Posted on May 23, 2011. Filed under: birth certificate, Christianity, Communism, Constitution, Democrats, Dictator, Freedom, Freedom of Speech, global governance, Indonesia, Kenya, Liberty, Marxism, McCain, News Media, Obama, planet, politics, Socialism, sovereignty, U.S. Government, United Nations, Who Is Obama? | Tags: 2012, Arab, birth certificate, book, campaign, Christianity, citizen, Congress, election, eligibility, Facebook, felony, Fox News, fraud, Google, guru, Jerome Corsi, Jesus Christ, Khalid Al-Mansour, Lawrence Lessig, president, technology, treason, White House, WND, World Net Daily, YouTube |
Oppose Obama at your own peril!
Did you think the Obama birth certificate controversary was over and settled when the White House posted a document on their web site and all of the media, including Fox News, declared Obama a U.S. citizen eligible to hold the office of President? If you did, then you would be wrong. Dr. Jerome Corsi’s new book came out a few days after the White House’s pre-emptive move to squelch interest and severely limit the sales of Where’s the Birth Certificate? The case That Barack Obama is Not Eligible to Be President.
The reaction of Fox News is puzzling since they are the only broadcaster to present both sides of any other issue, but in the case of Obama’s birth certificate, they are loathe to entertain the idea that something is amiss. If Obama is ineligible, Fox News would be just as guilty as Obama, for perpetuating the cover-up rather than investigating seriously with intent to discover the truth. It would seem that Fox News has chosen to pass up their opportunity to report the NEWS OF THE CENTURYout of fear of being wrong and looking foolish (you know, being one of those ridiculous “birthers”) or more likely, FEAR OF OBAMA’S WRATH!
Obama’s campaign team boasts of its close association with Google and Facebook, and hired Lawrence Lessig, technology guru, to advise them on campaigning on the internet in 2007/8. Is it really out of the realm of possibility that this group could forge a birth certificate for Obama? Of course not. Is it totally unthinkable that this group would do such a thing to get and keep Obama in the most powerful office on the planet, the power to get extreme left policies in place, the ticket to wealth, fame and power for progressives? The answer is obvious.
For a more revealing look at Lawrence Lessig, visit https://marbiesblog.wordpress.com/2008/04/28/another-bad-character-in-obamas-circle-april-27-2008/. Obama says he’s a Christian, but hired this anti-Christianity guy, who went so far as to denegrate Jesus in public in a vicious way and laughed about it.
Do these people really have the scruples that would prevent them from executing a lucrative fraud? There’s no evidence of such scruples. Did anyone have difficulty believing that Nixon and his team commited fraud and cover-up? No. What’s so different about Obama that it’s inconceivable that he and his bunch would commit fraud for the sake of power, wealth and fame? Many people have committed great frauds for wealth, but add great power and it’s even more tempting and more likely, especially when there is enough evidence to suspect.
Obama also has the support of gazillionaire, George Soros and a very wealthy Arab, Dr. Khalid Al-Mansour, who is noted for his intervention in Obama’s acceptance to Harvard. All the money needed to create a sham biography and cover up the true bio is easily at Obama’s disposal.
Why all the skeptism and doubt is beyond explanation. The Congress, the news media, conservatives, Obama’s political opponents, all prefer to go along with the cover-up for two reasons: supporters to keep him in power, opponents not wishing to look like tin foil hat wearing “birthers” GOD FORBID SUCH A FATE!. Opponents fail to recognize who coined the moniker “birthers”. It was Obama’s supporters in a defensive move. Why play by their rules instead of truth? In fact, the democrats and Obama’s team brought up the issue of Sen. John McCain’s eligibility to serve as president based on his place of birth and demanded to see his birth certificate, which McCain happily and QUICKLY produced. None in the media called Democrats or Obama’s team “birthers.” NONE!
Dr. Jerome Corsi’s book will still be in the public during the 2012 campaign season and World Net Daily will still be investigating and reporting. Those who are smart enough, will still be proving that the White House document was produced by placing layer of information upon layer of information, to build the bio that fits Obama’s public statements. A document typed on a 1961 typewriter, then scanned in 2011, cannot be broken into a dozen or more separate layers. It was produced in one step – typing the info on paper. Scanning does not produce multiple layers as shown in the many YouTube videos online. Get the free version of Adobe Illustrator, download the WH document, and see for yourself.
What’s to be gained by covering up Obama’s felony, treason and fraud?
“In a television interview last October, President Obama accidentally let slip a key element of his political philosophy: “We’re gonna punish our enemies, and we’re gonna reward our friends who stand with us on issues that are important to us.”
Obama later apologized — not for the underlying sentiment, mind you, but for his word choice. “I probably should have used the word ‘opponents’ instead of enemies,” the president declared.” http://www.aei.org/article/103643Read Full Post | Make a Comment ( None so far )
Posted on April 29, 2011. Filed under: ALERT!, birth certificate, Constitution, Democrats, Dictator, Freedom, Kenya, Liberty, Marxism, Obama, Orly Taitz, politics, SEIU, Socialism, U.S. Government, Who Is Obama? | Tags: Barack Hussein Obama, budget, fake, forged, fraud, Lolo Soetoro, long form, main stream media, racism, racists, Richard Trumpka, Scott Walker, Sr., Stanley Ann Dunham, union, Whoopi Goldberg, Wisconsin |
Who’s in the White House?
Barack Hussein Obama, II? Barry Obama? Barry Soetoro? Soebarkah, as found underneath his name, Barack Hussein Obama, on Stanley Ann Dunham’s passport renewal application of 1965? Was he adopted by step-dad Lolo Soetoro in Indonesia? How many citizenships does he have? One, American? Two, American and British (Kenya)? Three – American, British (Kenyan) and Indonesian?
