Maurice Strong

A SHOCKER! – Installment 2 Global Warming/Climate Change UPDATE! James Lovelock Changes His Mind

Posted on June 17, 2012. Filed under: Al Gore, ALERT!, Big Brother, Cap and Trade, Capitalism, Christianity, Constitution, Democrats, Energy, environmentalism, environmentalists, evolution, Freedom, Gaia, Gaia hypothesis, Gaia matrix, global governance, Global Warming/Cimate Change, globalization, goddess, Greek mythology, idol, James Lovelock, junk science, Liberty, Lynn margulis, Mars, Maurice Strong, Mikhail Gorbachav, Mother Earth, News Media, Obama, pantheism, planet, Political, politics, science, sovereignty, sustainability, sustainable, Taxes, U.S. Government, Uncategorized, uniformitarianism, United Nations | Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , |

Begin by reading the original post of May 15, 2008 about James Lovelock and his influence on the global warming movement, and his devotion to the pagan religion, Gaia.  There’s a lot to learn there and it’s never mentioned by the main stream media. Too many people know nothing of this.  If they did, they’d be much more skeptical of the green/global warming/climate change movement.

https://marbiesblog.wordpress.com/2009/10/29/a-shocker-installlment-2/

After you have the important background knowledge, read today’s surprising news coming from the ninety-two year-old James Lovelock whose latest comments are shocking AND will be completely ignored by the people in the movement whose beliefs are the direct result of this man’s influence.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2012/jun/15/james-lovelock-interview-gaia-theory?mobile-redirect=false

Lovelock believes in the Gaia religion, as you will see in both articles.  The Gaia religion “no longer sees man as the measure of all things or the center of the universe. He has been measured and found to be an undistinguished bit of matter, different in no essential way from bacteria, stones and trees.  Gaians also believe that over-population is a root cause of an imbalance in the Earth’s ecology.  Therefore, they believe in man-made global warming/climate change.  (Could this be a reason behind the fight for abortion “rights”?

Lovelock, having formulated the Gaia Hypothesis, is the father of the climate change movement.  He’s predicted complete doom on the Earth unless governments force people to adopt severe and costly changes to every thing people do on earth. It’s called “sustainable development”, and has been marketed to the people as “going green.”

But what is he saying today?

“Adapt and survive.”  He supports nuclear power, hates wind power, remarking that they are useless and ugly, AND is now encouraging the U.K. to embrace fracking because natural gas is cheap and doesn’t produce as much CO2 as burning coal.

“We rushed into renewable energy without any thought. The schemes are largely hopelessly inefficient and unpleasant. Fracking buys us some time, and we can learn to adapt.”

“Let’s be pragmatic and sensible and get Britain to switch everything to methane. We should be going mad on it.”

What has brought about this major reversal?  He’s been hit hard with some hefty home energy bills and he doesn’t like it.  He’s realizing that these costs are unsustainable, I suspect.  It has changed his economic, political and scientific views on global warming, as he used to call it.

He told MSNBC that “he had been extrapolating too far in reaching such a conclusion and had made a mistake in claiming to know with such certainty what will happen to the climate.”

He says “being allowed to change your mind and follow the evidence is one of the liberating marvels of being an independent scientist.”

Many of us never bought into what has been proven faulty and fake science, but we’ve all paid a high cost for Lovelock’s Gaiantic mistake.

At the International Climate Change Conference in Rio next week, Lovelock’s devotee’s will seek solutions to the devastating climate change disaster that he now says doesn’t exist.  They won’t  be phased by Lovelock’s latest revelations.

“Whenever the UN puts its finger in, it seems to become a mess.”

“The climate situation is more complex than we at present are capable of handling, or possibly even in the future.”

“It’s so much cheaper to air-condition the cities and let Gaia take care of the world. It’s a much better route to go than so-called ‘sustainable development’, which is meaningless drivel.”

Where’s the proof that he’s really changed his mind and won’t jump back on the “sustainable development” wagon?  He’s moving from his home of thirty years amidst acres of trees that he planted himself to a small beach cottage.  Unafraid of the horrors of rising seas caused by climate change.

“At worst, I think it will be two feet a century.”

Unfortunately for us, the costs associated with climate change legislation will rise much more rapidly.

As for his political views on the subject now days:

“I’m neither strongly left nor right, but I detest the Liberal Democrats.”   “The coalition has behaved disgracefully on environmental and energy policies. It would have been much better if they had been properly right wing.”

Perhaps he was warning us when he said:

“It’s just the way the humans are that if there’s a cause of some sort, a religion starts forming around it. It just so happens that the green religion is now taking over from the Christian religion. I don’t think people have noticed that, but it’s got all the sort of terms that religions use. The greens use guilt. You can’t win people round by saying they are guilty for putting CO2 in the air.”

Mr. Lovelock, some have noticed it.

https://marbiesblog.wordpress.com/2009/11/16/a-shocker-installment-6/ The Gaia Ark of Hope, The Earth Charter inside the Ark (to mimic The Ten Commandments), Temenos Books (to be sacred like our Bible), Cosmos is our God

https://marbiesblog.wordpress.com/2009/10/30/a-shocker-installment-3/

If you read Lovelock’s past writings and statements, you might think he sounds a little spacey.  He was an important person at NASA.  Just mull over that for a minute.  We never pay attention to the kind of people who lead our world. BUT WE SHOULD.

The Kyoto Treaty?  Kill it. Get out of all treaties, legislation and programs born out of the global warming/climate change hoax. Get back to basics, back to normal and relieve the people of the world from burdensome expenses and regulations that adversely affect their lives.

PASS IT ON. THE TRUTH SHALL SET US FREE  (from tyrannical governments, world governments, and slavery to regulations based on falsehoods and pagan religion.)

Advertisements
Read Full Post | Make a Comment ( None so far )

JOIN THE FIGHT! No Cap and Trade (Tax)

Posted on June 16, 2010. Filed under: 2010 election, Al Gore, ALERT!, Big Brother, Cap and Trade, Capitalism, Clinton, Constitution, Democrats, Energy, environmentalism, environmentalists, Freedom, Gaia, Gaia hypothesis, Gaia matrix, global governance, Global Warming/Cimate Change, globalization, goddess, Hillary, idol, junk science, Liberty, Marxism, Maurice Strong, Mikhail Gorbachav, Mother Earth, News Media, Obama, planet, politics, SEIU, Socialism, sustainability, sustainable, Taxes, U.S. Government, United Nations | Tags: , , , , , , , |

I’m aggravated every time I hear someone, usually a politician, say that we’re addicted to oil. That’s ridiculous and meant to shame us into CHANGE.  However, I can’t change how every product in life is made, how every company operates, and how everyone gets to work. No one is “addicted to oil.” Oil is basic to our productivity, like wood and stone and metals. No one says we’re addicted to wood!

