White House operative be this careless and stupid?  Surely they wanted this to be proven a fraud.  But why? Is it a conspiracy to keep Americans distracted while Obama pulled off some dastardly deed? Obama had already said he believed it was distracting everyone from important issues.  Perhaps he devised a way to use this to his advantage.  But what?

The bottom line is:  For the first time in American history, the citizens don’t know who they’ve elected president and too many of them don’t trust him.  It’s not just his birth, or life narrative that makes them suspicious. It’s the vast number of radicals he filled his administration with and who populate his life.  It’s the bold promises he made during his campaign and his unashamed breaking of almost all of those promises, often doing the exact opposite.  It’s his constant disregard for the Constitution and the rulings of the courts.  It’s his continual bypassing of the people’s house, Congress, when he writes an executive order to pass something that Congress rejected.

Obama’s statements about this latest birth certificate never explained why he sent a team of lawyers around the country to fight the cases seeking a forced release of his long form birth certificate  nor why he spent over $1 million to keep it from being released.  The latest version states nothing not already in the public domain, so why the effort and the expense to fight its release.   Either he is hiding something incriminating and important or he is very foolish to waste such resources and engender such animosity  among potential voters.

Obama has forged a legal document and perpetrated a fraud from the White House upon the American citizens, Congress and the States. IMPEACHMENT is warranted. Subverting the Constitution and our form of government cannot and must not be tolerated.  At the very least, Obama is very deceitful and dishonest.  But that being the case, he must be IMPEACHED.  HE HAS EARNED IT.

To view the evidence of the forgery, visit the following sites:

Americans, why would our president do this?  How can a document made in 1961 be broken into layers, especially since they say this was a copy (scanned) of the original, which is supposed to look like it’s bound in a book?  A scanned copy can’t be broken into layers because it is an image, like a photograph.  The document on the White House web site was computer-generated, using layers in order to fill in the blanks with the information that Obama needs to cover his secret.  If all of that information is true, it would not be necessary to layer the document.  It could have been scanned and in image format.  BUT IT WASN’T!  It’s been manufactured to achieve the needed goal. 

Why?  How could this possibly be used to Obama’s benefit?

Here’s one possibility and it truly does begin in Kenya for some strange reason.

In 2008, Obama went to Kenya and campaigned for Raila Odinga in their presidential election. Odinga lost to the incumbent.  He then enraged his supporters, stirring up discontent saying that the election was crooked and their will had been thwarted.  Odinga pushed them  to protest in the streets, which they did with machetes, hacking, slashing and murdering.  In the little town of Eldoret, women, children and the elderly took refuge in the Assembly of God Church, only to perish when Odinga’s supporters burned it to the ground with the people still inside.  The winning incumbent felt forced to ignore Kenya’s Constitution and agree to share power with Odinga, creating a new equal position with him.  Last summer, during the BP oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico, Pres. Obama sent VP Joe Biden to Kenya to pressure them to adopt a new Constitution with a coalition government.  Obama was involved from start to finish.  The end result being that the loser still got the power.

During Obama’s own presidential campaign in America, he spoke to an SEIU meeting, touting his history of support for them and pledging his solidarity with them. He promised to consult them when making decisions as president.

When Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker and the Wisconsin legislators proposed cutting some of the collective bargaining rights of union workers in an effort to lower the budget, ultimately saving their jobs, the SEIU protestors were bussed in and whipped up to intimidate them.  Obama, being thick as thieves with SEIU and their leader, Richard Trumpka, weighed in on the conflict, helping to inflame the union protestors.

SEIU sends instructions to their members to “protest” at banks who don’t tow their line, at state capitol buildings to intimidate legislators, at the private residences of CEO’s and bankers, in the streets, shouting, even attacking and pushing people.  Obama talks tough from the bully pulpit and SEIU leaders gin up the anger.  So far, SEIU doesn’t use machetes, but the fear factor is definitely a tool they use.