Can we look at his birth certificate and be assured of who it is that’s writing executive orders and signing bills into law? Not as conclusively as the situation calls for. First, he sealed all of his records. Why do that? Is there something incriminating? Then he published a certificate of live birth, which accomplishes one thing and one thing only. It certifies that Stanley Ann Dunham had a son and her address at the time was in Hawaii. It states that Barack Hussein Obama was his father. The difficulty with this is that it is a document that anyone could apply for whether or not the child was born in Hawaii and the parents supply the information. Once the certificate is issued, it triggers the notice in the papers. The two papers were owned by the same company, hence the identical wording. (This information has been widely reported online by many researchers.)
During the firestorm over a lack of long form birth certificate, there were reports that Obama couldn’t secure it because the State destroyed them after putting them all on microfiche. Then, Democrat Gov. Neil Abercrombie announced that he was going to find that long form and show it to the skeptics and end this controversy. After weeks of trying, he announced that he could not do it. We heard that it didn’t exist, but there was a hand-written notation in the books. A former employee had been saying that it didn’t exist. Now the public is confused. More and more high-profile people become suspicious and the derogatory “birther” label is no longer intimidating. It hits the main stream media, including Fox News and it’s discussed seriously without tin foil hats.
Finally, Donald Trump, with the funds and the means to send investigators, determines to solve the mystery. He has the clout to affect Obama’s poll numbers just as the president begins his re-election campaign. Just days before Jerome Corsi’s book, Where’s the Birth Certificate: The Case That Barack Obama is Not Eligible to Be President, is due to hit the shelves and be shipped out to thousands of Amazon.com customers, the country is surprised to learn that a document purported to be Obama’s long form birth certificate is on the whitehouse.gov website in .PDF format. The president holds a presser in which he is condescending and sarcastic, stating that he has more important things to do – not the skyrocketing $trillions debt, the inflation train barreling down the tracks or the jobless economy making America a third-world nation. No, he immediately jets off to do the Oprah show and attend a couple of fund-raisers. Very important. Obama would have us believe that we can’t walk and chew gum at the same time – that we can only concentrate on the birth issue and nothing else. That the five minutes it took him to phone someone and say “put the document online”, kept him from attending to national issues of import.
The country yawned. The “birthers”, more accurately, “Constitutionalists”, smelled a rat and the Obama supporters gloated. Fox News, who had surprised viewers by finally asking the right questions, were relieved to get this monkey off their backs and called it solved – over – file closed once and for all. BIG MISTAKE! They will forever be remembered as spineless sycophants.
Not five hours later, the internet was filled with YouTube videos explaining in detail with Adobe Illustrator how the .PDF document had been built on a computer by layering, a technique that takes elements and builds them, one upon another, to get a desired result – a realistic-looking long form birth certificate that says all the right things to make Obama eligible to be President of the United States. The ease with which techies discovered the layering and broke the document down, section by section, layer by layer, shocked even the techies. Was this a joke, they wondered. Could a White House operative be this careless and stupid? Surely they wanted this to be proven a fraud. But why? Is it a conspiracy to keep Americans distracted while Obama pulled off some dastardly deed? Obama had already said he believed it was distracting everyone from important issues. Perhaps he devised a way to use this to his advantage. But what?
The bottom line is: For the first time in American history, the citizens don’t know who they’ve elected president and too many of them don’t trust him. It’s not just his birth, or life narrative that makes them suspicious. It’s the vast number of radicals he filled his administration with and who populate his life. It’s the bold promises he made during his campaign and his unashamed breaking of almost all of those promises, often doing the exact opposite. It’s his constant disregard for the Constitution and the rulings of the courts. It’s his continual bypassing of the people’s house, Congress, when he writes an executive order to pass something that Congress rejected.
Obama’s statements about this latest birth certificate never explained why he sent a team of lawyers around the country to fight the cases seeking a forced release of his long form birth certificate nor why he spent over $1 million to keep it from being released. The latest version states nothing not already in the public domain, so why the effort and the expense to fight its release. Either he is hiding something incriminating and important or he is very foolish to waste such resources and engender such animosity among potential voters.
Obama has forged a legal document and perpetrated a fraud from the White House upon the American citizens, Congress and the States. IMPEACHMENT is warranted. Subverting the Constitution and our form of government cannot and must not be tolerated. At the very least, Obama is very deceitful and dishonest. But that being the case, he must be IMPEACHED. HE HAS EARNED IT.
To view the evidence of the forgery, visit the following sites:
Americans, why would our president do this? How can a document made in 1961 be broken into layers, especially since they say this was a copy (scanned) of the original, which is supposed to look like it’s bound in a book? A scanned copy can’t be broken into layers because it is an image, like a photograph. The document on the White House web site was computer-generated, using layers in order to fill in the blanks with the information that Obama needs to cover his secret. If all of that information is true, it would not be necessary to layer the document. It could have been scanned and in image format. BUT IT WASN’T! It’s been manufactured to achieve the needed goal.
Why? How could this possibly be used to Obama’s benefit?
Here’s one possibility and it truly does begin in Kenya for some strange reason.
In 2008, Obama went to Kenya and campaigned for Raila Odinga in their presidential election. Odinga lost to the incumbent. He then enraged his supporters, stirring up discontent saying that the election was crooked and their will had been thwarted. Odinga pushed them to protest in the streets, which they did with machetes, hacking, slashing and murdering. In the little town of Eldoret, women, children and the elderly took refuge in the Assembly of God Church, only to perish when Odinga’s supporters burned it to the ground with the people still inside. The winning incumbent felt forced to ignore Kenya’s Constitution and agree to share power with Odinga, creating a new equal position with him. Last summer, during the BP oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico, Pres. Obama sent VP Joe Biden to Kenya to pressure them to adopt a new Constitution with a coalition government. Obama was involved from start to finish. The end result being that the loser still got the power.