People must learn to “think” about what is said by politicians and then parroted endlessly by the talking heads on the news and talk shows.  Nothing is true just because it’s repeated a million times.  Some things sound good until you really think about them.

Are Americans addicted to water? It’s also a natural resource and its been said that we are running out.  Are we addicted to wood?  Environmentalists have said the same thing about our forests.  “They will all be gone someday.”

Aren’t you tired of being controlled by a bunch of “Chicken Littles”?  Their sky is always falling.  But the truth is, IT’S NOT!  Our Earth constantly renews itself.  There are earthly mechanisms at work that we never think about or even notice.   The water we see today is ancient.  It’s always been here.  The lakes, oceans, rivers, ponds, all waterways, evaporate into the sky where it condenses and rains back down again all over the Earth.  The rain soaks into the ground, where it’s filtered through layers of earth and rocks.  At some point a well is drilled, it’s pumped up or it bubbles up to the surface and the process starts all over again.  The water we use also goes back into the ground and through the Earth’s filtering system. 

Think about the forests.  Sure, companies cut down trees, but they also plant new ones elsewhere.  They don’t want to run out of trees.  That would put them out of business.  Trees grow where the wind, birds and animals have dropped acorns.  Stone is quarried for our use, but it never leaves the earth.  It is used and reused many times.  Even if it ends up in a land fill, that stone goes back down into the Earth.  Someday, it can be used again or not.  Either way, it’s still here.

We do need to be good stewards of our planet.  Notice I’m not calling it “Mother Earth”.  I don’t believe in that.  Earth hands us volcanoes, tsunamis, earthquakes, forest fires, blizzards, droughts, floods, hurricanes and tornadoes.  Not exactly the characteristics of a mother.  The Gaians who worship the idol, “Mother Earth”, paint pictures of a sweet-faced woman nursing her young.  That symbolizes a passive benign planet that allows us to use  her natural resources.  At the same time, they scream, yell, protest against that very use of Earth’s natural resources, treating them as sacred.  You can see the lunacy of that.

Let’s really think about what the politicians and environmentalists are saying and use common season and logical reasoning.  Sometimes we blindly follow to our own demise.  Apply this to the current global warming/climate change/energy initiative legislation the president is determined to pass.  It is actually designed to glean all the money it can from the citizens around the world and deposit it in the bank accounts of the already rich, elites who have set up companies and organizations for that purpose.  They are working to convince the rest of us that they are smarter than we are and that they know what is best for all of us.  While their right hand distracts you with PR, their left hand sets up systems to funnel that money into their own enterprises.

PLEASE read this article:  http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/politics/Once-a-government-pet-BP-now-a-capitalist-tool-95942659.html

Now PLEASE watch this video and notice the facts that  you can easily verify (and please do).

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U_oh6jbuydo&feature=related

After you watch this, you really need to go to YouTube and search for Glenn Beck + Crime, Inc. and watch all videos.  Beck couldn’t put all the info into one show.  There are several.  Everything is backed up and easy for YOU to verify as the truth.  Don’t make the mistake of discrediting the information just because you’ve heard people (always on the left) ridicule Beck.  They are trying to destroy him because he is destroying their “big money” plans.  You can go to www.glennbeck.com and type “Crime, Inc.” into his search box.  You can watch all of his presentations on the criminal ring using climate change to make gazillions of dollars for themselves at YOUR expense.  Go all the way.  After watching these, do your own research.  Google these people. 

Marbie’s Blog presented some of this in 2008 and again in 2009, before Beck put anything about it on his television show.  It’s out there, if you want to find it.  Go to the home page, https://marbiesblog.wordpress.com/, and type “A SHOCKER” into Marbie’s Blog search box.  There is a series of sixteen posts exposing a lot of this scheme and the main players.  There are other updates and related posts by different titles.  Type the terms “global warming”, “climate change” into the search box for those.

I hope you will educate yourself and others in order to protect your earnings, your property, your freedom and your way of life.  If you choose not to, you will become a sheep, headed for the slaughter.  Join the fight to stop this!

JOIN THE FIGHT!

BTW, do you really think Obama didn’t already know the Chairman of BP?  Read this:

http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/politics/Once-a-government-pet-BP-now-a-capitalist-tool-95942659.html

Obama and BP were part of the plan from the beginning.  Now Obama is using the BP oil spill to push Cap and Trade (Tax).  Both will profit HUGELY!

Read Full Post | Make a Comment ( None so far )

A SHOCKER! – Installment 11

Posted on April 27, 2010. Filed under: Al Gore, Cap and Trade, Capitalism, Communism, Constitution, Copenhagen, Democrats, Dictator, Energy, environmentalism, environmentalists, Freedom, Gaia, Gaia hypothesis, global governance, Global Warming/Cimate Change, globalization, junk science, Liberty, Marxism, Maurice Strong, Mother Earth, planet, Political, politics, science, Socialism, sovereignty, sustainability, sustainable, U.S. Government, United Nations | Tags: , |

SHOCKER! – Installment 11 – May 31, 2008

A Re-post.  

Quantcast 
MAURICE STRONG

   

Image by Jakub Kuzma 

“A major development to spur Washington in that direction (passing S.2191 Carbon Credit Trading Bill) would be the launching of a carbon credit exchange soon in Beijing, China. From Marbie’s Blog, A Shocker! Installment 10, May 30, 2008   

It’s  not a coincidence that Al Gore based Generation Investment Management in London where the largest carbon credit trading exchange is located. And it’s not a coincidence that Maurice Strong has moved to Beijing, China where another lucrative carbon credit trading exchange will be launched soon.   

Remember Maurice Strong?  Founder and Secretary General of the United Nations Environment Program and Senior Advisor to Koffi Annan. Founder of the Earth Council and the Earth Charter Initiative, and former President of the United Nations University for Peace.

While he chaired the Rio Earth Summit, outside, his wife Hanne and 300 followers called the Wisdom-Keepers, continuously beat drums, chanted prayers to Gaia, and tended sacred flames in order to ” establish and hold the energy field” for the duration of the summit. He founded the Manitou Institute where various Hindu, Bhuddist, and New Age groups perform rituals to heal Gaia. The Institute’s Mission is ” to perpetuate the ancient tradition of peoples of many tribes journeying here for a sacred connection to the Earth “. Very Gaian!! From Marbie’s Blog Installment 3 – May 16, 2008 

Strong, age 78, a Canadian socialist multi-millionaire owns a 63,000 acre ranch on the edge of the mountains in southern Colorado and another large ranch in Costa Rica. Strong currently spends 80% of his time in Beijing, according to his statement in the Beijing Review, China’s national English weekly, March 14, 2008. No doubt he buys carbon offsets to neutralize his fuel usage to travel between his land holdings and his apartment in Beijing(?) Strong is working on the Korea issue at the recently established Institute for Security and Sustainability (Gore’s Global Warming Agenda) in Northeast Asia at Peking University.   