It’s no secret that the main stream news media is in Obama’s back pocket, running interference for him and smearing his critics.  It’s obvious that they get talking points memos because they all start parroting the same words and phrases on the same day.  It’s not likely to be a coincidence that the day the White House posted the bogus long form birth certificate and techies began pointing out the forgery elements, the news media cried “Wolf!”, I mean “Racists!”  Whoopi Goldberg said that same day, “I’m playing the damn race card!” and called everyone questioning the validity of a computer-generated layered  forged document “racists”.

Obama’s poll numbers have sunk like a rock since he was elected – a steady decline.  Since Trump revived the birth certificate issue, Obama’s numbers fell even more.  Suddenly he comes out with such an obvious fake that people said, “Is this a joke?”  “Can’t the CIA forge a document better than this?”  Why would he do this?  The president posted a document so easy to debunk that the outcry was immediate.  Then, most likely,  Obama put out the word to SEIU, the main stream media and his Hollywood celebrity friends, that this is racism.  Cry “racism”, he told them.  And they began immediately.  This is one scenario that seems more than plausible.  If he starts a race war in America, he will regain the support of African-American voters who became disenchanted with him over broken promises.  He becomes the poor guy being attacked for his race.  He envisions everyone coming to his defense and counts on most never bothering to investigate the legitimacy of the document themselves.

Perhaps the explanation is much simpler and Obama’s techies made a mistake, not “flattening” their creation before publishing.  The end result is the same for the Constitutionality question.  Obama can’t show his true birth certificate because there is a lot at stake.  He has to resort to trickery and deceit.  He’s broken the law by forging a legal document.  He’s broken faith with the people who elected him.  He’s disgraced his office.  Our Congress is equally guilty for not upholding the Constitution which is their sworn duty.  Obama must be investigated by Congress, impeached and removed.  NO RACIST attacks must stop them.  It’s not racism. It’s the right thing to do.

Read Full Post | Make a Comment ( 2 so far )

Citizens Will Be Asked for Proof of Citizenship? Now That’s Absurd!

Posted on June 30, 2010. Filed under: 2010 election, ALERT!, amnesty, birth certificate, Constitution, Democrats, Illegal Aliens, immigration, Liberty, Marxism, News Media, Obama, politics, SEIU, Socialism, sovereignty, Taxes, terrorism, U.S. Government |

QUESTION:  What is the purpose of “proof of citizenship” if not to prove you are a citizen and entitled to the rights and benefits of being a citizen?  If no one can ask you for your proof of citizenship, then why issue it in the first place?  Is that where Obama and company are headed?  An open border country?  Think about it.  You can’t have a country without borders.  Borders are no good without enforcement and you can’t enforce them without fences, border patrol and asking for that proof of citizenship when suspected of committing a violation of some sort.

Listen again and notice that one man stands before a crowd and states that the Arizona law makes it a crime to be “undocumented”.  That’s another sweeter term for “ILLEGAL alien”.  He goes even further and states that the Federal law does NOT make “undocumented” a crime.  What???  Ignorance or propaganda for the ignorant? 

Pres. Obama has stated his objection to the Arizona law that tries to reign in illegal aliens and protect U.S./Arizona citizens from the crimes committed by illegals.  He is very worried that some people will have to endure the sheer torture of reaching into their wallet and producing a drivers’ license or social security card.  OMGosh!  That’s excruciating!  And just what if that happens  to them while they are in an ice cream shop?  Eeeeegads!  Their ice cream might melt and may even drip on their shirt!  What is this world coming to?

On the other side of the argument are those who are worried about the American citizens/Arizona citizens who ARE murdered, kidnapped, mugged, assaulted, robbed, raped or their property destroyed.  Compare that to melting ice cream dripping on their shirt and getting their drivers’ license out of their wallet.  The Arizona law also seeks to address the issues of tons of devastating drugs coming into that state and being distributted throughout the country.  America’s young people are falling prey to this and their lives are being destroyed.  Drug addiction has a devastating effect on their entire family.  Today’s prisons are filling up with America’s youth charged with drug-related offenses, mostly drug possession.

