Who Is Obama?

Obama Said Wives Are Off-Limits! In 2008

Posted on April 12, 2012. Filed under: Communism, Democrats, Marxism, McCain, News Media, Obama, Obama's Associates & Appointees, Political, politics, Socialism, U.S. Government, Who Is Obama? | Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |

Candidate Obama said in 2008 that wives and families are off-limits in a campaign. Here it is:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wwtO1k5GoAo&feature=results_main&playnext=1&list=PL105C071CB80D26CD

He said he would speak out against anyone doing that.  (crickets, crickets, crickets)

His surrogates have attacked candidate Mitt Romney’s wife.  (crickets, crickets, crickets)

Where is Pres. Obama defending her and demanding that his own people stop the attacks on wives?  Where was he when they attacked Cindy McCain, Sarah Palin, the Palin children, Michelle Bachmann and the husbands of Palin and Bachmann?

Is Obama responsible for what his team says? By his own mouth, he has said he would speak out to stop it. But he hasn’t.

CNN’s Anderson Cooper held a conversation with Obama supporter, Hilary Rosen in which she criticized Ann Romney for choosing to stay at home and raise her children, rather than have a career.  Is Rosen connected to Obama’s campaign?

Hilary Rosen and Anita Dunn are partners in a PR firm, SKDKnickerbocker, used by the DNC  for their campaigns, which includes that of Debbie Wasserman-Schultz, the DNC chairwoman.  This firm was involved in the Sandra Fluke appearance before a mock Congressional hearing and the ensuing controversy, which Obama’s team used to begin their War On Women.  Anita Dunn was Obama’s White House Communications Director from April through November, 2009.  She left under some controversy over her statement to high school seniors that the murderous and brutal dictator, Mao Zedong, was one of her FAVORITE political philosophers. Did Obama know she was a Maoist before he hired her?  It’s very likely that Obama knows Anita Dunn as well as anyone, considering their long association.

In 2oo6, Senator Obama hired Dunn as his STRATEGIST and communications director for his political action committee which he aptly named, The Hopefund.  She also helped with staffing and worked for his “Obama for America” effort.  Dunn became one of only four top advisors to Obama during his 2008 campaign, gaining the title “Senior Advisor” and was one of the MAJOR DECISION MAKERS. 

What were some of her decisions regarding the strategy of Obama’s campaign?  Listen to her explain it.  “We control the news media.”

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NlGNhAnwp_Y

She helped devise the Wars on Fox News, Glenn Beck, Republicans, and wives of candidates.  There can be no doubt. She was the senior advisor who made the major decisions. She was his communications director and strategist. It’s her plan. 

There can be no mistake that Hilary Rosen’s attack on Ann Romney is no accident, but part of Dunn’s campaign strategy for Obama’s re-election effort.

Yes, Ms. Dunn.  Anyone can now find the YouTube video to expose you, Rosen, Obama and team. Citizen journalists are vetting Obama and will be contrasting the videos of his former statements and promises with his current ones. 

*************

SKDKnickerbocker’s web site boasting of role in Obama’s election:   http://www.skdknick.com/work/far-reaching-role-in-election/

Dunn’s bio is well documented online. One source is:  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anita_Dunn.

*************

Does Dunn tell the truth and nothing but the truth?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1AEt180Wnls

Is CNN in Obama’s pocket?

Dunn consistently used CNN to get the smear out.  They seemed most willing to oblige.  Rosen committed her attack on CNN.

 

Advertisements
Read Full Post | Make a Comment ( None so far )

WILL OBAMA GET AWAY WITH IT? Birth Certificate Fraud

Posted on May 23, 2011. Filed under: birth certificate, Christianity, Communism, Constitution, Democrats, Dictator, Freedom, Freedom of Speech, global governance, Indonesia, Kenya, Liberty, Marxism, McCain, News Media, Obama, planet, politics, Socialism, sovereignty, U.S. Government, United Nations, Who Is Obama? | Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |

 

Oppose Obama at your own peril!

Did you think the Obama birth certificate controversary was over and settled when the White House posted a document on their web site and all of the media, including Fox News, declared Obama a U.S. citizen eligible to hold the office of President?  If you did, then you would be wrong.  Dr. Jerome Corsi’s new book came out a few days after the White House’s pre-emptive move to squelch interest and severely limit the sales of Where’s the Birth Certificate?  The case That Barack Obama is Not Eligible to Be President. 

The reaction of Fox News is puzzling since they are the only broadcaster to present both sides of any other issue, but in the case of Obama’s birth certificate, they are loathe to entertain the idea that something is amiss.  If Obama is ineligible, Fox News would be just as guilty as Obama, for perpetuating the cover-up rather than investigating seriously with intent to discover the truth.  It would seem that Fox News has chosen to pass up their opportunity to report the NEWS OF THE CENTURYout of fear of being wrong and looking foolish (you know, being one of those ridiculous “birthers”) or more likely, FEAR OF OBAMA’S WRATH!

