Posted on February 13, 2013. Filed under: Democrats, News Media, Obama | Tags: bias, drink, frenzy, gaffe, Marco Rubio, media, politics, rebuttal, Republican, response, Rubio, SOTUS, State of the Union Address, trivia, water, water bottle |
Social media and otherwise serious news organizations were all abuzz about Sen. Marco Rubio’s drink of water during his speech which followed up Obama’s State of the Union Address Tuesday night. The frivolous attention to trivia did not mask their attempt to avoid the substance of Rubio’s well-received common sense contrast to Obama’s call for more spending and bigger government which hasn’t worked in four years, nor anytime it’s ever been tried in history. The bias of the Left prompts their mocking of a Republican expressing conservative views, yet having no desire to do the same to “their guy”. Obama’s list of highly visible faux pas’ are noteworthy, but the Left will never note them.Read Full Post | Make a Comment ( None so far )
Posted on June 17, 2012. Filed under: Al Gore, ALERT!, Big Brother, Cap and Trade, Capitalism, Christianity, Constitution, Democrats, Energy, environmentalism, environmentalists, evolution, Freedom, Gaia, Gaia hypothesis, Gaia matrix, global governance, Global Warming/Cimate Change, globalization, goddess, Greek mythology, idol, James Lovelock, junk science, Liberty, Lynn margulis, Mars, Maurice Strong, Mikhail Gorbachav, Mother Earth, News Media, Obama, pantheism, planet, Political, politics, science, sovereignty, sustainability, sustainable, Taxes, U.S. Government, Uncategorized, uniformitarianism, United Nations | Tags: A Shocker!, climate change, fracking, international climate change conference, Kyoto Treaty, methane, natural gas, nuclear power, Rio, Rio de Janeiro, Update, wind power |
Begin by reading the original post of May 15, 2008 about James Lovelock and his influence on the global warming movement, and his devotion to the pagan religion, Gaia. There’s a lot to learn there and it’s never mentioned by the main stream media. Too many people know nothing of this. If they did, they’d be much more skeptical of the green/global warming/climate change movement.
After you have the important background knowledge, read today’s surprising news coming from the ninety-two year-old James Lovelock whose latest comments are shocking AND will be completely ignored by the people in the movement whose beliefs are the direct result of this man’s influence.
Lovelock believes in the Gaia religion, as you will see in both articles. The Gaia religion “no longer sees man as the measure of all things or the center of the universe. He has been measured and found to be an undistinguished bit of matter, different in no essential way from bacteria, stones and trees. Gaians also believe that over-population is a root cause of an imbalance in the Earth’s ecology. Therefore, they believe in man-made global warming/climate change. (Could this be a reason behind the fight for abortion “rights”?
Lovelock, having formulated the Gaia Hypothesis, is the father of the climate change movement. He’s predicted complete doom on the Earth unless governments force people to adopt severe and costly changes to every thing people do on earth. It’s called “sustainable development”, and has been marketed to the people as “going green.”
But what is he saying today?
“Adapt and survive.” He supports nuclear power, hates wind power, remarking that they are useless and ugly, AND is now encouraging the U.K. to embrace fracking because natural gas is cheap and doesn’t produce as much CO2 as burning coal.
“We rushed into renewable energy without any thought. The schemes are largely hopelessly inefficient and unpleasant. Fracking buys us some time, and we can learn to adapt.”
“Let’s be pragmatic and sensible and get Britain to switch everything to methane. We should be going mad on it.”
What has brought about this major reversal? He’s been hit hard with some hefty home energy bills and he doesn’t like it. He’s realizing that these costs are unsustainable, I suspect. It has changed his economic, political and scientific views on global warming, as he used to call it.
He told MSNBC that “he had been extrapolating too far in reaching such a conclusion and had made a mistake in claiming to know with such certainty what will happen to the climate.”
He says “being allowed to change your mind and follow the evidence is one of the liberating marvels of being an independent scientist.”
Many of us never bought into what has been proven faulty and fake science, but we’ve all paid a high cost for Lovelock’s Gaiantic mistake.
At the International Climate Change Conference in Rio next week, Lovelock’s devotee’s will seek solutions to the devastating climate change disaster that he now says doesn’t exist. They won’t be phased by Lovelock’s latest revelations.
“Whenever the UN puts its finger in, it seems to become a mess.”
“The climate situation is more complex than we at present are capable of handling, or possibly even in the future.”
“It’s so much cheaper to air-condition the cities and let Gaia take care of the world. It’s a much better route to go than so-called ‘sustainable development’, which is meaningless drivel.”
Where’s the proof that he’s really changed his mind and won’t jump back on the “sustainable development” wagon? He’s moving from his home of thirty years amidst acres of trees that he planted himself to a small beach cottage. Unafraid of the horrors of rising seas caused by climate change.
“At worst, I think it will be two feet a century.”
Unfortunately for us, the costs associated with climate change legislation will rise much more rapidly.
As for his political views on the subject now days:
“I’m neither strongly left nor right, but I detest the Liberal Democrats.” “The coalition has behaved disgracefully on environmental and energy policies. It would have been much better if they had been properly right wing.”