Obama and critics of the Arizona law swear that racial profiling will occur and people of Mexican and foreign descent will be targeted.  Arizona swears that RACIAL profiling is prohibited and that ANYONE stopped for a violation will be asked for credentials.  In the next video, notice the color of the skin of the driver who was pulled over AND ASKED FOR A DRIVERS’ LICENSE, REGISTRATION and probably proof of liability.  Everyone is asked for these credentials when they are pulled over – no matter what color their skin is.  Ask anyone who has ever been stopped.  This is standard procedure in every state.  If they produce those credentials, there’s no problem.

If the driver cannot produce any valid credentials, the officer has the obligation to find out who this person is, whether they are wanted for any crimes, including crossing the border illegally, which, of course, is a crime.  There’s usually a criminal reason for a person not having any credentials.

Contrast the situation of someone stopped for violation of a law and asked for their credentials – drivers license, ID, auto registration – with that of a legal citizen asking their elected representative a question about government policies.

For some reason, Obama is a firm believer in NOT producing credentials.  His own are sealed and he has spent millions to keep them sealed.  Does he see amnesty for millions of illegals as new votes for him and his party? Does he have any way to know how many are here?  Does he know that all of them are good people just seeking  jobs?  Can he be certain that none are terrorists or spies of enemy countries?  Of course not!  And that’s the problem, along with the extreme cost to taxpaying citizens who have to support the needs of illegals.

Ignorance is contributing to the destruction of this country.  Help us educate people and fight the propaganda that is patently false.

“Ye shall know the TRUTH and the TRUTH shall set you free.”

We can’t succomb to emotion and let truth wither.  Emotions change from day to day.  Truth is always true.

Read Full Post | Make a Comment ( None so far )

What Did Michelle Know and When Did She Know It?

Posted on April 29, 2010. Filed under: birth certificate, Obama, Orly Taitz, politics, Uncategorized, Who Is Obama? | Tags: , |

The following paragraphs are excerpts taken directly from: 

MSNBC ONLINE:  “MICHELLE OBAMA TALKS FATHERHOOD”  Posted Thursday, July 10, 2008 at 3:46 p.m by Domenico Montanaro

MSNBC>Home>Politics>First Read

From NBC/NJ’s Carrie Dann

 

KANSAS CITY, Mo. 

 

“The Kansas City roundtable, held at the city’s University of Missouri campus, was the aspiring First Lady’s second in as many days. Yesterday, she held a similar event in Pontiac, Michigan, before a crowded auditorium of mostly black women where they discussed soaring health care costs and unemployment.

Today’s audience was also made up of almost all women, but the crowd in the more affluent university area was more mixed. Participants mentioned college-loan payments and day-care fees as monthly costs that drive them to scrimp and cut corners.

Obama used the roundtable audience, as she did yesterday, to describe her husband’s understanding of women’s issues through the prism of the strong — but sometimes struggling — women in his life.

His own mother, she said at the beginning of her remarks, was “very young and very single when she had him.” And, Obama added, he has observed his wife’s attempts to reconcile motherhood with her career aspirations.

“He sees me, his wife, who struggles every day with that guilt that we all hold deep in our hearts as women,” she said. “That guilt that you don’t have the choice to stay home, and even if you do, you feel guilty.”

“He has seen me struggle with this my entire life,” she added. “Trust me, Barack understands the struggles of women.””

************************************************************

An online search for documents in the public domain resulted in this article, which was a complete surprise.  Has any television or cable news organization reported this?  If not, then why not?  This article puts this quote squarely on Michelle Obama’s  lips.  This is not from Fox News.  It is MSNBC, home of Chris Matthews, who has a tingle up his leg when he hears Barack Obama speak.

http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/07/10/1193601.aspx

***************************************************************

Does this have any bearing on the  Obama certificate of live birth posted online by his aides?  Don’t know.  Would the original long form birth certificate hold different information?  Don’t know.  That’s the problem.  No one really knows.  But Obama says his parents, Stanley Ann Dunham and Barack Hussein Obama, Sr. were married February 2, 1960.  Yet, Michelle, his wife, says that Barack’s mother was very young and very single when Barack was born.   Michelle said this during Obama’s presidential campaign in 2008.  She’s been married to Barack for years and met his relatives.  This wasn’t a slip of the tongue.  It was a deliberate statement purposely tying to the subject of the gathering.  At the very least, even Obama’s own wife doesn’t know the truth about his birth.  Why is it wrong to ask the President of the United States to prove his birth facts and his eligibility to be President?