Obama’s campaign team boasts of its close association with Google and Facebook, and hired Lawrence Lessig, technology guru,   to advise them on campaigning on the internet in 2007/8.  Is it really out of the realm of possibility that this group could forge a birth certificate for Obama?  Of course not.  Is it totally unthinkable that this group would do such a thing to get and keep Obama in the most powerful office on the planet, the power to get extreme left policies in place, the ticket to wealth, fame and power for progressives?  The answer is obvious.

For a more revealing look at Lawrence Lessig, visit https://marbiesblog.wordpress.com/2008/04/28/another-bad-character-in-obamas-circle-april-27-2008/.  Obama says he’s a Christian, but hired this anti-Christianity guy, who went so far as to denegrate Jesus in public in a vicious way and laughed about it. 

Do these people really have the scruples that would prevent them from executing a lucrative fraud?  There’s no evidence of such scruples.  Did anyone have difficulty believing that Nixon and his team commited fraud and cover-up?  No.  What’s so different about Obama that it’s inconceivable that he and his  bunch would commit fraud for the sake of power, wealth and fame?  Many people have committed great frauds for wealth, but add great power and it’s even more tempting and more likely, especially when there is enough evidence to suspect.

Obama also has the support of gazillionaire, George Soros and a very wealthy Arab, Dr. Khalid Al-Mansour, who is noted for his intervention in  Obama’s acceptance to Harvard.    All the money needed to create a sham biography and cover up the true bio is easily at Obama’s disposal. 

Why all the skeptism and doubt is beyond explanation.  The Congress, the news media, conservatives, Obama’s political opponents, all prefer to go along with the cover-up for two reasons:  supporters to keep him in power, opponents not wishing to look like tin foil hat wearing “birthers”  GOD FORBID SUCH A FATE!.  Opponents fail to recognize who coined the moniker “birthers”.  It was Obama’s supporters in a defensive move.  Why play by their rules instead of truth?  In fact, the democrats and Obama’s team brought up the issue of Sen. John McCain’s eligibility to serve as president based on his place of birth and demanded to see his birth certificate, which McCain happily and QUICKLY produced. None in the media called Democrats or Obama’s team “birthers.”  NONE!

Dr. Jerome Corsi’s book will still be in the public during the 2012 campaign season and World Net Daily will still be investigating and reporting.  Those who are smart enough, will still be proving that the White House document was produced by placing layer of information upon layer of information, to build the bio that fits Obama’s public statements.  A document typed on a 1961 typewriter, then scanned in 2011, cannot be broken into a dozen or more separate layers.  It was produced in one step – typing the info on paper.  Scanning does not produce multiple layers as shown in the many YouTube videos online.  Get the free version of Adobe Illustrator, download the WH document, and see for yourself.

What’s to be gained by covering up Obama’s felony, treason and fraud? 

A DICTATORSHIP!

 

“In a television interview last October, President Obama accidentally let slip a key element of his political philosophy: “We’re gonna punish our enemies, and we’re gonna reward our friends who stand with us on issues that are important to us.”

Obama later apologized — not for the underlying sentiment, mind you, but for his word choice. “I probably should have used the word ‘opponents’ instead of enemies,” the president declared.”  http://www.aei.org/article/103643

Read Full Post | Make a Comment ( None so far )

Obama’s Long Form Birth Certificate is Another Fraud

Posted on April 29, 2011. Filed under: ALERT!, birth certificate, Constitution, Democrats, Dictator, Freedom, Kenya, Liberty, Marxism, Obama, Orly Taitz, politics, SEIU, Socialism, U.S. Government, Who Is Obama? | Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |

Who’s in the White House?

Barack Hussein Obama, II?  Barry Obama?  Barry Soetoro? Soebarkah, as found underneath his name, Barack Hussein Obama, on Stanley Ann Dunham’s passport renewal application of 1965?  Was he adopted by step-dad Lolo Soetoro in Indonesia?  How many citizenships does he have? One, American?  Two, American and British (Kenya)?  Three – American, British (Kenyan) and Indonesian?

Can we look at his birth certificate and be assured of who it is that’s writing executive orders and signing bills into law?  Not as conclusively as the situation calls for.   First, he sealed all of his records.  Why do that?  Is there something incriminating?  Then he published a certificate of live birth, which accomplishes one thing and one thing only.  It certifies that Stanley Ann Dunham had a son and her address at the time was in Hawaii.  It states that Barack Hussein Obama was his father.  The difficulty with this is that it is a document that anyone could apply for whether or not the child was born in Hawaii and the parents supply the information.  Once the certificate is issued, it triggers the notice in the papers.    The two papers were owned by the same company, hence the identical wording.  (This information has been widely reported online by many researchers.)