” “What I see today is a tendency among some industrialized countries, notably the US, to shift the onus on China, India and other developing countries to divert attention from their own commitment,” he said in his address to the China Foreign Affairs University Forum.  “I predict there’s going to be tremendous additional pressure on China, and some of them will be unfair,” he said, because the per capita carbon footprint of China is very low.

“No country can do it (solve the problem) alone. China is right to expect that the US, Canada and other countries that created the problem in the first place should take the lead in helping resolve it,” Strong said in Beijing, March 13, 2008  
Couple the fact that Strong is living in Beijing, China working on the Korea issue and environmental programs in China, with the following report from the Free Republic, “Maurice Strong Steps Aside from UN Post”, April 21, 2005, Alan Freeman and Paul Waldie    

Washington and Toronto – Canadian Maurice Strong agreed to step aside Wednesday as a special envoy for the United Nations, but vowed to clear his name after being linked to Tongsun Park, a Korean lobbyist in connection with the Iraq “Oil for Food” scandal. Mr. Park, who formerly worked for the South Korean intelligence service, was a major figure in a 1970s influence-peddling scandal in Washington. http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1388471/   

The following are excerpts from a report by Fox News and I recommend reading the entire article at http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,250789,00.html by Claudia Rosett and George Russell, Feb. 8, 2007 “At the United Nations, the Curious Career of Maurice Strong, Fox   

“Without ever holding elected office, he has had a hand in some of the world’s most important bureaucratic appointments, both at the U.N. and at the World Bank. Strong has parlayed his personal enthusiasms and connections into a variety of huge U.N. projects, while punctuating his public service with private business deals. Along the way, Strong has also been caught up in a series of U.N. scandals and conflicts of interest. These extend from the notorious Oil-for-Food (Iraq) program to the latest furor over cash funneled via U.N. agencies to the rogue regime of North Korea, which involves, among other things, Strong’s creative use of a little-known, U.N.-chartered educational institution called the University for Peace. Above all, the tale of Maurice Strong illustrates the way in which the U.N., with its bureaucratic culture of secrecy, its diplomatic immunities, and its global reach, lends itself to manipulation by a small circle of those who best know its back corridors. 

 

China is a special place for Strong, a self-declared, life-long socialist. It is the burial place of a woman said to be one of his relatives, the famous pro-communist American journalist Anna Louise Strong, a vociferous supporter of Lenin and Stalin until the mid-30s, and a strong booster of Mao Zedong’s China. Maurice Strong’s presence in Beijing, however, raises awkward questions: For one thing, China, while one of the world’s biggest producers of industrial pollution, has been profiting from the trading of carbon emissions credits, thanks to heavily politicized U.N.-backed environmental deals engineered by Strong in the 1990sAnd from China, Strong has to this day maintained a network of personal and official connections within the U.N. system that he has long used to spin his own vast web of non-governmental organizations, business associates and ties to global glitterati. Within that web, Strong has developed a distinctive pattern over the years of helping to set up taxpayer-funded public bureaucracies, both outside and within the U.N., which he then taps for funding and contacts when he moves on to other projects.

Styling himself as a guru of global governance, Strong also helped to launch a major campaign for the U.N. to entwine its murky and graft-prone bureaucracy with big business, via so-called public-private partnerships. Strong introduced this process in his 1997 reform proposal as the bland notion of consultation between the United Nations and the business community.   End of Fox Article Excerpts 
The Maurice Strong web is a tangled one, including U.N. Secretary Generals, Boutros Boutros-Ghali, Koffi Annan, and now South Korean, Ban Ki-moon. Strong has used his many positions within the U.N. and his influence (read that money-making schemes) to place his own hand-picked people in lucrative and accommodating positions within the U.N. For all practical purposes, he hasn’t really left the U.N., merely moved to Beijing, where he operates out of the reach of the U.S. government and its laws.   

He also operates out of Costa Rica, but a discussion of that would make this article far too lengthy. Maybe another day. Fox News has covered that subject at the web site referenced above   

The obvious lesson to be learned is that Maurice Strong is both a worshiper of Gaia AND a founder of today’s “global warming” scheme. Strong’s multi-decade track record is one of making money by the millions by hook and crook using the United Nations, public-private partnerships, governments of foreign countries, people and connections made through the U.N. and the unwitting American taxpayer.   

There is no more time to do nothing.  

 

Read Full Post | Make a Comment ( None so far )

A SHOCKER! – Installment 10 – May 30, 2008

Posted on April 13, 2010. Filed under: Al Gore, atmosphere, Cap and Trade, Communism, Constitution, Copenhagen, Democrats, Dictator, Energy, environmentalism, environmentalists, Freedom, Gaia, global governance, Global Warming/Cimate Change, globalization, Liberty, Lindsey Graham, Marxism, Maurice Strong, McCain, Mikhail Gorbachav, Mother Earth, News Media, Obama, planet, Political, politics, science, sovereignty, sustainability, U.S. Government, United Nations | Tags: , , |

A SHOCKER! – Installment 10 – May 30, 2008

Re-post. Originially posted on May 29, 2008.

Soon, the Senate will hold hearings on a “Cap and Trade” bill, an effort to reduce carbon dioxide emissions into the atmosphere and prevent further global warming. It will be costly (multiple billions) and have far-reaching consequences (many decades and possibly beyond). Whether Cap and Trade will have any real benefit to the globe is still as unclear as the science of global warmings’ existence or cause. Senate Bill 2191 is offered to the Senate by Barbara Boxer (D – CA), Joe Lieberman (D-CONN) and John Warner (R-VA).

The “Cap” part of the bill places limits or “caps” on how much CO2 a company is allowed by government to emit into the air. This is usually measured in tons. The limit will be determined by the government’s estimate of current total emissions minus the reduction goal which will be a steadily reduced percentage annually. S. 2191 requires that emissions decline to 15% below 2005 levels by 2020, without regard to population increases and rising energy demands. Each unit of emissions allowed is called a carbon credit.

Company A may be allowed to emit 500 tons of CO2 this year, while Company B is allowed 600 tons. What happens if Company A exceeds the goal and only emits 450 tons, a savings of 50 carbon credits? What happens if Company B is unable to reduce emissions enough and exceeds the cap by 50 tons? No problem. Company B purchases the unused 50 carbon credits from Company A and is considered carbon neutral. In reality, Company A has done part of the reduction work for Company B and Company B hasn’t done its share.

How does Co. B absorb the cost of buying the additional carbon credits from Co. A? It doesn’t. It simply adds it to the cost of its goods and services, and you and I, the consumers, pay for it. Does the government give the annual carbon credits to companies for free? Nope. The government sells them and, by some estimates, expects to collect billions in new revenue. Who pays the cost of buying carbon credits from the government? You guessed it. The consumers – you and I. Companies add all of their costs of doing business to the prices of their goods and services and we pay for it. Our lives are getting more and more expensive, especially as the rate of reduction is constantly tightened year after year, making it increasingly more difficult for companies to comply. The harder it is, the more it will cost – US.

