sustainable

A SHOCKER! – Installment 2 Global Warming/Climate Change UPDATE! James Lovelock Changes His Mind

Posted on June 17, 2012. Filed under: Al Gore, ALERT!, Big Brother, Cap and Trade, Capitalism, Christianity, Constitution, Democrats, Energy, environmentalism, environmentalists, evolution, Freedom, Gaia, Gaia hypothesis, Gaia matrix, global governance, Global Warming/Cimate Change, globalization, goddess, Greek mythology, idol, James Lovelock, junk science, Liberty, Lynn margulis, Mars, Maurice Strong, Mikhail Gorbachav, Mother Earth, News Media, Obama, pantheism, planet, Political, politics, science, sovereignty, sustainability, sustainable, Taxes, U.S. Government, Uncategorized, uniformitarianism, United Nations | Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , |

Begin by reading the original post of May 15, 2008 about James Lovelock and his influence on the global warming movement, and his devotion to the pagan religion, Gaia.  There’s a lot to learn there and it’s never mentioned by the main stream media. Too many people know nothing of this.  If they did, they’d be much more skeptical of the green/global warming/climate change movement.

https://marbiesblog.wordpress.com/2009/10/29/a-shocker-installlment-2/

After you have the important background knowledge, read today’s surprising news coming from the ninety-two year-old James Lovelock whose latest comments are shocking AND will be completely ignored by the people in the movement whose beliefs are the direct result of this man’s influence.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2012/jun/15/james-lovelock-interview-gaia-theory?mobile-redirect=false

Lovelock believes in the Gaia religion, as you will see in both articles.  The Gaia religion “no longer sees man as the measure of all things or the center of the universe. He has been measured and found to be an undistinguished bit of matter, different in no essential way from bacteria, stones and trees.  Gaians also believe that over-population is a root cause of an imbalance in the Earth’s ecology.  Therefore, they believe in man-made global warming/climate change.  (Could this be a reason behind the fight for abortion “rights”?

Lovelock, having formulated the Gaia Hypothesis, is the father of the climate change movement.  He’s predicted complete doom on the Earth unless governments force people to adopt severe and costly changes to every thing people do on earth. It’s called “sustainable development”, and has been marketed to the people as “going green.”

But what is he saying today?

“Adapt and survive.”  He supports nuclear power, hates wind power, remarking that they are useless and ugly, AND is now encouraging the U.K. to embrace fracking because natural gas is cheap and doesn’t produce as much CO2 as burning coal.

“We rushed into renewable energy without any thought. The schemes are largely hopelessly inefficient and unpleasant. Fracking buys us some time, and we can learn to adapt.”

“Let’s be pragmatic and sensible and get Britain to switch everything to methane. We should be going mad on it.”

What has brought about this major reversal?  He’s been hit hard with some hefty home energy bills and he doesn’t like it.  He’s realizing that these costs are unsustainable, I suspect.  It has changed his economic, political and scientific views on global warming, as he used to call it.

He told MSNBC that “he had been extrapolating too far in reaching such a conclusion and had made a mistake in claiming to know with such certainty what will happen to the climate.”

He says “being allowed to change your mind and follow the evidence is one of the liberating marvels of being an independent scientist.”

Many of us never bought into what has been proven faulty and fake science, but we’ve all paid a high cost for Lovelock’s Gaiantic mistake.

At the International Climate Change Conference in Rio next week, Lovelock’s devotee’s will seek solutions to the devastating climate change disaster that he now says doesn’t exist.  They won’t  be phased by Lovelock’s latest revelations.

“Whenever the UN puts its finger in, it seems to become a mess.”

“The climate situation is more complex than we at present are capable of handling, or possibly even in the future.”

“It’s so much cheaper to air-condition the cities and let Gaia take care of the world. It’s a much better route to go than so-called ‘sustainable development’, which is meaningless drivel.”

Where’s the proof that he’s really changed his mind and won’t jump back on the “sustainable development” wagon?  He’s moving from his home of thirty years amidst acres of trees that he planted himself to a small beach cottage.  Unafraid of the horrors of rising seas caused by climate change.

“At worst, I think it will be two feet a century.”

Unfortunately for us, the costs associated with climate change legislation will rise much more rapidly.

As for his political views on the subject now days:

“I’m neither strongly left nor right, but I detest the Liberal Democrats.”   “The coalition has behaved disgracefully on environmental and energy policies. It would have been much better if they had been properly right wing.”

Perhaps he was warning us when he said:

“It’s just the way the humans are that if there’s a cause of some sort, a religion starts forming around it. It just so happens that the green religion is now taking over from the Christian religion. I don’t think people have noticed that, but it’s got all the sort of terms that religions use. The greens use guilt. You can’t win people round by saying they are guilty for putting CO2 in the air.”

Mr. Lovelock, some have noticed it.

https://marbiesblog.wordpress.com/2009/11/16/a-shocker-installment-6/ The Gaia Ark of Hope, The Earth Charter inside the Ark (to mimic The Ten Commandments), Temenos Books (to be sacred like our Bible), Cosmos is our God

https://marbiesblog.wordpress.com/2009/10/30/a-shocker-installment-3/

If you read Lovelock’s past writings and statements, you might think he sounds a little spacey.  He was an important person at NASA.  Just mull over that for a minute.  We never pay attention to the kind of people who lead our world. BUT WE SHOULD.

The Kyoto Treaty?  Kill it. Get out of all treaties, legislation and programs born out of the global warming/climate change hoax. Get back to basics, back to normal and relieve the people of the world from burdensome expenses and regulations that adversely affect their lives.

PASS IT ON. THE TRUTH SHALL SET US FREE  (from tyrannical governments, world governments, and slavery to regulations based on falsehoods and pagan religion.)

Advertisements
Read Full Post | Make a Comment ( None so far )

Polar Bear Fraud in Global Warming Hoax – SHOCKER Series

Posted on July 31, 2011. Filed under: Al Gore, ALERT!, bioscience, Cap and Trade, Clinton, Constitution, Democrats, Energy, environmentalism, environmentalists, Freedom, global governance, Global Warming/Cimate Change, globalization, junk science, Liberty, Marxism, News Media, Obama, planet, politics, science, SHOCKER, Socialism, sustainability, sustainable, Taxes, U.S. Government, United Nations | Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |

http://nation.foxnews.com/global-warming/2011/07/29/global-warming-industry-rocked-polar-bear-fraud

http://newsbusters.org/node/11879

Read the articles above.  Another global warming/climate change fraud has been exposed and the perpetrator suspended from his job.  CHARLES MONNETT, wildlife biologist, told America that the polar bears were drowning because the ice caps were melting and they were losing an important part of their habitat, fueling the global warming hysteria. Monnett is being investigated for misconduct stemming from integrity issues. Of course, global-warming advocates are soft-peddling that and trying to put lipstick on a p…olar bear.