Read Full Post | Make a Comment ( 1 so far )

Arizona’s New Immigration Law

Posted on April 27, 2010. Filed under: birth certificate, Democrats, Freedom of Speech, Hate Speech/Crime Bill, Illegal Aliens, Liberty, News Media, Obama, Political, politics, U.S. Government, Uncategorized | Tags: , , , , , , , , |

Can anyone else see that Arizona has been proven right in passing their new immigration laws?  Democrats and the Federal government blasted the peaceful lawful Tea Party gatherings as hateful, inciting violence and racists.  Everyone saw those people standing with American flags, singing patriotic songs, holding signs that were not HATEFUL,  and leaving the gathering grounds clean and undamaged.  Everyone saw the police wandering around unconcerned and smiling because there was no violence or threat of any kind.  Some of those people brought their young children who were perfectly safe. YET, they were painted as inciting violence and hatred.

For the last eight days, protestors on the left, not affiliated with the Tea Parties, have committed violence, hitting a police officer in the head with a bottle, rampaging through the cities of Arizona in screaming mobs, inciting violence, spewing out hate speech, committing vandalism, painting swaztikas on buildings and city sidewalks, and claiming that citizens of Arizona are hateful for enforcing current immigration law.

Do we want to give amnesty to these lawless people?  If they’re here illegally, it’s because they knew the immigration laws existed and sneaked across our borders, knowingly breaking our laws.  Now they’re protesting our efforts to enforce our laws because they might get caught and sent back.  They’re breaking more laws during their protests and once again displaying their lawless character.  Is this what America needs more of?  More lawless people?  More people who don’t respect the laws of America?

What would Mexico be like, if they stayed home and fought for “change” in their own country, and worked to make it a wonderful country to live in, rather than breaking into their neighbor’s yard and demanding that their neighbors accommodate them?  If these protestors rioted in Mexico, instead of America, perhaps in time, they could live in their homeland peacefully and happily, and Americans might enjoy taking vacations there, bringing in revenue.  Both countries would benefit.  The current situation hurts both countries and all the people.

The Democrats didn’t care about the unConstitutionality of their health care bill, the take-over of private and publicaly traded business, the take-over of the financial institutions, setting personal salary caps or ensuring that the man elected POTUS was eligible.  But suddenly, they care about the Constitutionality of a state enforcing an existing immigration law!  Could it be that Obama and the Democrats were counting on those illegals receiving amnesty and, in turn, voting for the Democrats AND OBAMA?

AMERICA!  THERE IS NO MORE TIME TO DO NOTHING!  GIT’ER DONE!

 

Mexico’s President Calderon is WARNING its citizens that travel to Arizona could result in being detained if they fail to carry their immigration documents.  HORRORS!  HOW AWFUL!  Foreigners may have to carry their documentation.  WHAT’S NEXT?  OBEYING THE LAW?  When Americans travel abroad, they  have to carry their passport.  Have they ever complained about that?  They just do it and enjoy their travels – no marching, no protesting, no name-calling, no bullying, no bottle-throwing, no vandalism, no temper-tantrums.  Calderon went further, stating that “it should be assumed that any Mexican citizen could be bothered and questioned for no other reason at any moment.”  http://www.foxnews.com/world/2010/04/26/mexican-president-condemns-arizona-immigrant-law/  He’s showing his opinion of American law enforcement.  He sees them as oppressors.  If that’s what the Mexican nationals believe, then why would they come here?    If Americans are so mean, then stay home where it’s better.

Read Full Post | Make a Comment ( None so far )

Obama’s Birth Certificate – Part 3 ALERT

Posted on September 11, 2009. Filed under: birth certificate, Dictator, Freedom, Freedom of Speech, Kenya, Liberty, Marxism, Muslims, Obama, Obama's Associates & Appointees, Orly Taitz, Political, Socialism, U.S. Government | Tags: , |

PLEASE READ ALL THREE PARTS OF “OBAMA’S BIRTH CERTIFICATE.”

CONNECTING THE DOTS

Why did Obama campaign for Odinga, who is now Prime Minister of Kenya?