Perhaps he was warning us when he said:
“It’s just the way the humans are that if there’s a cause of some sort, a religion starts forming around it. It just so happens that the green religion is now taking over from the Christian religion. I don’t think people have noticed that, but it’s got all the sort of terms that religions use. The greens use guilt. You can’t win people round by saying they are guilty for putting CO2 in the air.”
Mr. Lovelock, some have noticed it.
https://marbiesblog.wordpress.com/2009/11/16/a-shocker-installment-6/ The Gaia Ark of Hope, The Earth Charter inside the Ark (to mimic The Ten Commandments), Temenos Books (to be sacred like our Bible), Cosmos is our God
If you read Lovelock’s past writings and statements, you might think he sounds a little spacey. He was an important person at NASA. Just mull over that for a minute. We never pay attention to the kind of people who lead our world. BUT WE SHOULD.
The Kyoto Treaty? Kill it. Get out of all treaties, legislation and programs born out of the global warming/climate change hoax. Get back to basics, back to normal and relieve the people of the world from burdensome expenses and regulations that adversely affect their lives.
PASS IT ON. THE TRUTH SHALL SET US FREE (from tyrannical governments, world governments, and slavery to regulations based on falsehoods and pagan religion.)Read Full Post | Make a Comment ( None so far )
Posted on April 12, 2012. Filed under: Communism, Democrats, Marxism, McCain, News Media, Obama, Obama's Associates & Appointees, Political, politics, Socialism, U.S. Government, Who Is Obama? | Tags: 2012, Anderson Cooper, Anita Dunn, attacks, Bachmann, campaign, candidates wives, Cindy McCain, CNN, DNC, Fox News, Glenn Beck, Hilary Rosen. Ann Romney, off-limits, Palin, Republicans, strategy, war on women |
Candidate Obama said in 2008 that wives and families are off-limits in a campaign. Here it is:
He said he would speak out against anyone doing that. (crickets, crickets, crickets)
His surrogates have attacked candidate Mitt Romney’s wife. (crickets, crickets, crickets)
Where is Pres. Obama defending her and demanding that his own people stop the attacks on wives? Where was he when they attacked Cindy McCain, Sarah Palin, the Palin children, Michelle Bachmann and the husbands of Palin and Bachmann?
Is Obama responsible for what his team says? By his own mouth, he has said he would speak out to stop it. But he hasn’t.
CNN’s Anderson Cooper held a conversation with Obama supporter, Hilary Rosen in which she criticized Ann Romney for choosing to stay at home and raise her children, rather than have a career. Is Rosen connected to Obama’s campaign?
Hilary Rosen and Anita Dunn are partners in a PR firm, SKDKnickerbocker, used by the DNC for their campaigns, which includes that of Debbie Wasserman-Schultz, the DNC chairwoman. This firm was involved in the Sandra Fluke appearance before a mock Congressional hearing and the ensuing controversy, which Obama’s team used to begin their War On Women. Anita Dunn was Obama’s White House Communications Director from April through November, 2009. She left under some controversy over her statement to high school seniors that the murderous and brutal dictator, Mao Zedong, was one of her FAVORITE political philosophers. Did Obama know she was a Maoist before he hired her? It’s very likely that Obama knows Anita Dunn as well as anyone, considering their long association.
In 2oo6, Senator Obama hired Dunn as his STRATEGIST and communications director for his political action committee which he aptly named, The Hopefund. She also helped with staffing and worked for his “Obama for America” effort. Dunn became one of only four top advisors to Obama during his 2008 campaign, gaining the title “Senior Advisor” and was one of the MAJOR DECISION MAKERS.
What were some of her decisions regarding the strategy of Obama’s campaign? Listen to her explain it. “We control the news media.”
She helped devise the Wars on Fox News, Glenn Beck, Republicans, and wives of candidates. There can be no doubt. She was the senior advisor who made the major decisions. She was his communications director and strategist. It’s her plan.
There can be no mistake that Hilary Rosen’s attack on Ann Romney is no accident, but part of Dunn’s campaign strategy for Obama’s re-election effort.
Yes, Ms. Dunn. Anyone can now find the YouTube video to expose you, Rosen, Obama and team. Citizen journalists are vetting Obama and will be contrasting the videos of his former statements and promises with his current ones.
SKDKnickerbocker’s web site boasting of role in Obama’s election: http://www.skdknick.com/work/far-reaching-role-in-election/
Dunn’s bio is well documented online. One source is: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anita_Dunn.
Does Dunn tell the truth and nothing but the truth?
Is CNN in Obama’s pocket?
Dunn consistently used CNN to get the smear out. They seemed most willing to oblige. Rosen committed her attack on CNN.