 The truth is coming out now and global warming is NOT melting the ice caps drowning polar bears.

Any Google search of polar bears will yield  dozens of articles linking global warming/climate change to the death, and even the soon extinction of, polar bears.  School children are being brain-washed to believe that those cute cuddly baby bears, all purest white with big beautiful eyes, are being killed by big bad heartless business owners making obscene profits.  The next generation may well be anti-business to their own detriment because their heart strings are hopelessly tied to baby bears in the Artic where life is anything but heaven on earth.  It’s a harsh cruel environment of below zero temperatures where those darling bears swim long distances, ice caps or not, eat the poor fishies trying to live there and die of other causes.

Mountains of regulations have robbed us of our freedom.  The United Nations, the U.S. government, the EPA have usurped powers not given them under America’s Constitution in the name of stopping non-existent anthropogenic global warming.  The cost of living has risen and will keep rising due to these regulations, including the law that prohibits the old cheap incandescent light bulbs and forcing everyone to buy very expensive mercury-filled CFL bulbs.  It amounts to wealth re-distributuion again, a key plank in the agenda of Socialists.

DON’T TOLERATE ANY MORE OF THIS FRAUD, WEALTH REDISTRIBUTION AND LOSS OF FREEDOM. DON’T VOTE FOR ANYONE WHO ESPOUSES THIS CRIME ON HUMANITY AND THE ECONOMY.  DEMAND THIS BE STOPPED AND CRIMINAL CHARGES BE FILED ON THOSE PUSHING THIS LIE. MOST ARE DOING IT FOR THEIR OWN ENRICHMENT.

Read Full Post | Make a Comment ( None so far )

Discovery Channel’s Disturbed Environmentalist/Ted Turner/Al Gore/Daniel Quinn

Posted on September 1, 2010. Filed under: Al Gore, ALERT!, Cap and Trade, Clinton, Democrats, Energy, environmentalism, environmentalists, evolution, Gaia, Gaia hypothesis, Gaia matrix, global governance, Global Warming/Cimate Change, goddess, Greek mythology, Hillary, junk science, Mother Earth, News Media, Obama, planet, Political, science, sustainability, sustainable, U.S. Government, United Nations | Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , |

Marbie’s Blog has covered the Global Warming/Climate Change/Environmentalism/Sustainability/World Control/Pagan Gaia Religion movement and it’s tenants and leaders and participants.  One of which was Ted Turner of Turner Broadcasting Network.   Read the original post at:  https://marbiesblog.wordpress.com/2009/10/30/a-shocker-installment-3/ Ted Turner, multibillionaire and founder of CNN. Turner is deeply involved in the Global Green Agenda. He donated more than a billion dollars to the UN which was specifically tagged to fund the IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change)

Turner personally conceived and produced ‘Captain Planet’ an edu-tainment cartoon designed to brainwash our children. 

  Gaia, the spirit of Earth, awakens from a century long sleep to find the Earth in peril. She summons five teenagers, the Planeteers, from around the globe, and gives each of them a ring which controls an element of nature – Earth, Fire, Wind, Water – and a special power, Heart, which allows them to use their new powers wisely and compassionately.” – http://www.turner.com/planet/mythology/index.html 

  Today, James Jay Lee took hostages inside the office building of the Discovery Channel, a network which routinely airs global warming/climate change propaganda.  He made the following demands:  

 Discovery Channel “MUST have daily television programs at prime time slots BASED ON DANIEL QUINN’S “MY ISHMAEL” PAGES 207-212 where solutions to save the planet would be done…”  Promote Malthus-Darwin beliefs. 

  Focus must be given on how people can live WITHOUT GIVING BIRTH TO MORE FILTHY HUMAN CHILDREN since those new additions continue pollution and are pollution. 

  Must stop broadcasting programs that encourage the birth of human babies…and broadcast programs that encourage human sterilization and infertility. 

  Stop promoting war and war technology. 

  Expose the filth of civilization, its disgusting religious-cultural roots and greed. 

  Promote the cessation of immigration to the U.S. and anchor babies. 

  Find solutions for global warming, pollution, breeding, international trade and the whole blasted human economy. 

  REVERSE GLOBAL WARMING AND THE DESTRUCTION OF THE PLANET! 

http://tmz.vo.llnwd.net/o28/newsdesk/tmz_documents/0901_demands.pdf 

 “Lee [also] said at the time that he experienced an ‘‘awakening” when he watched former Vice President Al Gore’s environmental documentary ‘‘An Inconvenient Truth.” 

By his own words, the gunman told us that he was driven to do this by Al Gore’s error-ridden scare film, “An Inconvenient Truth”, and Daniel Quinn’s, “My Ishmael”, about the peril of the planet.  We’re very familiar with Gore’s piece of work and his claims that the world will be destroyed in ten years (we’re down to 5 years, 4 months and 25 days since Gore pronounced our doom in 2006.  You can see the doomsday clock on http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/home/today.guest.html down near the bottom of the page.) 

 
But what do we know about the book, My Ishmael, by Daniel Quinn?  TURNS out, it won an award from TED TURNER’S “TURNER TOMORROW FELLOWSHIP AWARD”, “created in 1989 by Ted Turner, to be awarded to an unpublished work of fiction offering creative and positive solutions to global problems.  In addition to a $500,000 award, the fellowship included a hardcover publishing contract with Turner Broadcasting’s publishing unit and $50,000 to market the book and a film option.”  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Turner_Tomorrow_Fellowship_Award
Ted Turner encouraged the work, awarded the work with $500,000., a hard-cover publishing contract with his own company and a film option, to increase the opportunities to brainwash people with these cock-eyed notions.  But what solutions did this book offer that Turner found so important that he must get it out to the world?
  
Not having time to have read the book in total today, I’ll put forth the reviews by editors and readers.  The book was written to encourage people to “think” about how humans affect the planet through consumption.  Two views are contrasted:  Leavers and Takers,  cultures who  believe that humanity belongs to the planet and cultures who believe that the planet belongs to humans.  Population, balance, consumption, extinction, sustainability, are all under the microscope.   The author, Daniel Quinn, is interested in over-population of the earth and food supplies.
  
 Given Ted Turner’s involvement in the sustainability/global warming/climate change/environmental movement, his creation of “Captain Planet” with Gaia awakening, I believe he chose “Ishmael” to win the award despite its lack of a plot and less than artful writing because it fit well into his agenda. 
  