During Obama’s own presidential campaign in America, he spoke to an SEIU meeting, touting his history of support for them and pledging his solidarity with them. He promised to consult them when making decisions as president.
When Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker and the Wisconsin legislators proposed cutting some of the collective bargaining rights of union workers in an effort to lower the budget, ultimately saving their jobs, the SEIU protestors were bussed in and whipped up to intimidate them. Obama, being thick as thieves with SEIU and their leader, Richard Trumpka, weighed in on the conflict, helping to inflame the union protestors.
SEIU sends instructions to their members to “protest” at banks who don’t tow their line, at state capitol buildings to intimidate legislators, at the private residences of CEO’s and bankers, in the streets, shouting, even attacking and pushing people. Obama talks tough from the bully pulpit and SEIU leaders gin up the anger. So far, SEIU doesn’t use machetes, but the fear factor is definitely a tool they use.
It’s no secret that the main stream news media is in Obama’s back pocket, running interference for him and smearing his critics. It’s obvious that they get talking points memos because they all start parroting the same words and phrases on the same day. It’s not likely to be a coincidence that the day the White House posted the bogus long form birth certificate and techies began pointing out the forgery elements, the news media cried “Wolf!”, I mean “Racists!” Whoopi Goldberg said that same day, “I’m playing the damn race card!” and called everyone questioning the validity of a computer-generated layered forged document “racists”.
Obama’s poll numbers have sunk like a rock since he was elected – a steady decline. Since Trump revived the birth certificate issue, Obama’s numbers fell even more. Suddenly he comes out with such an obvious fake that people said, “Is this a joke?” “Can’t the CIA forge a document better than this?” Why would he do this? The president posted a document so easy to debunk that the outcry was immediate. Then, most likely, Obama put out the word to SEIU, the main stream media and his Hollywood celebrity friends, that this is racism. Cry “racism”, he told them. And they began immediately. This is one scenario that seems more than plausible. If he starts a race war in America, he will regain the support of African-American voters who became disenchanted with him over broken promises. He becomes the poor guy being attacked for his race. He envisions everyone coming to his defense and counts on most never bothering to investigate the legitimacy of the document themselves.
Perhaps the explanation is much simpler and Obama’s techies made a mistake, not “flattening” their creation before publishing. The end result is the same for the Constitutionality question. Obama can’t show his true birth certificate because there is a lot at stake. He has to resort to trickery and deceit. He’s broken the law by forging a legal document. He’s broken faith with the people who elected him. He’s disgraced his office. Our Congress is equally guilty for not upholding the Constitution which is their sworn duty. Obama must be investigated by Congress, impeached and removed. NO RACIST attacks must stop them. It’s not racism. It’s the right thing to do.Read Full Post | Make a Comment ( 2 so far )
Posted on April 7, 2011. Filed under: Communism, Constitution, Democrats, Dictator, Freedom, globalization, Islam, Kenya, Liberty, Marxism, Muslims, Obama, politics, Socialism, sovereignty, U.S. Government, Uncategorized, Who Is Obama? | Tags: 2012, allegiance, America, Barak, bowing, elections, flag, flagpin, Gordan Brown, Great Britain, Iran, Israel, Japan, King, Mahmoud Ahmedinajad, mayor, Michelle, Netanyahu, Obama, patriotism, pledge, Queen, Raila Odinga, Saudi Arabia, Tampa, Tony Blair, U.S.A. |
Obama’s runnning again. Did he keep his 2008 campaign promises? Were the accusations spot-on? A re-run warrants a revisiting of his own words and deeds.
And we elected the only person on stage who stubbornly would not salute the American flag. He looked as if allegiance to this flag as a representation of this country, was no big deal.
A symbol of love and allegiance to America was too great a weight for this weak man. And how did he show his patriotism?
Is it wise to elect a president who has a low opinion of America?
Does he have allegiance to any country, any one, any thing?
Those were all heads of state. Why would a POTUS bow to a city mayor?
Was it just because he’s such a gracious person?
How’s this for gracious behavior?
And this? The POTUS filibustered and there’s no need to watch all of this. Just fast forward to the time 2:24:22 and watch through 2:27:07.
Sounded like Obama said, “I won, John. We don’t care what you and your constituents want.” Gracious or stinging?
Maybe Obama just bows in repect to all heads of state.
It doesn’t seem so. Great Britain is our closest ally. Don’t they deserve as much respect and grace as Japan? Doesn’t the Queen of England deserve as much respect as the King of Saudi Arabia?
What about the Prime Minister of Israel, another close ally?
No bows when Obama went to Israel and met Ahud Barak and Benjamin Netanyahu. What about Netanyahu’s visit to the White House?
Unheard of presidential behavior to a visiting head of state, especially one of our close allies.
Such humiliation from Obama to Great Britain, the Queen of England, Prime Minister Gordan Brown, former Prime Minister Tony Blair and the British people. NO GRACIOUSNESS. No bowing.
So what is the conclusion? Obama doesn’t want to pledge allegiance to America. Obama doesn’t want to wear a U.S. flagpin. Obama wants to show his patriotism by running down our country and apologizing for America all over the world. He IS willing, however, to bow to foreign countries, as long as they are NOT America’s closest allies (FRIENDS who have pledged to run to our assistance if we are attacked).
So why does Obama want to be President of the United States?
On April 7, 2011, I’M TEMPTED TO AGREE WITH HIM!Read Full Post | Make a Comment ( None so far )
Posted on January 31, 2011. Filed under: ALERT!, Communism, Dictator, Freedom, Freedom of Speech, global governance, globalization, Hillary, Islam, Kenya, Liberty, Marxism, Muslims, News Media, Obama, politics, Socialism, sovereignty, terrorism, U.S. Government, Uncategorized, United Nations | Tags: Egypt, ElBaradei, Mubarek, Muslim Brotherhood, riots, uprising, violence |
Peaceful???? What did the police react to? Who would be the recipient of these large rocks that can cause some real injuries, especially if they strike someone in the head? In fact one policeman was killed when struck in the head with large rocks.
