Obama Said Wives Are Off-Limits! In 2008

Posted on April 12, 2012. Filed under: Communism, Democrats, Marxism, McCain, News Media, Obama, Obama's Associates & Appointees, Political, politics, Socialism, U.S. Government, Who Is Obama? | Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |

Candidate Obama said in 2008 that wives and families are off-limits in a campaign. Here it is:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wwtO1k5GoAo&feature=results_main&playnext=1&list=PL105C071CB80D26CD

He said he would speak out against anyone doing that.  (crickets, crickets, crickets)

His surrogates have attacked candidate Mitt Romney’s wife.  (crickets, crickets, crickets)

Where is Pres. Obama defending her and demanding that his own people stop the attacks on wives?  Where was he when they attacked Cindy McCain, Sarah Palin, the Palin children, Michelle Bachmann and the husbands of Palin and Bachmann?

Is Obama responsible for what his team says? By his own mouth, he has said he would speak out to stop it. But he hasn’t.

CNN’s Anderson Cooper held a conversation with Obama supporter, Hilary Rosen in which she criticized Ann Romney for choosing to stay at home and raise her children, rather than have a career.  Is Rosen connected to Obama’s campaign?

Hilary Rosen and Anita Dunn are partners in a PR firm, SKDKnickerbocker, used by the DNC  for their campaigns, which includes that of Debbie Wasserman-Schultz, the DNC chairwoman.  This firm was involved in the Sandra Fluke appearance before a mock Congressional hearing and the ensuing controversy, which Obama’s team used to begin their War On Women.  Anita Dunn was Obama’s White House Communications Director from April through November, 2009.  She left under some controversy over her statement to high school seniors that the murderous and brutal dictator, Mao Zedong, was one of her FAVORITE political philosophers. Did Obama know she was a Maoist before he hired her?  It’s very likely that Obama knows Anita Dunn as well as anyone, considering their long association.

In 2oo6, Senator Obama hired Dunn as his STRATEGIST and communications director for his political action committee which he aptly named, The Hopefund.  She also helped with staffing and worked for his “Obama for America” effort.  Dunn became one of only four top advisors to Obama during his 2008 campaign, gaining the title “Senior Advisor” and was one of the MAJOR DECISION MAKERS. 

What were some of her decisions regarding the strategy of Obama’s campaign?  Listen to her explain it.  “We control the news media.”

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NlGNhAnwp_Y

She helped devise the Wars on Fox News, Glenn Beck, Republicans, and wives of candidates.  There can be no doubt. She was the senior advisor who made the major decisions. She was his communications director and strategist. It’s her plan. 

There can be no mistake that Hilary Rosen’s attack on Ann Romney is no accident, but part of Dunn’s campaign strategy for Obama’s re-election effort.

Yes, Ms. Dunn.  Anyone can now find the YouTube video to expose you, Rosen, Obama and team. Citizen journalists are vetting Obama and will be contrasting the videos of his former statements and promises with his current ones. 

*************

SKDKnickerbocker’s web site boasting of role in Obama’s election:   http://www.skdknick.com/work/far-reaching-role-in-election/

Dunn’s bio is well documented online. One source is:  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anita_Dunn.

*************

Does Dunn tell the truth and nothing but the truth?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1AEt180Wnls

Is CNN in Obama’s pocket?

Dunn consistently used CNN to get the smear out.  They seemed most willing to oblige.  Rosen committed her attack on CNN.

 

Read Full Post | Make a Comment ( None so far )

Social Issues Must Be Part of the Campaign

Posted on February 24, 2012. Filed under: Abortion, Democrats, Freedom, global governance, Liberty, News Media, Obama, politics, science, Socialism, U.S. Government | Tags: , , , , , , , , |

It's a living human being.

It’s astonishing that Republicans can be so duped by their opponents in the Democrat Party and lame stream media.   The Dems make abortion and gay marriage the premiere issues of their campaigns, all the while telling the electorate that the GOP will lose if they so much as mention the same.  It is usually assumed that the Democrat positions are correct and the only viable stances while the GOP positions are shameful.  Yet, Republican voters still secretly harbor pro-life and anti-gay marriage values.   What is shameful about protecting living human babies from harm, suffering and death?!