Companies will have to become experts in CO2 emission reduction technology, science and engineering. Instead of concentrating their efforts on making their product or providing their service, they will have to spend time and resources on emissions reduction. Most companies will hire someone to figure it out and get it done, passing the cost of the new employee/s on to us, again. Like losing weight, the last 20% of reduction may be very difficult to do, resulting in costly efforts. Just because the government decided to make a company reduce emissions by a number they picked, doesn’t mean it’s possible in reality. Of course, they can always purchase whatever extra carbon credits they need – and pass the cost on to you and me.

How will companies buy and sell carbon credits? Will they need to hire someone to handle that? Maybe not, but if they do, they will pass that cost on to…you guessed it…you and me. The American Chronicle online has a good article explaining carbon credit trading, the “Trade” part of “Cap and Trade”, entitled “‘Carbon Credit Trading’ is the New ‘Derivatives’ Game”,  by Ugur Akinci,  Ph.D.,  May 14, 2007  http://www.americanchronicle.com/articles/27045

A carbon credit is basically the right to pollute sold by those less-polluting companies to those who do not, for one reason or another, want to curb their carbon dioxide emissions yet. The prices of these credits probably rely more on the laws passed by legislative bodies in respective parliaments than on net corporate worths, or any classical technical ratios or interest rates.

The market to buy and sell such credits is especially hot in Europe where most countries have signed the U.N. Kyoto Protocol to curb CO2 emissions. The United States as of May 2007 still has not signed the Protocol.

To sell these credits as individual companies, you need to register your energy-saving and carbon-suppressing projects with the United Nations and get U.N. certification. Therefore, the U.S. companies cannot do that yet directly. That’s why London is right now the busy hub of the $25 billion carbon credit trading market where 60% of all transactions take place compared to only 10% in the U.S.

(MY NOTE: Al Gore’s company, Generation Investment Management is based in London (where all the money is flowing) with an office in Washington, D.C. (where he can push legislation in his favor.) This is a fund management company that trades “green” companies. Al Gore uses it to offset his own huge use of carbon fuels. He invests his money in these green companies thinking that he is investing enough in someone else’s effort to be eco-friendly and that will balance his “way out of the norm” use of energy in his mansion in Tennessee. He has two other homes around the country and I bet he flies to them. Maybe he drives a Prius between states? He invests his money in GIM, which then pays him a salary and a return on his investments. His “carbon neutral money scheme” keeps his money revolving from one of his pockets to another of his pockets, picking up more profit along the way. Clever guy, this Al Gore.)

However, the U.S. investors already take part in this new exciting market through various hedge funds that deal in the 200-member Chicago Climate Exchange, Inc.

(MY NOTE: The name ENRON keeps popping into my head. Carbon Credits bought and sold and they are not based on anything, just thin air. They have no concrete value.)

The pressures on Washington to sign the Kyoto Protocol and to participate more directly in the world-wide carbon credit trade comes from major states like California.

Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger has signed in September 2006 a law that mandates cutting down the CA carbon emissions by 25% as of 2020. This would of course increase the attention paid to CC trading as well since it is a lucrative way to self-finance many alternative energy projects.

(MY NOTE: Just order companies to lower their emissions by a percentage every year and be done with it. Don’t create this new carbon trading industry, in which the people are fleeced andthe government makes billions, as do the promoters of this pyramid scheme. It’s a mass wealth re-distribution scheme that moves money from yours and my bank accounts to the government treasuries and the promoters bank accounts.)

A major development to spur Washington in that direction would be the launching of a carbon credit exchange soon in Beijing, China. I’m sure we are witnessing only the beginning of a brand new trading sector that will make itself felt strongly in the months and years ahead.”

(MY NOTE: By all means, we must keep up with the Jones’ or China.)

You probably get the picture that just like oil, whose price is affected by speculators and traders bidding up the prices, carbon credits will be traded on an exchange and the prices will be bid up as well. The more scarce and the greater the demand for carbon credits, the higher the price will go. And that expense will be passed down to… YOU AND ME AGAIN.

The bottom line for me is that global warming hasn’t been satisfactorily proven yet. It certainly hasn’t been proven that human activities are causing detrimental global warming. And financing this whole scheme is YOU AND ME. If it turns out that the globe is not warming dangerously, but is only experiencing normal cycles OR that humans can’t and don’t cause warming and cannot prevent it, then you and I have been fleeced again by politicans who pushed this into law. Al Gore opened Generation Investments Management to capitalize on global warming and stands to make millions and perhaps billions. He will never allow anyone or anything to interfere with it, not even scientists who can show evidence contrary to Gore’s theory.

THE SENATE AND CONGRESS SHOULD WAIT UNTIL WE HAVE ACCURATE AND CONCRETE EVIDENCE PROVING THAT THE COMPANIES THAT WOULD BE FORCED TO BUY CARBON CREDITS ARE INDEED THE CAUSE.

CONTACT YOUR REPRESENTATIVES AND TELL THEM NOT TO PASS LEGISLATION UNTIL WE HAVE THE PROOF. Remember, Gore’s professor and mentor, Dr. Roger Revelle said repeatedly that “there is no harm in waiting. It is not an imminent threat.” Another Inconvenient Truth for Al Gore and his buddies that hope to profit from this.

There is no more time to do nothing.

Please read all the previous installments and the future installments of which there will be at least five more, perhap six or seven.

Read Full Post | Make a Comment ( None so far )

A SHOCKER! – Installment 8 Global Warming/Climate Change

Posted on February 3, 2010. Filed under: Al Gore, atmosphere, bioscience, Cap and Trade, Copenhagen, Darwin, Dawkins, Democrats, Energy, environmentalism, environmentalists, evolution, Freedom, Gaia, Gaia hypothesis, Gaia matrix, global governance, Global Warming/Cimate Change, globalization, goddess, Greek mythology, idol, James Lovelock, junk science, Liberty, Marguli, Maurice Strong, Mikhail Gorbachav, Mother Earth, News Media, Obama, pantheism, planet, Political, politics, science, sovereignty, sustainability, sustainable, U.S. Government, uniformitarianism, United Nations | Tags: , , |

A SHOCKER! – Installment 8 – May 27, 2008 Re-Post

Not every scientist is part of Al Gore’s mythical consensus. Scientists worried about a new ice age seek funding to better observe something bigger than your SUV – THE SUN!” http://www.ibdeditorials.com/IBDArticles.aspx?id=287279412587175, Investor’s Business Daily, Editorial, February 7, 2008

The Danish Meteorological Institute released a study, using data that covered centuries, showing that global temperatures closely tracked Solar cycles. This was in 1991 just about the time Al Gore was beginning to get the word out that the earth was going to burn up from gas emissions produced by man. He had created a slideshow in 1988 about the atmosphere and used it to teach on the subject. It was this slideshow that was the basis for An Inconvenient (and inaccurate) Truth (falsehood).