For your consideration: Please read this article thoughtfully. You must know these things to understand properly what you hear on the American news and to recognize what is omitted.
Knowing that George Soros is behind, and taking full advantage of, the uprising in Egypt and other countries, will explain Obama’s position on these events. Watch who Obama supports. Global Voices (Soros Org) Media Matters (Soros Org).
The Muslim Brotherhood is not a benign harmless group whose only desire is to free the people from Mubarek’s reign. They are tied to terrorists groups, including Hamas. They do want Israel to be annihilated. They also hate the USA. We are most definitely on their list for this same take-over tactic. We may be next or two or threes positions down the list, but WE ARE ON THEIR LIST. We are their prize jewel along with Israel. They will not rest until they have complete victory here. They are most likely to act in America while Obama is president and he may only have two more years. Watch for it. Oppose it vigorously.
After viewing tons of images from the protests and reading hundreds of tweets from protestors and supporters, questions about the purity of the protestors and their goals arise. How is it that tens of thousands of ordinary citizens just decided to go to the same location on the same day, January 25th, and protest the Mubarek dictatorship? They could not have. The January 25th protest was planned over time and executed. But by whom?
Organizers chose to protest on Egypt’s national holiday, National Police Day, which commemorates the day, January 25, 1952, that the Egyptian Police refused to obey British orders to hand over weapons and evacuate Ismailia Police Station. Fifty-two police officers were killed when the British Army surrounded the station with tanks and overcame the Egyptian Police Officers. A Facebook page was set up to advertise and recruit. About 2,000 signed up to protest in that city, Ismailia, 200 in Aswan and 3,000 in Mahallah. By the morning of the 25th, about 90,000 had signed up to protest all over the country. Twitter.com was a huge part of the protests until the government of Egypt shut down the internet and cell phone services. For a more interesting look at the Egyptian protests, go to www.twitter.com and search #Egypt and #Jan25.
A Google search for images of the riots in the streets produced benign pictures of people with handmade signs congregating in the streets, rows of men bowed down (faces on the ground and posteriors in the air) in front of army tanks and the bloody injured (all protestors, of course). For three days, tweets carried links to actual photos from the riots showing mobs carrying sticks and rocks, setting fires to buildings, looting shopping malls, attacking police, burning piles of wood and tires and vehicles, and breaking into museums destroying ancient artifacts that bring Egypt a great deal of much-needed tourism. Citizens armed with sticks formed human chains and guarded the museums, throwing out looters. The police and army were tied up by the riots elsewhere.
Another aspect of the riots not covered by photos in a Google search or even the New York Times, as far as I’ve been able to find, were the elaborate printed signs carried by many of the protestors. They must have been printed out well in advance at a cost to the organizers and handed out somewhere. This was not spontaneous.
Many signs were of Mubarek with the familiar Israeli state Star of David drawn over his face. Many signs were anti-America and anti-Israel. Most disturbing were the photos of an Egyptian holding a tear gas canister with “Made in the U.S.” printed on it. They made a point of linking the U.S. to the tanks, rubber bullets and tear gas canisters used on the protestors by Mubarek’s army. Tweets said, “America, stop supporting a dictator.” Many referred to rubber bullets flying over the heads of Egyptians made by the U.S. Some referred to army tanks made in the USA attacking Egyptians. There was a clear segment of this uprising who was actively inciting hatred against the USA and Israel.
It should be noted that Egypt is an ally and friendly to the U.S. We are allowed by law to sell defense weapons to allies. We have little control over an ally’s decision to use these against their own people. It’s also noteworthy that the protestors arrived with sticks, rocks, materials to start fires, and angry masses. It’s normal for a government to send armed police and armies to quell violence. The army held back as much as possible, from what I’ve been able to find in reports online, tweets and video. Live streaming video on Al Jazeera TV was another great source until Mubarek’s government pulled their license and revoked the credentials of the staff. Having not been there personally, I can only say what I’ve been able to find through many available sources. Do your own research.
Two American companies were also made targets of the hatred: Narus and Combined Systems, Inc. CSI manufactures the tear gas and smoke grenades.
“Narus provides Telecom Egypt, the state-controlled, dominant internet and telephone company, with deep packet inspection (DPI) technology. The specifics are complex, but DPI is essentially a filter that allows network administrators to track and scrutinize content being transmitted via the internet and cell phones.” http://www.good.is/post/meet-the-two-american-companies-helping-egypt-restrict-its-people/
This wouldn’t matter after Mubarek pulled the plug on cell phones and the internet, a tactic proposed to America’s legislature by Ind. Sen. Joe Lieberman and co-sponsored by Republican in name only, Sen. Susan Collins, which seeks to give Obama a “kill switch” and authority to use it at his discretion. This must not pass, as it violates freedom of speech and freedom of the press.
Does anyone really believe that the two American companies purposely manufactured those products to oppress the Egyptian people? Those could be used to defend Egypt against foreign invaders and by Egyptian armies fighting in wars in other countries, like Afghanistan. Some protestors want to incite hatred against America and all things American, and Israel. Sounds like anti-Western Muslim sentiment coming from The Muslim Brotherhood.
The same thing occurred in Tunisia, earlier, and is planned for other countries; Syria, Yemen, Albania, Palestine (again), Nigeria, Sudan.
There’s no doubt that the people want to be free. It’s the universal heart’s desire of all people around the world. America should always support freedom and government of the people, by the people and for the people everywhere. But it is prudent and necessary to our own interests to see who might be taking advantage of the people’s grievances to usurp power and control, such as the Muslim Brotherhood.