Read Full Post | Make a Comment ( None so far )
Posted on February 24, 2012. Filed under: Abortion, Democrats, Freedom, global governance, Liberty, News Media, Obama, politics, science, Socialism, U.S. Government | Tags: 2012, Al Capone, campaigns, elections, GOP, intimidation, Republicans, Social Issues, tactics |
It’s astonishing that Republicans can be so duped by their opponents in the Democrat Party and lame stream media. The Dems make abortion and gay marriage the premiere issues of their campaigns, all the while telling the electorate that the GOP will lose if they so much as mention the same. It is usually assumed that the Democrat positions are correct and the only viable stances while the GOP positions are shameful. Yet, Republican voters still secretly harbor pro-life and anti-gay marriage values. What is shameful about protecting living human babies from harm, suffering and death?!
While ashamed to admit their pro-life, anti-gay marriage beliefs in public, they make these the litmus test for selecting candidates! Once they’ve anointed someone, they immediately muzzle their champion for fear of losing the election. This suggests that Democrats have already won the debate and Republians are wimps.
But that’s not the case. Democrats have used the media to brow beat, excoriate, attack without merit, lie, exagerate and vilify anyone who dares to hold a different set of values from them. They’ve successfully used mob tactics to intimidate into compliance. Al Capone would be proud.
In the light of truth, there is no way that people can be against protecting the life of human beings. The U.N. claims it’s existence for that very purpose – “no more wars.” Doctors, nurses and hospitals exist to save life. The Health Movement’s platform is to protect and preserve human life. Pre-natal care is pushed to preserve and protect the life of the unborn baby. The government has a watchdog agency charged with insuring that products used with, for and around human babies are completely safe.
Now why is the pro-life position unpopular in America and something to keep quiet about in a campaign? Which party should be ashamed of their values or lack thereof? The GOP candidates should make the Democrats ashamed of their murderous cold-blooded life-snuffing position in every campaign. GOP candidates should stand tall and firm, heads held high and confidently proclaim Democrats as heartless. They should point out that pregnant women who prefer to murder their own innocent babies are self-centered and irresponsible.
Let the Democrats yell and scream. They will look like spoiled brats throwing temper tantrums. GOP will look like the mature adults with common sense.
To say that social issues do not belong in politics ignores the fact that politics is all about governing society and the government absolutely does interfere in and exert control over social issues, therefore, must be part of any political campaign. It’s time Republicans realize what the Democrats have perpetrated on their party and get over it. They must stop cowering and fight for the beliefs of their party. Show how and why the GOP is the opposite of the Democrat Party. Isn’t that the purpose of campaigns? It’s all common sense.
What’s the best way to go about killing this little baby?
There is NO way. Could you kill this baby? Could you support killing this baby? Can you support candidates who are determined to continue the legality of killing babies? And what about botched abortions? Could you support killing the baby after it’s born, if the doctor was unsuccessful in his first attempt at murder? Not only did Sen. Obama of Illinois support such barbaric behavior, he was the only one who voted to protect it, when the rest of his party voted to end it. He voted three times to protect this murder of living infants. Live birth abortions = Murdering babies after they’re born and alive.
Can you support this or a candidate who did? I CAN’T!Read Full Post | Make a Comment ( None so far )
Posted on September 14, 2011. Filed under: Al Gore, amnesty, Big Brother, Cap and Trade, Capitalism, Christianity, Communism, Constitution, Democrats, Dictator, Energy, environmentalism, environmentalists, evolution, Freedom, Freedom of Speech, global governance, globalization, Guns, Hate Speech/Crime Bill, Health Care, Illegal Aliens, immigration, Islam, junk science, Liberty, Marxism, Muslims, News Media, Obama, Political, politics, Rush Limbaugh, SEIU, Socialism, sovereignty, Taxes, terrorism, U.S. Government, Uncategorized | Tags: 2012 Election, America, attacks, Bachmann, Cain, candidates, citizens, CNN, debate, falsehoods, Fox, Gingrich, half-truths, honesty, Huntsman, lies, Newt, Perry, president, record, Romney, Ron Paul, Santorum, smears, sources, Tea Party, Texas, truth, U.S., USA, vote, voters, web sites |
Decision making in the 2012 election MUST BE MADE ON FACTS NOT RUMORS. Don’t be led around like sheep. Don’t fall prey to the rumor mill. Be educated. Know the facts. Find reputable trustworthy sources, which eliminates MSNBC, Salon.com, Huffington Post, The Daily Kos, SEIU publications and Jane Doe’s little blog. Marbie’s Blog always looks for sources that are credible and recognized as trustworthy with a good track record on accuracy and most importantly provides their sources for the information they publish.
As the front-runner in the GOP primary for the 2012 presidential election, Gov. Rick Perry of Texas is taking a real beating. The other candidates who are far below him in the polls have to knock him off to move up because, apparently, their message has been unable to propel them to the top. Mitt Romney has to attack him, as well, because he took first place, which Romney used to occupy, as soon as he announced his candidacy. It seems that Romney sees Perry as “the one to beat”.
The smears and lies and half-truths are being hurled like javelins squarely at Perry with little regard for truth. How will the voters know what is true and what is false? Here’s a great website by a citizen who has spent long hours researching Rick Perry through multiple credible sources which are listed in the same paragraph with the information so that we can all check out the validity of his presentation.