There was convincing data then, and Canadian scientists want more funding to study global cooling NOW. The Sun impacts Earth’s climate more than anything else. Elementary schools teach kids that our seasons are the result of our closeness to or distance from the Sun. In the past, we’ve been warned of solar storms affecting us with power blackouts, satellite failures and even pipeline explosions.

Gore and the Gaia worshipers pound everyone into submission by stating that “scientists agree” and that it is” scientifically proven”. They use the words “science, scientists, evidence and proven” as incontrovertible. What they don’t say is how many scientists disagree with Gore and have science that disproves the Gore truth. Al Gaia Gore never mentions all the evidence to the contrary. The following website presents a great deal of evidence and studies that cover centuries of data proving that solar activity changes Earth’s climate in cycles. An eleven year cycle is one of the main topics discussed, and yes, by scientists with very respected credentials. It also explains the ozone layer and the holes environmentalists claim are caused by gas emissions and blame for global warming.

http://www.solarstorms.org/SClimate.html

“The most well-documented connection between solar activity and climate change is the Maunder Minimum. This was a 40-year period when extreme cold weather prevailed in Europe. It also coincided with astronomers watching the sun and not seeing many sunspots! Astronomer Jack Eddy pointed this out in the 1970’s, and since then many other sun-climate connections have been looked for and in some cases uncovered.

The sunspot cycle and Boston Weather…. This study by Dave Henry at NOAA is based on 207 years of daily temperature data from Boston. It shows a 0.8 F drop in the average annual temperature near sunspot maximum, a 3-inch difference in the annual average precipitation near sunspot maximum, and a 7-inch increase in annual average snowfall at sunspot maximum.

The sunspot cycle and Annual Precipitation in Beijing.This article by Juan Zhao and his colleagues at Beijing Normal University was published in the Chinese Journal of Astronomy and Astrophysics (2004, vol 4 pg 189) and is based on rainfall records from 1870 to 2002. Their wavelet analysis of the rainfall data identifies four periods of 11, 22, 33 and 72 years. The wavelet analysis of the sunspot data for the same period reveals periods of 11, 22, 33 and 78 years.

The sunspot cycle and Extreme Weather over Portugal…. This 2005 study by P.S. Lucio at the Center for Geophysics in Evorea was published in the Geophysical Research Abstracts (vol. 7 p. 129) and is based on cosmic ray and rainfall data from 1901-2000. A statistically significant correlation was found between rainfall and temperature extremes, and cosmic ray fluxes beginning in 1980.

The sunspot cycle and the Global StratosphereThis study by H. van Loon and K. Labitzke at the National Center for Atmospheric Research (NOAA) shows that the heights and temperatures of the lower stratosphere vary in step with the sunspot cycle. It was published in the Journal of Atmospheric and Solar-Terrestrial Research (1999, vol. 61 pg. 53) and is an extension of a Northern Hemisphere study that they completed in 1997. The correlation between the sunspot cycle and the zonally averaged temperatures are highest between the tropopause and the 25-km level of the ozone layer.”

The amount of UV from the sun ( specifically UV-B) changes during the sunspot cycle. At sunspot maximum, there is 0.1 % more UV-B radiation than at minimum. Scientists have detected this sunspot cycle-effect in a 2% change in ozone concentrations. For more details see ” Solar Cycle Variability, Ozone, and Climate” by Drew Shindell, David Rind, Nambeth Balachandran, Judith Lean, and Patrick Lonergan in journal Science 1999 284: 305-308.

The difference in total ozone between maximum and minimum conditions during the sunspot cycle were estimated using yearly averages of total ozone. For solar cycle 21, 1.16% and 1.26% for solar cycle 22, a larger difference of 3.8% and 4.1% were found. The corresponding variation in UV-B at 3000 Angstroms, using Beer’s law, is 4-10% with maxima occurring during the minimum of the solar cycle. E. Escher, V. Kirchoff, Y. Sahai and N. Paes Leme published in the Advances in Space Research, Volume 27, Issue 12, p. 1983-1986.

The correlations between the total column ozone observed by TOMS and the 11-yr sunspot cycle are lowest in the equatorial region, where ozone is produced, and in the subpolar regions, where the largest amounts are found. In the annual mean the highest, statistically significant, correlations lie between the 5° and 30° parallels of latitude in either hemisphere — between the area of production and the areas of plenty. This position of the largest correlations suggests that the association between the Sun and the ozone is not a direct, radiative one, but that it is due to solar induced changes in the transport of ozone, that is, to changes in the atmospheric circulation. The highest tropical-subtropical correlations move with the Sun from summer hemisphere to summer hemisphere. The subtropical geopotential heights in the ozone layer are higher in the peaks than in the valleys of the 11-yr sunspot cycle. It is probable that the higher subtropical geopotentials in solar maxima depress the poleward transport of ozone through the subtropics and therefore create an abundance of ozone in the tropics relative to the solar minima. These results are based on a 15-yr series of ozone observations and may thus not necessarily be representative of a longer period. “ K. Labitzke and H. van Loon published in the Journal of Atmospheric and Solar-Terrestrial Physics V. 59, p. 9-19, 1997

Cosmic rays stream down into Earth’s atmosphere from the sun and elsewhere beyond the solar system. Recent studies show that these particles penetrate into the troposphere and alter the way that droplets condense to form clouds, rain and snow with important weather and climate consequences. Changes in the sun’s ultraviolet light affects the ozone layer and the energy input into the upper atmosphere. As the upper atmosphere is heated, it expands into space causing increased friction for satellites. 

There is enough opposing science to bring Gore’s hypothesis into question. It is far too soon in this debate to pass laws changing a free people’s way of life and bringing down the economies of developing nations, not to mention our own here in America.

There is no more time to do nothing.

Read Full Post | Make a Comment ( None so far )

CLIMATE-GATE EMAIL SCOUNDRELS WON’T BE PROSECUTED

Posted on January 29, 2010. Filed under: Al Gore, ALERT!, atmosphere, bioscience, Cap and Trade, Copenhagen, Darwin, Dawkins, Democrats, environmentalism, environmentalists, evolution, Freedom, Gaia, Gaia hypothesis, Gaia matrix, global governance, Global Warming/Cimate Change, globalization, goddess, Greek mythology, Hillary, idol, junk science, Liberty, Lindsey Graham, Marxism, Maurice Strong, McCain, Mikhail Gorbachav, Mother Earth, News Media, Obama, planet, Political, politics, science, SEIU, Socialism, sovereignty, sustainability, sustainable, U.S. Government, Uncategorized, uniformitarianism, United Nations | Tags: , , |

Phil Jones:

“The skeptics seem to be building up a head of steam here! … The IPCC comes in for a lot of stick. Leave it to you to delete as appropriate! Cheers Phil
PS I’m getting hassled by a couple of people to release the CRU station temperature data. Don’t any of you three tell anybody that the UK has a Freedom of Information Act !”