Research Global Voices, founded by George Soros, who is anti-Semitic, and very much a socialist/Marxist. He’s using this opportunity to achieve his goals. This man has been interfering in governments and economies all around the world for decades. He can influence Obama to be on the wrong side of this conflict.
When you hear people say, or read headlines proclaiming, “Don’t fear The Muslim Brotherhood”, be very suspicious. It’s like telling people, “Don’t fear the grim reaper.” The Muslims who truly hate Israel and America have been migrating to every country in the world, settling in among the citizens, growing families, building mosques and loyalty among their people. They plant the seeds of distrust of America and Israel in the minds of their people for a future “protest” against the leaders of those countries. When the time is right, as it now is in Egypt, Tunisia, and the rest of the Middle East, they call for the protests. They convince the people that they are victims of a corrupt government who is responsible for the lack of jobs while acquiring personal wealth.
I can’t say that every Muslim in the world is exactly like every other Muslim. I can say that it is obvious that enough of them are alike to topple the government of Tunisia and possibly Egypt. They gained control in Iran when the Shah was toppled. No one favors dictatorships, but what replaces them is equally important. It takes time to set up opposing political parties and hold free and fair elections, but the Muslim Brotherhood doesn’t allow that time. They are ready and waiting to rush in and install their man as the “savior”.
Mohammad El Baradei is their guy for Egypt. He’s rushed in and set himself up as their leader. The crowds weren’t shouting “Give us El Baradei!” He came in on his own and starting making public statements, inserting himself into the media coverage. You may remember him as the Director General of the International Atomic Energy Agency of the United Nations during the Clinton administration. He was supposed to monitor the nuclear ambitions of Iran and Iraq. His white-washing of Iran’s nuclear program became, and remained controversial until he left. His son was involved in the “Oil for Food” scandal involving the U.N.’s sanctions against Iraq. El Baradei also seemed to try to influence America’s presidential election by leaking a report that tons of explosives were missing from Iraq, just in time to cast Pres. Bush in a bad light at the voting booth. He had sat on the information he cited for weeks, releasing it only when it could harm Bush.
If I was a politician, I would avoid becoming wealthy while in office. This is the first thing dissidents point to.
What is El Baradei saying to the media, that we should scrutinize for truth?
January 11, 2011 on his Twitter account: “Cornerstones of change: transitional period; new constitution; civil state; true democracy; equal rights and social justice.”
He’s appealing to the real needs and grievances of the people to gain their support, but the tip-off is “social justice” which is a term used by socialist/Marxists. Obama calls it “redistribution of wealth”. Definition of today’s social justice: You make it. Government takes it. Someone else gets it. They believe that it is wrong for one person to have wealth while another does not. They aren’t concerned with how hard the first person worked to earn that wealth or if the other did not. All should be equal – like communism. They believe the government should be the “equalizers”, redistributing everyone’s wealth to “level the playing field”.
“They have to listen to the people, listen to them quickly, take concrete action towards reform, to a new Egypt that is democratic, that is based on social justice,”
Be suspicious when Obama and El Baradei both call for “change” and social justice. Research Kenya’s election where Obama went there and campaigned for Raila Odinga, calling for “change”.
When Hillary Clinton called for a transition period, El Baradei opposed that notion. He wants Mubarek gone today. El Baradei stands ready to step in now.
January 26, 2011 on his Twitter account: “We shall continue to exercise our rights of peaceful demonstrations…”
Yet, it wasn’t all peaceful. They attacked the police, threw rocks, used the sticks they brought on people, namely the police, set buildings on fire, burned vehicles, looted shopping malls and the museum. Peaceful? Some may have been peaceful, but any viewing of the photos of how the city and streets looked after a few days of this peaceful demonstration will cause one to question what happened there.
Echoing an idea he introduced to CNN’s Fareed Zakaria (seen on The Blaze earlier), Egypt’s Nobel laureate and self-appointed opposition leader Mohamed ElBaradei told ABC’s Christiane Amanpour the idea that the Muslim Brotherhood, which birthed the terror organization Hamas, is an extremist organization is “total bogus” and that the group is “in no way extremists” (interview starts at about 2:10 below):
(Excerpts from http://www.thedailybeast.com/blogs-and-stories/2011-01-27/muslim-brotherhood-could-win-in-egypt-protests-and-why-obama-shouldnt-worry/2/
(The Muslim Brotherhood is also known as Ikhwan.)
Riedel calls Ikhwan a “secretive Islamic opposition group” and gives his reasons why “Obama shouldn’t panic.”
“The Muslim Brethren was founded in 1928 by Shaykh Hassan al Banna as an Islamic alternative to weak secular nationalist parties that failed to secure Egypt’s freedom from British colonialism after World War I. Banna preached a fundamentalist Islamism and advocated the creation of an Islamic Egypt, but he was also open to importing techniques of political organization and propaganda from Europe that rapidly made the Brotherhood a fixture in Egyptian politics. Branches of the Brotherhood grew across the Arab world. By World War 2, it became more violent in its opposition to the British and the British-dominated monarchy, sponsoring assassinations and mass violence.”
“Egypt’s new opposition leader, former International Atomic Energy Agency head Mohamed ElBaradei, has formed a loose alliance with the Brotherhood because he knows it is the only opposition group that can mobilize masses of Egyptians, especially the poor.”
“Skeptics fear El Baradei will be swept along by more radical forces.”
“The Brotherhood raised an army to fight Israel in its war of independence in 1948. Its Palestinian branch was the nucleus for Hamas, and the Brotherhood retains links to the rulers of Gaza.”
“Their base is fundamentally opposed to any Egyptian cooperation with Israel.”
“The crisis in North Africa has come up unexpectedly for President Obama and Secretary Clinton.” (This is especially troubing for Americans since the internet, Facebook and Twitter were used extensively to advertise and recruit for the protests in Tunisia and Egypt. The information was there for all to see. Obama used the internet to get himself elected, raise money, recruit “volunteers” to his causes and improve his poll numbers to a greater degree than any other president. His people should not have missed this. If he and Clinton were doing their jobs well, this would not have caught them by surprise. The Obama administration has been preoccupied with monitoring American citizens on the internet and cell phones.
