science

A SHOCKER! – Installment 2 Global Warming/Climate Change UPDATE! James Lovelock Changes His Mind

Posted on June 17, 2012. Filed under: Al Gore, ALERT!, Big Brother, Cap and Trade, Capitalism, Christianity, Constitution, Democrats, Energy, environmentalism, environmentalists, evolution, Freedom, Gaia, Gaia hypothesis, Gaia matrix, global governance, Global Warming/Cimate Change, globalization, goddess, Greek mythology, idol, James Lovelock, junk science, Liberty, Lynn margulis, Mars, Maurice Strong, Mikhail Gorbachav, Mother Earth, News Media, Obama, pantheism, planet, Political, politics, science, sovereignty, sustainability, sustainable, Taxes, U.S. Government, Uncategorized, uniformitarianism, United Nations | Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , |

Begin by reading the original post of May 15, 2008 about James Lovelock and his influence on the global warming movement, and his devotion to the pagan religion, Gaia.  There’s a lot to learn there and it’s never mentioned by the main stream media. Too many people know nothing of this.  If they did, they’d be much more skeptical of the green/global warming/climate change movement.

https://marbiesblog.wordpress.com/2009/10/29/a-shocker-installlment-2/

After you have the important background knowledge, read today’s surprising news coming from the ninety-two year-old James Lovelock whose latest comments are shocking AND will be completely ignored by the people in the movement whose beliefs are the direct result of this man’s influence.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2012/jun/15/james-lovelock-interview-gaia-theory?mobile-redirect=false

Lovelock believes in the Gaia religion, as you will see in both articles.  The Gaia religion “no longer sees man as the measure of all things or the center of the universe. He has been measured and found to be an undistinguished bit of matter, different in no essential way from bacteria, stones and trees.  Gaians also believe that over-population is a root cause of an imbalance in the Earth’s ecology.  Therefore, they believe in man-made global warming/climate change.  (Could this be a reason behind the fight for abortion “rights”?

Lovelock, having formulated the Gaia Hypothesis, is the father of the climate change movement.  He’s predicted complete doom on the Earth unless governments force people to adopt severe and costly changes to every thing people do on earth. It’s called “sustainable development”, and has been marketed to the people as “going green.”

But what is he saying today?

“Adapt and survive.”  He supports nuclear power, hates wind power, remarking that they are useless and ugly, AND is now encouraging the U.K. to embrace fracking because natural gas is cheap and doesn’t produce as much CO2 as burning coal.

“We rushed into renewable energy without any thought. The schemes are largely hopelessly inefficient and unpleasant. Fracking buys us some time, and we can learn to adapt.”

“Let’s be pragmatic and sensible and get Britain to switch everything to methane. We should be going mad on it.”

What has brought about this major reversal?  He’s been hit hard with some hefty home energy bills and he doesn’t like it.  He’s realizing that these costs are unsustainable, I suspect.  It has changed his economic, political and scientific views on global warming, as he used to call it.

He told MSNBC that “he had been extrapolating too far in reaching such a conclusion and had made a mistake in claiming to know with such certainty what will happen to the climate.”

He says “being allowed to change your mind and follow the evidence is one of the liberating marvels of being an independent scientist.”

Many of us never bought into what has been proven faulty and fake science, but we’ve all paid a high cost for Lovelock’s Gaiantic mistake.

At the International Climate Change Conference in Rio next week, Lovelock’s devotee’s will seek solutions to the devastating climate change disaster that he now says doesn’t exist.  They won’t  be phased by Lovelock’s latest revelations.

“Whenever the UN puts its finger in, it seems to become a mess.”

“The climate situation is more complex than we at present are capable of handling, or possibly even in the future.”

“It’s so much cheaper to air-condition the cities and let Gaia take care of the world. It’s a much better route to go than so-called ‘sustainable development’, which is meaningless drivel.”

Where’s the proof that he’s really changed his mind and won’t jump back on the “sustainable development” wagon?  He’s moving from his home of thirty years amidst acres of trees that he planted himself to a small beach cottage.  Unafraid of the horrors of rising seas caused by climate change.

“At worst, I think it will be two feet a century.”

Unfortunately for us, the costs associated with climate change legislation will rise much more rapidly.

As for his political views on the subject now days:

“I’m neither strongly left nor right, but I detest the Liberal Democrats.”   “The coalition has behaved disgracefully on environmental and energy policies. It would have been much better if they had been properly right wing.”

Perhaps he was warning us when he said:

“It’s just the way the humans are that if there’s a cause of some sort, a religion starts forming around it. It just so happens that the green religion is now taking over from the Christian religion. I don’t think people have noticed that, but it’s got all the sort of terms that religions use. The greens use guilt. You can’t win people round by saying they are guilty for putting CO2 in the air.”

Mr. Lovelock, some have noticed it.

https://marbiesblog.wordpress.com/2009/11/16/a-shocker-installment-6/ The Gaia Ark of Hope, The Earth Charter inside the Ark (to mimic The Ten Commandments), Temenos Books (to be sacred like our Bible), Cosmos is our God

https://marbiesblog.wordpress.com/2009/10/30/a-shocker-installment-3/

If you read Lovelock’s past writings and statements, you might think he sounds a little spacey.  He was an important person at NASA.  Just mull over that for a minute.  We never pay attention to the kind of people who lead our world. BUT WE SHOULD.

The Kyoto Treaty?  Kill it. Get out of all treaties, legislation and programs born out of the global warming/climate change hoax. Get back to basics, back to normal and relieve the people of the world from burdensome expenses and regulations that adversely affect their lives.

PASS IT ON. THE TRUTH SHALL SET US FREE  (from tyrannical governments, world governments, and slavery to regulations based on falsehoods and pagan religion.)

Read Full Post | Make a Comment ( None so far )

Social Issues Must Be Part of the Campaign

Posted on February 24, 2012. Filed under: Abortion, Democrats, Freedom, global governance, Liberty, News Media, Obama, politics, science, Socialism, U.S. Government | Tags: , , , , , , , , |

It's a living human being.