During the firestorm over a lack of long form birth certificate, there were reports that Obama couldn’t secure it because the State destroyed them after putting them all on microfiche.  Then,  Democrat Gov. Neil Abercrombie announced that he was going to find that long form and show it to the skeptics and end this controversy.  After weeks of trying, he announced that he could not do it.  We heard that it didn’t exist, but there was a hand-written notation in the books.  A former employee had been saying that it didn’t exist.  Now the public is confused.  More and more high-profile people become suspicious and the  derogatory “birther” label is no longer intimidating.  It hits the main stream media, including Fox News and it’s discussed seriously without tin foil hats.

Finally, Donald Trump, with the funds and the means to send investigators, determines to solve the mystery.  He has the clout to affect Obama’s poll numbers just as the president begins his re-election campaign.   Just days before Jerome Corsi’s book, Where’s the Birth Certificate:  The Case That Barack Obama is Not Eligible to Be President, is due to hit the shelves and be shipped out to thousands of Amazon.com customers,  the country is surprised to learn that a document purported to be Obama’s long form birth certificate is on the whitehouse.gov website in .PDF format.  The president holds a presser in which he is condescending and sarcastic, stating that he has more important things to do – not the skyrocketing $trillions debt, the inflation train barreling down the tracks or the jobless economy making America a  third-world nation.  No, he immediately jets off to do the Oprah show and attend a couple of fund-raisers.  Very important.   Obama would have us believe that we can’t walk and chew gum at the same time – that we can only concentrate on the birth issue and nothing else.  That the five minutes it took him to phone someone and say “put the document online”, kept him from attending to national issues of import.

The country yawned.  The “birthers”, more accurately,  “Constitutionalists”, smelled a rat and the Obama supporters gloated.  Fox News, who had surprised viewers by finally asking the right questions, were relieved to get this monkey off their backs and called it solved – over – file closed once and for all.  BIG MISTAKE!  They will forever be remembered as spineless sycophants.

Not five hours later, the internet was filled with YouTube videos explaining in detail with Adobe Illustrator how the .PDF document had been built on a computer by layering, a technique that takes elements and builds them, one upon another, to get a desired result – a realistic-looking long form birth certificate that says all the right things to make Obama eligible to be President of the United States.  The ease with which techies discovered the layering and broke the document down, section by section, layer by layer, shocked even the techies.  Was this a joke, they wondered.  Could a White House operative be this careless and stupid?  Surely they wanted this to be proven a fraud.  But why? Is it a conspiracy to keep Americans distracted while Obama pulled off some dastardly deed? Obama had already said he believed it was distracting everyone from important issues.  Perhaps he devised a way to use this to his advantage.  But what?

The bottom line is:  For the first time in American history, the citizens don’t know who they’ve elected president and too many of them don’t trust him.  It’s not just his birth, or life narrative that makes them suspicious. It’s the vast number of radicals he filled his administration with and who populate his life.  It’s the bold promises he made during his campaign and his unashamed breaking of almost all of those promises, often doing the exact opposite.  It’s his constant disregard for the Constitution and the rulings of the courts.  It’s his continual bypassing of the people’s house, Congress, when he writes an executive order to pass something that Congress rejected.

Obama’s statements about this latest birth certificate never explained why he sent a team of lawyers around the country to fight the cases seeking a forced release of his long form birth certificate  nor why he spent over $1 million to keep it from being released.  The latest version states nothing not already in the public domain, so why the effort and the expense to fight its release.   Either he is hiding something incriminating and important or he is very foolish to waste such resources and engender such animosity  among potential voters.

Obama has forged a legal document and perpetrated a fraud from the White House upon the American citizens, Congress and the States. IMPEACHMENT is warranted. Subverting the Constitution and our form of government cannot and must not be tolerated.  At the very least, Obama is very deceitful and dishonest.  But that being the case, he must be IMPEACHED.  HE HAS EARNED IT.

To view the evidence of the forgery, visit the following sites:

Americans, why would our president do this?  How can a document made in 1961 be broken into layers, especially since they say this was a copy (scanned) of the original, which is supposed to look like it’s bound in a book?  A scanned copy can’t be broken into layers because it is an image, like a photograph.  The document on the White House web site was computer-generated, using layers in order to fill in the blanks with the information that Obama needs to cover his secret.  If all of that information is true, it would not be necessary to layer the document.  It could have been scanned and in image format.  BUT IT WASN’T!  It’s been manufactured to achieve the needed goal. 

Why?  How could this possibly be used to Obama’s benefit?

Here’s one possibility and it truly does begin in Kenya for some strange reason.

