Archive for December, 2009

Racist Tax and Government Doctors by Democrats!

Posted on December 21, 2009. Filed under: Communism, Constitution, Democrats, Dictator, Freedom, Health Care, Liberty, Marxism, Obama, Obama's Associates & Appointees, politics, SEIU, Socialism, U.S. Government |

News flash.  Fox News is reporting that the Democrats’ health care bill has a 10% tax on tanning beds.  Now who do you think uses tanning beds?  White people!  I’ve never heard of African-Americans or Latinos going to tanning salons to get a tan!  Have you?  This has to be a racist tax!

This health care bill will drive private doctors to leave their practices because of the cuts in their payments.  Earlier, the government took over student loans.  Very few students can pay for their own medical school tuition and most take out student loans.  Now they have to get those medical student loans from the government.  Obama wants to require ten years of service of those who get a student loan from the government.  That results in government doctors.  In effect, the government will drive private doctors out of practice and citizens will have to go to the new government doctors working off their student loans.  After ten years of government service, and the cuts in doctors’ pay, these government doctors will never go to private practice.

Thanks Obama and Democrats for a future government health care and government doctors, with no where else to go.  Can you call this freedom?  NO!

The new health care bill is over 2,000 pages long.  Freedom is one word and takes no pages.  You don’t have to write anything when societies are totally free.  Only when there are restrictions do you have to write anything down.   You have to put in writing those restrictions and conditions that apply.  Over 2,000 pages suggests just how much freedom is being taken from Americans  That’s 2,000 pages of what you MAY OR MAY  NOT DO OR RECEIVE.   RESTRICTIONS OF YOUR FREEDOM –  2,000 PAGES!

http://www.postchronicle.com/news/health/article_212274636.shtml

http://abcnews.go.com/Health/wireStory?id=9394423

http://www.39online.com/news/local/kiah-tan-tax-story,0,5671826.story

http://kdrv.com/news/local/156541

http://bulletin.aarp.org/yourhealth/policy/articles/tax_on_plastic_surgery_gets_ax_in_final_stretch.html –  (THIS IS A BULLETIN FROM AARP!)

http://www.tantoday.com/forums/salon-discussion/38660-10-tanning-tax-healthcare-bill.html

http://www.nasdaq.com/aspx/stock-market-news-story.aspx?storyid=200912191157dowjonesdjonline000329&title=update-us-senate-health-care-bill-would-add-10-tax-on-indoor-tanning  – THIS IS NASDAQ, THE STOCK EXCHANGE!

http://www.recordonline.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20091222/BIZ/912220323

http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/73063-final-health-bill-subs-indoor-tanning-tax-for-botax

Advertisements
Read Full Post | Make a Comment ( 3 so far )

Posted on December 21, 2009. Filed under: Al Gore, Cap and Trade, Communism, Constitution, Democrats, Dictator, Energy, Freedom, global governance, Global Warming/Cimate Change, Liberty, Marxism, Obama, Obama's Associates & Appointees, politics, SEIU, Socialism, sovereignty, U.S. Government, United Nations |

A SHOCKER! – Installment 7 – May 25, 2008 RE-POSTED

From the website: http://denisdutton.com/cooling_world.htm

Comments in red are mine.

Newsweek, The Cooling World, April 28, 1975

There are ominous signs that the Earth’s weather patterns have begun to change dramatically and that these changes may portend a drastic decline in food production – with serious political implications for just about every nation on Earth. The drop in food output could begin quite soon, perhaps only 10 years from now. The regions destined to feel its impact are the great wheat-producing lands of Canada and the U.S.S.R. in the North, along with a number of marginally self-sufficient tropical areas – parts of India, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Indochina and Indonesia – where the growing season is dependent upon the rains brought by the monsoon.

Where have we heard this before? in only 10 years. Al Gore says that we have only 10 years to save the planet, to avoid catastrophy, to save the oceans, to avoid passing the point of no return, to save our lives.

The terms used in the 1975 article are “ominous, dramatically, drastic, serious, every nation.” We’re hearing the same urgency in today’s warnings of global warming as was trumpeted in 1975 about global cooling.

The evidence in support of these predictions has now begun to accumulate so massively that meteorologists are hard-pressed to keep up with it. In England, farmers have seen their growing season decline by about two weeks since 1950, with a resultant overall loss in grain production estimated at up to 100,000 tons annually. During the same time, the average temperature around the equator has risen by a fraction of a degree – a fraction that in some areas can mean drought and desolation. Last April, in the most devastating outbreak of tornadoes ever recorded, 148 twisters killed more than 300 people and caused half a billion dollars’ worth of damage in 13 U.S. states.

Like Gore and his crowd today, the voices in ’75 claimed to have piles of evidence to prove their predictions. Yet, no calamaties befell Earth. No ice age. No cooling disasters occurred. Still using urgent words, such as “massively, drought, desolation, devastating.” Scientists were among the incorrect crowd, like today. The claim was made that a very small climate change caused death and destruction, and yet, it didn’t.

To scientists, these seemingly disparate incidents represent the advance signs of fundamental changes in the world’s weather. The central fact is that after three quarters of a century of extraordinarily mild conditions, the earth’s climate seems to be cooling down. Meteorologists disagree about the cause and extent of the cooling trend, as well as over its specific impact on local weather conditions. But they are almost unanimous in the view that the trend will reduce agricultural productivity for the rest of the century. If the climatic change is as profound as some of the pessimists fear, the resulting famines could be catastrophic. “A major climatic change would force economic and social adjustments on a worldwide scale,” warns a recent report by the National Academy of Sciences, “because the global patterns of food production and population that have evolved are implicitly dependent on the climate of the present century.”