It’s astonishing that Republicans can be so duped by their opponents in the Democrat Party and lame stream media.   The Dems make abortion and gay marriage the premiere issues of their campaigns, all the while telling the electorate that the GOP will lose if they so much as mention the same.  It is usually assumed that the Democrat positions are correct and the only viable stances while the GOP positions are shameful.  Yet, Republican voters still secretly harbor pro-life and anti-gay marriage values.   What is shameful about protecting living human babies from harm, suffering and death?!

While ashamed to admit their pro-life, anti-gay marriage beliefs in public, they make these the litmus test for selecting candidates!  Once they’ve anointed someone, they immediately muzzle their champion for fear of losing the election.  This suggests that Democrats have already won the debate and Republians are wimps.

But that’s not the case.  Democrats have used the media to brow beat, excoriate, attack without merit, lie, exagerate and vilify anyone who dares to hold a different set of values from them.  They’ve successfully used mob tactics to intimidate into compliance.  Al Capone would be proud.

In the light of truth, there is no way that people can be against protecting the life of human beings.  The U.N. claims it’s existence for that very purpose – “no more wars.”  Doctors, nurses and hospitals exist to save life.  The Health Movement’s platform is to protect and preserve human life.  Pre-natal care is pushed to preserve and protect the life of the unborn baby.  The government has a watchdog agency charged with insuring that products used with, for and around human babies are completely safe.

Now why is the pro-life position unpopular in America and something to keep quiet about in a campaign?  Which party should be ashamed of their values or lack thereof?  The GOP candidates should make the Democrats ashamed of their murderous cold-blooded life-snuffing position in every campaign.  GOP candidates should stand tall and firm, heads held high and confidently proclaim Democrats as heartless.  They should point out that pregnant women who prefer to murder their own innocent babies are self-centered and irresponsible.

Let the Democrats yell and scream.  They will look like spoiled brats throwing temper tantrums.  GOP will look like the mature adults with common sense.

To say that social issues do not belong in politics ignores  the fact that politics is all about governing society and the government absolutely does interfere in and exert control over social issues, therefore, must be part of any political campaign. It’s time Republicans realize what the Democrats have perpetrated on their party and get over it. They must stop cowering and fight for the beliefs of their party. Show how and why the GOP is the opposite of the Democrat Party. Isn’t that the purpose of campaigns? It’s all common sense.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wlSyfUQDWVw&feature=related

What’s the best way to go about killing this little baby?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gfgq7WiHbh4

There is NO way. Could you kill this baby?  Could you support killing this baby?  Can you support candidates who are determined to continue the legality of killing babies?  And what about botched abortions?  Could you support killing the baby after it’s born, if the doctor was unsuccessful in his first attempt at murder?  Not only did Sen. Obama of Illinois support such barbaric behavior, he was the only one who voted to protect it, when the rest of his party voted to end it. He voted three times to protect this murder of living infants.  Live birth abortions =  Murdering babies after they’re born and alive.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BYRpIf2F9NA

Can you support this or a candidate who did?  I CAN’T!

Read Full Post | Make a Comment ( None so far )

Discovery Channel’s Disturbed Environmentalist/Ted Turner/Al Gore/Daniel Quinn

Posted on September 1, 2010. Filed under: Al Gore, ALERT!, Cap and Trade, Clinton, Democrats, Energy, environmentalism, environmentalists, evolution, Gaia, Gaia hypothesis, Gaia matrix, global governance, Global Warming/Cimate Change, goddess, Greek mythology, Hillary, junk science, Mother Earth, News Media, Obama, planet, Political, science, sustainability, sustainable, U.S. Government, United Nations | Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , |

Marbie’s Blog has covered the Global Warming/Climate Change/Environmentalism/Sustainability/World Control/Pagan Gaia Religion movement and it’s tenants and leaders and participants.  One of which was Ted Turner of Turner Broadcasting Network.   Read the original post at:  https://marbiesblog.wordpress.com/2009/10/30/a-shocker-installment-3/ Ted Turner, multibillionaire and founder of CNN. Turner is deeply involved in the Global Green Agenda. He donated more than a billion dollars to the UN which was specifically tagged to fund the IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change)

Turner personally conceived and produced ‘Captain Planet’ an edu-tainment cartoon designed to brainwash our children. 

  Gaia, the spirit of Earth, awakens from a century long sleep to find the Earth in peril. She summons five teenagers, the Planeteers, from around the globe, and gives each of them a ring which controls an element of nature – Earth, Fire, Wind, Water – and a special power, Heart, which allows them to use their new powers wisely and compassionately.” – http://www.turner.com/planet/mythology/index.html 

  Today, James Jay Lee took hostages inside the office building of the Discovery Channel, a network which routinely airs global warming/climate change propaganda.  He made the following demands:  

 Discovery Channel “MUST have daily television programs at prime time slots BASED ON DANIEL QUINN’S “MY ISHMAEL” PAGES 207-212 where solutions to save the planet would be done…”  Promote Malthus-Darwin beliefs. 

  Focus must be given on how people can live WITHOUT GIVING BIRTH TO MORE FILTHY HUMAN CHILDREN since those new additions continue pollution and are pollution. 

  Must stop broadcasting programs that encourage the birth of human babies…and broadcast programs that encourage human sterilization and infertility. 

  Stop promoting war and war technology. 

  Expose the filth of civilization, its disgusting religious-cultural roots and greed. 

  Promote the cessation of immigration to the U.S. and anchor babies. 

  Find solutions for global warming, pollution, breeding, international trade and the whole blasted human economy. 

  REVERSE GLOBAL WARMING AND THE DESTRUCTION OF THE PLANET! 

http://tmz.vo.llnwd.net/o28/newsdesk/tmz_documents/0901_demands.pdf 

 “Lee [also] said at the time that he experienced an ‘‘awakening” when he watched former Vice President Al Gore’s environmental documentary ‘‘An Inconvenient Truth.” 

By his own words, the gunman told us that he was driven to do this by Al Gore’s error-ridden scare film, “An Inconvenient Truth”, and Daniel Quinn’s, “My Ishmael”, about the peril of the planet.  We’re very familiar with Gore’s piece of work and his claims that the world will be destroyed in ten years (we’re down to 5 years, 4 months and 25 days since Gore pronounced our doom in 2006.  You can see the doomsday clock on http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/home/today.guest.html down near the bottom of the page.) 