While ashamed to admit their pro-life, anti-gay marriage beliefs in public, they make these the litmus test for selecting candidates!  Once they’ve anointed someone, they immediately muzzle their champion for fear of losing the election.  This suggests that Democrats have already won the debate and Republians are wimps.

But that’s not the case.  Democrats have used the media to brow beat, excoriate, attack without merit, lie, exagerate and vilify anyone who dares to hold a different set of values from them.  They’ve successfully used mob tactics to intimidate into compliance.  Al Capone would be proud.

In the light of truth, there is no way that people can be against protecting the life of human beings.  The U.N. claims it’s existence for that very purpose – “no more wars.”  Doctors, nurses and hospitals exist to save life.  The Health Movement’s platform is to protect and preserve human life.  Pre-natal care is pushed to preserve and protect the life of the unborn baby.  The government has a watchdog agency charged with insuring that products used with, for and around human babies are completely safe.

Now why is the pro-life position unpopular in America and something to keep quiet about in a campaign?  Which party should be ashamed of their values or lack thereof?  The GOP candidates should make the Democrats ashamed of their murderous cold-blooded life-snuffing position in every campaign.  GOP candidates should stand tall and firm, heads held high and confidently proclaim Democrats as heartless.  They should point out that pregnant women who prefer to murder their own innocent babies are self-centered and irresponsible.

Let the Democrats yell and scream.  They will look like spoiled brats throwing temper tantrums.  GOP will look like the mature adults with common sense.

To say that social issues do not belong in politics ignores  the fact that politics is all about governing society and the government absolutely does interfere in and exert control over social issues, therefore, must be part of any political campaign. It’s time Republicans realize what the Democrats have perpetrated on their party and get over it. They must stop cowering and fight for the beliefs of their party. Show how and why the GOP is the opposite of the Democrat Party. Isn’t that the purpose of campaigns? It’s all common sense.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wlSyfUQDWVw&feature=related

What’s the best way to go about killing this little baby?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gfgq7WiHbh4

There is NO way. Could you kill this baby?  Could you support killing this baby?  Can you support candidates who are determined to continue the legality of killing babies?  And what about botched abortions?  Could you support killing the baby after it’s born, if the doctor was unsuccessful in his first attempt at murder?  Not only did Sen. Obama of Illinois support such barbaric behavior, he was the only one who voted to protect it, when the rest of his party voted to end it. He voted three times to protect this murder of living infants.  Live birth abortions =  Murdering babies after they’re born and alive.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BYRpIf2F9NA

Can you support this or a candidate who did?  I CAN’T!

Read Full Post | Make a Comment ( None so far )

For Lack of a Statesman

Posted on May 12, 2011. Filed under: ALERT!, Democrats, Dictator, Freedom, Illegal Aliens, immigration, Obama, politics, terrorism, U.S. Government | Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |

This is the White House in Washington, D.C.  It is currently occupied by this president.

This speech is dispicable for so many reasons.  Particularly offensive are the comments beginning at 19:00 in the speech.

The history of the border fence, what little there is, begins with a 14 mile stretch in SanDiego, California, which border patrol agents have said is effective for that area.  The rest of the 2100 mile U.S. Mexico border remained wide open until Republican Pres. George W. Bush signed a bill into law in 2006 which would build another 700 mile segment, still leaving 1400 unprotected miles. 

“The bill was introduced on Sep. 13, 2006 by Peter T. King (R-NY). In the House of Representatives, the Fence Act passed 283 -138 on September 14, 2006. On September 29, 2006 – the Fence Act passed in the Senate 80 -19. Most Republicans voted in support of the Fence Act while most Democrats voted against it.[2]”  From Wikipedia   Source: Obama & McCain back-to-back speeches at NALEO Jun 28, 2008

Take note that it was a Republican who proposed the bill and Republicans who voted for it and Democrats who opposed it and voted against it.  Would there be any fence if the President’s party had their way?  NO.  They voted against it.