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1246661/New-scandal-Climate-Gate-scientists-accused-hiding-data-global-warming-sceptics.html

The scientists (and I use that term loosely) who hid climate data which refuted the “global warming” theory broke the law, expressly the Freedom of Information Act.  However, they will escape prosecution simply because the crime was committed more than six months ago.  The crime is part of a conspiracy which will cost citizens of the world billions of dollars and more importantly, their basic freedoms, to satisfy the requirements of climate change laws.  The crime of withholding critical information used as a basis for climate change legislation and propaganda truly has an adverse and damaging effect upon all of us.  It amounts to a swindle and, to some degree, enslavement.   This is no small matter and should not be overlooked.  Prosecution must take place and an example must be made of these biased scientists.

It’s important to show others who may be engaging in this practice that they too will be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law.  There’s too much at stake to let this continue.   They are lying to the governments of the world, providing false testimony, and benefiting monetarily by receiving research grants to continue what they know to be false.

Americans and citizens of those countries whose leaders are signing on to climate change legislation are victims of  a scheme designed to convey power and money to those who have positioned themselves advantageously.   The internet is a gold mine of information for those who are willing to  look for evidence of this charge.  A thorough investigation of the big players, their backgrounds and their business connections will shed light on the scheme. Do your own homework, familiarize yourself with the big players and contact your representatives in Washington, D.C. as well as locally.

THERE IS NO MORE TIME TO DO NOTHING!

Mick Kelly:

“Yeah, it wasn’t so much 1998 and all that that I was concerned about, used to dealing with that, but the possibility that we might be going through a longer – 10 year – period of relatively stable temperatures beyond what you might expect from La Nina etc. Speculation, but if I see this as a possibility then others might also. Anyway, I’ll maybe cut the last few points off the filtered curve before I give the talk again as that’s trending down as a result of the end effects and the recent cold-ish years.”

VISIT:

http://www.nocapandtrade.com/climategate/

FOR INFORMATION REGARDING THE SCIENTISTS INVOLVED, THEIR TITLES AND THE CONTENTS OF THE EMAILS.

 

Read Full Post | Make a Comment ( None so far )

A SHOCKER! – Installment 7 Global Warming/Climate Change

Posted on January 27, 2010. Filed under: Al Gore, atmosphere, bioscience, Cap and Trade, Copenhagen, Darwin, Darwin, Dawkins, environmentalism, environmentalists, evolution, Gaia, Gaia hypothesis, Gaia matrix, Global Warming/Cimate Change, globalization, goddess, Greek mythology, idol, James Lovelock, junk science, Liberty, Lynn margulis, Marguli, Mars, Marxism, Maurice Strong, Mikhail Gorbachav, Mother Earth, Obama, pantheism, planet, Political, politics, science, Socialism, sovereignty, sustainability, sustainable, U.S. Government, uniformitarianism, United Nations | Tags: , , |

A SHOCKER! – Installment 7 – May 25, 2008 A Re-Post

From the website: http://denisdutton.com/cooling_world.htm

Comments in red are mine.

Newsweek, The Cooling World, April 28, 1975

There are ominous signs that the Earth’s weather patterns have begun to change dramatically and that these changes may portend a drastic decline in food production – with serious political implications for just about every nation on Earth. The drop in food output could begin quite soon, perhaps only 10 years from now. The regions destined to feel its impact are the great wheat-producing lands of Canada and the U.S.S.R. in the North, along with a number of marginally self-sufficient tropical areas – parts of India, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Indochina and Indonesia – where the growing season is dependent upon the rains brought by the monsoon.

Where have we heard this before? in only 10 years. Al Gore says that we have only 10 years to save the planet, to avoid catastrophy, to save the oceans, to avoid passing the point of no return, to save our lives.

The terms used in the 1975 article are “ominous, dramatically, drastic, serious, every nation.” We’re hearing the same urgency in today’s warnings of global warming as was trumpeted in 1975 about global cooling.

The evidence in support of these predictions has now begun to accumulate so massively that meteorologists are hard-pressed to keep up with it. In England, farmers have seen their growing season decline by about two weeks since 1950, with a resultant overall loss in grain production estimated at up to 100,000 tons annually. During the same time, the average temperature around the equator has risen by a fraction of a degree – a fraction that in some areas can mean drought and desolation. Last April, in the most devastating outbreak of tornadoes ever recorded, 148 twisters killed more than 300 people and caused half a billion dollars’ worth of damage in 13 U.S. states.

Like Gore and his crowd today, the voices in ’75 claimed to have piles of evidence to prove their predictions. Yet, no calamaties befell Earth. No ice age. No cooling disasters occurred. Still using urgent words, such as “massively, drought, desolation, devastating.” Scientists were among the incorrect crowd, like today. The claim was made that a very small climate change caused death and destruction, and yet, it didn’t.

To scientists, these seemingly disparate incidents represent the advance signs of fundamental changes in the world’s weather. The central fact is that after three quarters of a century of extraordinarily mild conditions, the earth’s climate seems to be cooling down. Meteorologists disagree about the cause and extent of the cooling trend, as well as over its specific impact on local weather conditions. But they are almost unanimous in the view that the trend will reduce agricultural productivity for the rest of the century. If the climatic change is as profound as some of the pessimists fear, the resulting famines could be catastrophic. “A major climatic change would force economic and social adjustments on a worldwide scale,” warns a recent report by the National Academy of Sciences, “because the global patterns of food production and population that have evolved are implicitly dependent on the climate of the present century.”

The revered National Academy of Sciences was wrong. We know that now. They are wrong again about global warming.

A survey completed last year by Dr. Murray Mitchell of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration reveals a drop of half a degree in average ground temperatures in the Northern Hemisphere between 1945 and 1968. According to George Kukla of Columbia University, satellite photos indicated a sudden, large increase in Northern Hemisphere snow cover in the winter of 1971-72. And a study released last month by two NOAA scientists notes that the amount of sunshine reaching the ground in the continental U.S. diminished by 1.3% between 1964 and 1972.

To the layman, the relatively small changes in temperature and sunshine can be highly misleading. Reid Bryson of the University of Wisconsin points out that the Earth’s average temperature during the great Ice Ages was only about seven degrees lower than during its warmest eras – and that the present decline has taken the planet about a sixth of the way toward the Ice Age average. Others regard the cooling as a reversion to the “little ice age” conditions that brought bitter winters to much of Europe and northern America between 1600 and 1900 – years when the Thames used to freeze so solidly that Londoners roasted oxen on the ice and when iceboats sailed the Hudson River almost as far south as New York City.

Just what causes the onset of major and minor ice ages remains a mystery. “Our knowledge of the mechanisms of climatic change is at least as fragmentary as our data,” concedes the National Academy of Sciences report. “Not only are the basic scientific questions largely unanswered, but in many cases we do not yet know enough to pose the key questions.”