Why won’t Obama release his birth certificate that he had when he was in high school or the official long form showing the hospital where he was born?

Lucas Daniel Smith says he bribed a military official to look the other while he obtained a certified copy of Obama’s birth certificate in Kenya.

Marbie’s Blog has no idea if there is any truth to this or if this BC is authentic.  The reason for writing about this one is because Lucas Smith has signed an affidavit in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California,  Santa Anna ( Southern) Division, Judge David Carter, under penalty of perjury if proven to be false.  His affidavit is part of a suit to require Pres. Obama to produce documents such as the long form BC to prove his eligibility to be POTUS.  The plaintiff list is long and includes many military persons who want to know that the president who orders them into battle has the true power to do so.

This is news worthy because all other judges have summarily dismissed every case without hearing any evidence.  As always, Obama’s lawyers and the Dept. of Justice requested that this case be dismissed.  Wouldn’t it have been simpler to produce the BC and end this here and now?  Guess Obama doesn’t want to do that for some reason.  What reason?

http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=109242

The judge did not immediately rule on Atty. Orly Taitz’ motion to be granted “discovery” (the right to see the president’s sealed records) and he did not rule immediately on a motion to dismiss the case submitted by the U.S. Government.

“The judge did comment that if there are legitimate constitutional questions regarding Obama’s eligibility, they need to be addressed and resolved.”

Oct. 5, 2009 is the date set for a hearing on the motion to dismiss and arguments on the issue of discovery.  If the case is not dismissed, a pretrial  hearing is set for Jan. 11, 2010 and the trial two weeks later.

QUESTION #1:  Why won’t Obama release his long form BC or the BC that he says he had when he was in high school?

Perhaps because he knows he was born in Kenya.

QUESTION #2:  Why did Obama campaign for Odinga?

Because he needed an operative he could trust in the highest seat of Kenya’s government to seal his birth document and block all efforts to acquire it!

Lucas Smith Affidavit

Lucas Smith Affidavit 2

NOTICE LINES 6 AND 7 ON THE SECOND PAGE OF SMITH’S AFFIDAVIT.

“I travelled to Kenya and Mombasas in particular with the intent to obtain the original birth certificate of Barack Hussein Obama, as I was told previoudly that it was on file in the hospital and under seal, due to the fact that the Prime Minister of Kenya Raela Odinga is Barack Hussein Obama’s cousin.

I had to pay a cash “consideration” to a Kenyan military officer on duty to look the other way, while I obtained the copy of the birth certificate of Barack Hussein Obama.”

WE NOW KNOW WHY OBAMA CAMPAIGNED FOR RAILA ODINGA TO THE DEGREE HE DID AND THIS LENDS CREDIBILITY TO THE AUTHENTICITY OF THIS BIRTH CERTIFICATE.

NO OTHER REASON WOULD BE AS COMPELLING AS OBAMA’S NEED FOR A HIGH OFFICIAL IN THE KENYAN GOVERNMENT TO SEAL HIS DOCUMENTS THAT WOULD PREVENT HIM FROM ADVANCING TO THE MOST POWERFUL OFFICE IN THE WORLD! 

If Americans choose to keep their heads in the sand and trust this man, they WILL be led down the path to complete government control of their lives. Individual liberty and freedom will be a memory.  It will take precious blood to get it back – just like that of our forefathers.  Wouldn’t it be easier to block politicians now and keep our freedoms?

PLEASE READ ALL THREE PARTS OF “OBAMA’S BIRTH CERTIFICATE.”

Read Full Post | Make a Comment ( 2 so far )

Obama’s Birth Certificate – Part 2

Posted on September 11, 2009. Filed under: birth certificate, Kenya, Obama, Obama's Associates & Appointees, Orly Taitz, Who Is Obama? | Tags: , , , , , , , |

PLEASE READ ALL THREE PARTS TO “OBAMA’S BIRTH CERTIFICATE.

Two questions need answers:

1.  Why won’t Obama release his real birth certificate?

2.  Why did Obama travel to Kenya and campaign for Raila Odinga as Prime Minister?

The dots may be connecting themselves as more and more people  investigate the mysterious man from Chicago, Hawaii and yes, Kenya.