As a U. S. Senator, Obama voted for the fence, but has since backed away, sensing the disapproval of Latino Democrat voters, as did Hillary Clinton.  As if he lived in a cacoon somewhere on Mars, he answered a question about his position on the border and illegal immigration this way:

“For all the noise and anger that too often surrounds the immigration debate, America has nothing to fear from today’s immigrants. They have come here for the same reason that families have always come here–for the hope that in America, they could build a better life for themselves and their families. Like the waves of immigrants that came before them and the Hispanic Americans whose families have been here for generations, the recent arrival of Latino immigrants will only enrich our country.”  Barack Obama,  Source: Obama & McCain back-to-back speeches at NALEO Jun 28, 2008   http://www.ontheissues.org/international/barack_obama_immigration.htm

Nothing to fear from all those illegal immigrants.  Don’t fear the drug cartels that behead their victims and dump the headless bodies in public places to terrorize citizens.  No need to fear the high-powered weapons they use to gun people down on our side of the border.  The thefts, property destruction, rapes and kidnappings should not disturb our sleep at night.  We should feel perfectly safe with drug cartels targeting our kids with highly addictive drugs and dangerous gangs ruling some neighborhoods and initiating new members with drive-by shootings, or settling turf wars by murdering their rivals.  Don’t worry about being caught in a cross-fire.  And as you write that big check to the IRS and your state and local taxes, don’t worry about how much of it is required to finance the jam-packed prisons and jails needed to house all the illegal alien criminals that will probably get out someday and commit another crime.

(This is where there should be a photo of people killed by illegals, but gore isn’t needed.  Everyone except the guy behind the heavily guarded fence at the White House knows what’s going on at our border.)

After Obama moved to 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue behind heavily-guarded fences, the clamor for a southern border fence grew too loud to ignore.  Fox News had reporters on-site filming lots of illegals streaming across umimpeded.  They filmed the large number of guns and weapons confiscated from apprehended illegals and the truckloads of drugs netted.

What happens when someone climbs the U.S.-Mexican border fence most of the time?

Usually nothing!

What happens when someone climbs the fence at Obama’s residence?

Does Obama feel unsafe without a fence, or without guards at the fence?  Does he fear for his family?  The citizens of the border states fear for their safety and the safety of their families, too.  They appealed to Obama for help.  To be fair, Obama and his Homeland Security Chief, Janet Napolitano, who also believes the border is safe, even though she said just the opposite when she was the governor of Arizona, decided to build a high tech fence rather than a physical one.  Oh wait!  That was also a Republican Pres. George W. Bush project Obama and Napolitano cancelled it, offering nothing in its place.  The project was too expensive and didn’t work, costing $1 billion and five wasted years.  Cancelled in 2010, it was the last effort to build a barrier to illegals.

Obama lives safely behind a physical fence with human guards, dogs and security cameras, while Texans, Arizonans, New Mexicans, Californians, and many states northward, live in danger, possesions stolen and/or defaced, and have to endure Obama telling them that the fence is finished, he added plenty of border patrol and the nation is safer than it’s ever been.  EVERYONE IN THE BORDER STATES KNOWS ITS UNTRUE!

To add insult to injury, Obama sarcastically mocked and laughed at the people in danger without admonishing the illegals climbing the fence portion that does exist, without demanding that the murder, human trafficking, drug running, rape, theft and property damage stop.  Without the slightest stern warning to the law-breakers, Obama insults the victims!  A higher fence, Mr. President?  How about any fence?  How about tearing down that fence around the White House and leaving it down until there is a fence around the U.S.?

http://www.cbp.gov/linkhandler/cgov/newsroom/highlights/fence_map.ctt/fence_map.pdf

The web site for the U. S. Customs and Border Protection Agency above provides a map of the U.S.-Mexico border showing the progress of the border fence.  A green line is finished fence.  A yellow line is fence under construction.  A red line is fence that is planned but not yet under construction.  You will notice a lot of green lines, but note that there are breaks in the line that amount to miles.  You will also notice that Texas is wide open, with only a small portion of fencing at El Paso.  I wonder why Obama made his “fence speech” at El Paso rather than further south in Texas.  I know why he didn’t choose to go to Arizona.  He is suing them.  This is the only map on their site and it’s dated 12/29/2009.  It appears that nothing has been planned since then and no construction is under way.  That represents the two years that Obama has been in the White House, yet in his speech he talks as if he has finished the fence and satisfied everyone’s requests, but Republicans keep moving the goal posts.