Bookmark this website and use it to help your family and friends know the truth. Learn these facts for use in conversations when the smears come up. Some really good people have been misled and will appreciate finding out the truth. You can help.
What good is a president elected on false premises or one that might have made a good president, but was eliminated because of lies? America is at a dangerous crossroads.
WE CANNOT AFFORD TO MAKE ANOTHER MISTAKE!Read Full Post | Make a Comment ( None so far )
Posted on August 11, 2011. Filed under: Al Gore, American Revolution, bioscience, Cap and Trade, Communism, Constitution, Democrats, Energy, environmentalism, environmentalists, Freedom, global governance, Global Warming/Cimate Change, junk science, News Media, Obama, planet, Political, politics, science, SHOCKER, Socialism, sovereignty, Taxes, U.S. Government, United Nations | Tags: Charles Monnett, hoax, ice caps, integrity, Interior Department, melting, polar bears, polar ice caps |
Global warming did not kill the polar bears. That’s the finding of the Interior Department’s investigators looking into the work of biologist Charles Monnett.
Read the details of that investigation and its implications at: http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=45447.
Charles Monnett’s current position is that he never stated that global warming was melting the ice caps and killing polar bears.
“We never mentioned global warming in the paper,” Gleason told the investigators, according to the transcript.
“But it’s inferred,” responded investigator Eric May. “That’s why the world took it up as a global warming tangent.”
Gleason told investigators that reaction to his and Monnett’s paper was overblown and spun out of context.
But did he ever speak up and correct the record when Al Gore, inventor of the internet, used his study to promulgate a hoax on the world? Not so you would notice! Did he take to the microphones and dispute the falsehood in the Inconvenient Truth when it won an Oscar for best propaganda film (or was that “documentary film?)? It never made the headlines if he did. Did he get with his colleagues in the scientific community and discuss what to do about non-scientist Al Gore distorting what he did say in his paper when Gore won the Noble Prize for fictional science (or was that the Peace Price?)? Few, if any, heard about that meeting if it did take place.
So while defending himself, there is little or no evidence that he did anything to dispel the myth that propelled Gore’s scheme which would have limited our freedom, taxed our earnings, and interfered with our successful lifestyles, based on a lie. Integrity is crucial to scientific study results. Truth should be the desired result, rather than a politial agenda.Read Full Post | Make a Comment ( None so far )
Posted on July 31, 2011. Filed under: Al Gore, ALERT!, bioscience, Cap and Trade, Clinton, Constitution, Democrats, Energy, environmentalism, environmentalists, Freedom, global governance, Global Warming/Cimate Change, globalization, junk science, Liberty, Marxism, News Media, Obama, planet, politics, science, SHOCKER, Socialism, sustainability, sustainable, Taxes, U.S. Government, United Nations | Tags: Australia, carbon dioxide emissions, Charles Monnett, climate change, climate change fraud, CO2, economy, EPA, global warming, global warming hoax, polar bear extinction, polar bears, regulations, U. S. Government, U.N., United Nations |
Read the articles above. Another global warming/climate change fraud has been exposed and the perpetrator suspended from his job. CHARLES MONNETT, wildlife biologist, told America that the polar bears were drowning because the ice caps were melting and they were losing an important part of their habitat, fueling the global warming hysteria. Monnett is being investigated for misconduct stemming from integrity issues. Of course, global-warming advocates are soft-peddling that and trying to put lipstick on a p…olar bear.
The truth is coming out now and global warming is NOT melting the ice caps drowning polar bears.
Any Google search of polar bears will yield dozens of articles linking global warming/climate change to the death, and even the soon extinction of, polar bears. School children are being brain-washed to believe that those cute cuddly baby bears, all purest white with big beautiful eyes, are being killed by big bad heartless business owners making obscene profits. The next generation may well be anti-business to their own detriment because their heart strings are hopelessly tied to baby bears in the Artic where life is anything but heaven on earth. It’s a harsh cruel environment of below zero temperatures where those darling bears swim long distances, ice caps or not, eat the poor fishies trying to live there and die of other causes.
Mountains of regulations have robbed us of our freedom. The United Nations, the U.S. government, the EPA have usurped powers not given them under America’s Constitution in the name of stopping non-existent anthropogenic global warming. The cost of living has risen and will keep rising due to these regulations, including the law that prohibits the old cheap incandescent light bulbs and forcing everyone to buy very expensive mercury-filled CFL bulbs. It amounts to wealth re-distributuion again, a key plank in the agenda of Socialists.