 
But what do we know about the book, My Ishmael, by Daniel Quinn?  TURNS out, it won an award from TED TURNER’S “TURNER TOMORROW FELLOWSHIP AWARD”, “created in 1989 by Ted Turner, to be awarded to an unpublished work of fiction offering creative and positive solutions to global problems.  In addition to a $500,000 award, the fellowship included a hardcover publishing contract with Turner Broadcasting’s publishing unit and $50,000 to market the book and a film option.”  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Turner_Tomorrow_Fellowship_Award
Ted Turner encouraged the work, awarded the work with $500,000., a hard-cover publishing contract with his own company and a film option, to increase the opportunities to brainwash people with these cock-eyed notions.  But what solutions did this book offer that Turner found so important that he must get it out to the world?
  
Not having time to have read the book in total today, I’ll put forth the reviews by editors and readers.  The book was written to encourage people to “think” about how humans affect the planet through consumption.  Two views are contrasted:  Leavers and Takers,  cultures who  believe that humanity belongs to the planet and cultures who believe that the planet belongs to humans.  Population, balance, consumption, extinction, sustainability, are all under the microscope.   The author, Daniel Quinn, is interested in over-population of the earth and food supplies.
  
 Given Ted Turner’s involvement in the sustainability/global warming/climate change/environmental movement, his creation of “Captain Planet” with Gaia awakening, I believe he chose “Ishmael” to win the award despite its lack of a plot and less than artful writing because it fit well into his agenda. 
  
Apparently, Lee read Ishmael and drew the conclusion that humans are the scourge of the earth, and coupled it with Al Gore’s proposition that humans are causing global warming and destroying the planet.   Al Gore, in particular, is responsible for convincing Mr. Lee that time is quickly running out and we MUST do something to save the planet.  Ishmael made him sink into deep thought with the suggestions posed by the author buried deep underneath his processes.  Gore poured on the fuel to light the fire that resulted in today’s tragedy.
  

 

Lee took these messages to heart.  He believed them.  Once he believed the premise and the dire situation and coupled it with Al Gore’s “deadline” for destruction, his emotional makeup led him to think he had no choice but to act – to try to make someone do something to stop what he saw as madness and save the planet.   Lee is responsible for his behavior.  He is the criminal, but is it  right to say that Gore and Quinn and all the other fear mongers have NO responsibility for creating this man’s belief’s which pushed him to take this action?  Doesn’t Ted Turner bear some responsibility for publishing this book and making huge efforts to brainwash the youth of America with this global warming destruction mindset?  Didn’t he create Captain Planet to make sure the kids hear and believe this philosophy?  Why should any of them be exempt from the consequences of the harm produced by the people they convinced? 
 
I think they should be exposed and reap the disdain of the people.  It’s one thing to propose a theory and quite another to fuel fires of anger and fear that lead to someone taking dangerous actions, especially when the data has been tampered with to force their desired outcome and the facts don’t back up the theory.  All of the main players in the global warming/climate change  movement are in it for the money and they know the  data is skewed to fit their needs.  They’ve successfully stirred up the public until the emotionally unstable go off the deep end believing they MUST do something now.  They’ve successfully convinced some that the situation is dire and drastic actions must be immediately undertaken.  All for money – millions and billions – for the players in the scheme.
Read Full Post | Make a Comment ( 2 so far )

A SHOCKER! – Installment 16 NEW! UPDATED!

Posted on April 27, 2010. Filed under: Al Gore, Cap and Trade, Communism, Copenhagen, Democrats, environmentalism, environmentalists, global governance, Global Warming/Cimate Change, globalization, Liberty, Lindsey Graham, Marxism, McCain, Obama, planet, politics, science, Socialism, sovereignty, sustainability, U.S. Government, United Nations | Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , |

In 2008 and 2009, Marbie’s Blog  posted 15 “A SHOCKER!” installments on global warming/climate change/cap and trade, with a number of additional updates and related posts.  The issue died down in the public domain because so many other things were popping up and taking center stage.  Now, the issue is re-surfacing and needs attention.  Marbie’s Blog is re-posting those 15 installments and some updates, plus working on new installments.  One in the works is about Obama’s involvement with the Joyce Foundation, Valerie Jarrett, his White House Adviser from Chicago, and Bill Ayers’ brother, John.  These people, through this organization are setting up a climate change trading exchange, which trades thin air, like stocks in companies, and are setting themselves up to make trillions of dollars.

Before Marbie’s Blog could finish the research and get the information  posted, Glenn Beck discovered the situation and did a very good television program on it, just scratching the surface.  He will eventually get to the rest. Stay tuned.  In the meantime, please, please, view his program.  EVERYONE MUST BE INFORMED ON THIS SUBJECT.

 

AMERICA!  GET INVOLVED AND STOP CAP AND TRADE LEGISLATION!  CALL REPUBLICANS LINDSEY GRAHAM, JOHN MCCAIN AND INDEPENDENT JOE LIEBERMAN.  THEY ARE WITH THE DEMOCRATS ON THIS ONE.

Read Full Post | Make a Comment ( 1 so far )

A SHOCKER! – Installment 11

Posted on April 27, 2010. Filed under: Al Gore, Cap and Trade, Capitalism, Communism, Constitution, Copenhagen, Democrats, Dictator, Energy, environmentalism, environmentalists, Freedom, Gaia, Gaia hypothesis, global governance, Global Warming/Cimate Change, globalization, junk science, Liberty, Marxism, Maurice Strong, Mother Earth, planet, Political, politics, science, Socialism, sovereignty, sustainability, sustainable, U.S. Government, United Nations | Tags: , |

SHOCKER! – Installment 11 – May 31, 2008

A Re-post.  

Quantcast 
MAURICE STRONG

   

Image by Jakub Kuzma 

“A major development to spur Washington in that direction (passing S.2191 Carbon Credit Trading Bill) would be the launching of a carbon credit exchange soon in Beijing, China. From Marbie’s Blog, A Shocker! Installment 10, May 30, 2008   

It’s  not a coincidence that Al Gore based Generation Investment Management in London where the largest carbon credit trading exchange is located. And it’s not a coincidence that Maurice Strong has moved to Beijing, China where another lucrative carbon credit trading exchange will be launched soon.   