This is not reassuring at all. Now that they have the spotlight in Egypt and are beginning to hear criticism and opposition, El Baradei is saying that the Muslim Brotherhood is not a religious organization nor is it violent. He’s trying to put a clean face on his group to silence a threat to stop them. Don’t fear the Muslim Brotherhood. Don’t fear the grim reaper.
For photos of the uprising, visit http://totallycoolpix.com/2011/01/the-egypt-protests/. Note picture #80.
REMEMBER TO WATCH WHO OBAMA SUPPORTS.
World Net Daily reported today:
JERUSALEM – The Egyptian government has information a diplomat at the U.S. embassy in Cairo secretly met yesterday with a senior leader of the Muslim Brotherhood, the nation’s major Islamist opposition group, WND has learned.
The topic of the meeting was the future of Egypt following the “fall” of President Hosni Mubarak, an Egyptian intelligence official told WND.Read Full Post | Make a Comment ( 3 so far )
Pardon me, but has anyone considered the fact that Obama has done diddly squat for peace? Does anyone think for one moment that the fix WASN’T in? The deadline for applications for the Nobel Peace Prize expired about the twelfth day of Obama’s presidency. At that point, he was still in campaign mode, patting himself on the back in numerous speeches and traveling around talking about himself, when not in the oval office writing executive orders to push his agenda bypassing the legislative branch and giving lavish parties packed with celebrities.
He did nothing as a U.S. Senator except travel to Kenya to campaign for Raila Odinga in their presidential elections of 2008, which erupted into brutality and murder when Odinga did not win. So much violence prevailed that the winner felt compelled to create an equal position of power and install Odinga as Prime Minister for the sole purpose of saving the lives of the tribe of the duly elected President. Perhaps the President of Kenya should have received the Nobel Peace Prize.
When comparing Obama’s lack of any accomplishments to those of the other winners, it is an embarrassment. It’s more “Hope” than “Change”. Visit http://nobelprize.org/ to read about the winners of the other categories, especially the prize for literature awarded to Huerta Muller, “whose writings in German chronicle, with honesty and poetry, life under dictatorship in her Romanian homeland. Learn about life under a dictator before giving the Obama administration any more un-Constitutional powers.
Even the Nobel institution has been corrupted, or so it seems. Ronald Reagan courageously ended the Cold War and brought down the Berlin wall allowing East and West Berlinians the freedom to see relatives separated for decades. “Mr. Gorbachav, tear down this wall!” Ronald Reagan;, in a speech at the Brandenburg Gate commemorating the 750th anniversary of Berlin, by the Berlin Wall on June 12, 1987, Reagan challenged Gorbachev, then the General Secretary of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union, to tear it down as a symbol of Reagan’s desire for increasing freedom in the Eastern Bloc.
The wall came down and Reagan was never awarded the Nobel Peace Prize. Tangible results vs. more empty “hope and change” rhetoric. Shame on the Nobel Foundation for being so shallow. The other recipients can’t feel as proud of their awards as they could if the Nobel Prize was truly given to those whose accomplishments were worthy of recognititon.
George W. Bush actually, rather than merely talked about, liberated about 50 million Iraqis from the brutal dictator, Saddam Hussein, and the murdering, torturing, raping of innocents by Uddai and Cussai Hussein, but no one in the Nobel Prize Committee could find a reason to award President Bush. It makes me wonder what is the purpose of the Nobel awards. Bush also made Afghani women free to attend school and ran the Taliban out of “Dodge”, giving more safety and security to Afghanis. Still no award. But, in their view, Obama’s teleprompted speeches were far more worthy of recognition.
(Did anyone else notice how gray Obama’s hair looked today while making his speech regarding his Nobel Prize? That’s a “change” for sure!”)Read Full Post | Make a Comment ( 2 so far )
Posted on September 14, 2009. Filed under: 2010 election, ACORN, ALERT!, American Revolution, Cap and Trade, Census, Democrats, Dictator, Energy, Freedom, Freedom of Speech, global governance, Global Warming/Cimate Change, Guns, Hate Speech/Crime Bill, Health Care, Hillary, Indonesia, Islam, Kenya, Liberty, Marxism, Muslims, News Media, Obama, Obama's Associates & Appointees, Political, SEIU, Socialism, terrorism, U.S. Government, United Nations |
The U.S. media reported that “tens of thousands” protested in D.C., numbers that surprised the authorities. However, the U.K. press reported up to two million protested. Looking at the photos and hearing reports from people who were there suggests that “up to two million” seems much more accurate than “tens of thousands. Of course, it the New York Times meant 100 tens of thousands or 200 tens of thousands, then they may have reported accurately, but played it down considerably. This protest was an overwhelming statement to the White House and Congress that the sleeping giant has awakened and is taking back their government and their freedom, holding the Constitution and the American flag at the forefront where they belong.
The American media seems to be downplaying the 9/12 march on Washington, D.C. There can only be one reason: they’re in the tank for Obama and the Democrats and don’t want to show the uprising of the people against this administration’s bizarre czars, use of force to pass unwanted bills, skyrocketing the nation’s debt, take-over of banks, auto companies, insurance companies and our individual health care, institutionalizing socialism, and a blatant disregard and contempt for our Constitution, which is the most disturbing of all.
The news media, with the exception of Fox News and some internet-based reporting, has lied to the American people, manipulated facts and omitted anything that didn’t serve Obama and the Dems. They’ve become an arm of this adminsitration. They’ve served the left for years, but never before have they been so overt and vicious.