Apparently, Lee read Ishmael and drew the conclusion that humans are the scourge of the earth, and coupled it with Al Gore’s proposition that humans are causing global warming and destroying the planet.   Al Gore, in particular, is responsible for convincing Mr. Lee that time is quickly running out and we MUST do something to save the planet.  Ishmael made him sink into deep thought with the suggestions posed by the author buried deep underneath his processes.  Gore poured on the fuel to light the fire that resulted in today’s tragedy.
  

 

Lee took these messages to heart.  He believed them.  Once he believed the premise and the dire situation and coupled it with Al Gore’s “deadline” for destruction, his emotional makeup led him to think he had no choice but to act – to try to make someone do something to stop what he saw as madness and save the planet.   Lee is responsible for his behavior.  He is the criminal, but is it  right to say that Gore and Quinn and all the other fear mongers have NO responsibility for creating this man’s belief’s which pushed him to take this action?  Doesn’t Ted Turner bear some responsibility for publishing this book and making huge efforts to brainwash the youth of America with this global warming destruction mindset?  Didn’t he create Captain Planet to make sure the kids hear and believe this philosophy?  Why should any of them be exempt from the consequences of the harm produced by the people they convinced? 
 
I think they should be exposed and reap the disdain of the people.  It’s one thing to propose a theory and quite another to fuel fires of anger and fear that lead to someone taking dangerous actions, especially when the data has been tampered with to force their desired outcome and the facts don’t back up the theory.  All of the main players in the global warming/climate change  movement are in it for the money and they know the  data is skewed to fit their needs.  They’ve successfully stirred up the public until the emotionally unstable go off the deep end believing they MUST do something now.  They’ve successfully convinced some that the situation is dire and drastic actions must be immediately undertaken.  All for money – millions and billions – for the players in the scheme.
Read Full Post | Make a Comment ( 2 so far )

JOIN THE FIGHT! No Cap and Trade (Tax)

Posted on June 16, 2010. Filed under: 2010 election, Al Gore, ALERT!, Big Brother, Cap and Trade, Capitalism, Clinton, Constitution, Democrats, Energy, environmentalism, environmentalists, Freedom, Gaia, Gaia hypothesis, Gaia matrix, global governance, Global Warming/Cimate Change, globalization, goddess, Hillary, idol, junk science, Liberty, Marxism, Maurice Strong, Mikhail Gorbachav, Mother Earth, News Media, Obama, planet, politics, SEIU, Socialism, sustainability, sustainable, Taxes, U.S. Government, United Nations | Tags: , , , , , , , |

I’m aggravated every time I hear someone, usually a politician, say that we’re addicted to oil. That’s ridiculous and meant to shame us into CHANGE.  However, I can’t change how every product in life is made, how every company operates, and how everyone gets to work. No one is “addicted to oil.” Oil is basic to our productivity, like wood and stone and metals. No one says we’re addicted to wood!

People must learn to “think” about what is said by politicians and then parroted endlessly by the talking heads on the news and talk shows.  Nothing is true just because it’s repeated a million times.  Some things sound good until you really think about them.

Are Americans addicted to water? It’s also a natural resource and its been said that we are running out.  Are we addicted to wood?  Environmentalists have said the same thing about our forests.  “They will all be gone someday.”

Aren’t you tired of being controlled by a bunch of “Chicken Littles”?  Their sky is always falling.  But the truth is, IT’S NOT!  Our Earth constantly renews itself.  There are earthly mechanisms at work that we never think about or even notice.   The water we see today is ancient.  It’s always been here.  The lakes, oceans, rivers, ponds, all waterways, evaporate into the sky where it condenses and rains back down again all over the Earth.  The rain soaks into the ground, where it’s filtered through layers of earth and rocks.  At some point a well is drilled, it’s pumped up or it bubbles up to the surface and the process starts all over again.  The water we use also goes back into the ground and through the Earth’s filtering system. 

Think about the forests.  Sure, companies cut down trees, but they also plant new ones elsewhere.  They don’t want to run out of trees.  That would put them out of business.  Trees grow where the wind, birds and animals have dropped acorns.  Stone is quarried for our use, but it never leaves the earth.  It is used and reused many times.  Even if it ends up in a land fill, that stone goes back down into the Earth.  Someday, it can be used again or not.  Either way, it’s still here.

We do need to be good stewards of our planet.  Notice I’m not calling it “Mother Earth”.  I don’t believe in that.  Earth hands us volcanoes, tsunamis, earthquakes, forest fires, blizzards, droughts, floods, hurricanes and tornadoes.  Not exactly the characteristics of a mother.  The Gaians who worship the idol, “Mother Earth”, paint pictures of a sweet-faced woman nursing her young.  That symbolizes a passive benign planet that allows us to use  her natural resources.  At the same time, they scream, yell, protest against that very use of Earth’s natural resources, treating them as sacred.  You can see the lunacy of that.

Let’s really think about what the politicians and environmentalists are saying and use common season and logical reasoning.  Sometimes we blindly follow to our own demise.  Apply this to the current global warming/climate change/energy initiative legislation the president is determined to pass.  It is actually designed to glean all the money it can from the citizens around the world and deposit it in the bank accounts of the already rich, elites who have set up companies and organizations for that purpose.  They are working to convince the rest of us that they are smarter than we are and that they know what is best for all of us.  While their right hand distracts you with PR, their left hand sets up systems to funnel that money into their own enterprises.

PLEASE read this article:  http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/politics/Once-a-government-pet-BP-now-a-capitalist-tool-95942659.html

Now PLEASE watch this video and notice the facts that  you can easily verify (and please do).

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U_oh6jbuydo&feature=related

After you watch this, you really need to go to YouTube and search for Glenn Beck + Crime, Inc. and watch all videos.  Beck couldn’t put all the info into one show.  There are several.  Everything is backed up and easy for YOU to verify as the truth.  Don’t make the mistake of discrediting the information just because you’ve heard people (always on the left) ridicule Beck.  They are trying to destroy him because he is destroying their “big money” plans.  You can go to www.glennbeck.com and type “Crime, Inc.” into his search box.  You can watch all of his presentations on the criminal ring using climate change to make gazillions of dollars for themselves at YOUR expense.  Go all the way.  After watching these, do your own research.  Google these people. 

Marbie’s Blog presented some of this in 2008 and again in 2009, before Beck put anything about it on his television show.  It’s out there, if you want to find it.  Go to the home page, https://marbiesblog.wordpress.com/, and type “A SHOCKER” into Marbie’s Blog search box.  There is a series of sixteen posts exposing a lot of this scheme and the main players.  There are other updates and related posts by different titles.  Type the terms “global warming”, “climate change” into the search box for those.