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2008/oct/12/obamas-kenya-ghosts/

“Initially, Mr. Odinga was not the favored opposition candidate to stand in the 2007 election against President Mwai Kibaki, who was seeking his second term. However, he received a tremendous boost when Sen. Barack Obama arrived in Kenya in August 2006 to campaign on his behalf. Mr. Obama denies that supporting Mr. Odinga was the intention of his trip, but his actions and local media reports tell otherwise.

Mr. Odinga and Mr. Obama were nearly inseparable throughout Mr. Obama’s six-day stay. The two traveled together throughout Kenya and Mr. Obama spoke on behalf of Mr. Odinga at numerous rallies. In contrast, Mr. Obama had only criticism for Kibaki. He lashed out against the Kenyan government shortly after meeting with the president on Aug. 25. “The [Kenyan] people have to suffer over corruption perpetrated by government officials,” Mr. Obama announced.

“Kenyans are now yearning for change,” he declared. The intent of Mr. Obama’s remarks and actions was transparent to Kenyans – he was firmly behind Mr. Odinga.

Mr. Odinga and Mr. Obama had met several times before the 2006 trip. Reports indicate Mr. Odinga visited Mr. Obama during trips to the U.S. in 2004, 2005 and 2006. Mr. Obama sent his foreign policy adviser Mark Lippert to Kenya in early 2006 to coordinate his summer visit. Mr. Obama’s August trip coincided with strategizing by Orange Democratic Movement leaders to defeat Mr. Kibaki in the upcoming elections. Mr. Odinga represented the ODM ticket in the presidential race.”

So why did Obama take such pains to get Odinga elected in Kenya?  Why did Obama want Odinga to be president and serve in the highest office in Kenya?

 

THE ANSWER MAY HAVE BEEN PRESENTED TO US BY MR. LUCAS DANIEL SMITH.

Continued in “Obama’s Birth Certificate – Part 3

PLEASE READ ALL THREE PARTS OF “OBAMA’S BIRTH CERTIFICATE”.

Read Full Post | Make a Comment ( None so far )

Obama’s Birth Certificate – Part 1

Posted on September 11, 2009. Filed under: birth certificate, Kenya, Orly Taitz |

PLEASE READ ALL THREE PARTS OF “OBAMA’S BIRTH CERTIFICATE.”

In Obama’s own words, from his autobiography, Dreams From My Father, he says, “I discovered this article, folded away among my birth certificate and old vaccination forms, when I was in high school.” (Pg.26, Google Books Online).

If he had his birth certificate when he was in high school, why doesn’t he have it now?  That would have been in the mid to late ’70’s.  Yet the certificate of live birth posted on Obama’s web site is dated on the back and read via the bleed-through,  June, 2007, and the document bears the notation in the lower left corner OHSM 1.1 (Rev. 11/01) LASER.

Both of his grandparents in Hawaii and both of his parents have passed away.  Anything in their possession would have passed down to him and his sister Maya.   Maya would certainly not have kept Barack’s birth certificate, knowing that the whole world is clamoring to see it and Obama could so easily settle the raging dispute about his eligiblity for POTUS by showing it publically.  Where’s the one Obama wrote about having in his autobiography?  Where’s the birth certificate that is not a laser print of recent days?

There is a photo of the laser copy that shows two folds as if it was folded for a mailing envelope.  Yet there is also one with no folds.  Strangely, we are asked to believe that both are one and the same.

http://fightthesmears.com/articles/5/birthcertificate  No folds laser copy with certificate number blacked out. 

Why aren’t there any folds like the one on FactCheck.org, Annenberg Political Fact Check Organization.  (Annenberg founded the Wood Foundation and appointed ’60’s bomber Williiam Ayers, and Barack Obama to the board.  They served on that board together and Ayers threw a fund raiser in his home for Obama.  Do you think the Annenberg Foundation is biased toward helping Obama?

http://www.factcheck.org/elections-2008/born_in_the_usa.html Folded copy with certificate number not blacked out.  The folds are very easy to see.  Annenberg’s copy has very visible folds and Obama’s web version does not.