In 2008, Obama went to Kenya and campaigned for Raila Odinga in their presidential election. Odinga lost to the incumbent.  He then enraged his supporters, stirring up discontent saying that the election was crooked and their will had been thwarted.  Odinga pushed them  to protest in the streets, which they did with machetes, hacking, slashing and murdering.  In the little town of Eldoret, women, children and the elderly took refuge in the Assembly of God Church, only to perish when Odinga’s supporters burned it to the ground with the people still inside.  The winning incumbent felt forced to ignore Kenya’s Constitution and agree to share power with Odinga, creating a new equal position with him.  Last summer, during the BP oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico, Pres. Obama sent VP Joe Biden to Kenya to pressure them to adopt a new Constitution with a coalition government.  Obama was involved from start to finish.  The end result being that the loser still got the power.

During Obama’s own presidential campaign in America, he spoke to an SEIU meeting, touting his history of support for them and pledging his solidarity with them. He promised to consult them when making decisions as president.

When Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker and the Wisconsin legislators proposed cutting some of the collective bargaining rights of union workers in an effort to lower the budget, ultimately saving their jobs, the SEIU protestors were bussed in and whipped up to intimidate them.  Obama, being thick as thieves with SEIU and their leader, Richard Trumpka, weighed in on the conflict, helping to inflame the union protestors.

SEIU sends instructions to their members to “protest” at banks who don’t tow their line, at state capitol buildings to intimidate legislators, at the private residences of CEO’s and bankers, in the streets, shouting, even attacking and pushing people.  Obama talks tough from the bully pulpit and SEIU leaders gin up the anger.  So far, SEIU doesn’t use machetes, but the fear factor is definitely a tool they use.

It’s no secret that the main stream news media is in Obama’s back pocket, running interference for him and smearing his critics.  It’s obvious that they get talking points memos because they all start parroting the same words and phrases on the same day.  It’s not likely to be a coincidence that the day the White House posted the bogus long form birth certificate and techies began pointing out the forgery elements, the news media cried “Wolf!”, I mean “Racists!”  Whoopi Goldberg said that same day, “I’m playing the damn race card!” and called everyone questioning the validity of a computer-generated layered  forged document “racists”.

Obama’s poll numbers have sunk like a rock since he was elected – a steady decline.  Since Trump revived the birth certificate issue, Obama’s numbers fell even more.  Suddenly he comes out with such an obvious fake that people said, “Is this a joke?”  “Can’t the CIA forge a document better than this?”  Why would he do this?  The president posted a document so easy to debunk that the outcry was immediate.  Then, most likely,  Obama put out the word to SEIU, the main stream media and his Hollywood celebrity friends, that this is racism.  Cry “racism”, he told them.  And they began immediately.  This is one scenario that seems more than plausible.  If he starts a race war in America, he will regain the support of African-American voters who became disenchanted with him over broken promises.  He becomes the poor guy being attacked for his race.  He envisions everyone coming to his defense and counts on most never bothering to investigate the legitimacy of the document themselves.

Perhaps the explanation is much simpler and Obama’s techies made a mistake, not “flattening” their creation before publishing.  The end result is the same for the Constitutionality question.  Obama can’t show his true birth certificate because there is a lot at stake.  He has to resort to trickery and deceit.  He’s broken the law by forging a legal document.  He’s broken faith with the people who elected him.  He’s disgraced his office.  Our Congress is equally guilty for not upholding the Constitution which is their sworn duty.  Obama must be investigated by Congress, impeached and removed.  NO RACIST attacks must stop them.  It’s not racism. It’s the right thing to do.

Read Full Post | Make a Comment ( 2 so far )

Obama Re-Run – 2012 – Part 1

Posted on April 7, 2011. Filed under: Communism, Constitution, Democrats, Dictator, Freedom, globalization, Islam, Kenya, Liberty, Marxism, Muslims, Obama, politics, Socialism, sovereignty, U.S. Government, Uncategorized, Who Is Obama? | Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |

OBAMA CAMPAIGNS FOR RAILA ODINGA IN KENYA

Obama’s runnning again.  Did he keep his 2008 campaign promises?  Were the accusations spot-on?  A re-run warrants a revisiting of his own words and deeds.

And we elected the only person on stage who stubbornly would not salute the American flag.  He looked as if allegiance to this flag as a representation of this country, was no big deal.

A symbol of love and allegiance to America was too great a weight for this weak man.  And how did he show his patriotism?

Is it wise to elect a president who has a low opinion of America?

Does he have allegiance to any country, any one, any thing?

Those were all heads of state.  Why would a POTUS bow to a city mayor?

Was it just because he’s such a gracious person?

How’s this for gracious behavior?