I hope you will educate yourself and others in order to protect your earnings, your property, your freedom and your way of life.  If you choose not to, you will become a sheep, headed for the slaughter.  Join the fight to stop this!

JOIN THE FIGHT!

BTW, do you really think Obama didn’t already know the Chairman of BP?  Read this:

http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/politics/Once-a-government-pet-BP-now-a-capitalist-tool-95942659.html

Obama and BP were part of the plan from the beginning.  Now Obama is using the BP oil spill to push Cap and Trade (Tax).  Both will profit HUGELY!

Read Full Post | Make a Comment ( None so far )

A SHOCKER! – Installment 11

Posted on April 27, 2010. Filed under: Al Gore, Cap and Trade, Capitalism, Communism, Constitution, Copenhagen, Democrats, Dictator, Energy, environmentalism, environmentalists, Freedom, Gaia, Gaia hypothesis, global governance, Global Warming/Cimate Change, globalization, junk science, Liberty, Marxism, Maurice Strong, Mother Earth, planet, Political, politics, science, Socialism, sovereignty, sustainability, sustainable, U.S. Government, United Nations | Tags: , |

SHOCKER! – Installment 11 – May 31, 2008

A Re-post.  

Quantcast 
MAURICE STRONG

   

Image by Jakub Kuzma 

“A major development to spur Washington in that direction (passing S.2191 Carbon Credit Trading Bill) would be the launching of a carbon credit exchange soon in Beijing, China. From Marbie’s Blog, A Shocker! Installment 10, May 30, 2008   

It’s  not a coincidence that Al Gore based Generation Investment Management in London where the largest carbon credit trading exchange is located. And it’s not a coincidence that Maurice Strong has moved to Beijing, China where another lucrative carbon credit trading exchange will be launched soon.   

Remember Maurice Strong?  Founder and Secretary General of the United Nations Environment Program and Senior Advisor to Koffi Annan. Founder of the Earth Council and the Earth Charter Initiative, and former President of the United Nations University for Peace.

While he chaired the Rio Earth Summit, outside, his wife Hanne and 300 followers called the Wisdom-Keepers, continuously beat drums, chanted prayers to Gaia, and tended sacred flames in order to ” establish and hold the energy field” for the duration of the summit. He founded the Manitou Institute where various Hindu, Bhuddist, and New Age groups perform rituals to heal Gaia. The Institute’s Mission is ” to perpetuate the ancient tradition of peoples of many tribes journeying here for a sacred connection to the Earth “. Very Gaian!! From Marbie’s Blog Installment 3 – May 16, 2008 

Strong, age 78, a Canadian socialist multi-millionaire owns a 63,000 acre ranch on the edge of the mountains in southern Colorado and another large ranch in Costa Rica. Strong currently spends 80% of his time in Beijing, according to his statement in the Beijing Review, China’s national English weekly, March 14, 2008. No doubt he buys carbon offsets to neutralize his fuel usage to travel between his land holdings and his apartment in Beijing(?) Strong is working on the Korea issue at the recently established Institute for Security and Sustainability (Gore’s Global Warming Agenda) in Northeast Asia at Peking University.   

” “What I see today is a tendency among some industrialized countries, notably the US, to shift the onus on China, India and other developing countries to divert attention from their own commitment,” he said in his address to the China Foreign Affairs University Forum.  “I predict there’s going to be tremendous additional pressure on China, and some of them will be unfair,” he said, because the per capita carbon footprint of China is very low.

“No country can do it (solve the problem) alone. China is right to expect that the US, Canada and other countries that created the problem in the first place should take the lead in helping resolve it,” Strong said in Beijing, March 13, 2008  
Couple the fact that Strong is living in Beijing, China working on the Korea issue and environmental programs in China, with the following report from the Free Republic, “Maurice Strong Steps Aside from UN Post”, April 21, 2005, Alan Freeman and Paul Waldie    

Washington and Toronto – Canadian Maurice Strong agreed to step aside Wednesday as a special envoy for the United Nations, but vowed to clear his name after being linked to Tongsun Park, a Korean lobbyist in connection with the Iraq “Oil for Food” scandal. Mr. Park, who formerly worked for the South Korean intelligence service, was a major figure in a 1970s influence-peddling scandal in Washington. http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1388471/   

The following are excerpts from a report by Fox News and I recommend reading the entire article at http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,250789,00.html by Claudia Rosett and George Russell, Feb. 8, 2007 “At the United Nations, the Curious Career of Maurice Strong, Fox   

“Without ever holding elected office, he has had a hand in some of the world’s most important bureaucratic appointments, both at the U.N. and at the World Bank. Strong has parlayed his personal enthusiasms and connections into a variety of huge U.N. projects, while punctuating his public service with private business deals. Along the way, Strong has also been caught up in a series of U.N. scandals and conflicts of interest. These extend from the notorious Oil-for-Food (Iraq) program to the latest furor over cash funneled via U.N. agencies to the rogue regime of North Korea, which involves, among other things, Strong’s creative use of a little-known, U.N.-chartered educational institution called the University for Peace. Above all, the tale of Maurice Strong illustrates the way in which the U.N., with its bureaucratic culture of secrecy, its diplomatic immunities, and its global reach, lends itself to manipulation by a small circle of those who best know its back corridors. 

 

China is a special place for Strong, a self-declared, life-long socialist. It is the burial place of a woman said to be one of his relatives, the famous pro-communist American journalist Anna Louise Strong, a vociferous supporter of Lenin and Stalin until the mid-30s, and a strong booster of Mao Zedong’s China. Maurice Strong’s presence in Beijing, however, raises awkward questions: For one thing, China, while one of the world’s biggest producers of industrial pollution, has been profiting from the trading of carbon emissions credits, thanks to heavily politicized U.N.-backed environmental deals engineered by Strong in the 1990sAnd from China, Strong has to this day maintained a network of personal and official connections within the U.N. system that he has long used to spin his own vast web of non-governmental organizations, business associates and ties to global glitterati. Within that web, Strong has developed a distinctive pattern over the years of helping to set up taxpayer-funded public bureaucracies, both outside and within the U.N., which he then taps for funding and contacts when he moves on to other projects.

Styling himself as a guru of global governance, Strong also helped to launch a major campaign for the U.N. to entwine its murky and graft-prone bureaucracy with big business, via so-called public-private partnerships. Strong introduced this process in his 1997 reform proposal as the bland notion of consultation between the United Nations and the business community.   End of Fox Article Excerpts 
The Maurice Strong web is a tangled one, including U.N. Secretary Generals, Boutros Boutros-Ghali, Koffi Annan, and now South Korean, Ban Ki-moon. Strong has used his many positions within the U.N. and his influence (read that money-making schemes) to place his own hand-picked people in lucrative and accommodating positions within the U.N. For all practical purposes, he hasn’t really left the U.N., merely moved to Beijing, where he operates out of the reach of the U.S. government and its laws.   