Regarding his statement that “they will want a higher fence”, it might be a good idea, considering all the video of illegals climbing over the existing fence.  What good is a fence that can be scaled?

This was not the speech of a statesman.  Not the speech of an informed politician.  Not the spirit of a president of the United States.  This was a vindictive slap at those  who dared fight back when he said “no.”    The border states asked for federal border control to keep them safe.  They were rebuffed.  When they had no other choice but to defend themselves, Obama sued the state of Arizona to block them from their own defense.  While no one has asked for a mote or an alligator, Obama has dogs that can tear your leg off if you climb his fence. 

Obama incorrectly assumes that the only aliens crossing our border illegally are honest hard-working Mexicans coming here to work so they can feed their families. Well, how honest can they be if they break the law to get here, take a fake social security number, falsify documents to conceal their immigrant status, take pay in cash to avoid paying taxes, use our welfare and medical benefits reserved for citizens, etc., etc., etc.?  Since none of these illegals check in with anyone, they can be from any country with any motive, such as felons escaping prison in their home countries,  Al Qaeida, Hamas, Hezbollah, Chinese spies, Russian spies, Venezuelans, virtually anyone with any motive – terrorism being the highest on the list.

Obama has forgotten that he is the president of the United States and should behave accordingly, sensitive to the needs of all citizens, and not a stand-up comic taking shots at people he doesn’t like.

Shame on Mr. Obama.

 

Where did these guns come from? The government’s deadly Fast and Furious gun running scheme?

More reading:

http://www.foxnews.com/us/2010/05/26/terror-alert-mexican-border/  FEDS ISSUE TERROR WATCH FOR THE TEXAS/MEXICO BORDER

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2011/05/13/exclusive-border-community-organizing-petition-protest-obamas-immigration/

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/06/28/AR2005062801135.html

http://www.chandlerswatch.com/2011/02/07/over-1600-indians-have-been-caughtillegally-crossing-the-usmexican-border/

http://www.toddbensman.com/Bensman/terrorists_who_crossed.html

https://litigation-essentials.lexisnexis.com/webcd/app?action=DocumentDisplay&crawlid=1&doctype=cite&docid=22+Geo.+Immigr.+L.J.+569&srctype=smi&srcid=3B15&key=345f53a26fc9822cb71acd3ee5afcd7d

 

So the fence is finished, high enough, there’s enough border patrol and we are safe.  Hogwash!

Read Full Post | Make a Comment ( None so far )

Cap and Trade Backdoor Scheme – STOP IT!

Posted on May 11, 2011. Filed under: Al Gore, ALERT!, Big Brother, Cap and Trade, Capitalism, Communism, Constitution, Democrats, Energy, environmentalism, environmentalists, Freedom, global governance, Global Warming/Cimate Change, globalization, junk science, Lindsey Graham, Marxism, McCain, Mother Earth, Obama, politics, science, Socialism, sustainability, Taxes, U.S. Government | Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |

 

 FROM FREEDOMWORKS – BULLETIN

It’s Time for Congress to Vote on The Energy Tax Prevention Act of 2011

 
For weeks now, Congress has debated President Obama’s big government energy agenda and specifically, his continued efforts to implement a backdoor cap and trade scheme through the massive EPA bureaucracy that he controls.

Energy prices, including ever-skyrocketing gasoline prices at the pump, continue to climb in the wake of Obama’s irresponsible actions and it is clear that NOW is the time for Congress to act.

TAKE ACTION!

The Energy Tax Prevention Act of 2011 (S. 482 in the Senate & H.R. 910 in the House), authored by Senator James Inhofe (R-OK) and Representative Fred Upton (R, MI-6), would stop Obama’s cap and trade scheme by completely stripping the EPA of its ability to use the ‘Clean Air Act’ to regulate greenhouse gases. This is important legislation that would take serious steps towards addressing high energy cos ts and ensuring America’s energy security.