And this?  The POTUS filibustered and there’s no need to watch all of this.  Just fast forward to the time 2:24:22 and watch through 2:27:07.

Sounded like Obama said, “I won, John.  We don’t care what you and your constituents want.”  Gracious or stinging?

Maybe Obama just bows in repect to all heads of state.

It doesn’t seem so.  Great Britain is our closest ally. Don’t they deserve as much respect and grace as Japan?  Doesn’t the Queen of England deserve as much respect as the King of Saudi Arabia?

What about the Prime Minister of Israel, another close ally?

No bows when Obama went to Israel and met Ahud Barak and Benjamin Netanyahu.  What about Netanyahu’s visit to the White House?

http://www.france24.com/en/20100706-benjamin-netanyahu-barack-obama-washington-diplomatic-relations-usa-israel

http://video.foxnews.com/v/4125551/netanyahu-humiliated-by-obama

Unheard of presidential behavior to a visiting head of state, especially one of our close allies.

http://video.foxnews.com/v/4125551/netanyahu-humiliated-by-obama

Such humiliation from Obama to Great Britain, the Queen of England, Prime Minister Gordan Brown, former Prime Minister Tony Blair and the British people.  NO GRACIOUSNESS.  No bowing.

So what is the conclusion?  Obama doesn’t want to pledge allegiance to America. Obama doesn’t want to wear a U.S. flagpin.  Obama wants to show his patriotism by running down our country and apologizing for America all over the world.  He IS willing, however, to bow to foreign countries, as long as they are NOT America’s closest allies (FRIENDS who have pledged to run to our assistance if we are attacked).

So why does Obama want to be President of the United States?

On April 7, 2011, I’M TEMPTED TO AGREE WITH HIM!

Read Full Post | Make a Comment ( None so far )

Arizona Memorial Service Hi-Jacked by Left – Together We Thrive

Posted on January 14, 2011. Filed under: ACORN, Democrats, Obama, politics, SEIU, Uncategorized, Who Is Obama? | Tags: , , , , , , , |

“Together We Thrive” 

That slogan gained notoriety at the Arizona Memorial Service for the victims of the massacre that killed six and injured many others, including Congresswoman Gabby Giffords and Fed. Judge John Roll.  People were shocked to see blue t-shirts draped over the backs of the chairs in the stadium where the service was held.  No one had ever seen that done at a memorial to the dead and wounded  before.  What on earth is that about?  Workers in red t-shirts had been seen earlier placing the shirts dutifully on each seat.  Fliers bearing the same slogan were given to the attendees, prompting more questions about this oddity at a memorial   And whoever heard of promoting a catchy slogan at such a solemn occasion?  Afterall, this wasn’t a marketing opportunity like the Super Bowl.

So whose idea was it and what was their purpose?  Immediately some pundits blamed the White House and Barack Obama, probably because a segment of the crowd turned the occasion into a rowdy pep rally for President Obama, cheering, clapping, whistling and shouting out.  Such inconsiderate behavior was first blamed on the college students and Obama was deemed an innocent uncomfortable victim who did a superior job of letting it grow into thunderous applause for himself and climaxing with the possibility of another term in the Oval Office.   He never made any effort to calm them down or remind them of the solemnity of the evening and the grieving of the families present.  He certainly should have known to do so. He’s a Harvard grad described by the main stream media as brilliant, savvy, intellectual, intelligent and eloquent. 

Even the fair and balanced Fox News experts said they didn’t believe Obama had anything to do with it and that he looked uncomfortable with all that adulation.  This author was suspicious from the git-go.  Every organization Obama has ever been associated with used t-shirts to solidify a base of supporters, voters, volunteers, organizers, agitators, protestors, union members.    T-shirts seemed to be the key to a leftist hand in this.   

     

An internet search of the slogan turned up the following web post:

http://www.examiner.com/civil-rights-in-phoenix/chicanos-unidos-arizona-members-attend-together-we-thrive-memorial

The Chicanos Unidos Arizona were bussed in for the “Together We Thrive Event”.  Being pro-amnesty, pro-illegal immigration, who do you think booed Gov. Jan Brewer when she rose to speak?  Who do you think cheered wildly when Obama rose to speak?   This was the first time this author realized that the service was named, billed and known from it’s inception as the “Together We Thrive Event”, not the Arizona Memorial Service.  Why was this organization bussed in from Phoenix for this event?  Why was anyone bussed in?

