Motor Voter Law 1993, Clinton, Cloward, Piven, Alinsky, Obama, Economic COLLAPSE

Posted on February 22, 2013. Filed under: ACORN, Capitalism, Clinton, Communism, Constitution, Democrats, Dictator, Freedom, Health Care, Hillary, Illegal Aliens, immigration, Liberty, Marxism, Obama, politics, Rush Limbaugh, Socialism, sovereignty, Taxes, U.S. Government, Uncategorized | Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |

Obama Black PanthersObama teachingCloward Piven Clinton

Remember the “Motor Voter Law” passed by Democrats and signed into law by Bill Clinton?  Bet you didn’t know this:

“This voter registration movement was spearheaded by the husband and wife team of Frances Fox Piven and Richard Cloward in the early 1980s in response to the Reagan administration. Both of them college professors and liberal activists.” Both of them involved in Alinksy radicalism. Still at it today. Obama embraced Alinsky, Cloward and Piven beliefs.

What’s the implication of involvement of Cloward and Piven? This:
“First proposed in 1966 and named after Columbia University sociologists Richard Andrew Cloward and Frances Fox Piven, the Cloward-Piven Strategy seeks to hasten the fall of capitalism by overloading the government bureaucracy with a flood of impossible demands, thus pushing society into crisis and economic collapse. Obama attended Columbia U and is carrying this out right in front of us, brazenly destroying our economy. ”

Have you noticed that there is crisis after crisis after crisis, since Obama was first elected in 2008? Each one is said to be devastating if Congress doesn’t pass some big money bill to solve it.  The results are trillions in debt, ailing economy, job losses, businesses closing. Capitalism is under attack.  If it fails, what will replace it? Socialism, Marxism, Dictatorship, something less than our Constitutional republic?

“In their 1966 article, Cloward and Piven charged that the ruling classes used welfare to weaken the poor; that by providing a social safety net, the rich doused the fires of rebellion. Poor people can advance only when “the rest of society is afraid of them,” Cloward told The New York Times on September 27, 1970. Rather than placating the poor with government hand-outs, wrote Cloward and Piven, activists should work to sabotage and destroy the welfare system; the collapse of the welfare state would ignite a political and financial crisis that would rock the nation; poor people would rise in revolt; only then would “the rest of society” accept their demands.

The key to sparking this rebellion would be to expose the inadequacy of the welfare state. Cloward-Piven’s early promoters cited radical organizer Saul Alinsky as their inspiration. “Make the enemy live up to their (sic) own book of rules,” Alinsky wrote in his 1989 book Rules for Radicals. When pressed to honor every word of every law and statute, every Judeo-Christian moral tenet, and every implicit promise of the liberal social contract, human agencies inevitably fall short. The system’s failure to “live up” to its rule book can then be used to discredit it altogether, and to replace the capitalist “rule book” with a socialist one.”

“Cloward and Piven calculated that persuading even a fraction of potential welfare recipients to demand their entitlements would bankrupt the system. The result, they predicted, would be “a profound financial and political crisis” that would unleash ‘powerful forces for major economic reform at the national level’.”

“Their article called for “cadres of aggressive organizers” to use “demonstrations to create a climate of militancy.” Intimidated by threats of black violence, politicians would appeal to the federal government for help.

“This was an example of what are commonly called Trojan Horse movements — mass movements whose outward purpose seems to be providing material help to the downtrodden, but whose real objective is to draft poor people into service as revolutionary foot soldiers; to mobilize poor people en masse to overwhelm government agencies with a flood of demands beyond the capacity of those agencies to meet. The flood of demands was calculated to break the budget, jam the bureaucratic gears into gridlock, and bring the system crashing down.   Fear, turmoil, violence and economic collapse would accompany such a breakdown — providing perfect conditions for fostering radical change.

“Cloward and Piven recruited a militant black organizer named George Wiley to lead their new movement.”  Beginning to sound like what we’re watching today?

“Both Cloward and Piven attended the White House signing of the 1996 Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act as guests of President Clinton.

“Both the Living Wage and Voting Rights movements depend heavily on financial support from George Soros‘s Open Society Institute and his Shadow Party.”

(Unlikely to improve on the writings in these two cited articles, I chose to post excerpts from them, adding only a little commentary here and there. I sincerely hope you go to these articles and read them in their entirety. It’s important that our elected officials and influential people like Rush Limbaugh, Mark Levin, Sean Hannity, and many others, be sent this information.  Send it to your state governors and elected officials, too, because they fight on the front lines to stop this onslaught.  They need to know and expose it before it’s too late.)


Read Full Post | Make a Comment ( 12 so far )

Free Cell Phones From Mexico Compliments of the Government

Posted on February 29, 2012. Filed under: Obama, politics | Tags: , , , , , , , , |

The story is going around that the Obama administration is giving free cells phones to welfare recipients.  That doesn’t sit well with some taxpayers who want the government to cut spending, pay off the debt and balance the budget.  Is it true? Why would the government give away free cell phones?  Who pays for this?

YES, it’s true!  Read this short article for the details of the FCC program.

In 1984, the FCC enacted a government program, Lifeline, to assist low-income families and update services in areas affected by disasters.

Lifeline is a government-supported program for low income-eligible households that insures available and affordable telephone service.

September 29, 2009, the first  year of Obama’s administration,  prepaid wireless cell phone provider TracFone Wireless, Inc. announced the launch of SafeLink in Illinois, Obama’s home state.  Note that SafeLink Wireless in Illinois is the FIRST and ONLY completely free offering of Lifeline.

Obama’s new administration took care of his state.  Recipients in other states’ didn’t receive the program for free.  In fact, the program is only available in nineteen states plus the District of Columbia.

Where does the funding come from for this government program?  The funding is collected from surcharges added to telephone and cell phone bills.  This means that other people pay surcharges on their phone bills to fund those receiving free service in Illinois.  Do the payers know they’re paying for phone service to recipients of free service in Illinois and subsidizing the others?

The interesting thing about the FCC’s decision to implement this program is their unnoticed creation of a new right!  According to a Reuter’s article, the FCC decided to “enhance its  Lifeline program and keep the right to communicate in pace with technology.”

Lifeline program and “keep the right to communicate in pace with technology.”  A quick check of the Constitutional Bill of Rights finds no such right enumerated.  We are guaranteed the right to free speech, press, religion.  While our right to communicate cannot be abridged by the government, it is not a right that requires the federal government to provide and fund. The government is only responsible for maintaining a free society whereby individuals can freely communicate.  How they communicate and use services available for purchase is entirely the responsibility of individuals.

Besides the free cell phone, recipients also get sixty free wireless phone service minutes per month.  According to the SafeLink web site, they’re also offered additional free minutes for referring a friend!

The choice of TracFone Wireless, Inc. is an interesting one.  It is a subsidiary of América Móvil S.A.B. de C.V. based in Mexico City, Mexico.  The government doesn’t even choose an American company.  TracFone says it expects the program to go nationwide soon.

Is it any wonder that America is deep in debt and has a high jobless rate?  The Obama administration seems intent on keeping U.S. that way.

Want to apply for your free cell phone with sixty free wireless minutes of service?

Don’t forget to refer a friend. Or two or three.  It’s all free!

Fine print: Your friends, neighbors, relatives, co-workers are all picking up your tab and the money is going to Mexico.

Have a nice day and thank you for shopping with the  U.S. FCC – Obama administration.

Read Full Post | Make a Comment ( None so far )

Liked it here?
Why not try sites on the blogroll...