The U.S. House of Representatives took the first step and passed H.R. 910. Thanks to grassroots pressure from limited-government activists like you, this legislation passed by an overwhelming margin…but now the battle moves to the U.S. Senate.

It’s time to demand that the Senate hold a vote on The Energy Tax Prevention Act of 2011.

Use FreedomWorks online action center: CLICK HERE to send an urgent message to your Senators on this important issue and CLICK HERE to use our online phone system to call their offices toll free. Tell them that the Inhofe-Upton Energy Tax Prevention Act of 2011 is critical to stopping the threat of spiraling energy costs and urge them to vote on — and vote for — this bill!

Momentum is building towards ending Obama’s backdoor cap and trade scheme once and for all, but your help is needed to see this fight through to the end.

Sincerely,

Dick Armey
Chairman, FreedomWorks

FreedomWorks
400 North Capitol Street, NW
Suite 765
Washington,DC 20001
Telephone: 1.888.564.6273

Read Full Post | Make a Comment ( None so far )

The Government Gavel War

Posted on January 5, 2011. Filed under: Clinton, Constitution, Democrats, Freedom, Health Care, Hillary, Liberty, Obama, politics, U.S. Government | Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , |

In her farewell address to Congress today, former House Speaker, Nancy Pelosi, filibustered from the Chair, touting her accomplishments and the miraculous characteristics of Obamacare as if she was identifying her one claim to fame before she fades from the scene.  Leaning into the microphone, as if in fear of someone dragging her away, she turned the occasion, which should have been the swearing-in of the new House Speaker, John Boehner, into a celebration of the election of Democrat John Kennedy as president, and her tenure of greatness as former House Speaker.  It was painfully reminiscent of former Democrat President Bill Clinton’s all-afternoon-long departure from Washington, D.C.’s presidential limelight. 

The Sargeant of Arms of the House, should have grabbed the hook from the coat closet and pulled her off the stage after she launched into her personal aggrandisement and embarrassing effort to appear greater than her successor, while he stood politely behind her, ever the perfect gentleman.  While she behaved arrogantly, he conducted himself with humility, dismissing her distasteful mocking of his gavel choice.  In her words, “It’s larger than most of the gavels here.”  Perhaps he feels the need to remind the House Democrats that he now holds the power of Speaker and that the Republicans now hold the majority, since their interviews on radio and television sounded as if they were not going to acknowledge that.

In fairness, the gavel that Pelosi carried in her triumphal march through D.C. after passing the much despised Obamacare, certainly looks just as large as Boehner’s gavel, if not bigger.   

In both photos, as well as in her speech today, Pelosi sends the message, “It’s all about me!  It’s all about me!”  Arrogance is a difficult thing to hide.

Contrast her with Speaker Boehner’s demeanor.  Even after Pelosi hands him the gavel and the power and respect that accompanies it, she is STILL standing in front of him, monopolizing the podium and the microphone.  Boehner’s head is down and his message in one of humbleness, hence the tears when he realizes that America has afforded him the opportunities to rise from nothing to something.   He is emotional because he truly appreciates this great country, the freedom we’re all promised and his chance to make a difference in Congress for all of us.   House Speaker John Boehner appreciates and loves the Constitution and is humbled by all that it guarantees.  He stands there humbly as living proof.

One shows arrogance and a love for power, celebrity, and wealth.  The other shows humbleness and a willingness to help others reach their goals and keep their freedom.  One is haughty with nose in the air, clinging to the microphone well beyond what was necessary.  The other is down-to-earth and mindful that he is no better than the rest of us.

To a thundering and very prolonged applause as he was first introduced as the new Speaker of the House,  John Boehner, the man, said, “It’s still just me.”

Read Full Post | Make a Comment ( None so far )

A SHOCKER! – Installment 16 NEW! UPDATED!