He also operates out of Costa Rica, but a discussion of that would make this article far too lengthy. Maybe another day. Fox News has covered that subject at the web site referenced above   

The obvious lesson to be learned is that Maurice Strong is both a worshiper of Gaia AND a founder of today’s “global warming” scheme. Strong’s multi-decade track record is one of making money by the millions by hook and crook using the United Nations, public-private partnerships, governments of foreign countries, people and connections made through the U.N. and the unwitting American taxpayer.   

There is no more time to do nothing.  

 

Read Full Post | Make a Comment ( None so far )

A SHOCKER! – Installment 9 Global Warming/Climate Change

Posted on February 5, 2010. Filed under: Al Gore, atmosphere, bioscience, Cap and Trade, Clinton, Copenhagen, Democrats, Dictator, environmentalism, environmentalists, Gaia, Gaia hypothesis, Gaia matrix, global governance, Global Warming/Cimate Change, globalization, goddess, Greek mythology, junk science, Liberty, News Media, planet, Political, politics, science, sovereignty, sustainability, sustainable, U.S. Government, Uncategorized, uniformitarianism, United Nations | Tags: , , |

A SHOCKER! – Installment 9 – May 29, 2008  Re-Post

In 1991, Al Gore wrote his book, Earth in the Balance, in which he cites his mentor and former professor, the late Dr. Roger Revelle, a renowned oceanographer and the first to recognize the effects of rising atmospheric CO2 on the earth’s temperature. Gore’s book called for awareness of carbon dioxide emissions into the air and its effects, and drastic changes in society to combat the perceived problem. The book was published in 1992. Gore spoke before Congress and the U.N. expressing his position that the end was only ten years away and measures must be implemented immediately. Gore put his reputation on the line with his global warming alarmist messages.

About the same time that Gore was writing his book, Prof. Revelle was writing a paper for the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) on greenhouse warming with co-authors Dr. Chauncy Star and Dr. S. Fred Singer, which was later presented to the Cosmos Club of Washington, D.C. and published in their monthly journal. According to Dr. Singer, the conclusion was a simple message: “The scientific base for greenhouse warming is too uncertain to justify drastic action at this time.” These words were almost identical to those written by Dr. Revelle to members of Congress after their hearing on global warming in 1988, which was instigated and chaired by Senator Al Gore.

It is noted that then Sen. Timothy Wirth (D., CO) ignored Revelle’s scientific opinion and joined with Gore in escalating the alarm over Earth’s warming climate. On a PBS “Frontline” special, “Hot Politics”, he explained Gore’s ploy, with Wirth’s help, to set the stage for the hearing. They called the weather station and asked what the hottest day of the year was. When they were told that historically it was June the 6th (or the 9th – Wirth didn’t remember), they scheduled the hearing for that day in June, which turned out to be the hottest day on record for Washington, D.C. Wirth tells that the night before the hearing, they went into the chambers and opened all the windows so that the air conditioners wouldn’t work. It was a set up. During the hearing, people were wiping sweat off their brows. Gore, of course, pushed for immediate legislation to restrict activities that produced CO2 and caused a greenhouse effect. http://planetgore.nationalreview.com/post/?q=MDk2YjVlYTYzZjZkNTRhZWU2NGNkNzcw…=

Revelle’s paper in the Cosmos didn’t get much attention right away. It was a year later, when journalist Gregg Easterbrook, contributing editor to Newsweek, referred to it in a piece entitled “Green Cassandras” in the July 6, 1992 issue of the New Republic, and gave it a political slant. He made the allegation that Gore credited Revelle with introducing him to the problem of climate change, but failed to mention that before his death a year earlier, Revelle had published a paper that concluded that “the scientific base for greenhouse warming is too uncertain to justify drastic action at this time. There is little risk in delaying policy responses.”

Other columnists and editors, including George Will, picked up on this and the contradiction got traction. Just as this embarrassment for Gore was breaking out, he was selected by Bill Clinton to be his running mate in the presidential election of 1992. Gore couldn’t afford the negative press and the controversy, which came up in a vice-presidential debate. Sen. Gore deflected it, charging that Dr. Revelle’s views had been “taken completely out of context.”

In July of 1992, Dr. S. Fred Singer received a phone call from Dr. Justin Lancaster at the Environmental Science and Policy Institute, Harvard University, claiming to be a former associate of Dr. Revelle’s. Lancaster demanded that Singer remove Revelle’s name from the article to be reprinted in the Geyer volume. Aghast at the demand, Singer refused, saying that he could not do that without the author’s permission and the author had died. Also that the copyright belonged to Cosmos.

Lancaster then waged a smear and pressure campaign on Singer to the extent that Singer filed a law suit against him and won! Lancaster took opportunities to say that Dr. Revelle had not really co-authored the piece, then Revelle’s mental capacities were failing at the time. There was evidence to disprove all of the smear tactics engaged in by Lancaster, a fact which he admitted in a legal statement after losing the court battle. During the trial, it was revealed that Al Gore had called Lancaster after Easterbrook’s article came out and asked about Revelle’s mental capabilities and views at the time this paper was written. Lancaster had replied in a letter that Revelle was sharp and these were his stated views.

A member of Gore’s staff, Dr. Anthony D. Socci, tried the same tactics, writing to the Geyer publishers requesting that the Cosmos article be dropped. The “request” was denied. Sadly, Gore was not satisfied with the outcome of Lancaster or Socci’s attempt to squash the inconvenient truth.

http://media.hoover.org/documents/0817939326_283.pdf (direct quote with some abbreviations)

On February 24, 1994, Ted Koppel revealed on his Nightline television program that Vice-President Al Gore had called him and suggested that Mr. Koppel investigate the political and economic forces behind the “anti-environmental” movement. In particular, VP Gore had urged Koppel to expose as fact that several U.S. scientists who had voiced skeptical views about greenhouse warming were receiving financial support from the coal industry and/or groups such as the Lyndon Larouche organizations or Reverend Moon’s Unification Church.

Mr. Koppel didn’t do the VP’s bidding and asked rhetorically, “Is this a case of industry supporting scientists who happen to hold sympathetic views, or scientists adapting their views to accommodate industry?” He closed the show by chastising Gore for trying to use the media to discredit skeptical scientists:

“There is some irony in the fact that Vice-President Gore – one of the most scientifically literate men to sit in the White House in this century – {is} resorting to political means to achieve what should ultimately be resolved on a purely scientific basis. The measure of good science is neither the politics of the scientist nor the people with whom the scientist associates. It is the immersion of hypotheses into the acid of truth. That’s the hard way to do it, but it’s the only way that works.” Ted Koppel

There is no more time to do nothing.