Finally, the proof was found at:  http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/johnberry_iv/C94H

As soon as Obama became president he started a volunteer program, Organizing for America, which he hoped would enlist America’s impressionable youth.  Perhaps a strong voter pool for him in the next election?    Notice the slogan “Together We Thrive” at the top of the post dated 2008?  Is it a coincidence that the Together We Thrive event that was expected to be a solemn tribute to the victims turned out to be an Obama campaign rally?  Is Obama just an innocent victim of circumstance?  His poll nmubers have been going down steadily and were in dangerous territory.  He needed a positive to boost his negative approval numbers.  As his former Chief of Staff, Rahm Emmanuel said, “Never let a crisis go to waste.”  He didn’t.  Clinton once bemoaned the fact that 9/11, or something like it, never happened during his presidency to give him a legacy other than Monica Lewinsky.

Obama’s presidential campaign of 2008 was extremely heavy on branding.  Obama had a logo which appeared everywhere on everything imagineable, including shirts.   His use of left-wing organizations such as ACORN AND SEIU was “in your face” in their red and purple t-shirts.  Now it appears that the tragedy in Arizona became a branded event, and lo and behold, it was an old Obama brand from 2008.  Organizing for America.  Once an organizer, always an organizer.   Together We Thrive – and get re-elected.

 

Read Full Post | Make a Comment ( 1 so far )

OBAMA’S SEIU = THUGGERY GOVERNMENT!

Posted on May 20, 2010. Filed under: 2010 election, ACORN, Big Brother, Capitalism, Communism, Constitution, Democrats, Dictator, Freedom, Freedom of Speech, Hate Speech/Crime Bill, Health Care, Liberty, Marxism, Obama, Obama's Associates & Appointees, politics, SEIU, Socialism, sovereignty, terrorism, U.S. Government, Uncategorized, Who Is Obama? |

This photo was taken during Obama’s 2008 campaign for president.  Remember that during those days, he refused to wear the American Flag lapel pin.  Look what he did not refuse to wear in this photo. SEIU’s logo has a purple background and their T-shirts are purple.  Look at Obama’s tie color – purple.  In the first video, Obama promises to turn America purple.   Telling, isn’t it?

Now who and what has Obama stood with and worked beside, right there with them for over twenty years, in his own words?

You will want to visit this site below.   Main stream media isn’t covering this.  Mob rule, like that of Kenya, thankfully without the machetes.

http://biggovernment.com/libertychick/2010/05/20/seiu-storms-private-residence-terrorizes-teenage-son-of-bank-of-america-exec/

Every American should be appalled that this type of intimitadation is allowed, pacified and not prosecuted in a court of law, while we still have courts of law.  Obama is a street rabble-rouser which is exactly what community organizers do.  They come into carefully chosen neighborhoods and pick until they find an issue they can use to rile up the citizens.  Then they talk it up with emotion, short of true facts, and whip the people into anger and action.  Remember hearing about angry mobs stringing up people without a trial?  Where are we headed?

Andy Stern was the head of SEIU in America for years, the years Obama says he worked side-by-side with SEIU.  Andy Stern went to the White House 23 times in the first few  months of Obama’s first year as President, many times more than ANYONE else.   Andy Stern left his post as head of SEIU after the ACORN scandal heated up.  He now heads SEIU Europe.  Great.  ACORN is also organizing internationally.    They want Card Check legislation to force companies to allow unions to take over the operation  of their businesses (which is what it amounts to) and SEIU will rush in immediately.  Thuggery is alive and well in the good ‘ole USA.

The question is:  Will Americans put up with it?  Will YOU put up with it?

Read Full Post | Make a Comment ( None so far )

What Did Michelle Know and When Did She Know It?

Posted on April 29, 2010. Filed under: birth certificate, Obama, Orly Taitz, politics, Uncategorized, Who Is Obama? | Tags: , |

The following paragraphs are excerpts taken directly from: 

MSNBC ONLINE:  “MICHELLE OBAMA TALKS FATHERHOOD”  Posted Thursday, July 10, 2008 at 3:46 p.m by Domenico Montanaro

MSNBC>Home>Politics>First Read

From NBC/NJ’s Carrie Dann

 

KANSAS CITY, Mo. 

 

“The Kansas City roundtable, held at the city’s University of Missouri campus, was the aspiring First Lady’s second in as many days. Yesterday, she held a similar event in Pontiac, Michigan, before a crowded auditorium of mostly black women where they discussed soaring health care costs and unemployment.

Today’s audience was also made up of almost all women, but the crowd in the more affluent university area was more mixed. Participants mentioned college-loan payments and day-care fees as monthly costs that drive them to scrimp and cut corners.

Obama used the roundtable audience, as she did yesterday, to describe her husband’s understanding of women’s issues through the prism of the strong — but sometimes struggling — women in his life.

His own mother, she said at the beginning of her remarks, was “very young and very single when she had him.” And, Obama added, he has observed his wife’s attempts to reconcile motherhood with her career aspirations.

“He sees me, his wife, who struggles every day with that guilt that we all hold deep in our hearts as women,” she said. “That guilt that you don’t have the choice to stay home, and even if you do, you feel guilty.”