No matter how fishy Obama’s lack of producing his authentic birth certificate seems; no matter how much money Obama has spent on lawyers to fight every attempt to release his birth certificate when he could easily produce the real one from his high school possessions; no matter how easy it is for Obama to order that the real birth certificate be released for about $20 or less, rather than the tens of thousands spent to prevent it; no matter how many people demand to see the real one; no matter what the Constitution of the United States requires; THE COURTS CONTINUE TO DISMISS THE LAW SUITS AND REFUSE TO HEAR ANY EVIDENCE; AND CONGRESS REFUSES TO ENFORCE THE CONSTITUTION!

Why won’t Obama just release the one he had in high school?  Why won’t Obama release the real one?   Why is Obama fighting with lots of lawyers in every case brought against him to prove his birth place?

The answer might lie in a future post here on Marbie’s Blog!

PLEASE READ ALL THREE PARTS OF “OBAMA’S BIRTH CERTIFICATE.”

Read Full Post | Make a Comment ( 1 so far )

Barck Hussein Obama Involved in Kenya’s Presidential Campaigns – August 20, 2008

Posted on August 21, 2008. Filed under: ALERT!, birth certificate, Capitalism, Christianity, Clinton, Communism, Constitution, Democrats, Dictator, Freedom, Freedom of Speech, Obama, Socialism, terrorism, U.S. Government, Uncategorized | Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , |

This was originally posted August 20, 2008 before Obama was elected President of the United States of America.  It was the author’s strongest desire that the American people would learn of Obama’s radical beliefs and behaviors and refuse to elect him to the most powerful office in the world.  That did not happen, in part because the news media did not report things that would harm Obama’s election chances.   It is still important to learn who and what Barack Hussein Obama is, believes and works to achieve.  Put all the puzzle pieces together and pray that the hidden pieces are soon revealed.  Spread the word – the truth.

While campaigning for president for himself in the United States of America, Barack Hussein Obama  campaigned for Raila Odinga for president of Kenya in the 2007 election there. Raila Odinga is the founder of the Orange Democratic Movement (ODM) and campaigned for “Change”. Have you heard that somewhere else? Yes, of course. It’s Barack Hussein Obama’s biggest motto. Just for fun, visit Raila Odinga’s web site at http://www.raila07.com/. Notice that he is an “agent for change”, and he asks citizens to “register for change” and “vote for change”. Sounds very familiar to Americans.  (UPDATE:  RAILA ODINGA NO LONGER HAS THE WEBSITE REFERRENCED ABOVE, SINCE THE ELECTION WAS HELD.)

What else does Obama and Odinga have in common? They are both from the Kenyan Luo Tribe. Obama has visited his father’s home land in Kenya three times. He’s met his relatives and taken the lay of the land. He knows the differences between the tribes. His last trip as a United States Senator was taxpayer funded. Official U.S. business should not have included backing one or the other candidate in their race unless our government officially took a stand and sent him to represent it, which wasn’t the case here.

Obama spoke out against the sitting government while on their soil and was seen with Raila Odinga, looking very friendly. Speaking against their current government would make President Kibaki feel that Obama didn’t support his campaign for re-election. Speaking favorably of Odinga and being quite friendly toward him while appearing in public with him, would make Odinga and Kibaki feel that Obama supported Odinga. Obama now says he did not promote Odinga’s candidacy while in Kenya. The following video records Obama’s presence in Kenya, with Raila and seems to substantiate the claim that he campaigned for, or at the least, promoted Odinga during their pre-election season.   Notice the CNN logo at the bottom of lots of footage.  It was reported overseas by CNN, but how much did Americans hear about it here?

The Kenyan government was upset with Obama for interfering in their elections and spoke out about it. Jerome Corsi’s book, “Obama Nation” says that Dick Morris, a former Clinton campaign strategist also went to Kenya to help Raila Odinga win the election.   In the following video, Odinga says that he saw Morris when he went to New York and was thrilled that Morris agreed to help his campaign.  Morris says that he promised to do this pro bono – FREE!!!  The question is, “WHY?”