DON’T TOLERATE ANY MORE OF THIS FRAUD, WEALTH REDISTRIBUTION AND LOSS OF FREEDOM. DON’T VOTE FOR ANYONE WHO ESPOUSES THIS CRIME ON HUMANITY AND THE ECONOMY. DEMAND THIS BE STOPPED AND CRIMINAL CHARGES BE FILED ON THOSE PUSHING THIS LIE. MOST ARE DOING IT FOR THEIR OWN ENRICHMENT.Read Full Post | Make a Comment ( None so far )
Posted on May 23, 2011. Filed under: birth certificate, Christianity, Communism, Constitution, Democrats, Dictator, Freedom, Freedom of Speech, global governance, Indonesia, Kenya, Liberty, Marxism, McCain, News Media, Obama, planet, politics, Socialism, sovereignty, U.S. Government, United Nations, Who Is Obama? | Tags: 2012, Arab, birth certificate, book, campaign, Christianity, citizen, Congress, election, eligibility, Facebook, felony, Fox News, fraud, Google, guru, Jerome Corsi, Jesus Christ, Khalid Al-Mansour, Lawrence Lessig, president, technology, treason, White House, WND, World Net Daily, YouTube |
Oppose Obama at your own peril!
Did you think the Obama birth certificate controversary was over and settled when the White House posted a document on their web site and all of the media, including Fox News, declared Obama a U.S. citizen eligible to hold the office of President? If you did, then you would be wrong. Dr. Jerome Corsi’s new book came out a few days after the White House’s pre-emptive move to squelch interest and severely limit the sales of Where’s the Birth Certificate? The case That Barack Obama is Not Eligible to Be President.
The reaction of Fox News is puzzling since they are the only broadcaster to present both sides of any other issue, but in the case of Obama’s birth certificate, they are loathe to entertain the idea that something is amiss. If Obama is ineligible, Fox News would be just as guilty as Obama, for perpetuating the cover-up rather than investigating seriously with intent to discover the truth. It would seem that Fox News has chosen to pass up their opportunity to report the NEWS OF THE CENTURYout of fear of being wrong and looking foolish (you know, being one of those ridiculous “birthers”) or more likely, FEAR OF OBAMA’S WRATH!
Obama’s campaign team boasts of its close association with Google and Facebook, and hired Lawrence Lessig, technology guru, to advise them on campaigning on the internet in 2007/8. Is it really out of the realm of possibility that this group could forge a birth certificate for Obama? Of course not. Is it totally unthinkable that this group would do such a thing to get and keep Obama in the most powerful office on the planet, the power to get extreme left policies in place, the ticket to wealth, fame and power for progressives? The answer is obvious.
For a more revealing look at Lawrence Lessig, visit https://marbiesblog.wordpress.com/2008/04/28/another-bad-character-in-obamas-circle-april-27-2008/. Obama says he’s a Christian, but hired this anti-Christianity guy, who went so far as to denegrate Jesus in public in a vicious way and laughed about it.
Do these people really have the scruples that would prevent them from executing a lucrative fraud? There’s no evidence of such scruples. Did anyone have difficulty believing that Nixon and his team commited fraud and cover-up? No. What’s so different about Obama that it’s inconceivable that he and his bunch would commit fraud for the sake of power, wealth and fame? Many people have committed great frauds for wealth, but add great power and it’s even more tempting and more likely, especially when there is enough evidence to suspect.
Obama also has the support of gazillionaire, George Soros and a very wealthy Arab, Dr. Khalid Al-Mansour, who is noted for his intervention in Obama’s acceptance to Harvard. All the money needed to create a sham biography and cover up the true bio is easily at Obama’s disposal.
Why all the skeptism and doubt is beyond explanation. The Congress, the news media, conservatives, Obama’s political opponents, all prefer to go along with the cover-up for two reasons: supporters to keep him in power, opponents not wishing to look like tin foil hat wearing “birthers” GOD FORBID SUCH A FATE!. Opponents fail to recognize who coined the moniker “birthers”. It was Obama’s supporters in a defensive move. Why play by their rules instead of truth? In fact, the democrats and Obama’s team brought up the issue of Sen. John McCain’s eligibility to serve as president based on his place of birth and demanded to see his birth certificate, which McCain happily and QUICKLY produced. None in the media called Democrats or Obama’s team “birthers.” NONE!
Dr. Jerome Corsi’s book will still be in the public during the 2012 campaign season and World Net Daily will still be investigating and reporting. Those who are smart enough, will still be proving that the White House document was produced by placing layer of information upon layer of information, to build the bio that fits Obama’s public statements. A document typed on a 1961 typewriter, then scanned in 2011, cannot be broken into a dozen or more separate layers. It was produced in one step – typing the info on paper. Scanning does not produce multiple layers as shown in the many YouTube videos online. Get the free version of Adobe Illustrator, download the WH document, and see for yourself.
What’s to be gained by covering up Obama’s felony, treason and fraud?
“In a television interview last October, President Obama accidentally let slip a key element of his political philosophy: “We’re gonna punish our enemies, and we’re gonna reward our friends who stand with us on issues that are important to us.”
Obama later apologized — not for the underlying sentiment, mind you, but for his word choice. “I probably should have used the word ‘opponents’ instead of enemies,” the president declared.” http://www.aei.org/article/103643Read Full Post | Make a Comment ( None so far )
Posted on January 31, 2011. Filed under: ALERT!, Communism, Dictator, Freedom, Freedom of Speech, global governance, globalization, Hillary, Islam, Kenya, Liberty, Marxism, Muslims, News Media, Obama, politics, Socialism, sovereignty, terrorism, U.S. Government, Uncategorized, United Nations | Tags: Egypt, ElBaradei, Mubarek, Muslim Brotherhood, riots, uprising, violence |
Peaceful???? What did the police react to? Who would be the recipient of these large rocks that can cause some real injuries, especially if they strike someone in the head? In fact one policeman was killed when struck in the head with large rocks.