Meteorologists think that they can forecast the short-term results of the return to the norm of the last century. They begin by noting the slight drop in overall temperature that produces large numbers of pressure centers in the upper atmosphere. These break up the smooth flow of westerly winds over temperate areas. The stagnant air produced in this way causes an increase in extremes of local weather such as droughts, floods, extended dry spells, long freezes, delayed monsoons and even local temperature increases – all of which have a direct impact on food supplies.

“The world’s food-producing system,” warns Dr. James D. McQuigg of NOAA’s Center for Climatic and Environmental Assessment, “is much more sensitive to the weather variable than it was even five years ago.” Furthermore, the growth of world population and creation of new national boundaries make it impossible for starving peoples to migrate from their devastated fields, as they did during past famines.

Climatologists are pessimistic that political leaders will take any positive action to compensate for the climatic change, or even to allay its effects. They concede that some of the more spectacular solutions proposed, such as melting the Arctic ice cap by covering it with black soot or diverting arctic rivers, might create problems far greater than those they solve. But the scientists see few signs that government leaders anywhere are even prepared to take the simple measures of stockpiling food or of introducing the variables of climatic uncertainty into economic projections of future food supplies. The longer the planners delay, the more difficult they will find it to cope with climatic change once the results become grim reality.

PETER GWYNNE with bureau reports

Thank goodness the government was unwilling to take drastic actions to prevent global cooling. The harm they would have caused would have been unnecessary and difficult to recover from. Today, the governments of the world are already taking steps to “prevent global warming.” The harm they will do may take decades to recover from, if then.

Plans to change our sovereignty, national borders, business practices, individual freedoms, laws and enforcement, transportation, even our religious beliefs, are already being crafted and eased into our daily lives. Some truly scary ideas have been put on the table for altering Earth’s atmosphere to head off the perceived warming trend. If they are successful, climate change will occurr by the hands of people who don’t know what they’re doing.

There is no more time to do nothing!

Read Full Post | Make a Comment ( None so far )

A SHOCKER! Climate News Update

Posted on November 19, 2009. Filed under: 2010 election, Al Gore, atmosphere, bioscience, Cap and Trade, Communism, Constitution, Copenhagen, Darwin, Dawkins, Democrats, Dictator, Energy, environmentalism, environmentalists, evolution, Freedom, Freedom of Speech, Gaia, Gaia hypothesis, Gaia matrix, global governance, Global Warming/Cimate Change, globalization, goddess, Greek mythology, idol, James Lovelock, Jean Soderman, junk science, Liberty, Lynn margulis, Marguli, Mars, Marxism, Maurice Strong, Mikhail Gorbachav, Mother Earth, News Media, Obama, Obama's Associates & Appointees, pantheism, planet, Political, politics, science, SEIU, Socialism, sovereignty, sustainability, sustainable, U.S. Government, uniformitarianism, United Nations | Tags: , , |

http://www.spiegel.de/international/world/0,1518,662092,00.html

Climatologists Baffled by Global Warming Time-Out, By Gerald Traufetter

“Global warming appears to have stalled. Climatologists are puzzled as to why average global temperatures have stopped rising over the last 10 years. Some attribute the trend to a lack of sunspots, while others explain it through ocean currents.”

“Otherwise, however, not much is happening with global warming at the moment. The Earth’s average temperatures have stopped climbing since the beginning of the millennium, and it even looks as though global warming could come to a standstill this year.”

“Ironically, climate change appears to have stalled in the run-up to the upcoming world summit in the Danish capital, where thousands of politicians, bureaucrats, scientists, business leaders and environmental activists plan to negotiate a reduction in greenhouse gas emissions. Billions of euros are at stake in the negotiations.”

This is a very inconvenient truth for the Gore/Gaia/GE/Obama crowd who expect to become billionaires from forcing legislation on this.  The computer models were wrong.  Gore was wrong.  We didn’t die in ten years and we’re not going to die in the next ten years.  The sincere chicken littles were duped and don’t need to run for cover.

Yet, there are still those politicians who intend to force this down our throats and clean out our bank accounts, while they remove our freedoms ten at a time.  Do everything you can to stop this.  Contact your elected officials today.

Read Full Post | Make a Comment ( None so far )

A SHOCKER! – Installment 6 Global Warming/Climate Change

Posted on November 16, 2009. Filed under: Al Gore, atmosphere, bioscience, Cap and Trade, Communism, Darwin, Dawkins, Democrats, Dictator, Energy, environmentalism, environmentalists, evolution, Freedom, Freedom of Speech, Gaia, Gaia hypothesis, Gaia matrix, global governance, Global Warming/Cimate Change, globalization, goddess, Greek mythology, idol, James Lovelock, Jean Soderman, junk science, Lynn margulis, Marguli, Mars, Maurice Strong, Mikhail Gorbachav, Mother Earth, News Media, Obama, pantheism, planet, politics, science, Socialism, sovereignty, sustainability, sustainable, U.S. Government, uniformitarianism, United Nations | Tags: , , , |

Ark

A SHOCKER! – Installment 6 – May 23, 2008 – RE-POST

http://www.arkofhope.org/    Please visit this site.

Called “The Ark of Hope”, containing the Earth Charter (a revised edition by Maurice Strong and written on handmade papyrus), Temenos Books (temenos: a magical sacred circle where special rules apply and extraordinary events inevitably occur.  Temenos book: a handmade book filled with pages of visual prayers/affirmations for global healing, peace and gratitude) and Temenos Earth Masks worn and made by children with Earth’s elements ( leaves, pebbles, feathers, paints, scraps of paper).

This wooden box was deliberately fashioned after the Ark of the Covenant in the Bible which contained the Ten Commandments, Aaron’s rod that budded and a golden pot of Manna from Heaven. God’s Ark was born by two poles overlaid with gold and the Gaia ark is carried by two poles referred to as unicorn horns. God’s ark resided in the Holy of Holies in the Temple.

ARK 2

Gaia’s ark has been carried to many places in the world for ceremonies, usually on Earth Day, but its overseers hope its final resting place will someday be the meditation room in the United Nations Building. The greatest difference between the two arks is that God’s Presence was manifested upon His ark and Gaia’s ark is made of dead wood and no power is discernable. The Golden Ark of the Bible represents a covenant with God Almighty, Creator of the Universe, while Gaia’s ark is a symbol of defiance of that God and directs all to worship the creation rather than the Creator. The Ark of Hope is based on man’s hope that he can “fix” everything in the world by his own power.

