Rush Limbaugh

Motor Voter Law 1993, Clinton, Cloward, Piven, Alinsky, Obama, Economic COLLAPSE

Posted on February 22, 2013. Filed under: ACORN, Capitalism, Clinton, Communism, Constitution, Democrats, Dictator, Freedom, Health Care, Hillary, Illegal Aliens, immigration, Liberty, Marxism, Obama, politics, Rush Limbaugh, Socialism, sovereignty, Taxes, U.S. Government, Uncategorized | Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |

Obama Black PanthersObama teachingCloward Piven Clinton

Remember the “Motor Voter Law” passed by Democrats and signed into law by Bill Clinton Bet you didn’t know this:

“This voter registration movement was spearheaded by the husband and wife team of Frances Fox Piven and Richard Cloward in the early 1980s in response to the Reagan administration. Both of them college professors and liberal activists.” Both of them involved in Alinksy radicalism. Still at it today. Obama embraced Alinsky, Cloward and Piven beliefs.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Voter_Registration_Act_of_1993

What’s the implication of involvement of Cloward and Piven? This:
“First proposed in 1966 and named after Columbia University sociologists Richard Andrew Cloward and Frances Fox Piven, the Cloward-Piven Strategy seeks to hasten the fall of capitalism by overloading the government bureaucracy with a flood of impossible demands, thus pushing society into crisis and economic collapse. Obama attended Columbia U and is carrying this out right in front of us, brazenly destroying our economy. ”

Have you noticed that there is crisis after crisis after crisis, since Obama was first elected in 2008? Each one is said to be devastating if Congress doesn’t pass some big money bill to solve it? The results are trillions in debt, ailing economy, job losses, businesses closing. Capitalism is under attack. If it fails, what will replace it? Socialism, Marxism, Dictatorship, something less than our Constitutional republic?

“In their 1966 article, Cloward and Piven charged that the ruling classes used welfare to weaken the poor; that by providing a social safety net, the rich doused the fires of rebellion. Poor people can advance only when “the rest of society is afraid of them,” Cloward told The New York Times on September 27, 1970. Rather than placating the poor with government hand-outs, wrote Cloward and Piven, activists should work to sabotage and destroy the welfare system; the collapse of the welfare state would ignite a political and financial crisis that would rock the nation; poor people would rise in revolt; only then would “the rest of society” accept their demands.

The key to sparking this rebellion would be to expose the inadequacy of the welfare state. Cloward-Piven’s early promoters cited radical organizer Saul Alinsky as their inspiration. “Make the enemy live up to their (sic) own book of rules,” Alinsky wrote in his 1989 book Rules for Radicals. When pressed to honor every word of every law and statute, every Judeo-Christian moral tenet, and every implicit promise of the liberal social contract, human agencies inevitably fall short. The system’s failure to “live up” to its rule book can then be used to discredit it altogether, and to replace the capitalist “rule book” with a socialist one.”

“Cloward and Piven calculated that persuading even a fraction of potential welfare recipients to demand their entitlements would bankrupt the system. The result, they predicted, would be “a profound financial and political crisis” that would unleash ‘powerful forces for major economic reform at the national level’.”

“Their article called for “cadres of aggressive organizers” to use “demonstrations to create a climate of militancy.” Intimidated by threats of black violence, politicians would appeal to the federal government for help.

“This was an example of what are commonly called Trojan Horse movements — mass movements whose outward purpose seems to be providing material help to the downtrodden, but whose real objective is to draft poor people into service as revolutionary foot soldiers; to mobilize poor people en masse to overwhelm government agencies with a flood of demands beyond the capacity of those agencies to meet. The flood of demands was calculated to break the budget, jam the bureaucratic gears into gridlock, and bring the system crashing down.   Fear, turmoil, violence and economic collapse would accompany such a breakdown — providing perfect conditions for fostering radical change.

“Cloward and Piven recruited a militant black organizer named George Wiley to lead their new movement.”  Beginning to sound like what we’re watching today?

“Both Cloward and Piven attended the White House signing of the 1996 Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act as guests of President Clinton.

http://www.discoverthenetworks.org/Articles/theclowardpivenstrategypoe.html

“Both the Living Wage and Voting Rights movements depend heavily on financial support from George Soros‘s Open Society Institute and his Shadow Party.”

(Unlikely to improve on the writings in these two cited articles, I chose to post excerpts from them, adding only a little commentary here and there. I sincerely hope you go to these articles and read them in their entirety. It’s important that our elected officials and influential people like Rush Limbaugh, Mark Levin, Sean Hannity, and many others, be sent this information.  Send it to your state governors and elected officials, too, because they fight on the front lines to stop this onslaught.  They need to know and expose it before it’s too late.)

IT’S NOT A CONSPIRACY.  IT’S A FACT!