For your consideration: Please read this article thoughtfully. You must know these things to understand properly what you hear on the American news and to recognize what is omitted.
Knowing that George Soros is behind, and taking full advantage of, the uprising in Egypt and other countries, will explain Obama’s position on these events. Watch who Obama supports. Global Voices (Soros Org) Media Matters (Soros Org).
The Muslim Brotherhood is not a benign harmless group whose only desire is to free the people from Mubarek’s reign. They are tied to terrorists groups, including Hamas. They do want Israel to be annihilated. They also hate the USA. We are most definitely on their list for this same take-over tactic. We may be next or two or threes positions down the list, but WE ARE ON THEIR LIST. We are their prize jewel along with Israel. They will not rest until they have complete victory here. They are most likely to act in America while Obama is president and he may only have two more years. Watch for it. Oppose it vigorously.
After viewing tons of images from the protests and reading hundreds of tweets from protestors and supporters, questions about the purity of the protestors and their goals arise. How is it that tens of thousands of ordinary citizens just decided to go to the same location on the same day, January 25th, and protest the Mubarek dictatorship? They could not have. The January 25th protest was planned over time and executed. But by whom?
Organizers chose to protest on Egypt’s national holiday, National Police Day, which commemorates the day, January 25, 1952, that the Egyptian Police refused to obey British orders to hand over weapons and evacuate Ismailia Police Station. Fifty-two police officers were killed when the British Army surrounded the station with tanks and overcame the Egyptian Police Officers. A Facebook page was set up to advertise and recruit. About 2,000 signed up to protest in that city, Ismailia, 200 in Aswan and 3,000 in Mahallah. By the morning of the 25th, about 90,000 had signed up to protest all over the country. Twitter.com was a huge part of the protests until the government of Egypt shut down the internet and cell phone services. For a more interesting look at the Egyptian protests, go to www.twitter.com and search #Egypt and #Jan25.
A Google search for images of the riots in the streets produced benign pictures of people with handmade signs congregating in the streets, rows of men bowed down (faces on the ground and posteriors in the air) in front of army tanks and the bloody injured (all protestors, of course). For three days, tweets carried links to actual photos from the riots showing mobs carrying sticks and rocks, setting fires to buildings, looting shopping malls, attacking police, burning piles of wood and tires and vehicles, and breaking into museums destroying ancient artifacts that bring Egypt a great deal of much-needed tourism. Citizens armed with sticks formed human chains and guarded the museums, throwing out looters. The police and army were tied up by the riots elsewhere.
Another aspect of the riots not covered by photos in a Google search or even the New York Times, as far as I’ve been able to find, were the elaborate printed signs carried by many of the protestors. They must have been printed out well in advance at a cost to the organizers and handed out somewhere. This was not spontaneous.
Many signs were of Mubarek with the familiar Israeli state Star of David drawn over his face. Many signs were anti-America and anti-Israel. Most disturbing were the photos of an Egyptian holding a tear gas canister with “Made in the U.S.” printed on it. They made a point of linking the U.S. to the tanks, rubber bullets and tear gas canisters used on the protestors by Mubarek’s army. Tweets said, “America, stop supporting a dictator.” Many referred to rubber bullets flying over the heads of Egyptians made by the U.S. Some referred to army tanks made in the USA attacking Egyptians. There was a clear segment of this uprising who was actively inciting hatred against the USA and Israel.
It should be noted that Egypt is an ally and friendly to the U.S. We are allowed by law to sell defense weapons to allies. We have little control over an ally’s decision to use these against their own people. It’s also noteworthy that the protestors arrived with sticks, rocks, materials to start fires, and angry masses. It’s normal for a government to send armed police and armies to quell violence. The army held back as much as possible, from what I’ve been able to find in reports online, tweets and video. Live streaming video on Al Jazeera TV was another great source until Mubarek’s government pulled their license and revoked the credentials of the staff. Having not been there personally, I can only say what I’ve been able to find through many available sources. Do your own research.
Two American companies were also made targets of the hatred: Narus and Combined Systems, Inc. CSI manufactures the tear gas and smoke grenades.
“Narus provides Telecom Egypt, the state-controlled, dominant internet and telephone company, with deep packet inspection (DPI) technology. The specifics are complex, but DPI is essentially a filter that allows network administrators to track and scrutinize content being transmitted via the internet and cell phones.” http://www.good.is/post/meet-the-two-american-companies-helping-egypt-restrict-its-people/
This wouldn’t matter after Mubarek pulled the plug on cell phones and the internet, a tactic proposed to America’s legislature by Ind. Sen. Joe Lieberman and co-sponsored by Republican in name only, Sen. Susan Collins, which seeks to give Obama a “kill switch” and authority to use it at his discretion. This must not pass, as it violates freedom of speech and freedom of the press.