Read Full Post | Make a Comment ( 9 so far )

A SHOCKER! – Installment 8 Global Warming/Climate Change

Posted on February 3, 2010. Filed under: Al Gore, atmosphere, bioscience, Cap and Trade, Copenhagen, Darwin, Dawkins, Democrats, Energy, environmentalism, environmentalists, evolution, Freedom, Gaia, Gaia hypothesis, Gaia matrix, global governance, Global Warming/Cimate Change, globalization, goddess, Greek mythology, idol, James Lovelock, junk science, Liberty, Marguli, Maurice Strong, Mikhail Gorbachav, Mother Earth, News Media, Obama, pantheism, planet, Political, politics, science, sovereignty, sustainability, sustainable, U.S. Government, uniformitarianism, United Nations | Tags: , , |

A SHOCKER! – Installment 8 – May 27, 2008 Re-Post

Not every scientist is part of Al Gore’s mythical consensus. Scientists worried about a new ice age seek funding to better observe something bigger than your SUV – THE SUN!” http://www.ibdeditorials.com/IBDArticles.aspx?id=287279412587175, Investor’s Business Daily, Editorial, February 7, 2008

The Danish Meteorological Institute released a study, using data that covered centuries, showing that global temperatures closely tracked Solar cycles. This was in 1991 just about the time Al Gore was beginning to get the word out that the earth was going to burn up from gas emissions produced by man. He had created a slideshow in 1988 about the atmosphere and used it to teach on the subject. It was this slideshow that was the basis for An Inconvenient (and inaccurate) Truth (falsehood).

There was convincing data then, and Canadian scientists want more funding to study global cooling NOW. The Sun impacts Earth’s climate more than anything else. Elementary schools teach kids that our seasons are the result of our closeness to or distance from the Sun. In the past, we’ve been warned of solar storms affecting us with power blackouts, satellite failures and even pipeline explosions.

Gore and the Gaia worshipers pound everyone into submission by stating that “scientists agree” and that it is” scientifically proven”. They use the words “science, scientists, evidence and proven” as incontrovertible. What they don’t say is how many scientists disagree with Gore and have science that disproves the Gore truth. Al Gaia Gore never mentions all the evidence to the contrary. The following website presents a great deal of evidence and studies that cover centuries of data proving that solar activity changes Earth’s climate in cycles. An eleven year cycle is one of the main topics discussed, and yes, by scientists with very respected credentials. It also explains the ozone layer and the holes environmentalists claim are caused by gas emissions and blame for global warming.

http://www.solarstorms.org/SClimate.html

“The most well-documented connection between solar activity and climate change is the Maunder Minimum. This was a 40-year period when extreme cold weather prevailed in Europe. It also coincided with astronomers watching the sun and not seeing many sunspots! Astronomer Jack Eddy pointed this out in the 1970’s, and since then many other sun-climate connections have been looked for and in some cases uncovered.

The sunspot cycle and Boston Weather…. This study by Dave Henry at NOAA is based on 207 years of daily temperature data from Boston. It shows a 0.8 F drop in the average annual temperature near sunspot maximum, a 3-inch difference in the annual average precipitation near sunspot maximum, and a 7-inch increase in annual average snowfall at sunspot maximum.

The sunspot cycle and Annual Precipitation in Beijing.This article by Juan Zhao and his colleagues at Beijing Normal University was published in the Chinese Journal of Astronomy and Astrophysics (2004, vol 4 pg 189) and is based on rainfall records from 1870 to 2002. Their wavelet analysis of the rainfall data identifies four periods of 11, 22, 33 and 72 years. The wavelet analysis of the sunspot data for the same period reveals periods of 11, 22, 33 and 78 years.

The sunspot cycle and Extreme Weather over Portugal…. This 2005 study by P.S. Lucio at the Center for Geophysics in Evorea was published in the Geophysical Research Abstracts (vol. 7 p. 129) and is based on cosmic ray and rainfall data from 1901-2000. A statistically significant correlation was found between rainfall and temperature extremes, and cosmic ray fluxes beginning in 1980.

The sunspot cycle and the Global StratosphereThis study by H. van Loon and K. Labitzke at the National Center for Atmospheric Research (NOAA) shows that the heights and temperatures of the lower stratosphere vary in step with the sunspot cycle. It was published in the Journal of Atmospheric and Solar-Terrestrial Research (1999, vol. 61 pg. 53) and is an extension of a Northern Hemisphere study that they completed in 1997. The correlation between the sunspot cycle and the zonally averaged temperatures are highest between the tropopause and the 25-km level of the ozone layer.”

The amount of UV from the sun ( specifically UV-B) changes during the sunspot cycle. At sunspot maximum, there is 0.1 % more UV-B radiation than at minimum. Scientists have detected this sunspot cycle-effect in a 2% change in ozone concentrations. For more details see ” Solar Cycle Variability, Ozone, and Climate” by Drew Shindell, David Rind, Nambeth Balachandran, Judith Lean, and Patrick Lonergan in journal Science 1999 284: 305-308.

The difference in total ozone between maximum and minimum conditions during the sunspot cycle were estimated using yearly averages of total ozone. For solar cycle 21, 1.16% and 1.26% for solar cycle 22, a larger difference of 3.8% and 4.1% were found. The corresponding variation in UV-B at 3000 Angstroms, using Beer’s law, is 4-10% with maxima occurring during the minimum of the solar cycle. E. Escher, V. Kirchoff, Y. Sahai and N. Paes Leme published in the Advances in Space Research, Volume 27, Issue 12, p. 1983-1986.