The main stream news media is as much to blame for the negative conditions Americans are facing as the politicians. Instead of being a watchdog for the people and exposing corruption, they covered it up, put a positive spin on it when someone else exposed it, and vilified the whistleblowers. They are not ashamed to reap benefits from the left for doing their dirty work.
Americans must demand the truth and nothing but the truth and abandon those outlets who will not provide it. This tide is already in motion. Fox News ratings are shooting up while the others are dropping like a boulder. The sooner they change back to real reporting rather than leftist propaganda, the sooner their ratings will recover. So far, there is no sign of change in the works. They are going to ride their ships all the way down to the bottom.
Once they’re out of business, this country will be free to read truth and vote intelligently, throwing out those who use rackets like ACORN and SEIU. It will be a great day. In the meantime, it’s become necessary to protest in front of the headquarters of NBC, ABC AND CBS. Here are their addresses:NBC & MSNBC 30 Rockefeller Plaza New York, New York 10112 212-664-4444 nbc.com/Footer/Contact_Us/ ABC 500 S. Buena Vista St. Burbank, California 91521-4551 818-460-7477 abc.g0.com CBS 51 West 52nd St. New York, New York 10019 212-975-4321
If you can personally protest at these media offices, please do. Take your Tea Party Group, your friends, whoever you can round up and generate large crowds of protestors. Let these MSM moguls know that you’re not tolerating their dishonesty anymore. It’s important to show the strenghth of the American citizens to shape their own destiny and not be led around by ABC, NBC and CBS and politicians.“We the people” MEANS something in this country! Every week, there should be a huge crowd protesting outside of a main stream media office, like the 9/12 march on Washington D.C. In addition, Americans need to phone and send letters via snail mail and email, to notify these bastions of left-wing propaganda that we’re no longer watching or listening to them and no longer reading their tripe! When they fire the leftists liars and hire honest reporters who engage in investigative reporting, not just on right-wingers, then we will give them another look. Read Full Post | Make a Comment ( None so far )
Posted on September 11, 2009. Filed under: birth certificate, Dictator, Freedom, Freedom of Speech, Kenya, Liberty, Marxism, Muslims, Obama, Obama's Associates & Appointees, Orly Taitz, Political, Socialism, U.S. Government | Tags: Lucas Smith, Raila Odinga |
PLEASE READ ALL THREE PARTS OF “OBAMA’S BIRTH CERTIFICATE.”
CONNECTING THE DOTS
Why did Obama campaign for Odinga, who is now Prime Minister of Kenya?
Why won’t Obama release his birth certificate that he had when he was in high school or the official long form showing the hospital where he was born?
Lucas Daniel Smith says he bribed a military official to look the other while he obtained a certified copy of Obama’s birth certificate in Kenya.
Marbie’s Blog has no idea if there is any truth to this or if this BC is authentic. The reason for writing about this one is because Lucas Smith has signed an affidavit in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California, Santa Anna ( Southern) Division, Judge David Carter, under penalty of perjury if proven to be false. His affidavit is part of a suit to require Pres. Obama to produce documents such as the long form BC to prove his eligibility to be POTUS. The plaintiff list is long and includes many military persons who want to know that the president who orders them into battle has the true power to do so.
This is news worthy because all other judges have summarily dismissed every case without hearing any evidence. As always, Obama’s lawyers and the Dept. of Justice requested that this case be dismissed. Wouldn’t it have been simpler to produce the BC and end this here and now? Guess Obama doesn’t want to do that for some reason. What reason?
The judge did not immediately rule on Atty. Orly Taitz’ motion to be granted “discovery” (the right to see the president’s sealed records) and he did not rule immediately on a motion to dismiss the case submitted by the U.S. Government.
“The judge did comment that if there are legitimate constitutional questions regarding Obama’s eligibility, they need to be addressed and resolved.”
Oct. 5, 2009 is the date set for a hearing on the motion to dismiss and arguments on the issue of discovery. If the case is not dismissed, a pretrial hearing is set for Jan. 11, 2010 and the trial two weeks later.
QUESTION #1: Why won’t Obama release his long form BC or the BC that he says he had when he was in high school?
Perhaps because he knows he was born in Kenya.
QUESTION #2: Why did Obama campaign for Odinga?
Because he needed an operative he could trust in the highest seat of Kenya’s government to seal his birth document and block all efforts to acquire it!
NOTICE LINES 6 AND 7 ON THE SECOND PAGE OF SMITH’S AFFIDAVIT.
“I travelled to Kenya and Mombasas in particular with the intent to obtain the original birth certificate of Barack Hussein Obama, as I was told previoudly that it was on file in the hospital and under seal, due to the fact that the Prime Minister of Kenya Raela Odinga is Barack Hussein Obama’s cousin.
I had to pay a cash “consideration” to a Kenyan military officer on duty to look the other way, while I obtained the copy of the birth certificate of Barack Hussein Obama.”
WE NOW KNOW WHY OBAMA CAMPAIGNED FOR RAILA ODINGA TO THE DEGREE HE DID AND THIS LENDS CREDIBILITY TO THE AUTHENTICITY OF THIS BIRTH CERTIFICATE.
NO OTHER REASON WOULD BE AS COMPELLING AS OBAMA’S NEED FOR A HIGH OFFICIAL IN THE KENYAN GOVERNMENT TO SEAL HIS DOCUMENTS THAT WOULD PREVENT HIM FROM ADVANCING TO THE MOST POWERFUL OFFICE IN THE WORLD!
If Americans choose to keep their heads in the sand and trust this man, they WILL be led down the path to complete government control of their lives. Individual liberty and freedom will be a memory. It will take precious blood to get it back – just like that of our forefathers. Wouldn’t it be easier to block politicians now and keep our freedoms?