Does anyone really believe that the two American companies purposely manufactured those products to oppress the Egyptian people? Those could be used to defend Egypt against foreign invaders and by Egyptian armies fighting in wars in other countries, like Afghanistan. Some protestors want to incite hatred against America and all things American, and Israel. Sounds like anti-Western Muslim sentiment coming from The Muslim Brotherhood.
The same thing occurred in Tunisia, earlier, and is planned for other countries; Syria, Yemen, Albania, Palestine (again), Nigeria, Sudan.
There’s no doubt that the people want to be free. It’s the universal heart’s desire of all people around the world. America should always support freedom and government of the people, by the people and for the people everywhere. But it is prudent and necessary to our own interests to see who might be taking advantage of the people’s grievances to usurp power and control, such as the Muslim Brotherhood.
Research Global Voices, founded by George Soros, who is anti-Semitic, and very much a socialist/Marxist. He’s using this opportunity to achieve his goals. This man has been interfering in governments and economies all around the world for decades. He can influence Obama to be on the wrong side of this conflict.
When you hear people say, or read headlines proclaiming, “Don’t fear The Muslim Brotherhood”, be very suspicious. It’s like telling people, “Don’t fear the grim reaper.” The Muslims who truly hate Israel and America have been migrating to every country in the world, settling in among the citizens, growing families, building mosques and loyalty among their people. They plant the seeds of distrust of America and Israel in the minds of their people for a future “protest” against the leaders of those countries. When the time is right, as it now is in Egypt, Tunisia, and the rest of the Middle East, they call for the protests. They convince the people that they are victims of a corrupt government who is responsible for the lack of jobs while acquiring personal wealth.
I can’t say that every Muslim in the world is exactly like every other Muslim. I can say that it is obvious that enough of them are alike to topple the government of Tunisia and possibly Egypt. They gained control in Iran when the Shah was toppled. No one favors dictatorships, but what replaces them is equally important. It takes time to set up opposing political parties and hold free and fair elections, but the Muslim Brotherhood doesn’t allow that time. They are ready and waiting to rush in and install their man as the “savior”.
Mohammad El Baradei is their guy for Egypt. He’s rushed in and set himself up as their leader. The crowds weren’t shouting “Give us El Baradei!” He came in on his own and starting making public statements, inserting himself into the media coverage. You may remember him as the Director General of the International Atomic Energy Agency of the United Nations during the Clinton administration. He was supposed to monitor the nuclear ambitions of Iran and Iraq. His white-washing of Iran’s nuclear program became, and remained controversial until he left. His son was involved in the “Oil for Food” scandal involving the U.N.’s sanctions against Iraq. El Baradei also seemed to try to influence America’s presidential election by leaking a report that tons of explosives were missing from Iraq, just in time to cast Pres. Bush in a bad light at the voting booth. He had sat on the information he cited for weeks, releasing it only when it could harm Bush.
If I was a politician, I would avoid becoming wealthy while in office. This is the first thing dissidents point to.
What is El Baradei saying to the media, that we should scrutinize for truth?
January 11, 2011 on his Twitter account: “Cornerstones of change: transitional period; new constitution; civil state; true democracy; equal rights and social justice.”
He’s appealing to the real needs and grievances of the people to gain their support, but the tip-off is “social justice” which is a term used by socialist/Marxists. Obama calls it “redistribution of wealth”. Definition of today’s social justice: You make it. Government takes it. Someone else gets it. They believe that it is wrong for one person to have wealth while another does not. They aren’t concerned with how hard the first person worked to earn that wealth or if the other did not. All should be equal – like communism. They believe the government should be the “equalizers”, redistributing everyone’s wealth to “level the playing field”.
“They have to listen to the people, listen to them quickly, take concrete action towards reform, to a new Egypt that is democratic, that is based on social justice,”
Be suspicious when Obama and El Baradei both call for “change” and social justice. Research Kenya’s election where Obama went there and campaigned for Raila Odinga, calling for “change”.
When Hillary Clinton called for a transition period, El Baradei opposed that notion. He wants Mubarek gone today. El Baradei stands ready to step in now.
January 26, 2011 on his Twitter account: “We shall continue to exercise our rights of peaceful demonstrations…”
Yet, it wasn’t all peaceful. They attacked the police, threw rocks, used the sticks they brought on people, namely the police, set buildings on fire, burned vehicles, looted shopping malls and the museum. Peaceful? Some may have been peaceful, but any viewing of the photos of how the city and streets looked after a few days of this peaceful demonstration will cause one to question what happened there.
Echoing an idea he introduced to CNN’s Fareed Zakaria (seen on The Blaze earlier), Egypt’s Nobel laureate and self-appointed opposition leader Mohamed ElBaradei told ABC’s Christiane Amanpour the idea that the Muslim Brotherhood, which birthed the terror organization Hamas, is an extremist organization is “total bogus” and that the group is “in no way extremists” (interview starts at about 2:10 below):
(Excerpts from http://www.thedailybeast.com/blogs-and-stories/2011-01-27/muslim-brotherhood-could-win-in-egypt-protests-and-why-obama-shouldnt-worry/2/
(The Muslim Brotherhood is also known as Ikhwan.)