Remember Maurice Strong?  Founder and Secretary General of the United Nations Environment Program and Senior Advisor to Koffi Annan. Founder of the Earth Council and the Earth Charter Initiative, and former President of the United Nations University for Peace.

While he chaired the Rio Earth Summit, outside, his wife Hanne and 300 followers called the Wisdom-Keepers, continuously beat drums, chanted prayers to Gaia, and tended sacred flames in order to ” establish and hold the energy field” for the duration of the summit. He founded the Manitou Institute where various Hindu, Bhuddist, and New Age groups perform rituals to heal Gaia. The Institute’s Mission is ” to perpetuate the ancient tradition of peoples of many tribes journeying here for a sacred connection to the Earth “. Very Gaian!! From Marbie’s Blog Installment 3 – May 16, 2008 

Strong, age 78, a Canadian socialist multi-millionaire owns a 63,000 acre ranch on the edge of the mountains in southern Colorado and another large ranch in Costa Rica. Strong currently spends 80% of his time in Beijing, according to his statement in the Beijing Review, China’s national English weekly, March 14, 2008. No doubt he buys carbon offsets to neutralize his fuel usage to travel between his land holdings and his apartment in Beijing(?) Strong is working on the Korea issue at the recently established Institute for Security and Sustainability (Gore’s Global Warming Agenda) in Northeast Asia at Peking University.   

” “What I see today is a tendency among some industrialized countries, notably the US, to shift the onus on China, India and other developing countries to divert attention from their own commitment,” he said in his address to the China Foreign Affairs University Forum.  “I predict there’s going to be tremendous additional pressure on China, and some of them will be unfair,” he said, because the per capita carbon footprint of China is very low.

“No country can do it (solve the problem) alone. China is right to expect that the US, Canada and other countries that created the problem in the first place should take the lead in helping resolve it,” Strong said in Beijing, March 13, 2008  
Couple the fact that Strong is living in Beijing, China working on the Korea issue and environmental programs in China, with the following report from the Free Republic, “Maurice Strong Steps Aside from UN Post”, April 21, 2005, Alan Freeman and Paul Waldie    

Washington and Toronto – Canadian Maurice Strong agreed to step aside Wednesday as a special envoy for the United Nations, but vowed to clear his name after being linked to Tongsun Park, a Korean lobbyist in connection with the Iraq “Oil for Food” scandal. Mr. Park, who formerly worked for the South Korean intelligence service, was a major figure in a 1970s influence-peddling scandal in Washington. http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1388471/   

The following are excerpts from a report by Fox News and I recommend reading the entire article at http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,250789,00.html by Claudia Rosett and George Russell, Feb. 8, 2007 “At the United Nations, the Curious Career of Maurice Strong, Fox   

“Without ever holding elected office, he has had a hand in some of the world’s most important bureaucratic appointments, both at the U.N. and at the World Bank. Strong has parlayed his personal enthusiasms and connections into a variety of huge U.N. projects, while punctuating his public service with private business deals. Along the way, Strong has also been caught up in a series of U.N. scandals and conflicts of interest. These extend from the notorious Oil-for-Food (Iraq) program to the latest furor over cash funneled via U.N. agencies to the rogue regime of North Korea, which involves, among other things, Strong’s creative use of a little-known, U.N.-chartered educational institution called the University for Peace. Above all, the tale of Maurice Strong illustrates the way in which the U.N., with its bureaucratic culture of secrecy, its diplomatic immunities, and its global reach, lends itself to manipulation by a small circle of those who best know its back corridors. 

 

China is a special place for Strong, a self-declared, life-long socialist. It is the burial place of a woman said to be one of his relatives, the famous pro-communist American journalist Anna Louise Strong, a vociferous supporter of Lenin and Stalin until the mid-30s, and a strong booster of Mao Zedong’s China. Maurice Strong’s presence in Beijing, however, raises awkward questions: For one thing, China, while one of the world’s biggest producers of industrial pollution, has been profiting from the trading of carbon emissions credits, thanks to heavily politicized U.N.-backed environmental deals engineered by Strong in the 1990sAnd from China, Strong has to this day maintained a network of personal and official connections within the U.N. system that he has long used to spin his own vast web of non-governmental organizations, business associates and ties to global glitterati. Within that web, Strong has developed a distinctive pattern over the years of helping to set up taxpayer-funded public bureaucracies, both outside and within the U.N., which he then taps for funding and contacts when he moves on to other projects.

Styling himself as a guru of global governance, Strong also helped to launch a major campaign for the U.N. to entwine its murky and graft-prone bureaucracy with big business, via so-called public-private partnerships. Strong introduced this process in his 1997 reform proposal as the bland notion of consultation between the United Nations and the business community.   End of Fox Article Excerpts 
The Maurice Strong web is a tangled one, including U.N. Secretary Generals, Boutros Boutros-Ghali, Koffi Annan, and now South Korean, Ban Ki-moon. Strong has used his many positions within the U.N. and his influence (read that money-making schemes) to place his own hand-picked people in lucrative and accommodating positions within the U.N. For all practical purposes, he hasn’t really left the U.N., merely moved to Beijing, where he operates out of the reach of the U.S. government and its laws.   

He also operates out of Costa Rica, but a discussion of that would make this article far too lengthy. Maybe another day. Fox News has covered that subject at the web site referenced above   

The obvious lesson to be learned is that Maurice Strong is both a worshiper of Gaia AND a founder of today’s “global warming” scheme. Strong’s multi-decade track record is one of making money by the millions by hook and crook using the United Nations, public-private partnerships, governments of foreign countries, people and connections made through the U.N. and the unwitting American taxpayer.   

There is no more time to do nothing.  

 

Read Full Post | Make a Comment ( None so far )

Hugo Chavez and Mother Earth – Climate Change for the Unbalanced

Posted on April 24, 2010. Filed under: Al Gore, Cap and Trade, Capitalism, Communism, Constitution, Copenhagen, Dictator, Energy, environmentalism, environmentalists, Freedom, Freedom of Speech, Gaia, Gaia hypothesis, global governance, Global Warming/Cimate Change, globalization, goddess, Greek mythology, junk science, Marxism, Mother Earth, Obama, pantheism, planet, politics, science, Socialism, sovereignty, sustainability, Uncategorized, United Nations |

Photo: Bolivian President Evo Morales. Credit: EFE; Noticias 24, Reuters

Hugo Chavez, Leader of Venezuela’s demise, and Evo Morales, lunatic-in-chief of Bolivia, attended the recent World People’s Conference on Climate Change and the Rights of Mother Earth in Cochabamba, Bolivia on April 22, 2010.  Morales made a speech in which he informed attendees that chicken producers inject the chickens with female hormones and that “men who eat them have trouble being men”.   He went on to say that being gay and baldness is the result of eating chicken, pointing to his own thick head of hair as proof.

