Obama and Clinton Vying for “Savior of the World”
saying “Bill Clinton has helped improve and save the lives of millions.”gave the keynote speech,
Oh, yeah? Whose? Where? When? Back up that statement, Obama. Just being president doesn’t mean you’ve save any lives. It could be argued that rather than save lives, Clinton actually cost lives, when he passed on the opportunity to get Osama bin Laden, or perhaps during the “Blackhawk Down” affair, or any number of bombings of embassies around the world by Osama bin Laden’s gang of terrorists. It’s hard to quantify how many deaths could be laid at the door of Clinton’s Oval Office. And by the same token, it is hard to quantify the number of lives saved by Clinton, if there are any at all.
In the audience sat another 60 current and former , along with the Goldman Sachs, while of Coca-Cola, Nissan, and Hollywood stars like Matt Damon and Demi Moore added the sort of pizazz the United Nations rarely enjoys.” http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20090923/ts_alt_afp/usunpoliticsclintonobama_20090923141706
Notice who attended the “Savior’s” Global Warming Get-Together – wealthy people who fly around the world routinely, burning more carbons in a month than the average person would in a lifetime. While most of us own only one home, this bunch, with few exceptions, own multiple homes. What is the carbon footprint of maintaining multiple homes times the number of people in that audience?
What’s the carbon footprint of the big-time award extravaganzas they attend to get their face on television? What’s the carbon footprint of all the satellite trucks sent to cover their “presence”, as if that is the most important thing going on in the world?
These same people support Obama, who has appointed czars and staff who are on the record as anti-capitalists. This same audience made their wealth in a capitalist system. Now that they have theirs, they support an administration that will make it unavailable to the rest of us who haven’t made ours yet. Do they believe they will be allowed to keep theirs after Obama successfully “fundamentally changes” America? Boy, are they in for a big and unpleasant surprise!”
This privileged crowd loves to sit in audiences of the rich and famous and have their photo-ops, thinking it raises their personal value, but they display a “do as I say, not as I do” value system. Some may actually feel better about themselves because they participate in “global initiatives” for a weekend. But when the so-called “initiative” is over, they go back to one of their homes and continue their lifestyles of the rich and famous as before – supposedly with clear consciences.
The point is not that these celebs should reject their lifestyle – to the contrary! They should proceed full steam ahead and enjoy the fruits of their labors in a free capitalist society and make and enjoy as much they desire. And while doing so, mind their own business and allow the same for everyone else.
BTW, what are Clinton and Obama doing in company with the likes of Exxon Mobile and Goldman Sachs? The Democrats demonized Exxon Mobile execs as if Lucifer had personally anointed them to destroy the world and all the people in it! Yet, they have no problem hobnobbing with these same people, and are especially happy to take their donations and accept their support for “initiatives.”
As for Goldman Sachs, they’ve been the recipients of govt money through convoluted filtering while the public was being told that the banking industry was on the precipice of total collapse if we didn’t give them billions $$$.
Among their many accomplishments, Clinton Global Initiatives (CGI) members have:
- Given 10 million children a better education
- Cut CO2 emissions by 60 million metric tons
- Protected or restored 33 million acres of forest
- Given 48 million people access to better health care
- Funded 270 microfinance institutions, assisting 3 million micro-entrepreneurs
- Treated 34 million people for neglected tropical diseases
Treating disease is wonderful. Educating children could be wonderful if they aren’t using this effort to indoctrinate those children to be leftist, anti-capitalists, socialists, Communists, Marxists, one-world robots. How would we know if they are?
Protecting or restoring forests is great as long as they aren’t hampering industry to a detrimental degree and infringing on the rights of others for a pie-in-the-sky politically correct notion.
Giving 48 million people access to better health care is wonderful and was done without Obama’s government take-over of the entire U.S. health care system.
Cutting 60 million metric tons of CO2 is???? How do they quantify this? Is this an honest number? If this is true, it’s important to realize that they did it without a government forced cap and trade law that will make all of our lives miserable and much poorer.
Funding 270 microfinance institutions makes me wonder how many of them were ACORN or ACORN affiliates. I’d really like to know. Were any of them SEIU or Rathke/Soros institutions? It’s likely, given that this crowd is solidly Democrat party supporters and definitely Obama enthusiasts.
(One of the members listed on the CGI web site: George Soros.)
|“At Wal-Mart, what we appreciate most about CGI is that each participant makes a real commitment to improve the world and then delivers on that commitment. This approach ensures that all of us who step forward are in fact making a difference and living up to President Clinton’s vision. We look forward in the years ahead to continue working with President Clinton and CGI as we broaden and accelerate our commitment to being a more sustainable company.”|
|Mike Duke, President and CEO, Wal-Mart|
TIP: When you see the use of the word “sustainable” or any form of that word, you can be sure it came directly from United Nations Climate Change literature. Visit the U.N. web site and see for yourself.
TIP: The U.N. plans, if enacted, will literally enslave people around the world and deny the freedoms protected by the U.S. Constitution. People like Obama, a self-professed Constitutional lawyer, believes the Constitution is flawed and is a living document, meaning he has the right to change it to whatever he wants at the time. In other words, the U.S. should be ruled by the whims of whomever is in power at any given time – right now the very radical, leftist Obama and his extremely radical czars.
(In this clip, Rush makes statements, then plays Obama’s own words from his own mouth.)
Obama and Bill Clinton seem to be vying for “savior of the world”, but who will win? Prediction: They will cancel each other out.
Once we get these narcissists off the world stage, we can get on with the business of living in freedom, working in capitalism, supporting our families, raising our kids with our own values and reclaiming our religious freedoms. What a happy day!