Read Full Post | Make a Comment ( 3 so far )

The Truth About Gov. Rick Perry

Posted on September 14, 2011. Filed under: Al Gore, amnesty, Big Brother, Cap and Trade, Capitalism, Christianity, Communism, Constitution, Democrats, Dictator, Energy, environmentalism, environmentalists, evolution, Freedom, Freedom of Speech, global governance, globalization, Guns, Hate Speech/Crime Bill, Health Care, Illegal Aliens, immigration, Islam, junk science, Liberty, Marxism, Muslims, News Media, Obama, Political, politics, Rush Limbaugh, SEIU, Socialism, sovereignty, Taxes, terrorism, U.S. Government, Uncategorized | Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |

Decision making in the 2012 election MUST BE MADE ON FACTS NOT RUMORS.  Don’t be led around like sheep. Don’t fall prey to the rumor mill. Be educated. Know the facts. Find reputable trustworthy sources, which eliminates MSNBC, Salon.com, Huffington Post, The Daily Kos, SEIU publications and Jane Doe’s little blog.  Marbie’s Blog always looks for sources that are credible and recognized as trustworthy with a good track record on accuracy and most importantly provides their sources for the information they publish. 

As the front-runner  in the GOP primary for the 2012 presidential election, Gov. Rick Perry of Texas is taking a real beating. The other candidates who are far below him in the polls have to knock him off to move up because, apparently, their message has been unable to propel them to the top.  Mitt Romney has to attack him, as well, because he took first place, which Romney used to occupy, as soon as he announced his candidacy.   It seems that Romney sees Perry as “the one to beat”. 

The smears and lies and half-truths are being hurled like javelins squarely at Perry with little regard for truth.  How will the voters know what is true and what is false? Here’s a great website by a citizen who has spent long hours researching Rick Perry through multiple credible sources which are listed in the same paragraph with the information so that we can all check out the validity of his presentation.

http://peskytruth.wordpress.com/2011/07/19/rick-perrys-negatives/

Bookmark this website and use it to help your family and friends know the truth.  Learn these facts for use in conversations when the smears come up. Some really good people have been misled and will appreciate finding out the truth. You can help.

What good is a president elected on false premises or one that might have made a good president, but was eliminated because of lies?  America is at a dangerous crossroads.

WE CANNOT AFFORD TO MAKE ANOTHER MISTAKE!

Read Full Post | Make a Comment ( None so far )

“To defend the Constitution against all enemies…domestic”

Posted on October 19, 2009. Filed under: Cap and Trade, Census, Christianity, Clinton, Communism, Constitution, Democrats, Dictator, Freedom, Freedom of Speech, global governance, Global Warming/Cimate Change, Guns, Hate Speech/Crime Bill, Health Care, Hillary, Islam, Liberty, Marxism, Muslims, News Media, Obama, Obama's Associates & Appointees, Political, Rush Limbaugh, SEIU, Socialism, terrorism, U.S. Government, Uncategorized, United Nations, Who Is Obama? |

oath_banner_main

…to support and defend the Constitution against all enemies, foreign and domestic, so help us God. Our Oath is to the Constitution

OATH KEEPERS: ORDERS WE WILL NOT OBEY

 1. We will NOT obey orders to disarm the American people.2. We will NOT obey orders to conduct warrantless searches of the American people.3. We will NOT obey orders to detain American citizens as “unlawful enemy combatants” or to subject them to military tribunal.

4. We will NOT obey orders to impose martial law or a “state of emergency” on a state.

5. We will NOT obey orders to invade and subjugate any state that asserts its sovereignty.

6. We will NOT obey any order to blockade American cities, thus turning them into giant concentration camps.

7. We will NOT obey any order to force American citizens into any form of detention camps under any pretext.

8. We will NOT obey orders to assist or support the use of any foreign troops on U.S. soil against the American people to “keep the peace” or to “maintain control.”

9. We will NOT obey any orders to confiscate the property of the American people, including food and other essential supplies.

10.We will NOT obey any orders which infringe on the right of the people to free speech, to peaceably assemble, and to petition their government for a redress of grievances.

Oath Keepers – http://oathkeepers.org/oath/

Which of these oaths scare you?  Which of these oaths are dangerous?  Which of these oaths sound like a “revolt”?

How many of these oaths  are completely in line with the U.S. Constitution?

Answer:  All of them are completely in line with the U.S. Constitution.

Dictators cannot control a country without the cooperation of armies and police forces threatening  with weapons and imprisonment.  Without armed forces obeying the dictates of a despot in office, there can be no  dictatorship.  Our Constitution set up the rules to guarantee our freedom and liberty, but a despot will ignore them, write new laws that benefit him/herself and send the armed forces and police to intimidate, arrest and shoot protestors.  We’ve seen this scenario played out around the world too many times.