Riedel calls Ikhwan a “secretive Islamic opposition group” and gives his reasons why “Obama shouldn’t panic.”
“The Muslim Brethren was founded in 1928 by Shaykh Hassan al Banna as an Islamic alternative to weak secular nationalist parties that failed to secure Egypt’s freedom from British colonialism after World War I. Banna preached a fundamentalist Islamism and advocated the creation of an Islamic Egypt, but he was also open to importing techniques of political organization and propaganda from Europe that rapidly made the Brotherhood a fixture in Egyptian politics. Branches of the Brotherhood grew across the Arab world. By World War 2, it became more violent in its opposition to the British and the British-dominated monarchy, sponsoring assassinations and mass violence.”
“Egypt’s new opposition leader, former International Atomic Energy Agency head Mohamed ElBaradei, has formed a loose alliance with the Brotherhood because he knows it is the only opposition group that can mobilize masses of Egyptians, especially the poor.”
“Skeptics fear El Baradei will be swept along by more radical forces.”
“The Brotherhood raised an army to fight Israel in its war of independence in 1948. Its Palestinian branch was the nucleus for Hamas, and the Brotherhood retains links to the rulers of Gaza.”
“Their base is fundamentally opposed to any Egyptian cooperation with Israel.”
“The crisis in North Africa has come up unexpectedly for President Obama and Secretary Clinton.” (This is especially troubing for Americans since the internet, Facebook and Twitter were used extensively to advertise and recruit for the protests in Tunisia and Egypt. The information was there for all to see. Obama used the internet to get himself elected, raise money, recruit “volunteers” to his causes and improve his poll numbers to a greater degree than any other president. His people should not have missed this. If he and Clinton were doing their jobs well, this would not have caught them by surprise. The Obama administration has been preoccupied with monitoring American citizens on the internet and cell phones.
This is not reassuring at all. Now that they have the spotlight in Egypt and are beginning to hear criticism and opposition, El Baradei is saying that the Muslim Brotherhood is not a religious organization nor is it violent. He’s trying to put a clean face on his group to silence a threat to stop them. Don’t fear the Muslim Brotherhood. Don’t fear the grim reaper.
For photos of the uprising, visit http://totallycoolpix.com/2011/01/the-egypt-protests/. Note picture #80.
REMEMBER TO WATCH WHO OBAMA SUPPORTS.
World Net Daily reported today:
JERUSALEM – The Egyptian government has information a diplomat at the U.S. embassy in Cairo secretly met yesterday with a senior leader of the Muslim Brotherhood, the nation’s major Islamist opposition group, WND has learned.
The topic of the meeting was the future of Egypt following the “fall” of President Hosni Mubarak, an Egyptian intelligence official told WND.Read Full Post | Make a Comment ( 3 so far )
Posted on December 27, 2010. Filed under: Al Gore, ALERT!, Cap and Trade, Capitalism, Communism, Constitution, Democrats, Energy, environmentalism, environmentalists, Freedom, global governance, Global Warming/Cimate Change, junk science, Liberty, News Media, Obama, planet, politics, science, Socialism, sovereignty, Taxes, U.S. Government, uniformitarianism |
Marbie’s Blog has been extremely interested in the global warming/climate change issue for years and blogged extensively about it, always reaching the same conclusion, based on research and truth. Others are finding the same truth. Global warming is not occurring. The climate is not static, but varies from year to year, decade to decade, not caused by the industrial age. So what is the real agenda behind the global warming/climate change legislation in the works?
REDISTRIBUTION OF WEALTH – FROM AMERICANS TO LESS DEVELOPED COUNTRIES.
You earn it. They take it.
I found a blog post recently that says it very well.
“This is what global warming is really about — wealth redistribution by people whose beliefs are basically socialist. It has little or nothing to do with climate.”
The author explains this position clearly and is right on target.
Type the following search terms in Marbie’s Blog search box and read the 17 plus posts discussing global warming/climate change and the people behind the push for legislation to control it: “SHOCKER!” and “Global Warming”. The real proof for wealth redistribution is the study of the people working hard to get legislation passed all over the world. If they really believed they had to save the planet from carbon dioxide exhausts, they would not fly all over the world in jets almost as often as commercial jet pilots, emitting what they say is harmful CO2. They wouldn’t have multiple homes scattered about the earth, flying from one to the other for personal enjoyment, and using carbon based energy to power, heat and air condition those homes. These so-called environmentalists are greedy frauds.
They see the opportunity to redistribute America’s wealth using this ruse and divert millions and billions of dollars into their own companies and personal bank accounts along the way. Don’t be fooled. Your costs will rise and your bank account will decrease, while their bank accounts increase by millions and billions. Wake up and tell these crooks to go butt a stump. You’re keeping your hard-earned money.Read Full Post | Make a Comment ( None so far )
« Previous Entries