But the real issues to be noted here are the name of the event  “Rights of Mother Earth” and the conference accords calling for the “industrialized nations to change the system of capitalism that is imposed upon us.”  That is the real agenda of the climate change movement Their plans would replace capitalism, freedom and individual liberty with Socialism, Communism and Marxism, transferring the wealth and power of the “people” to the few who have lied, cheated and stolen their way to the top.

As a free people, for the moment, we can’t sit here and hope it all turns out all right.  The people whose only desire is to have power and wealth are working day and night to achieve their goals.   We have to be vigilant, work aggressively to defeat their efforts and decrease the size and powers of our own government. 

THERE IS NO MORE TIME TO DO NOTHING.

http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/laplaza/2010/04/bolivia-president.html

Read Full Post | Make a Comment ( 1 so far )

A SHOCKER! – Installment 10 – May 30, 2008

Posted on April 13, 2010. Filed under: Al Gore, atmosphere, Cap and Trade, Communism, Constitution, Copenhagen, Democrats, Dictator, Energy, environmentalism, environmentalists, Freedom, Gaia, global governance, Global Warming/Cimate Change, globalization, Liberty, Lindsey Graham, Marxism, Maurice Strong, McCain, Mikhail Gorbachav, Mother Earth, News Media, Obama, planet, Political, politics, science, sovereignty, sustainability, U.S. Government, United Nations | Tags: , , |

A SHOCKER! – Installment 10 – May 30, 2008

Re-post. Originially posted on May 29, 2008.

Soon, the Senate will hold hearings on a “Cap and Trade” bill, an effort to reduce carbon dioxide emissions into the atmosphere and prevent further global warming. It will be costly (multiple billions) and have far-reaching consequences (many decades and possibly beyond). Whether Cap and Trade will have any real benefit to the globe is still as unclear as the science of global warmings’ existence or cause. Senate Bill 2191 is offered to the Senate by Barbara Boxer (D – CA), Joe Lieberman (D-CONN) and John Warner (R-VA).

The “Cap” part of the bill places limits or “caps” on how much CO2 a company is allowed by government to emit into the air. This is usually measured in tons. The limit will be determined by the government’s estimate of current total emissions minus the reduction goal which will be a steadily reduced percentage annually. S. 2191 requires that emissions decline to 15% below 2005 levels by 2020, without regard to population increases and rising energy demands. Each unit of emissions allowed is called a carbon credit.

Company A may be allowed to emit 500 tons of CO2 this year, while Company B is allowed 600 tons. What happens if Company A exceeds the goal and only emits 450 tons, a savings of 50 carbon credits? What happens if Company B is unable to reduce emissions enough and exceeds the cap by 50 tons? No problem. Company B purchases the unused 50 carbon credits from Company A and is considered carbon neutral. In reality, Company A has done part of the reduction work for Company B and Company B hasn’t done its share.

How does Co. B absorb the cost of buying the additional carbon credits from Co. A? It doesn’t. It simply adds it to the cost of its goods and services, and you and I, the consumers, pay for it. Does the government give the annual carbon credits to companies for free? Nope. The government sells them and, by some estimates, expects to collect billions in new revenue. Who pays the cost of buying carbon credits from the government? You guessed it. The consumers – you and I. Companies add all of their costs of doing business to the prices of their goods and services and we pay for it. Our lives are getting more and more expensive, especially as the rate of reduction is constantly tightened year after year, making it increasingly more difficult for companies to comply. The harder it is, the more it will cost – US.

Companies will have to become experts in CO2 emission reduction technology, science and engineering. Instead of concentrating their efforts on making their product or providing their service, they will have to spend time and resources on emissions reduction. Most companies will hire someone to figure it out and get it done, passing the cost of the new employee/s on to us, again. Like losing weight, the last 20% of reduction may be very difficult to do, resulting in costly efforts. Just because the government decided to make a company reduce emissions by a number they picked, doesn’t mean it’s possible in reality. Of course, they can always purchase whatever extra carbon credits they need – and pass the cost on to you and me.

How will companies buy and sell carbon credits? Will they need to hire someone to handle that? Maybe not, but if they do, they will pass that cost on to…you guessed it…you and me. The American Chronicle online has a good article explaining carbon credit trading, the “Trade” part of “Cap and Trade”, entitled “‘Carbon Credit Trading’ is the New ‘Derivatives’ Game”,  by Ugur Akinci,  Ph.D.,  May 14, 2007  http://www.americanchronicle.com/articles/27045

A carbon credit is basically the right to pollute sold by those less-polluting companies to those who do not, for one reason or another, want to curb their carbon dioxide emissions yet. The prices of these credits probably rely more on the laws passed by legislative bodies in respective parliaments than on net corporate worths, or any classical technical ratios or interest rates.

The market to buy and sell such credits is especially hot in Europe where most countries have signed the U.N. Kyoto Protocol to curb CO2 emissions. The United States as of May 2007 still has not signed the Protocol.

To sell these credits as individual companies, you need to register your energy-saving and carbon-suppressing projects with the United Nations and get U.N. certification. Therefore, the U.S. companies cannot do that yet directly. That’s why London is right now the busy hub of the $25 billion carbon credit trading market where 60% of all transactions take place compared to only 10% in the U.S.

(MY NOTE: Al Gore’s company, Generation Investment Management is based in London (where all the money is flowing) with an office in Washington, D.C. (where he can push legislation in his favor.) This is a fund management company that trades “green” companies. Al Gore uses it to offset his own huge use of carbon fuels. He invests his money in these green companies thinking that he is investing enough in someone else’s effort to be eco-friendly and that will balance his “way out of the norm” use of energy in his mansion in Tennessee. He has two other homes around the country and I bet he flies to them. Maybe he drives a Prius between states? He invests his money in GIM, which then pays him a salary and a return on his investments. His “carbon neutral money scheme” keeps his money revolving from one of his pockets to another of his pockets, picking up more profit along the way. Clever guy, this Al Gore.)