Posted on April 27, 2010. Filed under: Al Gore, Cap and Trade, Communism, Copenhagen, Democrats, environmentalism, environmentalists, global governance, Global Warming/Cimate Change, globalization, Liberty, Lindsey Graham, Marxism, McCain, Obama, planet, politics, science, Socialism, sovereignty, sustainability, U.S. Government, United Nations | Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , |

In 2008 and 2009, Marbie’s Blog  posted 15 “A SHOCKER!” installments on global warming/climate change/cap and trade, with a number of additional updates and related posts.  The issue died down in the public domain because so many other things were popping up and taking center stage.  Now, the issue is re-surfacing and needs attention.  Marbie’s Blog is re-posting those 15 installments and some updates, plus working on new installments.  One in the works is about Obama’s involvement with the Joyce Foundation, Valerie Jarrett, his White House Adviser from Chicago, and Bill Ayers’ brother, John.  These people, through this organization are setting up a climate change trading exchange, which trades thin air, like stocks in companies, and are setting themselves up to make trillions of dollars.

Before Marbie’s Blog could finish the research and get the information  posted, Glenn Beck discovered the situation and did a very good television program on it, just scratching the surface.  He will eventually get to the rest. Stay tuned.  In the meantime, please, please, view his program.  EVERYONE MUST BE INFORMED ON THIS SUBJECT.

 

AMERICA!  GET INVOLVED AND STOP CAP AND TRADE LEGISLATION!  CALL REPUBLICANS LINDSEY GRAHAM, JOHN MCCAIN AND INDEPENDENT JOE LIEBERMAN.  THEY ARE WITH THE DEMOCRATS ON THIS ONE.

Read Full Post | Make a Comment ( 1 so far )

Scott Brown for President? Not So Fast.

Posted on January 20, 2010. Filed under: 2010 election, Health Care | Tags: , , , , , , , , , |

After last night’s election of Republican Scott Brown in Massachusetts, the throne held by Teddy Kennedy for decades, thoughts turned immediately to Scott Brown’s potential to win the presidency.  That’s not a well-thought-out reaction.  Scott Brown was the one who took on the challenge and won, but not necessarily because he is a great Republican or even a great moral man.  Most of us in the U.S. know nothing about him. 

In the past, people got excited about Colin Powell and begged him to run for president as the Republican candidate before they knew much about his political beliefs or even his party affiliation.  He was a handsome, well-educated, well-spoken four-star general who became very popular.  As it turned out, he affiliated with the Republican Party, but was very left-leaning and moderate, opposing some of the Party’s platform, which is not helpful to achieving those goals.  Eventually, he publicly endorsed the Democrat candidate for president over his own long-time friend and fellow veteran, Sen. John McCain.

In a “morning-after” interview aired on Fox News, Brown was asked if he favored the “big tent” theory for the Republican Party and he made it clear that he does.   Others who have advocated this position are; Colin Powell, who voted for the Democrat in the presidential election, abandoning his own Republican party; John McCain, who lost the election because of Republicans like Colin Powell who voted against his own party; former Congressman Christopher Shays, who was defeated by the Democrat he wanted to compromise with, perhaps because there was no clear difference between the candidates; and former Sen. Jim Jeffords, who eventually left the Republican party and caucused with the Democrats.  There are many others; some who are still in the Grand Old Party.  Watch those still in the GOP and see if they lose their elections, leave the Party and/or vote with the Democrats.

The moral is, either you’re a Republican or you’re not.  The Party has a platform – goals they are working to achieve.  If you’re advocating “not” achieving those goals, why are you a Republican?  Join the Party because you share their beliefs, not for the purpose of weakening their ability to accomplish their stated (and voted on) platform goals.  If you don’t share those beliefs, you’re in the wrong party.

Some have championed the virtue of “compromise”.  You should compromise when you’re out with friends and some want to eat Mexican food, while others want Italian food.  You should never compromise on your core values, your moral values, your principles.  You should never sell your values for some benefit, which politicians seem to do often.  The consequences of compromising your core beliefs are, more often than not, very damaging to people and to the country. 

Let’s take a wait and see attitude towards today’s winner, Scott Brown.  I’m glad he won because he wants to stop the current health care debacle bill and he was our last chance for that.  But President?  Not so fast,

Read Full Post | Make a Comment ( None so far )

Obama, by Someone Who Really Knows Him – March 04, 2008

Posted on March 5, 2008. Filed under: Democrats, Obama, Obama's Associates & Appointees, Political, politics, Uncategorized, Who Is Obama? | Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |

http://www.houstonpress.com/2008-02-28/news/barack-obama-screamed-at-me/full/

Todd Spivak is a reporter who has known Obama since 2000 and watched his rise from obscure to Democratic Presidential hopeful and rock star in just eight years. His article is posted on the web site of the HoustonPress. He talks about being stuck in traffic on the Southwest Freeway in Houston and remembering when he first met Obama.