The correlations between the total column ozone observed by TOMS and the 11-yr sunspot cycle are lowest in the equatorial region, where ozone is produced, and in the subpolar regions, where the largest amounts are found. In the annual mean the highest, statistically significant, correlations lie between the 5° and 30° parallels of latitude in either hemisphere — between the area of production and the areas of plenty. This position of the largest correlations suggests that the association between the Sun and the ozone is not a direct, radiative one, but that it is due to solar induced changes in the transport of ozone, that is, to changes in the atmospheric circulation. The highest tropical-subtropical correlations move with the Sun from summer hemisphere to summer hemisphere. The subtropical geopotential heights in the ozone layer are higher in the peaks than in the valleys of the 11-yr sunspot cycle. It is probable that the higher subtropical geopotentials in solar maxima depress the poleward transport of ozone through the subtropics and therefore create an abundance of ozone in the tropics relative to the solar minima. These results are based on a 15-yr series of ozone observations and may thus not necessarily be representative of a longer period. “ K. Labitzke and H. van Loon published in the Journal of Atmospheric and Solar-Terrestrial Physics V. 59, p. 9-19, 1997

Cosmic rays stream down into Earth’s atmosphere from the sun and elsewhere beyond the solar system. Recent studies show that these particles penetrate into the troposphere and alter the way that droplets condense to form clouds, rain and snow with important weather and climate consequences. Changes in the sun’s ultraviolet light affects the ozone layer and the energy input into the upper atmosphere. As the upper atmosphere is heated, it expands into space causing increased friction for satellites. 

There is enough opposing science to bring Gore’s hypothesis into question. It is far too soon in this debate to pass laws changing a free people’s way of life and bringing down the economies of developing nations, not to mention our own here in America.

There is no more time to do nothing.

Read Full Post | Make a Comment ( None so far )

CLIMATE-GATE EMAIL SCOUNDRELS WON’T BE PROSECUTED

Posted on January 29, 2010. Filed under: Al Gore, ALERT!, atmosphere, bioscience, Cap and Trade, Copenhagen, Darwin, Dawkins, Democrats, environmentalism, environmentalists, evolution, Freedom, Gaia, Gaia hypothesis, Gaia matrix, global governance, Global Warming/Cimate Change, globalization, goddess, Greek mythology, Hillary, idol, junk science, Liberty, Lindsey Graham, Marxism, Maurice Strong, McCain, Mikhail Gorbachav, Mother Earth, News Media, Obama, planet, Political, politics, science, SEIU, Socialism, sovereignty, sustainability, sustainable, U.S. Government, Uncategorized, uniformitarianism, United Nations | Tags: , , |

Phil Jones:

“The skeptics seem to be building up a head of steam here! … The IPCC comes in for a lot of stick. Leave it to you to delete as appropriate! Cheers Phil
PS I’m getting hassled by a couple of people to release the CRU station temperature data. Don’t any of you three tell anybody that the UK has a Freedom of Information Act !”

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1246661/New-scandal-Climate-Gate-scientists-accused-hiding-data-global-warming-sceptics.html

The scientists (and I use that term loosely) who hid climate data which refuted the “global warming” theory broke the law, expressly the Freedom of Information Act.  However, they will escape prosecution simply because the crime was committed more than six months ago.  The crime is part of a conspiracy which will cost citizens of the world billions of dollars and more importantly, their basic freedoms, to satisfy the requirements of climate change laws.  The crime of withholding critical information used as a basis for climate change legislation and propaganda truly has an adverse and damaging effect upon all of us.  It amounts to a swindle and, to some degree, enslavement.   This is no small matter and should not be overlooked.  Prosecution must take place and an example must be made of these biased scientists.

It’s important to show others who may be engaging in this practice that they too will be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law.  There’s too much at stake to let this continue.   They are lying to the governments of the world, providing false testimony, and benefiting monetarily by receiving research grants to continue what they know to be false.

Americans and citizens of those countries whose leaders are signing on to climate change legislation are victims of  a scheme designed to convey power and money to those who have positioned themselves advantageously.   The internet is a gold mine of information for those who are willing to  look for evidence of this charge.  A thorough investigation of the big players, their backgrounds and their business connections will shed light on the scheme. Do your own homework, familiarize yourself with the big players and contact your representatives in Washington, D.C. as well as locally.

THERE IS NO MORE TIME TO DO NOTHING!

Mick Kelly:

“Yeah, it wasn’t so much 1998 and all that that I was concerned about, used to dealing with that, but the possibility that we might be going through a longer – 10 year – period of relatively stable temperatures beyond what you might expect from La Nina etc. Speculation, but if I see this as a possibility then others might also. Anyway, I’ll maybe cut the last few points off the filtered curve before I give the talk again as that’s trending down as a result of the end effects and the recent cold-ish years.”

VISIT:

http://www.nocapandtrade.com/climategate/

FOR INFORMATION REGARDING THE SCIENTISTS INVOLVED, THEIR TITLES AND THE CONTENTS OF THE EMAILS.

 

Read Full Post | Make a Comment ( None so far )

A SHOCKER! – Installment 7 Global Warming/Climate Change

Posted on January 27, 2010. Filed under: Al Gore, atmosphere, bioscience, Cap and Trade, Copenhagen, Darwin, Darwin, Dawkins, environmentalism, environmentalists, evolution, Gaia, Gaia hypothesis, Gaia matrix, Global Warming/Cimate Change, globalization, goddess, Greek mythology, idol, James Lovelock, junk science, Liberty, Lynn margulis, Marguli, Mars, Marxism, Maurice Strong, Mikhail Gorbachav, Mother Earth, Obama, pantheism, planet, Political, politics, science, Socialism, sovereignty, sustainability, sustainable, U.S. Government, uniformitarianism, United Nations | Tags: , , |

A SHOCKER! – Installment 7 – May 25, 2008 A Re-Post

From the website: http://denisdutton.com/cooling_world.htm

Comments in red are mine.

Newsweek, The Cooling World, April 28, 1975

There are ominous signs that the Earth’s weather patterns have begun to change dramatically and that these changes may portend a drastic decline in food production – with serious political implications for just about every nation on Earth. The drop in food output could begin quite soon, perhaps only 10 years from now. The regions destined to feel its impact are the great wheat-producing lands of Canada and the U.S.S.R. in the North, along with a number of marginally self-sufficient tropical areas – parts of India, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Indochina and Indonesia – where the growing season is dependent upon the rains brought by the monsoon.

Where have we heard this before? in only 10 years. Al Gore says that we have only 10 years to save the planet, to avoid catastrophy, to save the oceans, to avoid passing the point of no return, to save our lives.

The terms used in the 1975 article are “ominous, dramatically, drastic, serious, every nation.” We’re hearing the same urgency in today’s warnings of global warming as was trumpeted in 1975 about global cooling.

The evidence in support of these predictions has now begun to accumulate so massively that meteorologists are hard-pressed to keep up with it. In England, farmers have seen their growing season decline by about two weeks since 1950, with a resultant overall loss in grain production estimated at up to 100,000 tons annually. During the same time, the average temperature around the equator has risen by a fraction of a degree – a fraction that in some areas can mean drought and desolation. Last April, in the most devastating outbreak of tornadoes ever recorded, 148 twisters killed more than 300 people and caused half a billion dollars’ worth of damage in 13 U.S. states.