Political correctness has outlawed the teaching of anything Christian in American schools, but it’s critical to note that Gaia, presented as environmentalism, is being taught in our schools and universities at all grade levels. Notice that children are used to make the temenos books and masks and figures of children are painted on the side of the ark of Gaia. Brainwashing humans from birth is the plan for spreading Gaia worship throughout the planet without using force or violence.

http://www.mettaearth.org/articles_ark.php4

Metta Earth Institute, A Center for Contemplative Ecology

“Toward a Sustainable World: The Earth Charter in Action,”  by Cameron Davis and Sally Linder

Teachers from Indiana, USA to Johannesburg, South Africa embraced the project as a means to relate their curriculums to a global expression of sustainability and non-violence.  One Temenos Book’s accordion pages unfold in long trains of painted oceans and jungles teeming with endangered species; another has paintings of trees watered by clouds while birds fly amongst sari, chador, and jean clad children skipping rope. Its last page displays a huge hand touching big red lips with the caption, “Let Our Smiles Touch One Another.” Crafting hand-dyed felt covered books, 900 children in one Vermont school witnessed their connection with farmers, sheep, wool, vegetables, and the world community. Older students added another link by using their Temenos Books to educate local governments about the Earth Charter; encouraging its endorsement by twenty-two Vermont towns. University students unleashed their own creative ways to introduce the Earth Charter; beating drums, wearing costumes, and zooming into schools and cafes on roller blades.

Connect the dots: Earth Charter, temenos books, in our schools and local governments. This is NOT just “take care of our planet”. This is FULL BLOWN GAIA PAGAN IDOL WORSHIP disguised as environmentalism because its adherents know that people will not put up with replacing their own religious beliefs in Christianity, Judaism, Islam, atheism or political correctness. However, Buddism and Hinduism is embracing Gaia worship.

Maurice Strong has said, “The real goal of the Earth Charter is that it will in fact become like the Ten Commandments.”

And, The Los Angeles Times, May 8, 1997

 “Do not do unto the environment of others what you do not want done to your own environment…My hope is that this charter will be a kind of Ten Commandments, a ‘Sermon on the Mount’, that provides a guide for human behavior toward the environment in the next century.” Mikhail Gorbachev.  

He also said,  “Cosmos is my God. Nature is my God.”   PBS Charlie Rose Show, October 23, 1996

There is no more time to do nothing.

Read Full Post | Make a Comment ( None so far )

A SHOCKER! – Installment 5 Global Warming/Climate Change Follow Up

Posted on November 11, 2009. Filed under: Al Gore, atmosphere, bioscience, Cap and Trade, Communism, Constitution, Darwin, Dawkins, Democrats, Dictator, Energy, environmentalism, environmentalists, evolution, Freedom, Gaia, Gaia hypothesis, Gaia matrix, global governance, Global Warming/Cimate Change, globalization, goddess, Greek mythology, idol, James Lovelock, Jean Soderman, junk science, Liberty, Lynn margulis, Marguli, Mars, Marxism, Maurice Strong, Mikhail Gorbachav, Mother Earth, News Media, Obama, pantheism, planet, politics, science, Socialism, sovereignty, sustainability, sustainable, U.S. Government, Uncategorized, uniformitarianism, United Nations | Tags: , , , |

A SHOCKER! – Follow up for Installment 5 – May 22, 2008 RE-POST

Gore Money

The links in this article won’t work because I transferred this article from its original location on the website of Investor’s Business Daily. Please visit http://www.ibdeditorials.com/IBDArticles.aspx?id=295139326448571

The emphasis is mine.

This is information everyone should be armed with when facing the United Nations’ onslaught of heavy legislation designed to bring every citizen in the world (and I mean the whole world and so do they) under submission to their Gaia Agenda 21 to save goddess Mother Earth from the harm perpetrated by human activities.

Al Gore And Climate Ka-Ching

By INVESTOR’S BUSINESS DAILY | Posted Thursday, May 08, 2008 4:20 PM PT

Junk Science: Al Gore blames the Burma tragedy on global warming despite growing evidence to the contrary. Could the hype be related to his financial interests?


Read More: Global Warming


Gore’s reaction to the death and destruction caused by a cyclone ravaging Burma was to utter an emphatic “I told you so” Tuesday on National Public Radio. In an interview on NPR’s “Fresh Air” broadcast, the jolly green giant made the charge while talking about the paperback release of his ironically named book, “The Assault on Reason.”Ignoring the fact that the rising death toll is due in part to an incompetent, isolationist and authoritarian government that allows most of its people to live in shanty towns of tin and bamboo, Gore claimed that “we’re seeing consequences that scientists have long predicted might be associated with continued global warming.”In other words, people die in Rangoon because of an SUV in Richmond, Va.

There’s a “trend toward more Category 5 storms,” Gore claimed, and this trend “appears to be linked to global warming and specifically to the impact of global warming on higher ocean temperatures in the top couple of hundred feet in the ocean, which drives convection energy and moisture into these storms and makes them more powerful.”

Except, as we recently noted, the trend in the world’s oceans — as shown by measurements taken by a fleet of 3,000 high-tech ocean buoys first deployed in 2003 — is toward cooling. As Dr. Josh Willis, of NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory, noted in a separate interview with National Public Radio, “there has been a very slight cooling” over the buoys’ five years of observation.

As Joseph D’Aleo, the Weather Channel’s first director of meteorology, told National Review Online’s Deroy Murdock that the slight warming trend “peaked in 1998, and the temperature trend the last decade has been flat, even as CO2 has increased 5.5%. Cooling began in 2002. He added: “Ocean buoys have echoed that slight cooling since the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration deployed them in 2003.”

In fact, Ryan Maue of Florida State University’s Center for Ocean-Atmosphere Prediction Studies says 2007 “will rank as a historically inactive tropical cyclone year for the Northern Hemisphere as a whole.” It was!

In the past 30 years, Maue adds, only 1977 had less hurricane activity from January through October. Last September had the lowest activity since 1977 while the Octobers of 2006 and 2007 had the lowest activity since 1976 and 1977, respectively.

So why the hype? Well, global warming is a growth industry designed to keep Earth and some bank accounts green.

Gore himself joined the venture capital group, Kleiner Perkins Caufield & Byers just last September. On May 1, the firm announced a $500 million investment in maturing green technology firms called the Green Growth Fund.

The group announced another $700 million to be invested over the next three years in green-tech startup firms. But if the green technology business, uh, cools down, there will be no return on that investment. There would be no need for such investments if global warming wasn’t a threat. So Gore just launched, among other things, a $300 million ad campaign to convince us it is so.

Speaking at a conference in Monterey, Calif., on March 1, the former vice president admitted to having “a stake” in a number of green investments into which he recommended attendees put money rather than “subprime carbon assets” such as tar sands and shale oil. He also is co-founder and chairman of Generation Investment Management, which sells carbon offsets that allow rich polluters to continue polluting with a clear conscience.

We have a prediction all our own — that disastrous global warming will not occur. Then the greenies will take credit for preventing it and ask us if we’re glad we spent trillions in fighting it. Al Gore will be laughing all the way to the bank.

There is no more time to do nothing.

 

Read Full Post | Make a Comment ( None so far )

« Previous Entries

Liked it here?
Why not try sites on the blogroll...