I did not write the following. I’m taking it from Spivak’s own account. I’ve shortened sentences, paraphrased when necessary, left out a whole lot and put in just enough so that you get the picture. It would be beneficial to read the entire article.

Some key moments are:

“During his seven year tenure in the Illinois Legislature, Obama wrote an occasional column for the Lakefront Outlook community newspaper where I worked. In 2004, during his U.S. Senate bid, I profiled Obama for the Illinois Times.” Todd Spivak

Spivak was a young struggling reporter and Obama was a rookie state senator making about $50,000 a year living in a small condo just two blocks away from Spivak.

When Obama is asked now about his legislative record he rattles off several bills he sponsored as an Illinois lawmaker. He expanded children’s health insurance; made the state Earned Income Tax Credit refundable for low-income families; required public bodies to tape closed-door meetings to make government more transparent; and required police to videotape interrogations of homicide suspects. And the list goes on – a lengthy record filled with core liberal issues.

But what’s interesting, and almost never discussed, is that he built his entire legislative record in Illinois in a single year. During six of Obama’s seven year tenure in the Illinois Senate, it was controlled by Republicans. Each of those six years, Obama backed legislation that went nowhere. But in his seventh year, the Republican Majority Leader had been replaced with Emil Jones, Jr., a “gravel-voiced, dark-skinned African-American known for chain-smoking cigarettes on the Senate floor. Jones had served for three decades and represented a district on the Chicago South Side not far from Obama’s. He became Obama’s kingmaker.

Jones called his old friend Cliff Kelley, a former Chicago alderman, and told him he was going to make Obama a U.S. Senator.” And he did. Jones appointed Obama sponsor of virtually every high profile piece of legislation, angering many rank-and-file state legislators who had more seniority than Obama and had spent years championing the bills.

“I took all the beatings and insults and endured all the racist comments over the years from nasty Republican committee chairmen,” State Senator Rickey Hendon, the original sponsor of landmark racial profiling and videotaped confession legislation yanked away by Jones and given to Obama, complained to me (Spivak) at the time. “Barack didn’t have to endure any of it, yet, in the end, he got all the credit”.

During his seventh and final year in the state Senate, Obama’s stats soared. He sponsored a whopping 26 bills passed into law – including many he now cites in his presidential campaign when attacked as inexperienced. It was a stunnning achievement that started him on the path of national politics – and he couldn’t have done it without Jones.

Jones further helped raise Obama’s profile by having him craft legislation addressing the day-to-day tragedies that dominated local news headlines.

So how has Obama repaid Jones? Last June, to prove his commitment to government transparency, Obama released a comprehensive list of his earmark requests for fiscal year 2008. It comprised MORE THAN $300 MILLION IN PET PROJECTS FOR ILLINOIS, INCLUDING TENS OF MILLIONS FOR JONES’ SENATE DISTRICT.

On the stump, Obama has frequently invoked his experiences as a community organizer on the Chicago South Side in the early 1990’s, when he passed on six figure salary offers at corporate law firms after graduating from Harvard Law School to direct a massive voter-registration drive. But as a state senator, Obama evaded leadership on a host of critical community issues, from historic preservation to the rapid demolition of nearby public-housing projects, according to many South Siders. Harold Lucas, a veteran South Side community organizer who remembers when Obama was “just a big-eared kid fresh out of school”, says he didn’t finally decide to support Obama’s presidential bid until he was actually inside the voting booth on Super Tuesday. “I’m not happy about the quality of life in my community,” says Lucas, who now heads a black-heritage tourism business in Chicago. “As a local elected official, he had a primary role in that.”