PLEASE READ ALL THREE PARTS OF “OBAMA’S BIRTH CERTIFICATE.”Read Full Post | Make a Comment ( 2 so far )
Posted on September 11, 2009. Filed under: birth certificate, Kenya, Obama, Obama's Associates & Appointees, Orly Taitz, Who Is Obama? | Tags: 2007, California, campaign, court, Judge Carter, Lucas Smith, Odinga, Raila |
PLEASE READ ALL THREE PARTS TO “OBAMA’S BIRTH CERTIFICATE.
Two questions need answers:
1. Why won’t Obama release his real birth certificate?
2. Why did Obama travel to Kenya and campaign for Raila Odinga as Prime Minister?
The dots may be connecting themselves as more and more people investigate the mysterious man from Chicago, Hawaii and yes, Kenya.
“Initially, Mr. Odinga was not the favored opposition candidate to stand in the 2007 election against President Mwai Kibaki, who was seeking his second term. However, he received a tremendous boost when Sen. Barack Obama arrived in Kenya in August 2006 to campaign on his behalf. Mr. Obama denies that supporting Mr. Odinga was the intention of his trip, but his actions and local media reports tell otherwise.
Mr. Odinga and Mr. Obama were nearly inseparable throughout Mr. Obama’s six-day stay. The two traveled together throughout Kenya and Mr. Obama spoke on behalf of Mr. Odinga at numerous rallies. In contrast, Mr. Obama had only criticism for Kibaki. He lashed out against the Kenyan government shortly after meeting with the president on Aug. 25. “The [Kenyan] people have to suffer over corruption perpetrated by government officials,” Mr. Obama announced.
“Kenyans are now yearning for change,” he declared. The intent of Mr. Obama’s remarks and actions was transparent to Kenyans – he was firmly behind Mr. Odinga.
Mr. Odinga and Mr. Obama had met several times before the 2006 trip. Reports indicate Mr. Odinga visited Mr. Obama during trips to the U.S. in 2004, 2005 and 2006. Mr. Obama sent his foreign policy adviser Mark Lippert to Kenya in early 2006 to coordinate his summer visit. Mr. Obama’s August trip coincided with strategizing by Orange Democratic Movement leaders to defeat Mr. Kibaki in the upcoming elections. Mr. Odinga represented the ODM ticket in the presidential race.”
So why did Obama take such pains to get Odinga elected in Kenya? Why did Obama want Odinga to be president and serve in the highest office in Kenya?
THE ANSWER MAY HAVE BEEN PRESENTED TO US BY MR. LUCAS DANIEL SMITH.
Continued in “Obama’s Birth Certificate – Part 3
PLEASE READ ALL THREE PARTS OF “OBAMA’S BIRTH CERTIFICATE”.Read Full Post | Make a Comment ( None so far )
PLEASE READ ALL THREE PARTS OF “OBAMA’S BIRTH CERTIFICATE.”
In Obama’s own words, from his autobiography, Dreams From My Father, he says, “I discovered this article, folded away among my birth certificate and old vaccination forms, when I was in high school.” (Pg.26, Google Books Online).
If he had his birth certificate when he was in high school, why doesn’t he have it now? That would have been in the mid to late ’70’s. Yet the certificate of live birth posted on Obama’s web site is dated on the back and read via the bleed-through, June, 2007, and the document bears the notation in the lower left corner OHSM 1.1 (Rev. 11/01) LASER.
Both of his grandparents in Hawaii and both of his parents have passed away. Anything in their possession would have passed down to him and his sister Maya. Maya would certainly not have kept Barack’s birth certificate, knowing that the whole world is clamoring to see it and Obama could so easily settle the raging dispute about his eligiblity for POTUS by showing it publically. Where’s the one Obama wrote about having in his autobiography? Where’s the birth certificate that is not a laser print of recent days?
There is a photo of the laser copy that shows two folds as if it was folded for a mailing envelope. Yet there is also one with no folds. Strangely, we are asked to believe that both are one and the same.
http://fightthesmears.com/articles/5/birthcertificate No folds laser copy with certificate number blacked out.
Why aren’t there any folds like the one on FactCheck.org, Annenberg Political Fact Check Organization. (Annenberg founded the Wood Foundation and appointed ’60’s bomber Williiam Ayers, and Barack Obama to the board. They served on that board together and Ayers threw a fund raiser in his home for Obama. Do you think the Annenberg Foundation is biased toward helping Obama?
http://www.factcheck.org/elections-2008/born_in_the_usa.html Folded copy with certificate number not blacked out. The folds are very easy to see. Annenberg’s copy has very visible folds and Obama’s web version does not.
No matter how fishy Obama’s lack of producing his authentic birth certificate seems; no matter how much money Obama has spent on lawyers to fight every attempt to release his birth certificate when he could easily produce the real one from his high school possessions; no matter how easy it is for Obama to order that the real birth certificate be released for about $20 or less, rather than the tens of thousands spent to prevent it; no matter how many people demand to see the real one; no matter what the Constitution of the United States requires; THE COURTS CONTINUE TO DISMISS THE LAW SUITS AND REFUSE TO HEAR ANY EVIDENCE; AND CONGRESS REFUSES TO ENFORCE THE CONSTITUTION!
Why won’t Obama just release the one he had in high school? Why won’t Obama release the real one? Why is Obama fighting with lots of lawyers in every case brought against him to prove his birth place?
The answer might lie in a future post here on Marbie’s Blog!
PLEASE READ ALL THREE PARTS OF “OBAMA’S BIRTH CERTIFICATE.”Read Full Post | Make a Comment ( 1 so far )
Rather than re-type a lot of the key points in the following article, it’s best to re-direct readers to the original post which is chocked full of information the main stream media would NOT cover and cites the sources. PLEASE READ:
Read it slowly and follow the leads and sources. It’s important to understand who Obama is and who Raila Odinga is. It’s important to start putting the pieces of the puzzle together for a complete picture.Read Full Post | Make a Comment ( None so far )