However, the U.S. investors already take part in this new exciting market through various hedge funds that deal in the 200-member Chicago Climate Exchange, Inc.

(MY NOTE: The name ENRON keeps popping into my head. Carbon Credits bought and sold and they are not based on anything, just thin air. They have no concrete value.)

The pressures on Washington to sign the Kyoto Protocol and to participate more directly in the world-wide carbon credit trade comes from major states like California.

Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger has signed in September 2006 a law that mandates cutting down the CA carbon emissions by 25% as of 2020. This would of course increase the attention paid to CC trading as well since it is a lucrative way to self-finance many alternative energy projects.

(MY NOTE: Just order companies to lower their emissions by a percentage every year and be done with it. Don’t create this new carbon trading industry, in which the people are fleeced andthe government makes billions, as do the promoters of this pyramid scheme. It’s a mass wealth re-distribution scheme that moves money from yours and my bank accounts to the government treasuries and the promoters bank accounts.)

A major development to spur Washington in that direction would be the launching of a carbon credit exchange soon in Beijing, China. I’m sure we are witnessing only the beginning of a brand new trading sector that will make itself felt strongly in the months and years ahead.”

(MY NOTE: By all means, we must keep up with the Jones’ or China.)

You probably get the picture that just like oil, whose price is affected by speculators and traders bidding up the prices, carbon credits will be traded on an exchange and the prices will be bid up as well. The more scarce and the greater the demand for carbon credits, the higher the price will go. And that expense will be passed down to… YOU AND ME AGAIN.

The bottom line for me is that global warming hasn’t been satisfactorily proven yet. It certainly hasn’t been proven that human activities are causing detrimental global warming. And financing this whole scheme is YOU AND ME. If it turns out that the globe is not warming dangerously, but is only experiencing normal cycles OR that humans can’t and don’t cause warming and cannot prevent it, then you and I have been fleeced again by politicans who pushed this into law. Al Gore opened Generation Investments Management to capitalize on global warming and stands to make millions and perhaps billions. He will never allow anyone or anything to interfere with it, not even scientists who can show evidence contrary to Gore’s theory.

THE SENATE AND CONGRESS SHOULD WAIT UNTIL WE HAVE ACCURATE AND CONCRETE EVIDENCE PROVING THAT THE COMPANIES THAT WOULD BE FORCED TO BUY CARBON CREDITS ARE INDEED THE CAUSE.

CONTACT YOUR REPRESENTATIVES AND TELL THEM NOT TO PASS LEGISLATION UNTIL WE HAVE THE PROOF. Remember, Gore’s professor and mentor, Dr. Roger Revelle said repeatedly that “there is no harm in waiting. It is not an imminent threat.” Another Inconvenient Truth for Al Gore and his buddies that hope to profit from this.

There is no more time to do nothing.

Please read all the previous installments and the future installments of which there will be at least five more, perhap six or seven.

Read Full Post | Make a Comment ( None so far )

Cherry Trees of Truth in Washington, D.C

Posted on February 17, 2010. Filed under: Al Gore, Cap and Trade, Freedom, global governance, Global Warming/Cimate Change, globalization, Liberty, Obama, science, Uncategorized | Tags: , , , , |

CHERRY TREES IN WASHINGTON, D.C.

How poetic!

The colossal lie of global warming has been brutally exposed by record breaking snow storms, blizzards, and record-low temps all around the world.   Winter has arrived earlier and stayed later than normal in the last several years to the consternation of the climate change crowd, busily working like bees in the hive to cover up the truth and manipulate the data to keep the “dream” alive.  But it’s not working.  It seems that God is greater and more powerful than all the politicians and so-called scientists in the world, no matter where they got their revered degrees.

America’s first president, George Washington, was known for his truthfulness and would no doubt be appalled at the lies and distortions perpetrated by the world’s pathetic leaders to gain wealth and power over the common man.  Washington was himself wealthy and powerful, yet refused to accept the offer to become king of the newly formed country of the United States of America.   He understood the value of freedom of every man. 

The cherry tree is the symbol of George Washington’s truth-telling.  The old legend says that he chopped down a cherry tree and when asked about it, he answered, “I cannot tell a lie. I chopped down the cherry tree.”   In the city bearing George Washington’s name, the beautiful cherry trees blooming in spring are a great tourist attraction and bestow an unmatched beauty on the seat of our government.  But they mask a robust ugliness residing in the Capitol building, the White house and the Hart Senate building.   The ugliness of corruption, lying, selfishness and every unseemly behavior known to man.  Scandals abound, but the one that hurts all of us the most is the global warming/climate change scheme.  This one is designed to rob us of our freedom, our way of life, our success, our wealth and our honor.

The symbol of truth, the cherry tree, has been broken, damaged, weighted down by snow in the nation’s power center, as if God was defying their modern day Tower of Babel.

Read Full Post | Make a Comment ( None so far )

A SHOCKER! – Installment 9 Global Warming/Climate Change

Posted on February 5, 2010. Filed under: Al Gore, atmosphere, bioscience, Cap and Trade, Clinton, Copenhagen, Democrats, Dictator, environmentalism, environmentalists, Gaia, Gaia hypothesis, Gaia matrix, global governance, Global Warming/Cimate Change, globalization, goddess, Greek mythology, junk science, Liberty, News Media, planet, Political, politics, science, sovereignty, sustainability, sustainable, U.S. Government, Uncategorized, uniformitarianism, United Nations | Tags: , , |

A SHOCKER! – Installment 9 – May 29, 2008  Re-Post

In 1991, Al Gore wrote his book, Earth in the Balance, in which he cites his mentor and former professor, the late Dr. Roger Revelle, a renowned oceanographer and the first to recognize the effects of rising atmospheric CO2 on the earth’s temperature. Gore’s book called for awareness of carbon dioxide emissions into the air and its effects, and drastic changes in society to combat the perceived problem. The book was published in 1992. Gore spoke before Congress and the U.N. expressing his position that the end was only ten years away and measures must be implemented immediately. Gore put his reputation on the line with his global warming alarmist messages.