When Odinga did not win, he claimed that the election results were falsified or tampered with and called for protests. Odinga’s supporters of the Luo Tribe were so outraged that they went on murderous rampages, killing, raping, beating, hacking and chopping with machetes, and even beheading five people. Their victims were of the Kikuyu Tribe, the same as the re-elected President Kibaki. They burned churches, including an Assembly of God church where 35 to 50 people, including children, were burned alive. Those that tried to escape were beaten and hacked.

Morturary interview after Eldoret A/G Church mass murders PLEASE LISTEN CLOSELY TO THIS TWO-MINUTE AUDIO!

http://www.rfi.fr/actuen/articles/101/article_232.asp 

Notice in the previous video at :55 seconds to 1:05, the reporter states that Odinga had garnered support in the nation’s two slum areas by promising the poor that he would redistribute the wealth more evenly.  Sounds like Obama in America.    These two have much in common.  Odinga has been labeled a Socialist/Communist.

The next videos are upsetting and difficult to watch because they document the aftermath of the election when Odinga did not win. One video spotlights the actions of the Luo Tribal gang who calls themselves the Taliban.  (This video has disappeared.  It doesn’t come up in a search of YouTube anymore.)

When the reporter says, “her husband was panga’ed, he refers to the machete, called “panga” in Kenya. The woman’s husband was killed with a machete.  (This video no longer appears in a YouTube search.)

Notice that water cannons are used to disperse the crowd. It doesn’t kill,  just makes it impossible for crowds to stand and cause harm to others. The army points their weapons up not at the protestors.  You don’t see anyone in the crowd fall.  The news reporter seems to think the army is using excessive force, but with so much killing in the streets and much of it with machetes, water cannons and firing in the air seems tame.

I watched many videos of the unrest and violence in Kenya resulting from the disputed election and Odinga’s refusal to accept the outcome. Almost all of them, from a variety of sources, including Reuters News Agency, BBC News, and CNN News, cite Odinga for calling for the protests and inciting his tribe, the Luos, to take matters into their own hands, which they did. Keep in mind that the Kikuyu Tribe is the tribe of the incumbent president Kibaki. It is his people being routed out of their homes, killed, raped and murdered by the Luo Tribe of Raila Odinga (also Barack Obama’s tribe).

Who burns Christian churches and murders Christians, even children? Atheists and Muslims. Kenya is reported to be 80% Christian and 10% Muslim. Odinga signed an agreement with Muslims for changes he would make in their favor, once in a position of power.

With all the resulting riots, rampages, death and anarchy, the international community put pressure on the re-elected Kibaki to stop the violence. To satisfy the internationals, re-elected President Kibaki created the office of Prime Minister for Raila Odinga, a power-share not in Kenya’s constitution.

Although he accepted the position, this is not what Odinga wanted. He called for Kibaki to hold new elections, in which Odinga expected to win and hold the presidency in full power.

Listen to Obama’s speech at the University of Nairobi and ask the question, “Did his speech play any part in the way Odinga’s supporters reacted to Odinga’s election loss?” Did he help make them dissatisfied with the current “corrupt government and police force” and did he say anything that made them unwilling to accept the election results?  In the next video, the last minute is important.  (3:05 to 4:00 minutes)

It’s bad enough that a U.S. Senator got involved in the democratic elections of Kenya, but what followed was horrendous and Obama’s name will forever be associated with those events. Why did he choose one side over the other? Was it loyalty to his own Luo Tribe? Odinga is pretty far left on the political scale. He named his son, Fidel, after Fidel Castro. He seems a strange choice to curry Obama’s favor, except for sharing the same tribal blood in his veins as Obama. It’s anyone’s guess what will happen next or what role Barack Obama, a Luo tribe member living in America, would play in Kenya’s future, if elected president of the U.S.

I, for one, am praying that he is NEVER the president of the United States. He has far too many leftists, Marxists, Communists, terrorists, Muslims, and dangerous people in his circle of acquaintances, and even close friends. IS THAT MERELY A COINCIDENCE? I RATHER DOUBT IT.

There is no more time to do nothing.

Read Full Post | Make a Comment ( None so far )

Liked it here?
Why not try sites on the blogroll...