“He has seen me struggle with this my entire life,” she added. “Trust me, Barack understands the struggles of women.””

************************************************************

An online search for documents in the public domain resulted in this article, which was a complete surprise.  Has any television or cable news organization reported this?  If not, then why not?  This article puts this quote squarely on Michelle Obama’s  lips.  This is not from Fox News.  It is MSNBC, home of Chris Matthews, who has a tingle up his leg when he hears Barack Obama speak.

http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/07/10/1193601.aspx

***************************************************************

Does this have any bearing on the  Obama certificate of live birth posted online by his aides?  Don’t know.  Would the original long form birth certificate hold different information?  Don’t know.  That’s the problem.  No one really knows.  But Obama says his parents, Stanley Ann Dunham and Barack Hussein Obama, Sr. were married February 2, 1960.  Yet, Michelle, his wife, says that Barack’s mother was very young and very single when Barack was born.   Michelle said this during Obama’s presidential campaign in 2008.  She’s been married to Barack for years and met his relatives.  This wasn’t a slip of the tongue.  It was a deliberate statement purposely tying to the subject of the gathering.  At the very least, even Obama’s own wife doesn’t know the truth about his birth.  Why is it wrong to ask the President of the United States to prove his birth facts and his eligibility to be President?

Read Full Post | Make a Comment ( 1 so far )

“To defend the Constitution against all enemies…domestic”

Posted on October 19, 2009. Filed under: Cap and Trade, Census, Christianity, Clinton, Communism, Constitution, Democrats, Dictator, Freedom, Freedom of Speech, global governance, Global Warming/Cimate Change, Guns, Hate Speech/Crime Bill, Health Care, Hillary, Islam, Liberty, Marxism, Muslims, News Media, Obama, Obama's Associates & Appointees, Political, Rush Limbaugh, SEIU, Socialism, terrorism, U.S. Government, Uncategorized, United Nations, Who Is Obama? |

oath_banner_main

…to support and defend the Constitution against all enemies, foreign and domestic, so help us God. Our Oath is to the Constitution

OATH KEEPERS: ORDERS WE WILL NOT OBEY

 1. We will NOT obey orders to disarm the American people.2. We will NOT obey orders to conduct warrantless searches of the American people.3. We will NOT obey orders to detain American citizens as “unlawful enemy combatants” or to subject them to military tribunal.

4. We will NOT obey orders to impose martial law or a “state of emergency” on a state.

5. We will NOT obey orders to invade and subjugate any state that asserts its sovereignty.

6. We will NOT obey any order to blockade American cities, thus turning them into giant concentration camps.

7. We will NOT obey any order to force American citizens into any form of detention camps under any pretext.

8. We will NOT obey orders to assist or support the use of any foreign troops on U.S. soil against the American people to “keep the peace” or to “maintain control.”

9. We will NOT obey any orders to confiscate the property of the American people, including food and other essential supplies.

10.We will NOT obey any orders which infringe on the right of the people to free speech, to peaceably assemble, and to petition their government for a redress of grievances.

Oath Keepers – http://oathkeepers.org/oath/

Which of these oaths scare you?  Which of these oaths are dangerous?  Which of these oaths sound like a “revolt”?

How many of these oaths  are completely in line with the U.S. Constitution?

Answer:  All of them are completely in line with the U.S. Constitution.

Dictators cannot control a country without the cooperation of armies and police forces threatening  with weapons and imprisonment.  Without armed forces obeying the dictates of a despot in office, there can be no  dictatorship.  Our Constitution set up the rules to guarantee our freedom and liberty, but a despot will ignore them, write new laws that benefit him/herself and send the armed forces and police to intimidate, arrest and shoot protestors.  We’ve seen this scenario played out around the world too many times.

How does a despot get in office in the first place?  He/she lies to the electorate about what they believe in, what they stand for, and what they will do if elected.  They espouse a populist message, telling voters what they know the voters favor.    But once in office, they immediately begin to implement their own agenda, which takes away the freedoms of the people one by one until all liberty is lost.  The dictator has two goals; lifetime power and personal wealth.  BUT, he will tell the citizens that he only wants to help YOU, give YOU what YOU want and need, make YOUR life better.  While a dictator-in-the-making may throw YOU a bone or two to keep YOU satisfied and unsuspicious, he/she is busily laying the foundation for THEIR OWN power and wealth behind closed doors.

They use “crisis” to make drastic un-Constitutional moves and circumvent the laws designed to protect our freedom.  Obama’s Chief of Staff, Rahm Emmanuel has said, “Never let a good crisis go to waste.”  It’s obvious that Obama believes that, too.