About the same time that Gore was writing his book, Prof. Revelle was writing a paper for the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) on greenhouse warming with co-authors Dr. Chauncy Star and Dr. S. Fred Singer, which was later presented to the Cosmos Club of Washington, D.C. and published in their monthly journal. According to Dr. Singer, the conclusion was a simple message: “The scientific base for greenhouse warming is too uncertain to justify drastic action at this time.” These words were almost identical to those written by Dr. Revelle to members of Congress after their hearing on global warming in 1988, which was instigated and chaired by Senator Al Gore.

It is noted that then Sen. Timothy Wirth (D., CO) ignored Revelle’s scientific opinion and joined with Gore in escalating the alarm over Earth’s warming climate. On a PBS “Frontline” special, “Hot Politics”, he explained Gore’s ploy, with Wirth’s help, to set the stage for the hearing. They called the weather station and asked what the hottest day of the year was. When they were told that historically it was June the 6th (or the 9th – Wirth didn’t remember), they scheduled the hearing for that day in June, which turned out to be the hottest day on record for Washington, D.C. Wirth tells that the night before the hearing, they went into the chambers and opened all the windows so that the air conditioners wouldn’t work. It was a set up. During the hearing, people were wiping sweat off their brows. Gore, of course, pushed for immediate legislation to restrict activities that produced CO2 and caused a greenhouse effect. http://planetgore.nationalreview.com/post/?q=MDk2YjVlYTYzZjZkNTRhZWU2NGNkNzcw…=

Revelle’s paper in the Cosmos didn’t get much attention right away. It was a year later, when journalist Gregg Easterbrook, contributing editor to Newsweek, referred to it in a piece entitled “Green Cassandras” in the July 6, 1992 issue of the New Republic, and gave it a political slant. He made the allegation that Gore credited Revelle with introducing him to the problem of climate change, but failed to mention that before his death a year earlier, Revelle had published a paper that concluded that “the scientific base for greenhouse warming is too uncertain to justify drastic action at this time. There is little risk in delaying policy responses.”

Other columnists and editors, including George Will, picked up on this and the contradiction got traction. Just as this embarrassment for Gore was breaking out, he was selected by Bill Clinton to be his running mate in the presidential election of 1992. Gore couldn’t afford the negative press and the controversy, which came up in a vice-presidential debate. Sen. Gore deflected it, charging that Dr. Revelle’s views had been “taken completely out of context.”

In July of 1992, Dr. S. Fred Singer received a phone call from Dr. Justin Lancaster at the Environmental Science and Policy Institute, Harvard University, claiming to be a former associate of Dr. Revelle’s. Lancaster demanded that Singer remove Revelle’s name from the article to be reprinted in the Geyer volume. Aghast at the demand, Singer refused, saying that he could not do that without the author’s permission and the author had died. Also that the copyright belonged to Cosmos.

Lancaster then waged a smear and pressure campaign on Singer to the extent that Singer filed a law suit against him and won! Lancaster took opportunities to say that Dr. Revelle had not really co-authored the piece, then Revelle’s mental capacities were failing at the time. There was evidence to disprove all of the smear tactics engaged in by Lancaster, a fact which he admitted in a legal statement after losing the court battle. During the trial, it was revealed that Al Gore had called Lancaster after Easterbrook’s article came out and asked about Revelle’s mental capabilities and views at the time this paper was written. Lancaster had replied in a letter that Revelle was sharp and these were his stated views.

A member of Gore’s staff, Dr. Anthony D. Socci, tried the same tactics, writing to the Geyer publishers requesting that the Cosmos article be dropped. The “request” was denied. Sadly, Gore was not satisfied with the outcome of Lancaster or Socci’s attempt to squash the inconvenient truth.

http://media.hoover.org/documents/0817939326_283.pdf (direct quote with some abbreviations)

On February 24, 1994, Ted Koppel revealed on his Nightline television program that Vice-President Al Gore had called him and suggested that Mr. Koppel investigate the political and economic forces behind the “anti-environmental” movement. In particular, VP Gore had urged Koppel to expose as fact that several U.S. scientists who had voiced skeptical views about greenhouse warming were receiving financial support from the coal industry and/or groups such as the Lyndon Larouche organizations or Reverend Moon’s Unification Church.

Mr. Koppel didn’t do the VP’s bidding and asked rhetorically, “Is this a case of industry supporting scientists who happen to hold sympathetic views, or scientists adapting their views to accommodate industry?” He closed the show by chastising Gore for trying to use the media to discredit skeptical scientists:

“There is some irony in the fact that Vice-President Gore – one of the most scientifically literate men to sit in the White House in this century – {is} resorting to political means to achieve what should ultimately be resolved on a purely scientific basis. The measure of good science is neither the politics of the scientist nor the people with whom the scientist associates. It is the immersion of hypotheses into the acid of truth. That’s the hard way to do it, but it’s the only way that works.” Ted Koppel

There is no more time to do nothing.

Read Full Post | Make a Comment ( 9 so far )

A SHOCKER! – Installment 8 Global Warming/Climate Change

Posted on February 3, 2010. Filed under: Al Gore, atmosphere, bioscience, Cap and Trade, Copenhagen, Darwin, Dawkins, Democrats, Energy, environmentalism, environmentalists, evolution, Freedom, Gaia, Gaia hypothesis, Gaia matrix, global governance, Global Warming/Cimate Change, globalization, goddess, Greek mythology, idol, James Lovelock, junk science, Liberty, Marguli, Maurice Strong, Mikhail Gorbachav, Mother Earth, News Media, Obama, pantheism, planet, Political, politics, science, sovereignty, sustainability, sustainable, U.S. Government, uniformitarianism, United Nations | Tags: , , |

A SHOCKER! – Installment 8 – May 27, 2008 Re-Post

Not every scientist is part of Al Gore’s mythical consensus. Scientists worried about a new ice age seek funding to better observe something bigger than your SUV – THE SUN!” http://www.ibdeditorials.com/IBDArticles.aspx?id=287279412587175, Investor’s Business Daily, Editorial, February 7, 2008

The Danish Meteorological Institute released a study, using data that covered centuries, showing that global temperatures closely tracked Solar cycles. This was in 1991 just about the time Al Gore was beginning to get the word out that the earth was going to burn up from gas emissions produced by man. He had created a slideshow in 1988 about the atmosphere and used it to teach on the subject. It was this slideshow that was the basis for An Inconvenient (and inaccurate) Truth (falsehood).