How does a despot get in office in the first place?  He/she lies to the electorate about what they believe in, what they stand for, and what they will do if elected.  They espouse a populist message, telling voters what they know the voters favor.    But once in office, they immediately begin to implement their own agenda, which takes away the freedoms of the people one by one until all liberty is lost.  The dictator has two goals; lifetime power and personal wealth.  BUT, he will tell the citizens that he only wants to help YOU, give YOU what YOU want and need, make YOUR life better.  While a dictator-in-the-making may throw YOU a bone or two to keep YOU satisfied and unsuspicious, he/she is busily laying the foundation for THEIR OWN power and wealth behind closed doors.

They use “crisis” to make drastic un-Constitutional moves and circumvent the laws designed to protect our freedom.  Obama’s Chief of Staff, Rahm Emmanuel has said, “Never let a good crisis go to waste.”  It’s obvious that Obama believes that, too.

There are many citizens, some in the media, who will not believe this is happening until it’s irreversible.   Wouldn’t it be much wiser and safer to pay close attention to everything from the beginning and nip any such behavior in the bud, so that our freedom is never in jeopardy and we have little to nothing to reverse? 

Of course, it’s difficult to believe this could ever happen in America, but look at what has already happened that is unbelievable; czars, bank take-overs, GM take-over, student loans take-over, brainwashing in the schools, NEArts collusion, crooks in Congress and the Presidential cabinet, queering of elementary schools (Obama’s “Safe Schools Czar, Kevin Jennings), Miranda rights to enemy combatants captured in war, the President slandering America all around the world, mocking Christianity while praising the Muslim faith, giving away our sensitive national defense secrets, cozying up to despots and dictators around the world, snubbing our friends and allies around the world, purposely devaluing the U.S. dollar, advocating America sign world treaties that over-ride the U.S. Constitution, giving away more money than Americans can earn and pay for generations to every outlandish idea while decreasing the funding for America’s military engaged in two wars,  and on and on and on.  Next on the horizon IS Obama going to Copenhagen to sign away our democracy to a world treaty on climate change!  This MUST BE STOPPED NOW.  This is another document with dangerous fine print not read by our elected officials, nor by the general public.

The Oath Keepers see the handwriting on the wall and are saying flatly, “Not on our watch!”  They took an oath to uphold and defend the Constitution and have pledged to keep that oath no matter who is in office.  If they are ever asked to violate the Constitution, they will NOT. 

Some in the Obama-controlled news media are characterizing this group as “dangerous”, “radicals”, and using the label “revolt” to describe what their intentions are.  This is all a false smear campaign.  Why would Obama care if he has no intentions of ever asking the military or law enforcement agencies to violate the Constitution?  Why would the media attack a group that is saying, “We will uphold the Constitution if ordered to violate it.”

The Las Vegas Review-Journal online is going so far as to connect Timothy McVeigh and other “nut jobs” who have committed crimes and murder with the Oath Keepers.

In a July report titled “Return of the Militias,” the Alabama-based Southern Poverty Law Center singled out Oath Keepers as “a particularly worrisome example of the Patriot revival.”

The Patriot movement, so named because its adherents believe the federal government has stepped on the constitutional ideals of the American Revolution, gained traction in the 1990s and has been closely linked to anti-government militia and white supremacist movements.

The movement is blamed for spawning Timothy McVeigh, who bombed a federal building in Oklahoma City in 1995, killing 168 people.

“I’m not accusing Stewart Rhodes or any member of his group of being Timothy McVeigh or a future Timothy McVeigh,” law center spokesman Mark Potok said. “But these kinds of conspiracy theories are what drive a small number of people to criminal violence. …”

The author of this smear piece has left himself an “out” by saying, “I’m not accusing…”  Of course he is.  He wants to discredit this group so that they will be shamed out of business.  This group poses a threat to Obama and others who may follow him.  

It’s a tactic that’s been used before.  When talk show host, Rush Limbaugh was the fastest growing program on radio and/or television in the nineties, the Clinton administration and their left-wing buddies in the media, tried to connect McVeigh with Limbaugh.  They deliberately and methodically tried to blame Limbaugh for inciting McVeigh to commit the atrocity of the Oklahoma City bombing.  It wasn’t true and the American people were too smart to buy that tripe.  They won’t buy it this time, either.  They also see  the handwriting on the wall.  The news media in conjunction with the Obama administration tried to smear the Tea Party Movement recently.  They tried to scare people into believing that this movement was full of dangerous radicals inciting violence.  Americans didn’t buy that.  Instead, they joined them.

The Obama administration is a lot scarier than the Oath Keepers. 

Let’s all subscribe to the same motto today.  “Not on my watch!.”  We must ensure the same freedom and liberties for our kids and grandkids that we enjoyed growing up.  We must protect America, the last bastion of true freedom on the planet.  Where will the huddled masses go if America falls to a despot regime?

 

Read Full Post | Make a Comment ( None so far )

The Day the Health Care Died/Sung By Paul Shanklin

Posted on August 20, 2009. Filed under: Health Care, Obama, Political, Rush Limbaugh, U.S. Government | Tags: , |

Read Full Post | Make a Comment ( None so far )

Liked it here?
Why not try sites on the blogroll...