The revered National Academy of Sciences was wrong. We know that now. They are wrong again about global warming.

A survey completed last year by Dr. Murray Mitchell of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration reveals a drop of half a degree in average ground temperatures in the Northern Hemisphere between 1945 and 1968. According to George Kukla of Columbia University, satellite photos indicated a sudden, large increase in Northern Hemisphere snow cover in the winter of 1971-72. And a study released last month by two NOAA scientists notes that the amount of sunshine reaching the ground in the continental U.S. diminished by 1.3% between 1964 and 1972.

To the layman, the relatively small changes in temperature and sunshine can be highly misleading. Reid Bryson of the University of Wisconsin points out that the Earth’s average temperature during the great Ice Ages was only about seven degrees lower than during its warmest eras – and that the present decline has taken the planet about a sixth of the way toward the Ice Age average. Others regard the cooling as a reversion to the “little ice age” conditions that brought bitter winters to much of Europe and northern America between 1600 and 1900 – years when the Thames used to freeze so solidly that Londoners roasted oxen on the ice and when iceboats sailed the Hudson River almost as far south as New York City.

Just what causes the onset of major and minor ice ages remains a mystery. “Our knowledge of the mechanisms of climatic change is at least as fragmentary as our data,” concedes the National Academy of Sciences report. “Not only are the basic scientific questions largely unanswered, but in many cases we do not yet know enough to pose the key questions.”

Meteorologists think that they can forecast the short-term results of the return to the norm of the last century. They begin by noting the slight drop in overall temperature that produces large numbers of pressure centers in the upper atmosphere. These break up the smooth flow of westerly winds over temperate areas. The stagnant air produced in this way causes an increase in extremes of local weather such as droughts, floods, extended dry spells, long freezes, delayed monsoons and even local temperature increases – all of which have a direct impact on food supplies.

“The world’s food-producing system,” warns Dr. James D. McQuigg of NOAA’s Center for Climatic and Environmental Assessment, “is much more sensitive to the weather variable than it was even five years ago.” Furthermore, the growth of world population and creation of new national boundaries make it impossible for starving peoples to migrate from their devastated fields, as they did during past famines.

Climatologists are pessimistic that political leaders will take any positive action to compensate for the climatic change, or even to allay its effects. They concede that some of the more spectacular solutions proposed, such as melting the Arctic ice cap by covering it with black soot or diverting arctic rivers, might create problems far greater than those they solve. But the scientists see few signs that government leaders anywhere are even prepared to take the simple measures of stockpiling food or of introducing the variables of climatic uncertainty into economic projections of future food supplies. The longer the planners delay, the more difficult they will find it to cope with climatic change once the results become grim reality.

PETER GWYNNE with bureau reports

Thank goodness the government was unwilling to take drastic actions to prevent global cooling. The harm they would have caused would have been unnecessary and difficult to recover from. Today, the governments of the world are already taking steps to “prevent global warming.” The harm they will do may take decades to recover from, if then.

Plans to change our sovereignty, national borders, business practices, individual freedoms, laws and enforcement, transportation, even our religious beliefs, are already being crafted and eased into our daily lives. Some truly scary ideas have been put on the table for altering Earth’s atmosphere to head off the perceived warming trend. If they are successful, climate change will occurr by the hands of people who don’t know what they’re doing.

There is no more time to do nothing!

Read Full Post | Make a Comment ( None so far )

Climate Change Summit Breaking News!

Posted on December 17, 2009. Filed under: Al Gore, Cap and Trade, Clinton, Communism, Constitution, Democrats, Dictator, Energy, Freedom, global governance, Global Warming/Cimate Change, Hillary, Liberty, Marxism, Obama, politics, Socialism, sovereignty, U.S. Government, United Nations | Tags: , , |

Shocker! Global Warming

As limosine liberals jet in to Copenhagen from all over the world to spend a few nights in $1,000+ hotel rooms, eat lavish cuisine and be chauffeured around in limos brought in from over 200 miles away to meet the demand, the temperature and snow is falling at record levels!  (I admit that I prayed for the world’s worst winter storm – a blizzard of record levels piling up snow so deep that these crooks are stuck in their hotels for days – to smother Copenhagen for weeks.  God just may be answering my prayer in the affirmative.  Perhaps He knows something the libs, socialists, Marxists and dictators don’t.  In fact, I’m certain He DOES.)

The WeatherNetwork at http://www.theweathernetwork.com/index.php?product=weather&placecode=daxx0009&switchto=f is reporting 20 degrees F. with wind chill of -12 degrees (feels like).

Weather Forecast: Copenhagen, Denmark

Weather Warning

Current Weather Updated: Thursday, December 17, 2009, 18:00 CST – Copenhagen

Copenhagen, DK Partly cloudy 20°F   
  • Feels Like: 12
  • Whether it snows or not isn’t important.  That only measures the amount of  moisture in the air.  The temperature is unusually cold for Copenhagen.  Their average is 32-35 degrees F.  Even the hot air being spewed by all the global warming enthusiasts can’t raise the temps enough to support their cause.  That’s because they’re wrong – totally.  While some blindly accept the concept, others are in it for the money.  These are the people we need to defeat.  It’s our money they’re after.

    Read Full Post | Make a Comment ( None so far )

    Liked it here?
    Why not try sites on the blogroll...