There are many citizens, some in the media, who will not believe this is happening until it’s irreversible.   Wouldn’t it be much wiser and safer to pay close attention to everything from the beginning and nip any such behavior in the bud, so that our freedom is never in jeopardy and we have little to nothing to reverse? 

Of course, it’s difficult to believe this could ever happen in America, but look at what has already happened that is unbelievable; czars, bank take-overs, GM take-over, student loans take-over, brainwashing in the schools, NEArts collusion, crooks in Congress and the Presidential cabinet, queering of elementary schools (Obama’s “Safe Schools Czar, Kevin Jennings), Miranda rights to enemy combatants captured in war, the President slandering America all around the world, mocking Christianity while praising the Muslim faith, giving away our sensitive national defense secrets, cozying up to despots and dictators around the world, snubbing our friends and allies around the world, purposely devaluing the U.S. dollar, advocating America sign world treaties that over-ride the U.S. Constitution, giving away more money than Americans can earn and pay for generations to every outlandish idea while decreasing the funding for America’s military engaged in two wars,  and on and on and on.  Next on the horizon IS Obama going to Copenhagen to sign away our democracy to a world treaty on climate change!  This MUST BE STOPPED NOW.  This is another document with dangerous fine print not read by our elected officials, nor by the general public.

The Oath Keepers see the handwriting on the wall and are saying flatly, “Not on our watch!”  They took an oath to uphold and defend the Constitution and have pledged to keep that oath no matter who is in office.  If they are ever asked to violate the Constitution, they will NOT. 

Some in the Obama-controlled news media are characterizing this group as “dangerous”, “radicals”, and using the label “revolt” to describe what their intentions are.  This is all a false smear campaign.  Why would Obama care if he has no intentions of ever asking the military or law enforcement agencies to violate the Constitution?  Why would the media attack a group that is saying, “We will uphold the Constitution if ordered to violate it.”

The Las Vegas Review-Journal online is going so far as to connect Timothy McVeigh and other “nut jobs” who have committed crimes and murder with the Oath Keepers.

In a July report titled “Return of the Militias,” the Alabama-based Southern Poverty Law Center singled out Oath Keepers as “a particularly worrisome example of the Patriot revival.”

The Patriot movement, so named because its adherents believe the federal government has stepped on the constitutional ideals of the American Revolution, gained traction in the 1990s and has been closely linked to anti-government militia and white supremacist movements.

The movement is blamed for spawning Timothy McVeigh, who bombed a federal building in Oklahoma City in 1995, killing 168 people.

“I’m not accusing Stewart Rhodes or any member of his group of being Timothy McVeigh or a future Timothy McVeigh,” law center spokesman Mark Potok said. “But these kinds of conspiracy theories are what drive a small number of people to criminal violence. …”

The author of this smear piece has left himself an “out” by saying, “I’m not accusing…”  Of course he is.  He wants to discredit this group so that they will be shamed out of business.  This group poses a threat to Obama and others who may follow him.  

It’s a tactic that’s been used before.  When talk show host, Rush Limbaugh was the fastest growing program on radio and/or television in the nineties, the Clinton administration and their left-wing buddies in the media, tried to connect McVeigh with Limbaugh.  They deliberately and methodically tried to blame Limbaugh for inciting McVeigh to commit the atrocity of the Oklahoma City bombing.  It wasn’t true and the American people were too smart to buy that tripe.  They won’t buy it this time, either.  They also see  the handwriting on the wall.  The news media in conjunction with the Obama administration tried to smear the Tea Party Movement recently.  They tried to scare people into believing that this movement was full of dangerous radicals inciting violence.  Americans didn’t buy that.  Instead, they joined them.

The Obama administration is a lot scarier than the Oath Keepers. 

Let’s all subscribe to the same motto today.  “Not on my watch!.”  We must ensure the same freedom and liberties for our kids and grandkids that we enjoyed growing up.  We must protect America, the last bastion of true freedom on the planet.  Where will the huddled masses go if America falls to a despot regime?

 

Read Full Post | Make a Comment ( None so far )

Bush vs. Obama with the Military – You Decide

Posted on October 9, 2009. Filed under: Dictator, Freedom, Liberty, News Media, Obama, Political, U.S. Government, Who Is Obama? |

Read Full Post | Make a Comment ( None so far )

George Soros – Who Is He?

Posted on September 24, 2009. Filed under: Democrats, Dictator, Freedom, Freedom of Speech, global governance, Liberty, Marxism, News Media, Obama, Obama's Associates & Appointees, Political, Socialism, U.S. Government, United Nations, Who Is Obama? |

Soros

Visit this link for a quick view of who George Soros is and what he does.

http://www.discoverthenetworks.org/individualProfile.asp?indid=977

Read Full Post | Make a Comment ( None so far )

« Previous Entries

Liked it here?
Why not try sites on the blogroll...