Thank You, Mr. Darwin! – April 09, 2008
Be sure to watch this short video before reading today’s post. “8 Girls Beat Friend”
Thank you, Charles Darwin. You dreamed up a wild idea based on no science and promoted it until society accepted your unfounded views. The public was duped into believing that we’re all just higher order monkeys – that we evolved from monkeys. You got one court to fall for it and we’re all paying the price now.
Keep telling these girls that they are only animals and they will keep acting like animals. Keep telling our teens that they aren’t spiritual beings, there’s no hell, no God, no judgment. And they will keep acting like it. I wonder, if you were alive today, would you be happy with the kind of people you’ve helped create? Girls have Gone Wild like wild animals. Teens have no conscience because they’ve been brainwashed to believe that there is no reason to have good morals. There’s no spiritual life after the earthly body dies. There’s no judgment day when people have to answer to God for their sins. No punishment or hell for the wicked exists.
People used to live good moral lives because they believed they would go to hell, if they didn’t. They believed that there was a life after their life here on earth. They believed that they were created by God, who loved them and watched over them. That they were created as something special and valuable and that God had a purpose and a plan for their life. Self-respect was the result. They believed that this same God had high expectations of them and strong consequences for immorality. People used to have good strong reasons to live moral lives. Once they were convinced that there is no God and they are just animals, it was all over. That brings us to YouTube.
I don’t like the YouTube Society. It’s a dangerous place. Who can you trust? Who is filming you to plaster on YouTube. Is your classmate, friend, neighbor or enemy planning to assault or murder you and upload it to YouTube? While it started out as a benign and fun concept, YouTube has ‘EVOLVED’ into a motive for immoral, animalistic behavior in humans.
I know that Darwin was wrong because no matter how much higher the order of a monkey may get, it is still a monkey and has no ability to invent YouTube or upload video to YouTube. No monkey, even the most high monkey, can plot, execute, film and upload a brutal beating of a friend or classmate on YouTube. My personal opinion of the girls in this video is that they are not “higher” order monkey or human. What they did was very “LOW.”
As everyone knows, we still have monkeys today, right alongside humans. Why didn’t they evolve? Shouldn’t all monkeys be extinct because they’ve had plenty of time to evolve into humans? Why do we have both monkeys and humans together, distinctly monkey and distinctly human, with no blurring, no half-monkey half-human?
Plenty of people believe that Darwin’s “THEORY” (meaning “guess”, not proven) is a statement of science. It’s not. There is no science that supports his theory. It is indeed a statement of religious faith. It’s Darwin’s decision to rebel against God. I offer proof from Darwin’s own writings: http://darwin-online.org.uk/content/frameset?itemID=F1497&viewtype=text&pages… The Complete Work of Charles Darwin Online.
“A man who has no assured and ever present belief in the existence of a personal God or of a future existence with retribution and reward, can have for his rule of life, as far as I can see, only to follow those impulses and instincts which are the strongest or which seem to him the best ones.” Charles Darwin
Those girls followed their strongest impulses rather than the teachings of God, and they ended up in jail. Their poor victim ended up in the hospital with the loss of sight in her left eye (hopefully it may return), the loss of hearing in her left ear (which may return) and was too wounded to be recognized by her own father. She had been knocked unconcious and suffered a concusion. Her attackers wanted to teach her a lesson. They followed their strongest impulses, like animals.
“Although I did not think much about the existence of a personal God until a considerably later period of my life, I will here give the vague conclusions to which I have been driven. The old argument of design in nature, as given by Paley, which formerly seemed to me so conclusive, fails, now that the law of natural selection has been discovered. We can no longer argue that, for instance, the beautiful hinge of a bivalve shell must have been made by an intelligent being, like the hinge of a door by man. There seems to be no more design in the variability of organic beings and in the action of natural selection, than in the course which the wind blows. Everything in nature is the result of fixed laws.” Charles Darwin
The question is “laws” without “a lawmaker”? Where do laws come from? How do laws become true and fixed from a random, no design – no designer – world? What makes the same thing happen twice, thrice, ten times, a thousand times, EVERY TIME?