When the city seized by eminent domain, the 70-year-old Gerri’s Palm Tavern, a historic jazz club that regularly hosted Duke Ellington, Billie Holiday, Josephine Baker and many others, and forced the Checkerboard Lounge, regularly featuring B.B. King and the like, to re-locate, Obama was silent. Obama’s aloofness on key community issues for years frustrated Lucas and many other South Siders. They believe he was just afraid of making politcal enemies.

Obama inflamed many residents in his old state Senate district last March when he endorsed controversial Chicago alderman Dorothy Tillman in a runoff election. She is best known for once pulling a pistol from her purse and brandishing it around at a city council meeting. Her ward comprised the city’s largest concentration of vacant lots. Just three months before Obama endorsed her, the Lakefront Outlook, a community newspaper ran a three-part investigative series exposing flagrant cronyism and possible tax law violations that centered on Tillman and her biggest pet project. Tillman lost the election despite Obama’s endorsement, which critics said countered his calls for clean government. He told the Chicago Tribune that he had backed Tillman because she was an early supporter of his 2004 U.S. Senate campaign.

This was not a wise decision. It was poor judgment on his part. He was operating like a politician trying to win the next step up.” says Timuel Black, a historian and City Colleges of Chicago professor emeritus who lived in Obama’s state Senate district. Obama has spent his entire political career trying to win the next step up. Every three years, he has aspired to a more powerful political position. Even many of his staunchist supporters, such as Black, still resent the strong-arm tactics Obama employed to win his seat in the Illinois Legislature.

Obama hired fellow Harvard Law alum and election law expert Thomas Johnson to challenge the nominating petitions of four other candidates. He found enough flaws to knock them all off and run unopposed. Of course, he won. “A close examination of Obama’s first campaign clouds the image he has cultivated throughout his political career,” wrote Tribune political reporters David Jackson and Ray Long.

Three years later, in September 1999, Obama was preparing for his first national campaign. He ran for U.S. Congress against the veteran incumbent Bobby Rush, a former co-founder of the Illinois chapter of the Black Panther Party. Rush won by more than 30 percentage points.

Three years later, January 2003, Obama ran for U.S. Senate and cruised to victory thanks to the self-desctruction of his top opponents in both the primary and general elections. The front-runner’s campaign in the primary imploded when his divorce files were unsealed, revealing an ex-wife’s charges of verbal and physical abuse. Obama unleashed a barrage of television ads just before the election, when the other candidates had largely depleted their war chests. He won the nomination. The general election was a repeat performance. Obama’s opponent, Jack Ryan dropped out after a judge ordered that his divorce files be unsealed. Obama spent several weeks running unopposed while Republicans tried to find a new candidate. They finally put up Alan Keyes, whose bombastic rhetoric wasn’t popular. Obama won.

“He’s been given a pass,” says Harold Lucas. “His career has been such a meteoric rise that he has not had the time to set a record.”

A week after my (Spivak) profile of Obama was published, I called some of my contacts in the Illinois Legislature. I ran through a list of black Chicago lawmakers who had worked with Obama, and was surprised to learn that many resented him and had supported other candidates in the U.S. Senate election. “Anybody but Obama”, the late state Rep. Lovana Jones told me at the time. State Rep. Monique Davis attended the same church as Obama and co-sponsored several bills with him, also did not support him. “I was snubbed,” Davis told me. “I felt he was shutting me out of history.”

In a follow-up report published a couple of weeks later, I wrote about these disgruntled black legislators and the central role Senate President Emil Jones, Jr. played in Obama’s revived political life. The morning after the story was posted online, I arrived early at my offices. I hadn’t taken my coat off when the phone rang. It was Obama.

(This conversation you must read for yourself on page 5, the final page of the article.) In a nutshell, Obama wasn’t happy.

http://www.houstonpress.com/2008-02-28/news/barack-obama-screamed-at-me/full/

If this reporter is telling the truth, then we get a new picture of the real Barak Obama. If he isn’t telling the truth, he will be found out because he names many people who could refute this story.

Just thought you ought to know about this new rock star.

http://www.houstonpress.com/2008-02-28/news/barack-obama-screamed-at-me/full/

Read Full Post | Make a Comment ( None so far )

Liked it here?
Why not try sites on the blogroll...