Like Gore and his crowd today, the voices in ’75 claimed to have piles of evidence to prove their predictions. Yet, no calamaties befell Earth. No ice age. No cooling disasters occurred. Still using urgent words, such as “massively, drought, desolation, devastating.” Scientists were among the incorrect crowd, like today. The claim was made that a very small climate change caused death and destruction, and yet, it didn’t.

To scientists, these seemingly disparate incidents represent the advance signs of fundamental changes in the world’s weather. The central fact is that after three quarters of a century of extraordinarily mild conditions, the earth’s climate seems to be cooling down. Meteorologists disagree about the cause and extent of the cooling trend, as well as over its specific impact on local weather conditions. But they are almost unanimous in the view that the trend will reduce agricultural productivity for the rest of the century. If the climatic change is as profound as some of the pessimists fear, the resulting famines could be catastrophic. “A major climatic change would force economic and social adjustments on a worldwide scale,” warns a recent report by the National Academy of Sciences, “because the global patterns of food production and population that have evolved are implicitly dependent on the climate of the present century.”

The revered National Academy of Sciences was wrong. We know that now. They are wrong again about global warming.

A survey completed last year by Dr. Murray Mitchell of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration reveals a drop of half a degree in average ground temperatures in the Northern Hemisphere between 1945 and 1968. According to George Kukla of Columbia University, satellite photos indicated a sudden, large increase in Northern Hemisphere snow cover in the winter of 1971-72. And a study released last month by two NOAA scientists notes that the amount of sunshine reaching the ground in the continental U.S. diminished by 1.3% between 1964 and 1972.

To the layman, the relatively small changes in temperature and sunshine can be highly misleading. Reid Bryson of the University of Wisconsin points out that the Earth’s average temperature during the great Ice Ages was only about seven degrees lower than during its warmest eras – and that the present decline has taken the planet about a sixth of the way toward the Ice Age average. Others regard the cooling as a reversion to the “little ice age” conditions that brought bitter winters to much of Europe and northern America between 1600 and 1900 – years when the Thames used to freeze so solidly that Londoners roasted oxen on the ice and when iceboats sailed the Hudson River almost as far south as New York City.

Just what causes the onset of major and minor ice ages remains a mystery. “Our knowledge of the mechanisms of climatic change is at least as fragmentary as our data,” concedes the National Academy of Sciences report. “Not only are the basic scientific questions largely unanswered, but in many cases we do not yet know enough to pose the key questions.”

Meteorologists think that they can forecast the short-term results of the return to the norm of the last century. They begin by noting the slight drop in overall temperature that produces large numbers of pressure centers in the upper atmosphere. These break up the smooth flow of westerly winds over temperate areas. The stagnant air produced in this way causes an increase in extremes of local weather such as droughts, floods, extended dry spells, long freezes, delayed monsoons and even local temperature increases – all of which have a direct impact on food supplies.

“The world’s food-producing system,” warns Dr. James D. McQuigg of NOAA’s Center for Climatic and Environmental Assessment, “is much more sensitive to the weather variable than it was even five years ago.” Furthermore, the growth of world population and creation of new national boundaries make it impossible for starving peoples to migrate from their devastated fields, as they did during past famines.

Climatologists are pessimistic that political leaders will take any positive action to compensate for the climatic change, or even to allay its effects. They concede that some of the more spectacular solutions proposed, such as melting the Arctic ice cap by covering it with black soot or diverting arctic rivers, might create problems far greater than those they solve. But the scientists see few signs that government leaders anywhere are even prepared to take the simple measures of stockpiling food or of introducing the variables of climatic uncertainty into economic projections of future food supplies. The longer the planners delay, the more difficult they will find it to cope with climatic change once the results become grim reality.

PETER GWYNNE with bureau reports

Thank goodness the government was unwilling to take drastic actions to prevent global cooling. The harm they would have caused would have been unnecessary and difficult to recover from. Today, the governments of the world are already taking steps to “prevent global warming.” The harm they will do may take decades to recover from, if then.

Plans to change our sovereignty, national borders, business practices, individual freedoms, laws and enforcement, transportation, even our religious beliefs, are already being crafted and eased into our daily lives. Some truly scary ideas have been put on the table for altering Earth’s atmosphere to head off the perceived warming trend. If they are successful, climate change will occurr by the hands of people who don’t know what they’re doing.

There is no more time to do nothing!

Read Full Post | Make a Comment ( None so far )

A SHOCKER! Climate News Update

Posted on November 19, 2009. Filed under: 2010 election, Al Gore, atmosphere, bioscience, Cap and Trade, Communism, Constitution, Copenhagen, Darwin, Dawkins, Democrats, Dictator, Energy, environmentalism, environmentalists, evolution, Freedom, Freedom of Speech, Gaia, Gaia hypothesis, Gaia matrix, global governance, Global Warming/Cimate Change, globalization, goddess, Greek mythology, idol, James Lovelock, Jean Soderman, junk science, Liberty, Lynn margulis, Marguli, Mars, Marxism, Maurice Strong, Mikhail Gorbachav, Mother Earth, News Media, Obama, Obama's Associates & Appointees, pantheism, planet, Political, politics, science, SEIU, Socialism, sovereignty, sustainability, sustainable, U.S. Government, uniformitarianism, United Nations | Tags: , , |

http://www.spiegel.de/international/world/0,1518,662092,00.html

Climatologists Baffled by Global Warming Time-Out, By Gerald Traufetter

“Global warming appears to have stalled. Climatologists are puzzled as to why average global temperatures have stopped rising over the last 10 years. Some attribute the trend to a lack of sunspots, while others explain it through ocean currents.”

“Otherwise, however, not much is happening with global warming at the moment. The Earth’s average temperatures have stopped climbing since the beginning of the millennium, and it even looks as though global warming could come to a standstill this year.”

“Ironically, climate change appears to have stalled in the run-up to the upcoming world summit in the Danish capital, where thousands of politicians, bureaucrats, scientists, business leaders and environmental activists plan to negotiate a reduction in greenhouse gas emissions. Billions of euros are at stake in the negotiations.”

This is a very inconvenient truth for the Gore/Gaia/GE/Obama crowd who expect to become billionaires from forcing legislation on this.  The computer models were wrong.  Gore was wrong.  We didn’t die in ten years and we’re not going to die in the next ten years.  The sincere chicken littles were duped and don’t need to run for cover.

Yet, there are still those politicians who intend to force this down our throats and clean out our bank accounts, while they remove our freedoms ten at a time.  Do everything you can to stop this.  Contact your elected officials today.

Read Full Post | Make a Comment ( None so far )

« Previous Entries

Liked it here?
Why not try sites on the blogroll...