There was convincing data then, and Canadian scientists want more funding to study global cooling NOW. The Sun impacts Earth’s climate more than anything else. Elementary schools teach kids that our seasons are the result of our closeness to or distance from the Sun. In the past, we’ve been warned of solar storms affecting us with power blackouts, satellite failures and even pipeline explosions.

Gore and the Gaia worshipers pound everyone into submission by stating that “scientists agree” and that it is” scientifically proven”. They use the words “science, scientists, evidence and proven” as incontrovertible. What they don’t say is how many scientists disagree with Gore and have science that disproves the Gore truth. Al Gaia Gore never mentions all the evidence to the contrary. The following website presents a great deal of evidence and studies that cover centuries of data proving that solar activity changes Earth’s climate in cycles. An eleven year cycle is one of the main topics discussed, and yes, by scientists with very respected credentials. It also explains the ozone layer and the holes environmentalists claim are caused by gas emissions and blame for global warming.

http://www.solarstorms.org/SClimate.html

“The most well-documented connection between solar activity and climate change is the Maunder Minimum. This was a 40-year period when extreme cold weather prevailed in Europe. It also coincided with astronomers watching the sun and not seeing many sunspots! Astronomer Jack Eddy pointed this out in the 1970’s, and since then many other sun-climate connections have been looked for and in some cases uncovered.

The sunspot cycle and Boston Weather…. This study by Dave Henry at NOAA is based on 207 years of daily temperature data from Boston. It shows a 0.8 F drop in the average annual temperature near sunspot maximum, a 3-inch difference in the annual average precipitation near sunspot maximum, and a 7-inch increase in annual average snowfall at sunspot maximum.

The sunspot cycle and Annual Precipitation in Beijing.This article by Juan Zhao and his colleagues at Beijing Normal University was published in the Chinese Journal of Astronomy and Astrophysics (2004, vol 4 pg 189) and is based on rainfall records from 1870 to 2002. Their wavelet analysis of the rainfall data identifies four periods of 11, 22, 33 and 72 years. The wavelet analysis of the sunspot data for the same period reveals periods of 11, 22, 33 and 78 years.

The sunspot cycle and Extreme Weather over Portugal…. This 2005 study by P.S. Lucio at the Center for Geophysics in Evorea was published in the Geophysical Research Abstracts (vol. 7 p. 129) and is based on cosmic ray and rainfall data from 1901-2000. A statistically significant correlation was found between rainfall and temperature extremes, and cosmic ray fluxes beginning in 1980.

The sunspot cycle and the Global StratosphereThis study by H. van Loon and K. Labitzke at the National Center for Atmospheric Research (NOAA) shows that the heights and temperatures of the lower stratosphere vary in step with the sunspot cycle. It was published in the Journal of Atmospheric and Solar-Terrestrial Research (1999, vol. 61 pg. 53) and is an extension of a Northern Hemisphere study that they completed in 1997. The correlation between the sunspot cycle and the zonally averaged temperatures are highest between the tropopause and the 25-km level of the ozone layer.”

The amount of UV from the sun ( specifically UV-B) changes during the sunspot cycle. At sunspot maximum, there is 0.1 % more UV-B radiation than at minimum. Scientists have detected this sunspot cycle-effect in a 2% change in ozone concentrations. For more details see ” Solar Cycle Variability, Ozone, and Climate” by Drew Shindell, David Rind, Nambeth Balachandran, Judith Lean, and Patrick Lonergan in journal Science 1999 284: 305-308.

The difference in total ozone between maximum and minimum conditions during the sunspot cycle were estimated using yearly averages of total ozone. For solar cycle 21, 1.16% and 1.26% for solar cycle 22, a larger difference of 3.8% and 4.1% were found. The corresponding variation in UV-B at 3000 Angstroms, using Beer’s law, is 4-10% with maxima occurring during the minimum of the solar cycle. E. Escher, V. Kirchoff, Y. Sahai and N. Paes Leme published in the Advances in Space Research, Volume 27, Issue 12, p. 1983-1986.

The correlations between the total column ozone observed by TOMS and the 11-yr sunspot cycle are lowest in the equatorial region, where ozone is produced, and in the subpolar regions, where the largest amounts are found. In the annual mean the highest, statistically significant, correlations lie between the 5° and 30° parallels of latitude in either hemisphere — between the area of production and the areas of plenty. This position of the largest correlations suggests that the association between the Sun and the ozone is not a direct, radiative one, but that it is due to solar induced changes in the transport of ozone, that is, to changes in the atmospheric circulation. The highest tropical-subtropical correlations move with the Sun from summer hemisphere to summer hemisphere. The subtropical geopotential heights in the ozone layer are higher in the peaks than in the valleys of the 11-yr sunspot cycle. It is probable that the higher subtropical geopotentials in solar maxima depress the poleward transport of ozone through the subtropics and therefore create an abundance of ozone in the tropics relative to the solar minima. These results are based on a 15-yr series of ozone observations and may thus not necessarily be representative of a longer period. “ K. Labitzke and H. van Loon published in the Journal of Atmospheric and Solar-Terrestrial Physics V. 59, p. 9-19, 1997

Cosmic rays stream down into Earth’s atmosphere from the sun and elsewhere beyond the solar system. Recent studies show that these particles penetrate into the troposphere and alter the way that droplets condense to form clouds, rain and snow with important weather and climate consequences. Changes in the sun’s ultraviolet light affects the ozone layer and the energy input into the upper atmosphere. As the upper atmosphere is heated, it expands into space causing increased friction for satellites. 

There is enough opposing science to bring Gore’s hypothesis into question. It is far too soon in this debate to pass laws changing a free people’s way of life and bringing down the economies of developing nations, not to mention our own here in America.

There is no more time to do nothing.

Read Full Post | Make a Comment ( None so far )

« Previous Entries

Liked it here?
Why not try sites on the blogroll...